Growth behavior and glyphosate resistance level in 10 populations of Echinochloa colona in Australia
Autoři:
Gulshan Mahajan aff001; Vishavdeep Kaur aff001; Michael Thompson aff001; Bhagirath Singh Chauhan aff001
Působiště autorů:
Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia
aff001
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221382
Souhrn
Recently, poor control of Echinochloa colona with glyphosate has been reported in no-till agriculture systems of the northern grain region (NGR) of Australia. Two experiments were conducted using 10 populations of E. colona selected from the NGR of Australia to understand differences in their growth behavior and resistance pattern. Growth studies revealed that these populations differed in plant height (53–70 cm plant-1), tiller production (30–52 tillers plant-1), leaf production (124–186 leaves plant-1) and seed head production (37–65 seed heads plant-1). Days taken to seed heads and shoot biomass in these populations ranged between 40–48 d and 21–27 g plant-1, respectively. Seed production in these populations ranged between 5380 and 10244 seeds plant-1; lowest for population B17/25 and highest for population B17/13. Correlation studies revealed that seed number plant-1 had a positive correlation with tiller number plant-1 (r = 0.73) and negative relation with days taken to seed head initiation (r = - 0.65). The glyphosate dose-response study showed a wide range of responses in these populations and the glyphosate dose required to kill 50% plants (LD50 values) was estimated between 161 to 2339 g a.e. glyphosate ha-1. LD50 values of populations B17/16, B 17/34 and B17/35 were 1086, 2339 and 1153 g ha-1, respectively, making them 6.7, 15.1 and 7.2-fold resistant to glyphosate compared with the susceptible population B17/37. Growth behavior and seed production potential in these populations had no correlation with the resistance index. These results suggest that some populations of E. colona are highly problematic; for example, population B17/34 was not only highly glyphosate-resistant, but also produced a high seed number (9300 seeds plant-1). This study demonstrated that there is a possibility of great risk with the increased use of glyphosate for managing E. colona in the NGR of Australia. The results warrant integrated weed management strategies and improved stewardship guidelines are required for managing glyphosate-resistant populations of E. colona and to restrict further movement of resistant populations to other regions of Australia.
Klíčová slova:
Australia – Cotton – Crops – Herbicides – Leaves – Plant physiology – Seeds – Weeds
Zdroje
1. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP. The World’s Worst Weeds. Distribution and biology. Honolulu, University of Hawaii, 1977, 609 p.
2. Walker SR, Taylor IN, Milne G, Osten VA, Hoque Z, Farquharson RJ. A survey of management and economic impact of weeds in dryland cotton cropping systems of subtropical Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2005. 45: p. 79–91.
3. Friend E. Queensland weed seeds. Department of Primary Industries, 1983. p. 206.
4. Rew LJ, Medd RW, Van de Ven R, Gavin JJ, Robinson GR, Tuitee M et al. Weed species richness, density and relative abundance on farms in the subtropical grain region of Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2005. 45: p. 711–723.
5. Osten VA, Walker SR, Storrie A, Widderick M, Moylan P, Robinson GR et al. Survey of weed flora and management relative to cropping practices in the north-eastern grain region of Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2007. 47: p. 57–70.
6. Llewellyn R., Ronning D, Clarke M, Mayfield A, Walker S, Ouzman J. Iwmpact of weeds in Australian grain production. Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2016. p. 112.
7. Wu H, Walker S, Osten V, Taylor I, Sindel B. Emergence and persistence of barnyard grass (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link) and its management options in sorghum. In Weed management: Balancing People, Planet, Profit. 14th Australian Weeds Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, 6–9 September 2004: Papers and Proceedings
8. Nguyen TH. Evolution and spread of glyphosate resistant barnyard grass (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link) from Australia. 2015. (Doctoral dissertation). p. 151.
9. Swanton CJ, Huang JZ, Shrestha A, Tollenaar M, Deen W, Rahimian H. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on the phenological development of barnyard grass. Agronomy Journal, 2000. 92: p. 1125–1134.
10. Duke SO, Baerson SR, Rimando AM. Glyphosate. Encyclopedia of agrochemicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA, 2003.
11. Storrie A, Cook T, Boutsalis P, Penberthy D, Moylan P. Glyphosate resistance in awnless barnyard grass (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link) and its implications for Australian farming systems. 2008, 74 p. in R. D. van Klinken, et al. (2008) Proceedings of the 16th Australian Weeds Conference. Queensland Weeds Society, Brisbane, Queensland.
12. Heap I, Duke SO. Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Management Science, 2018, 74: p. 1040–1049. doi: 10.1002/ps.4760 29024306
13. Norsworthy JK, Talbert RE, Hoagland RE. Chlorophyll fluorescence for rapid detection of propanil-resistant barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Weed Science, 1998. 46: p. 163–169.
14. Beckie HJ. Herbicide‐resistant weed management: focus on glyphosate. Pest Management Science, 2011. 67: p. 1037–1048. doi: 10.1002/ps.2195 21548004
15. Heap I. Global perspective of herbicide‐resistant weeds. Pest Management Science, 2014. 70: p. 1306–1315. doi: 10.1002/ps.3696 24302673
16. Caseley JC, Coupland D. Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement and activity, in The Herbicide Glyphosate, ed. by Grossbard E and Atkinson D. Butterworth & Co., London, UK, 1985, p. 92–123.
17. Christoffers MJ. Genetic aspects of herbicide-resistant weed management. Weed Technology, 1999. 13: p. 647–652.
18. Délye C, Michel S, Bérard A, Chauvel B, Brunel D, Guillemin JP et al. Geographical variation in resistance to acetyl‐coenzyme A carboxylase‐inhibiting herbicides across the range of the arable weed Alopecurus myosuroides (black‐grass). New Phytologist, 2010. 186: p. 1005–1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03233.x 20345631
19. Thill DC, Mallory-Smith CA. The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems. Weed Science, 1997. 45:337–342.
20. Llewellyn RS, Allen DM. Expected mobility of herbicide resistance via weed seeds and pollen in a Western Australian cropping region. Crop Protection, 2006. 25: p. 520–526.
21. Christoffoleti PJ Curvas de dose-resposta de biótipos resistente e suscetível de Bidens pilosa L. aos herbicidas inibidores da ALS. Scientia Agricola, 2002. 59: p: 513–519.
22. Mutti NK, Mahajan G, Prashant J, Chauhan BS. The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible populations of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) to mungbean interference. Weed Science, 2019. 67: p. 419–425.
23. Damalas CA, Dhima KV, Eleftherohorinos IG. Morphological and physiological variation among species of the genus Echinochloa in Northern Greece. Weed Science, 2008. 56: p. 416–423.
24. Chun JC, Moody K. Differential competitiveness of Echinochloa colona ecotypes. Korean Journal of Weed Science, 1987. 7: p. 247–256.
25. Smith AE. Handbook of Weed Management Systems. 1st edn. New York: CRC Press, 1995. p. 758.
26. Thullen RJ, Keeley PE. Seed production and germination in Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus. Weed Science, 1979. 27: p. 502–505.
27. Tayo T. The analysis of the physiological basis of yield in oil seed rape (Brassica napus L.). 1974, Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge.
28. Meadley JT, Milbourn GM. The growth of vining peas: III. The effect of shading on abscission of flowers and pods. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1977. 77: p.103–108.
29. Neve P, Diggle AJ, Smith FP, Powles SB. Simulating evolution of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum II: past, present and future glyphosate use in Australian cropping. Weed Research, 2003. 43: p. 418–427.
30. Powles SB, Lorraine-Colwill DF, Dellow JJ, Preston C. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia. Weed Science, 1998. 46: p. 604–607.
31. Gaines TA, Cripps A, Powles SB. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in junglerice (Echinochloa colona) from the tropical Ord River region in Australia. Weed Technology, 2012 26: p. 480–484.
32. Shaner DL, Lindenmeyer RB, Ostlie MH. What have the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate taught us? Pest Management Science, 2012. 68: p. 3–9. doi: 10.1002/ps.2261 21842528
33. Preston C, Wakelin AM, Dolman FC, Bostamam Y, Boutsalis P. A decade of glyphosate-resistant Lolium around the world: mechanisms, genes, fitness, and agronomic management. Weed Science, 2009. 57: p. 435–441.
34. Binkholder KM, Fresenburg BS, Teuton TC, Xiong X, Smeda RJ. Selection of glyphosate-resistant annual bluegrass (Poa annua) on a golf course. Weed Science, 2011. 59: p. 286–289.
35. de Carvalho LB, Cruz-Hipolito H, Gonzalez-Torralva F, da Costa Aguiar Alves PL, Christoffoleti PJ, de Prado R. Detection of sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) populations resistant to glyphosate in Brazil. Weed Science, 2011. 59: p. 171–176.
36. Dickson JW, Scott RC, Burgos NR, Salas RA, Smith KL. Confirmation of glyphosate-resistant italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) in Arkansas. Weed Technology, 2011. 25: p. 674–679.
37. Light GG, Mohammed MY, Dotray PA, Chandler JM, Wright RJ. Glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) confirmed in Texas. Weed Technology, 2011. 25: p. 480–485.
38. Mueller T., Barnett KA, Brosnan JT, Steckel LE. Glyphosate resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) confirmed in Tennessee. Weed Science 2011. 59: p. 562–566.
39. Norsworthy JK, Riar D, Jha P, Scott RC. Confirmation, control, and physiology of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Arkansas. Weed Technology, 2011. 25: p. 430–435.
40. Riar DS, Norsworthy JK, Johnson DB, Scott RC, Bagavathiannan M. Glyphosate resistance in a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) population from Arkansas. Weed Science, 2011. 59: p. 299–304.
41. Alarcón‐Reverte R, García A, Watson SB, Abdallah I, Sabaté S, Hernández MJ., et al Concerted action of target‐site mutations and high EPSPS activity in glyphosate‐resistant junglerice (Echinochloa colona) from California. Pest Management Science, 2015. 71: p. 996–1007. doi: 10.1002/ps.3878 25115401
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2020 Číslo 1
- Proč se v Česku šíří několik „vymýcených“ infekcí najednou? Ptáme se odborníků
- ADHD jako evoluční výhoda? Výzkum se zaměřil na lovce a sběrače
- Není migréna jako migréna: Co pociťují ženy a co muži?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Není statin jako statin aneb praktický přehled rozdílů jednotlivých molekul
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Severity of misophonia symptoms is associated with worse cognitive control when exposed to misophonia trigger sounds
- Chemical analysis of snus products from the United States and northern Europe
- Calcium dobesilate reduces VEGF signaling by interfering with heparan sulfate binding site and protects from vascular complications in diabetic mice
- Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) supplementation in drinking water on chicken crop and caeca microbiome
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy