The role of services content for manufacturing competitiveness: A network analysis

Autoři: Leticia Blázquez aff001;  Carmen Díaz-Mora aff001;  Belén González-Díaz aff001
Působiště autorů: University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cobertizo San Pedro Mártir s/n, Toledo, Spain aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article


This paper explores the phenomenon of international servicification of manufacturing from the period 1995 to 2011. By applying empirical techniques of Social Network Analysis and graph theory, we find that the network of flows of intermediate services embodied in manufacturing exports is still slightly dense and would not correspond to a traditional centre-periphery structure. The mapping shows a numerous, highly cohesive group of countries, with China, the USA and Germany as central economies and an increasing leading role of Asian economies, which would indicate their commitment to upgrading within global value chains. We go a step further by empirically analysing the impact of the countries’ centrality in the global network of intermediate services on manufacturing competitiveness. Our findings reveal that, together with the level of embodiment of intermediate services into manufacturing exports, who the providers of those services inputs are is a key determining factor for manufacturing competitiveness.

Klíčová slova:

Asia – Canada – Centrality – Computer networks – Europe – Finance – China – Network analysis


1. Lanz R, Maurer A. Services and Global Value Chains: Servification of manufacturing and services networks. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy. 2015; 06(03).

2. National Board of Trade. The Servicification of EU manufacturing. Building Competitiveness in the Internal Market. National Board of Trade, Sweden. 2016.

3. De Backer K, Menos C, Desnoyers-James I, Moussiegt L. Reshoring: Myth or Reality?. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 27. 2016

4. Miroudot S, Cadestin C. Services in Global Value Chains: From Inputs to Value-Creating Activities. OECD Trade Policy Papers No 197. 2017.

5. Heuser C, Mattoo A. Services Trade and Global Value Chains, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8126. 2017.Available at

6. OECD. Interconnected Economies: Benefiting from Global Value Chains. OECD, OECD Publishing. 2013.

7. Kowalski P, López-González J, Ragoussis A, Ugarte C. Participation of Developing Countries in Global Value Chains: Implications for Trade and Trade-Related Policies. OECD. Trade Policy Papers No. 179. 2015.

8. Aristei D, Castellani D, Franco Ch. Firm’s exporting and importing activities: Is there a two-way relationship?. Review of World Economics. 2013; 149: 55–84.

9. Lo Turco A, Maggioni D. On the role of imports in enhancing manufacturing exports. The World Economy. 2013; 36(1): 93–120.

10. Meinen P. Sunk costs of exporting and the role of experience in international trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique. 2015; 48(1): 335–367.

11. Bas M, Strauss-Khan V. Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France. Review of World Economics. 2014; 150: 241–275.

12. Feng L, Li Z, Swenson D. The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms. NBER Working Paper No. 18260. 2012.

13. Navas A, Serti F, Tomasi Ch. Intermediate inputs and the export gravity equation. SERP No. 2013014. 2013. Department of Economics, University of Sheffield.

14. Pierola M D, Fernandes A, Farole T. The role of imports for exporter performance in Peru. Policy Research Working Paper No. 7492. 2015. World Bank Group.

15. Francois J, Woerz J. Producer services, manufacturing linkages and trade. Journal and Industry Competition and Trade. 2008; 8: 199–229.

16. Wolfmayr Y. Export performance and increased services content in manufacturing. National Institute Economic Review. 2012; 220: 36–52.

17. Landesmann M, Leitner S. M. Competitiveness of the European economy. WIIW Research Report 401, 2015. May.

18. Díaz-Mora C, Gandoy R, Gonzalez-Díaz B. Strengthening the stability of exports through GVC participation: The who and how matters. Journal of Economic Studies. 2018; 45(3): 610–637.

19. Liu X, Matoo A, Wang Z, Wei S-J. Services Development and Comparative Advantage in Manufacturing. Policy Research Working Paper No. 8450. 2018. World Bank Group.

20. Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei J. Tracing value added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review. 2014; 104(2): 459–494.

21. Wang Z, Wei S J, Zhu K. Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels. NBER Working Paper No. 19677. 2013. Washington, D.C.

22. Amador J, Cabral S. Networks of Value-added Trade. The World Economy. 2017; 40(7): 1265–1512.

23. Squartini T, Fagiolo G., Garlaschelli D. Randomizing World Trade. Part II. A Weighted Network Analysis. Physical Review E. 2011; 84(1), 046118.

24. Lü L, Chen D, Rend X-L, Zhang Q-M, Zhang Y-Ch., Zhou T. Vital Nodes Identification in Complex Networks. Physics Reports. 2016; 650 (13): 1–63

25. Kleinberg J. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM. 1999; 46: 604–632.

26. Deguchi T, Takahashi K, Takayasu H, Takayasu M. Hubs and Authorities in the World Trade Network Using a Weighted HITS Algorithm. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(7). e100338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100338 25050940

27. Benzi M, Estrada E, Klymko Ch. Ranking Hubs and Authorities using Matrix Functions. Linear Algebra and its Applications. 2013; 438(5): 2447–2474

28. Wei W, Liu G. Bringing Order to the World Trade Network. In: IPEDR Proceedings. Singapore: IACSIT Press. 2012; 28: 88–92.

29. Baldwin R, López-González J. Supply-chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses. The World Economy. 2015; 38 (11): 1682–721.

30. Van der Marel E, Shepherd B. “International Tradability of Services.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6712. 2013. Washington, DC.

31. Saez S, Taglioni D, van der Marel E, Hollweg C H, Zavacka V. Valuing Services in Trade: A Toolkit for Competitiveness Diagnostics. World Bank. 2014. Washington, DC.

32. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 1994

33. Newman M. A Measure of Betweenness Centrality based on Random Walks. Social Networks. 2005; 27: 39–54.

34. Fisher E, Vega-Redondo F. The linchpins of a modern economy, Working Paper. Available at: 2006.

Článek vyšel v časopise


2020 Číslo 1
Nejčtenější tento týden