The use of telephone communication between nurse navigators and their patients


Autoři: Brody Heritage aff001;  Clare Harvey aff002;  Janie Brown aff003;  Desley Hegney aff004;  Eileen Willis aff002;  Adele Baldwin aff002;  David Heard aff002;  Sandy Mclellan aff007;  Virginia Clayton aff008;  Jamin Claes aff008;  Melanie Lang aff002;  Venessa Curnow aff009
Působiště autorů: College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia aff001;  School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia aff002;  School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Western Australia, Australia aff003;  Research Division, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, Australia aff004;  Queensland, Australia, and School of Nursing, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia aff005;  College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia aff006;  School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Science, Central Queensland University, Mackay, Queensland, Australia aff007;  Cairns Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, North Queensland, Australia aff008;  Torres and Cape Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, North Queensland, Australia aff009
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227925

Souhrn

Background

Hospitals and other health care providers frequently experience difficulties contacting patients and their carers who live remotely from the town where the health service is located. In 2016 Nurse Navigator positions were introduced into the health services by Queensland Health, to support and navigate the care of people with chronic and complex conditions. One hospital in Far North Queensland initiated an additional free telephone service to provide another means of communication for patients and carers with the NNs and for off-campus health professionals to obtain details about a patient utilising the service. Calls made between 7am and 10pm, seven days per week are answered by a nurse navigator.

Aim

To report utilisation of the service by navigated clients and remotely located clinicians compared to use of navigators’ individual work numbers and direct health service numbers. We report the reason for calls to the free number and examine features of these calls.

Methods

Statistical analysis examined the call reason, duration of calls, setting from where calls originated and stream of calls. Interactions between the reasons for calls and the features of calls, such as contact method, were examined.

Results

The major reason for calls was clinical issues and the source of calls was primarily patients and carers. Clinical calls were longer in duration. Shorter calls were mainly non-clinical, made by a health professional. Setting for calls was not related to the reason. The most frequent number used was the individual mobile number of the NN, followed by the hospital landline. Although the free number was utilised by patients and carers, it was not the preferred option.

Conclusion

As patients and carers preferred to access their NN directly than via the 1800 number, further research should explore options best suited to this group of patients outside normal business hours.

Klíčová slova:

Allied health care professionals – Cell phones – Culture – Economic geography – Nurses – Patients – Telephones – Cultural geography


Zdroje

1. World Health Organization. Integrated care models: an overview. Geneva: World Health Organization (Europe); 2016.

2. Lawn S, Zabeen S, Smith D, Wilson E, Miller C, Battersby M, et al. Managing chronic conditions care across primary care and hospital systems: Lessons from an Australian Hospital Avoidance Risk Program using the Flinders Chronic Condition Management Program. Australian health review: A publication of the Australian Hospital Association. 2017;42(5):542–9.

3. Sheridan NF, Kenealy TW, Kidd JD, Schmidt‐Busby JIG, Hand JE, Raphael DL, et al. Patients’ engagement in primary care: powerlessness and compounding jeopardy. A qualitative study. Health Expectations. 2015;18(1):32–43. doi: 10.1111/hex.12006 23033910

4. Oetzel J, Scott N, Hudson M, Masters-Awatere B, Rarere M, Foote J, et al. Implementation framework for chronic disease intervention effectiveness in Māori and other indigenous communities. Globalization and health. 2017;13(1):69–13. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0295-8 28870225

5. Nguyen TT, Vable AM, Glymour MM, Nuru-Jeter A. Trends for Reported Discrimination in Health Care in a National Sample of Older Adults with Chronic Conditions. Journal of general internal medicine. 2018;33(3):291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4209-5 29247435

6. Eger K, Gleichweit S, Rieder A, Stein KV. Prioritising integrated care initiatives on a national level. Experiences from Austria. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2009;9(3):e91.

7. Busetto L, Luijkx K, Calciolari S, González Ortiz LG, Vrijhoef HJM. Exploration of workforce changes in integrated chronic care: Findings from an interactive and emergent research design. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0187468–e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187468 29267288

8. Boston-Fleischhauer C, Rose R, Hartwig L. Cross-continuum Care Continuity: Achieving Seamless Care and Managing Comorbidities. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2017;47(7/8):399.

9. Manthorpe J, Goodman C, Drennan V, Davies S, Masey H, Gage H, et al. Nurse-led case management in the National Health Service: bridging clinical and social worlds. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2012;13(2):153–64.

10. Parker S, Fuller J. Are nurses well placed as care co‐ordinators in primary care and what is needed to develop their role: a rapid review? Health & Social Care in the Community. 2016;24(2):113–22.

11. Browne AJ, Varcoe CM, Wong ST, Smye VL, Lavoie J, Littlejohn D, et al. Closing the health equity gap: evidence-based strategies for primary health care organizations. International journal for equity in health. 2012;11(1):59.

12. Lippard T. Supportive care for complex needs—Kaiser Permanente care team management models. The Permanente Journal. 2017.

13. Connolly M. Alleviating the Burden of Chronic Conditions in New Zealand In: Uo Auckland, editor. Auckland: ABCC Study Group; 2011.

14. McCaffrey N, Gill L, Kaambwa B, Cameron ID, Patterson J, Crotty M, et al. Important features of home‐based support services for older Australians and their informal carers. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2015;23(6):654–64.

15. Australian Health Minister's Advisory Council. National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions. Canberra: Australian Government; 2017.

16. Primary Health Network Northern Queensland. Health needs assessment update 2017–2018. Department of Health; 2018. doi: 10.1177/1363459317693404

17. Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service. Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service annual report 2018. In: Health Q, editor. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2018.

18. Carins and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service. Strategic Plan 2018–2022. In: Health Q, editor. Brisbane: Service Agreement Strategy Unit; 2018.

19. Health Queensland. Office of the Chief Nursing and Midwifery Officer: Nurse Navigators 2015 [Available from: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/ocnmo/nursing/nurse-navigators.

20. Spooner AJ, Booth N, Downer T-R, Gordon L, Hudson AP, Bradford NK, et al. Advanced practice profiles and work activities of nurse navigators: An early-stage evaluation. Collegian. 2018.

21. Health Queensland. Nurse and Midwife Navigator Toolkit In: Officer OotCNaM, editor. 2.3 ed. Brisbane: State of Queensland 2018.

22. Hunter E, Onnis L-A, Santhanam-Martin R, Skalicky J, Gynther B, Dyer G. Beasts of burden or organised cooperation: the story of a mental health team in remote, Indigenous Australia. Australasian Psychiatry. 2013;21(6):572–7. doi: 10.1177/1039856213501724 23996667

23. Kruschke J, Liddell T. The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2017;25(1):176–206.

24. Kruschke K. Doing Bayesian data analysis 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2015.

25. Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S. Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004(3).

26. Devi BR, Syed-Abdul S, Kumar A, Iqbal U, Nguyen P-A, Li Y-C, et al. mHealth: An updated systematic review with a focus on HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis long term management using mobile phones. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2015;122(2):257–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.003 26304621

27. Stokes T, Tumilty E, Doolan-Noble F, Gauld R. Multimorbidity, clinical decision making and health care delivery in New Zealand Primary care: a qualitative study. BMC family practice. 2017;18(1):51–11. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0622-4 28381260

28. McLean S, Protti D, Sheikh A. Telehealthcare for long term conditions. British Medical Journal. 2011;342(7793):374.

29. Parliamentary Committees. Inquiry into telehealth services Queensland. Report No 55 Health and Commnity Services Committee. In: Parliament QS, editor. Brisbane. Queensland: Queensland Government; 2014.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2020 Číslo 1