Exploring the impact of terminology differences in blood and organ donor decision making

Autoři: Stephen Whyte aff001;  Ho Fai Chan aff001;  Karin Hammarberg aff004;  Benno Torgler aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, QLD, Australia aff001;  Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia aff002;  Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia aff003;  School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia aff004;  CREMA—Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Zurich Switzerland aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227536


Because the global shortage of blood and organ donors across all medical markets is a serious concern for health care provision, we aim in this study to better understand decisions (not) to participate in these two forms of medical donation, which can save or prolong another’s life. Using unique responses from over 1,000 online survey respondents, we compare the reasons given for the donation decision given by blood and/or registered organ donors versus non-donors. To do so, we categorize responses based on five dimensions of language choice: egocentric (referring to self), social, moral, positively emotional, and negatively emotional. Our results reveal statistically significant differences between blood donors and non-donors in the use of all five categories. With respect to organ donation, we find statistically significant differences between donors and non-donors in the use of social, moral and positive emotional terms but not in the use of egocentric or negatively emotional justifications. Such results suggest that the ‘gift of life’ terminology used universally to market to potential blood and organ donors may only be relevant in the blood donation market and unlikely to incentivize or change organ donation behaviour.

Klíčová slova:

Altruistic behavior – Behavior – Blood – Blood donation – Blood donors – Educational attainment – Emotions – Religion


1. World Health Organisation (2014) retrieved 6th June 2019 from:https://www.vailranchpharmacy.com/blog/june-14-blood-donor-day

2. Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicle (2018). Retrieved 6th June 2019 from:http://www.flhsmv.gov/html/organ_donor.html

3. Piliavin JA. Why do they give the gift of life? A review of research on blood donors since 1977. Transfusion. 1990 Jun;30(5):444–59. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30590296381.x 2193431

4. Sque M, Long T, Payne S, Allardyce D. Why relatives do not donate organs for transplants:‘sacrifice’or ‘gift of life’?. Journal of advanced nursing. 2008 Jan;61(2):134–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04491.x 18186905

5. Trivers RL. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly review of biology. 1971 Mar 1;46(1):35–57.

6. Sojka BN, Sojka P. The blood donation experience: self‐reported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox sanguinis. 2008 Jan;94(1):56–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00990.x 18171329

7. Davey RJ. Recruiting blood donors: challenges and opportunities. Transfusion. 2004 Apr;44(4):597–600. doi: 10.1111/j.0041-1132.2004.04402.x 15043578

8. Pitocco C, Sexton TR. Alleviating blood shortages in a resource‐constrained environment. Transfusion. 2005 Jul;45(7):1118–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00176.x 15987356

9. Abouna GM. Organ shortage crisis: problems and possible solutions. InTransplantation proceedings 2008 Jan 1 (Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 34–38). Elsevier.

10. Misje AH, Bosnes V, Heier HE. Recruiting and retaining young people as voluntary blood donors. Vox sanguinis. 2008 Feb;94(2):119–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.01004.x 18067488

11. Titmuss R. The gift relationship (reissue): From human blood to social policy. Policy Press; 2018 Oct 31.

12. Piliavin JA, Callero PL. Giving blood: the development of an altruistic identity. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991.

13. Gardner WL, Cacioppo JT. Multi‐gallon blood donors: why do they give?. Transfusion. 1995 Oct;35(10):795–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.351096026358.x 7570907

14. Gillespie TW, Hillyer CD. Blood donors and factors impacting the blood donation decision. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2002 Apr 1;16(2):115–30. doi: 10.1053/tmrv.2002.31461 11941574

15. Glynn SA, Kleinman SH, Schreiber GB, Zuck T, Mc Combs S, Bethel J, et al. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Motivations to donate blood: demographic comparisons. Transfusion. 2002 Feb;42(2):216–25. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00008.x 11896338

16. Oswalt RM. A review of blood donor motivation and recruitment. Transfusion. 1977 Mar 4;17(2):123–35. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1977.17277151916.x 850930

17. Pennings G. Demanding pure motives for donation: the moral acceptability of blood donations by haemochromatosis patients. Journal of medical ethics. 2005 Feb 1;31(2):69–72. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.001271 15681668

18. Steele WR, Schreiber GB, Guiltinan A, Nass C, Glynn SA, Wright DJ, et al. The role of altruistic behavior, empathetic concern, and social responsibility motivation in blood donation behavior. Transfusion. 2008 Jan;48(1):43–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01481.x 17894795

19. Chell K, Davison TE, Masser B, Jensen K. A systematic review of incentives in blood donation. Transfusion. 2018 Jan;58(1):242–54. doi: 10.1111/trf.14387 29106732

20. Capraro V, Rand DG. Do the Right Thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity or efficiency per se, drive human prosociality. Forthcoming in Judgment and Decision Making. 2018.

21. Capraro V, Vanzo A. The power of moral words: Loaded language generates framing effects in the extreme dictator game. Forthcoming in Judgment and Decision Making. 2019.

22. Tappin BM, Capraro V. Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018 Nov 1;79:64–70.

23. Gemelli CN, Hayman J, Waller D. Frequent whole blood donors: understanding this population and predictors of lapse. Transfusion. 2017 Jan;57(1):108–14. doi: 10.1111/trf.13874 27774681

24. Zou S, Musavi F, Notari IV EP, Fang CT, ARCNET Research Group. Changing age distribution of the blood donor population in the United States. Transfusion. 2008 Feb;48(2):251–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01517.x 18005327

25. Boulware L, Ratner LE, Cooper LA, Sosa JA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Understanding disparities in donor behavior: race and gender differences in willingness to donate blood and cadaveric organs. Medical care. 2002 Feb.

26. Newton JD. How does the general public view posthumous organ donation? A meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature. BMC public health. 2011 Dec;11(1):791.

27. Davis C, Randhawa G. The influence of religion on organ donation and transplantation among the Black Caribbean and Black African population-A pilot study in the United Kingdom. Ethnicity and Disease. 2006 Jan 1;16(1):281. 16599384

28. Irving MJ, Tong A, Jan S, Cass A, Rose J, Chadban S, et al. Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2011 Dec 21;27(6):2526–33.

29. Oliver M, Ahmed A, Woywodt A. Donating in good faith or getting into trouble Religion and organ donation revisited. World journal of transplantation. 2012 Oct 24;2(5):69. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v2.i5.69 24175198

30. Pennebaker JW, Boyd RL, Jordan K, Blackburn K. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. 2015 Sep 15.

31. Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, Wojcik SP, et al. Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. InAdvances in experimental social psychology 2013 Jan 1 (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press.

32. Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009 May;96(5):1029. doi: 10.1037/a0015141 19379034

33. Feeley TH, Servoss TJ. Examining college students' intentions to become organ donors. Journal of Health Communication. 2005 Apr 1;10(3):237–49. doi: 10.1080/10810730590934262 16036731

34. Gillespie TW, Hillyer CD. Blood donors and factors impacting the blood donation decision. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2002 Apr 1;16(2):115–30. doi: 10.1053/tmrv.2002.31461 11941574

35. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J. Using the Internet for surveys and health research. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2002;4(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13 12554560

Článek vyšel v časopise


2020 Číslo 1