#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Enzyme response of activated sludge to a mixture of emerging contaminants in continuous exposure


Authors: Georgiana Amariei aff001;  Karina Boltes aff001;  Roberto Rosal aff001;  Pedro Leton aff001
Authors place of work: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain aff001
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227267

Summary

The relevant information about the impacts caused by presence of emerging pollutants in mixtures on the ecological environment, especially on the more vulnerable compartments such as activated sludge (AS) is relatively limited. This study investigated the effect of ibuprofen (IBU) and triclosan (TCS), alone and in combination to the performance and enzymatic activity of AS bacterial community. The assays were carried out in a pilot AS reactor operating for two-weeks under continuous dosage of pollutants. The microbial activity was tracked by measuring oxygen uptake rate, esterase activity, oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities. It was found that IBU and TCS had no acute toxic effects on reactor biomass concentration. TCS led to significant decrease of COD removal efficiency, which dropped from 90% to 35%. Continuous exposure to IBU, TCS and their mixtures increased the activities of glutathione s-transferase (GST) and esterase as a response to oxidative damage. A high increase in GST activity was associated with non-reversible toxic damage while peaks of esterase activity combined with moderate GST increase were attributed to an adaptive response.

Keywords:

Bacteria – Water pollution – oxidative stress – Esterases – Pollutants – Chemical oxygen demand – Glutathione chromatography – Sludge

1. Introduction

Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCP) are one of the most relevant group of emerging pollutants because of their worldwide detection in practically all environmental compartments and their adverse biological effects [13]. PPCP includes many active substances, some of which, like antibiotics and antiseptics, specifically target bacteria and can also affect other microorganisms [4]. The extensive use and disposal of PPCP inevitably leads to their release to the environment either excreted in unmetabolized forms, or as active metabolites. Most PPCP reach the environment through industrial, hospital, and household wastewaters, which are discharged as effluents of wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) to receiving bodies [510]. WWTP represent the final defense for preventing PPCP from discharging into water environments, but the rate of biodegradation in conventional AS processes is low for most of these compounds [11]. AS processes are designed to remove chemical oxygen demand (COD), nutrient substances and pathogens, but not specifically to deal with emerging pollutants [1113]. Conversely, the presence of substances with inhibitory or toxic effects to AS biological community may impair wastewater treatment performance [14].

Several studies examined the influence of pharmaceuticals on biological wastewater treatment processes, mainly focusing on the effects of pollutants on the efficiency of plants for their removal, microbial growth and the rate of COD and nutrients removal [1518]. Arriaga et al. reported a decrease of COD removal in conventional AS reactors fed with pharmaceuticals [19]. Considerable research has been performed on the composition of functionality of microbial communities in AS upon exposure to anthropogenic chemicals [15, 16, 1821]. Alvarino et al. studied the inhibitory effects of acetaminophen and doxycycline on the activity of nitrifying, denitrifying, and anammox biomass and found significant inactivation of ammonium oxidizing and denitrifying bacteria [13]. Zhang et al. studied the influence of environmentally relevant (1 μg L-1) concentrations of tetracycline on the microbial community of Sequent Batch Reactors and reported changes in microbial community and the proliferation of tetracycline-resistance genes [22]. Alterations in bacterial communities have also been found upon exposure to non-antibiotic polar pharmaceuticals [23]. In certain cases, it has been reported that continuous exposure to PPCP alters the composition of microbial community even in the absence of significant decrease in WWTP performance [24]. Some studies have addressed the impact of PPCP on the enzymatic activities of AS microbial consortia [25]. It has recently been found that an increase of the activity of oxidative stress enzymes could indicate low-to-moderate toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to AS communities [16]. However, there is a limited amount of work on this topic, and in particular addressing the impact of drug combinations to the enzymatic activity of AS. Therefore, should be paid more attention to the interaction between pollutants and AS [6].

In this work, we studied ibuprofen (IBU) and triclosan (TCS) as representative PPCP usually found in treated wastewaters [26, 27]. IBU is a widely used a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and one of the most used active pharmaceutical ingredients worldwide [28]. TCS is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent used as antiseptic, disinfectant and preservative in many consumer products including cosmetics, household cleaning products and materials such as medical devices, textiles and plastic ware [29, 30].

In a previous work, we demonstrated the toxic effects of IBU and TCS, alone and in combination to the microbial activity of AS in terms of viability and respiration for short-time exposure (1h) and non-acclimated sludge by using a batch experimental design [31]. Here, we evaluated the influence of IBU and TCS, alone and in combination to the microbial activity of AS in pilot AS reactors operating for 14-day upon continuous exposure. This study focused on: (1) the effects of IBU and TCS on the reactor performance parameters and (2) their influence on oxygen uptake rate, esterase activity and, for the first time, some key enzymes associated with oxidative stress namely glutathione S-transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT). This work provides new insights into the toxicity mechanisms of mixed emerging pollutants to a heterogeneous AS microbial community under continuous exposure.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Chemicals

Triclosan, (TCS, C12H7Cl3O2) and ibuprofen (IBU, C13H18O2) both > 97% purity, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The stock solutions of TCS and IBU were prepared in methanol and water, respectively and stored at 4 °C. Methanol in the testing solution was kept below 0.01% (v/v). Ultrapure water was generated from a Direct-Q 5 Ultrapure Water Systems from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA) with a specific resistance of 18.2 MΩ cm at 25 °C. Monochlorobimane (MCB), 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (H2DCF-DA), reduced glutathione (GSH) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99.9%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The components of synthetic feed were acquired from Conda-Pronadisa (Spain).

2.2. Experimental setup and procedure

The inoculated sludge was obtained from a local municipal WWTP (Seville, Spain) with a capacity to process 255,000 m3 of raw domestic wastewater per day and operating at SRTs of 2.54 days, and maintained in a bubble column reactor as described in Amariei et al [31]. The AS was fed using a Synthetic Sewage Feed, based on OCDE 209 standard medium with the following composition: peptone 16.0 g L-1, beef extract 11.0 g L-1, urea 3.0 g L-1, NaCl 0.7 g L-1, CaC12·2H2O 0.4 g L-1, MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 g L-1, and K2HPO4 2.8 g L-1 [32].

The lab-scale AS systems used in this work were formed by three continuous aerated reactors and settlers, operated in parallel (Fig 1). The reactors were glass columns 41 cm height, 7.5 cm diameter and 2 L working volume. The air was supplied through a fine bubble diffuser set at the bottom of every reactor. For the startup of reactor operation, 300 mL of sludge (3 g/L TSS) taken from the settler of the bubble column reactor were added to every reactor as inoculum. The synthetic influent was continuous feed to the reactors at fixed rate by a peristaltic pump. The hydraulic retention time under operating conditions was 24 h. 50% of biomass from the settler was returned to the reactor in order to maintain the desired SRT and biomass concentration. The reactors were operated at food-to-microorganisms (F/M) ratios of 0.72 ± 0.084 g COD/g biomass at the starting of exposure experiments in order to avoid possible negative effects on the bacteria due to the limitation of food under toxic exposure experiments. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was maintained at 3 mg L-1, temperature at 20 ± 2 °C and pH at 8.0 ± 0.1, close to the pKa of TCS reported to be 8.1 [33]. Prior to exposure experiments, the reactors were operated continuously for 120 days under pseudo steady-state [34]. Acclimation was considered successful after this time as no significant changes in operating parameters (oxygen concentration, pH and biomass concentration) were observed. The biomass concentration, expressed as total suspended solids (TSS), was in the 300–500 mg L-1 range throughout all the experiments with minor deviations. The stability of pollutants under continuous bioassay conditions was verified by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) before initiating the exposure experiments.

Diagram of the activated sludge laboratory systems.
Fig. 1. Diagram of the activated sludge laboratory systems.

For the exposure study, the bioreactors operated in parallel with individual pollutants and their mixtures. The bioreactors were monitored for 14 days, divided into two periods. The first 7 days they operated with continuous dosing of IBU (2 mg L-1) and TCS (0.05 mg L-1) as well as their mixture (2 mg L-1 IBU + 0.05 mg L-1 TCS) in the influent. During the second period, starting day 8th, the dosing of pollutants doubled: 4 mg L-1 IBU, 0.10 mg L-1 TCS and for their mixture 4 mg L-1 IBU + 0.10 mg L-1 TCS. The amount of pollutants fed with the influent are listed in Table 1 expressed in mg day-1. Relative to the dry matter in AS, the pollutants were fed at rates of 125 mg kg-1 and 5000 mg kg-1 for TCS and IBU respectively during Period I and twice these figures for Period II. These figures were chosen to approach the upper estimates reported for the mass of PPCPs adsorbed or in general accumulated in the sewage sludge, which are 133 mg kg-1 and 2988 mg kg-1 for TCS and IBU respectively [28]. The concentrations in the influent, in the milligram per liter range, are representative of the whole amount of pharmaceuticals and personal care products reaching usual WWTP. For example, a one-year monitoring study quantifying 50 individual pollutants in a WWTP receiving urban wastewater over, which included PPCA and some metabolites found average and maximum global concentrations of 0.12 and 0.32 mg/L respectively [27]. The operational stability of reactors was carefully assessed before starting the runs.

Tab. 1. Mean amounts of ibuprofen (IBU) and triclosan (TCS) removed and standard deviations (n = 3) in the influent and effluent reactors loaded with pollutants alone or in binary mixture.
Mean amounts of ibuprofen (IBU) and triclosan (TCS) removed and standard deviations (n = 3) in the influent and effluent reactors loaded with pollutants alone or in binary mixture.
The amount removed refers to the liquid phase. All amounts are expressed in mg day-1.

Samples of sludge and reactor effluent were withdrawn for analyses at prescribed times during the operation. Analyses of IBU and TCS concentration, COD (chemical oxygen demand), TOC, and ammonia-, nitrite-, and nitrate nitrogen were performed from the samples collected from the influent, effluent and sludge, as described in section 2.4. All assays were carried out in triplicate and the results were expressed as mean plus/minus standard deviation.

2.3. Microbial activity

The microbial activity was assayed by studying the oxygen uptake rate, esterase activity, oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities. All measurements were carried out in triplicate and the results were expressed as mean standard deviation.

2.3.1. Oxygen uptake rate

The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) was determined as a measure of the whole aerobic biomass activity using the methodology developed elsewhere [31]. Briefly, the respirometry assay was carried out using a Oxygraph Hansatech System (Germany), consisting of a S1 Clark Type polarographic oxygen electrode in an enclosed cell equipped with magnetic stirring. The cell was filled with 2 mL of each sample and the changes in the dissolved oxygen (DO) were monitored. The values are expressed as grams of oxygen consumed per gram of biomass per day (day-1).

2.3.2. Esterase activity

The fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis technique was applied for evaluation of total esterase activity. FDA is a non-fluorescent molecule that diffuse into cells and are hydrolysed by intracellular non-specific esterases of bacteria [35]. For this, 195 μL samples of reactor were analyzed in 96-well microplates by adding 5 μL of FDA (0.02% w/w in DMSO) to each well. Fluorescence was measured using a fluorometer (ThermoScientific FL, Ascent) at excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 520 nm, respectively. The incubation time for staining was 30 min at 25 °C.

2.3.3. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant enzyme activity

The intracellular ROS in the sludge cells was measured by means of the H2DCF-DA assay method according to the procedure reported in the literature [36]. Prior to the assay, the sludge liquor was first centrifuged at 10000 x g relative centrifugal force for 10 min and washed with 0.85% (w/w) NaCl solution. Then, the collected pellets were re-suspended in 0.85% (w/w) NaCl solution and incubated with 20 μl mol L-1 H2DCF-DA for 30 min. The mixed liquor was transferred into 96-well microtiter plates (ThermoScientific FL, Ascent) for fluorescence spectroscopy at excitation and emission wavelengths of 495 and 525 nm, respectively.

The enzyme-containing fractions from AS samples were obtained by sonication method. In brief, ice cooled samples of 10 mL sludge (~ 0.5 g TSS L-1) were individually homogenized using an ultrasonic cell disintegrator Sonics-VibraCell (BioBlock Scientific, France) with a power density of 1 W/mL for 5 (net) min in intervals of 5 s with 5 s breaks to avoid sample heating [37]. The crude cell lysate was subsequently purified through 0.45 μm and 0.20 μm syringe filters (Whatman 25 mm GD/X polyethersulfone membrane with glass microfiber prefilter). GST and CAT activities of the resulting cell lysates were assayed immediately after extraction [33].

GST activity was assessed using MCB as substrate and following the method of Nauen and Stumpf with minor variations [38]. In brief, the total reaction volume in each well was 150 μL, consisting of 25 μL sample aliquots, 25 μL potassium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH7), 50 μL MCB (1% v/v ethanol), and GSH (3 mM). After 20 min of incubation at 22 °C, the GSH–bimane adduct was determined at 465 nm, upon exciting at 390 nm using a ThermoScientific FL, Ascent microplate reader.

The method for determining the activity of CAT enzyme was based on the O2 production caused by H2O2 reduction in presence of CAT enzyme [39]. The Oxygraph Hansatech System with a Clark-type oxygen electrode described before was used for this purpose following a method described elsewhere [31]. Briefly, the test cell was filled with 1.9 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 7, 50 mM), 100 μL enzyme extracts and 1mL H2O2 (0.003%). The changes in DO due to H2O2 reduction were monitored and recorded. The results were expressed as O2 produced/mL of bacterial biomass.

2.3.4. Live/Dead distribution on AS

Cell integrity and metabolic changes of microbial consortia in AS during pollutants exposure were also visually examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Live/Dead BacLight Bacterial Viability kit (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Detection Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to evaluate bacterial viability in the sludge. In brief, this method differentiates viable and no-viability cells using Syto9, a fluorescent nucleic acid stain capable to penetrate cell membrane and bind DNA, and propidium iodide (PI), which is a fluorescent stain marking only membrane-damaged non-viable cells. The excitation/emission were 480/500 nm for Syto9 and 490/635 nm for PI. The micrographs were obtained in a Leica Microsystems Confocal SP5 fluorescence microscope. For this study, sludge samples (1 mL) were taken from the reactors before starting the exposure experiment: 0 days (Control), and at 7 days (Period I), and 14 days (Period II), in order to observe the effects of pollutants at the beginning and end of each period of exposure, respectively.

2.4. Analytical methods

COD was measured using spectrophotometer NOVA60 (Merck) after 2 h digestion. TOC values were determined by TOC-VCSH Total Organic Analyzer, Shimadzu. For the analysis of IBU and TCS, a solid phase extraction (SPE) was performed using, by 30 mg/3 mL Strata-X 33u Polymeric Reversed Phase cartridges (Phenomenex) as pre-concentration technique prior to quantitative determination. The extraction protocol was similar to that described elsewhere [40]. IBU and TCS were quantified by HPLC using an Agilent LC 1260 system, equipped with a 1260 Quaternary pump VL, 1260 DAD detector and automatic 1260 ALS injector. The column used was a Promosil C18 4.6 x 150 mm column. In each analysis, 50 μL samples were injected using a mobile phase consisting of 70% acetonitrile and 30% acid water (at pH 2) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min [31]. A pH-meter and an oximeter (Crison) were used to determine the pH and DO.

2.5. Statistical analysis

A two-way ANOVA coupled with Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) post-hoc test was performed for comparison of means. Statistically significant differences were considered to exist when p-value < 0.05. Results were provided as average and standard deviation.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Bioreactor performance

Table 1 shows the concentration of IBU and TCS in reactor influent and effluent for the three operational conditions used in this work (IBU, TCS and IBU+TCS) together with the amount removed from the aqueous phase (liquid) of effluent expressed in mg day-1. In all cases, most of the remaining IBU and TCS were dissolved in the effluent with a minimum part adsorbed on sludge. The amount removed during the Period I represented 50 ± 6% for IBU and 95 ± 3% for TCS. During Period II, after 7 days of acclimation, the removal of IBU increased to 89 ± 4%. TCS also increased slightly to 98 ± 1%.

In reactors treating binary mixtures of IBU and TCS, the removal efficiencies were not very different from reactors fed with IBU or TCS alone. The average removal for IBU during period I was 67 ± 7%, even higher than when IBU was fed alone. At the beginning of Period II the removal efficiency for IBU dropped until 20–30% in reactor operating with IBU+TCS mixture that in part recovered thereafter. For TCS, the removal was 89 ± 5% and 98 ± 1% (IBU+TCS reactors), only slightly lower than in reactors treating TCS alone. High removal efficiencies of anti-inflammatory drugs in aerobic treatment processes and low sorption potential of IBU on sludge have already been reported elsewhere [16]. In our case, removal efficiencies for TCS were mostly > 90%, both when fed alone or in combination with IBU. High removal efficiency of TCS has been reported elsewhere and attributed to biologically degradation [41]. The part related to the PPCPs absorbed on the components of the AS system (such as reactors, tubing etc.) was insignificant.

The overall performance of bioreactors is shown in Fig 2. Fig 2A represents the evolution of SOUR upon continuous introduction of IBU, TCS and IBU+TCS during Period I (7 days with IBU 2 mg L-1, TCS 0.05 mg L-1 or 2 mg L-1 IBU + 0.05 mg L-1 TCS) and Period II (7 days with IBU 4 mg L-1, TCS 0.10 mg L-1 or 4 mg L-1 IBU + 0.10 mg L-1 TCS). The results showed a clear stimulation during the first 24–48 h after the introduction of pollutants, with maximum SOUR values even doubling the stationary state before exposure (~ 2 day-1). A peak in SOUR was not observed when doubling concentrations (Period II). During this period SOUR tended to decrease upon toxicant exposure. Our results showed that COD removal rate in acclimated reactors was in the 75–78% range (Fig 2B). During exposure experiments, the average COD removal showed a pattern similar to SOUR with COD removal increasing ~ 20% after 48 h and a subsequent decrease. During period II, with higher concentration of pollutants, COD removal also increased (48 h, 15–30%) in all reactors. COD removal eventually decreased at the end of Period II.

Effect of ibuprofen (IBU), triclosan (TCS) and their mixture on oxygen uptake (expressed as SOUR in day<sup>-1</sup>) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal during 14-day assays.
Fig. 2. Effect of ibuprofen (IBU), triclosan (TCS) and their mixture on oxygen uptake (expressed as SOUR in day-1) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal during 14-day assays.
(Period 0 represents the stable operation prior to the introduction of toxics).

In the current study the amount of IBU and TCS used for Period I were 125 mg kg-1 and 5000 mg kg-1 respectively (twice during Period II) representing 1% and 5% respectively of their individual short-term EC50 values. A previous study performed according to the Standard Guideline OECD Test Guide 209 showed inhibitory effect of IBU and TCS to the respiration activity of AS measured in short-term (60 min) exposure [32]. The short-term EC50 value for TCS was 0.32 ± 0.07 mg L-1 for a concentration of AS of 125 mg L−1, which represented 2560 mg kg sludge-1. The short-term EC50 for IBU was of 64 ± 13 mg L−1 or 512000 mg kg sludge-1 for the same conditions [31]. The continuous introduction intended to mimic a realistic scenario and to avoid the artifacts derived to the lack of acclimation of sludge. Figure A in S1 File, shows the evolution of dissolved oxygen, pH and biomass concentration during the runs. Dissolved oxygen was stable along the assays, pH presented a continuous and moderate increase from 7.26 to 8.14 and the concentration of biomass was essentially constant at about 400 mg/L with a slightly decrease during the first 24–48 h of Period I. The overall operational parameters were consistent with the assumption that the acclimation of microorganisms created a stable state for microbial biomass [42].

The effect of TCS to the microbial community function in anaerobic digesters has been described by McNamara et al. who found increased methane production and transient divergence of community structure in reactors treating relatively low (5–50 mg/kg) TCS concentration [4]. TCS was shown to alter community structure by selecting resistant microorganisms [30]. The stimulatory effect of low (0.05–1.0 mg L-1) TCS concentration upon sludge SOUR was observed before and attributed to increased microbial metabolic rates linked with uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation [43]. An initial stimulation followed by a decreased at the end of the two one-week period was also observed in this work for COD removal, suggesting a balance between acclimation and toxicity.

The stimulation of microbial activity upon stress conditions has been observed in different stress circumstances. For example, increased salinity generally inhibits the bioactivity of sludge microorganisms, but the selective growth of microbes with higher tolerance to saline environment may lead to an increase in microbial respiration rates [44]. Sorption, volatilization, photodegradation, and microbial degradation are important routes that eliminate PPCP from AS systems. However, several contradictory bio- and photo-transformation results were reported, while some studies suggest that the PPCP fraction removed by volatilization could be neglected due to low Henry coefficient values [45]. Different microbial processes may be involved such as the induction of different enzymatic pathways or the metabolization of different intermediates as an adaptation mechanism upon exposure to new chemicals, which may explain the observed changes in removal efficiencies and operational parameters [46]. A sudden stress given by a step increase in the influent concentration of toxicants has been shown elsewhere to be followed by a physiological adaptation period [47].

It is important to determine whether the impact of changes in toxicant concentrations on AS is reversible or not. Our results showed a possible warning situation in Period II (with higher concentration of IBU and TCS), at the beginning of which a sharp decrease in the removal of IBU was observed in reactors treating IBU+TCS mixture. At the end of Period II a clear decrease in COD removal was probably indicating a non-recoverable situation. Generally, the operators of WWTP take into account the quality of the effluent and the physical characteristics of the sludge to take measures on operational parameters. In the following section of this article we describe the results of a series of enzymatic activity tests in an attempt to provide a further insight into the mechanisms behind the stress conditions associated to emerging pollutants and their relationship with AS performance.

3.2. Enzymatic activity in AS

The effect of IBU, TCS and IBU+TCS to the enzymatic activity of AS is shown in Fig 3A to 3D. Fig 3A displays the evolution of the average esterase activity expressed as percentage of the stable value recorded before introducing pollutants with the bioreactor feed. The results showed that IBU slightly inhibited esterase activity after the first 24 h (< 15%) followed by a moderate and continuous increase during the rest of Period I. TCS and IBU+TCS mixture induced higher esterase activity (more than doubling controls) and even higher values were recorded after 48 h during Period II to decline thereafter during the last part of the runs. The comparison with literature data is difficult due to the scarcity of toxicological studies dealing with specific emerging pollutants to the metabolic activity of acclimated AS communities. One previous study using short-term (60 min) exposure and non-acclimated sludge, showed EC50 values for the inhibition of esterase activity in activated exposed to IBU and TCS of 633 ± 63 mg L−1 sludge (125 mg L−1 of AS) and 1.94–5.34 mg L−1 (125–500 mg L−1 of AS) respectively [31]. The effect recorded here showed that low concentration and long-term exposure did not cause a decrease of the esterase activity. Conversely, we observed a stimulatory response in line with SOUR and COD as indicated before. Esterase activity in AS is driven by diverse esterase enzymes with broad, and partially overlapping, substrate specificity, which has been proposed to characterize the biological activity in wastewater treatment plants [48]. Esterase activity is a measure of microbiological activity and viability, but it has also been associated with stress responses. An increase in esterase activity has been described as physiological acclimation to stringent nutrient limitation in AS communities [49]. The operational conditions of bioreactors, including substrate, pH and temperature, also affect esterase activity. In our case, the pH of the reactors presented a continuous and moderate increase from 7.26 to 8.14 during the assay (Figure B S1 File), which may partially explain the general trend to esterase activity increase. Accordingly, it has been shown that esterase enzymes are most active at pH about 8.5, with less activity at pH ≤ 5.5 and deactivation at pH ≥ 8.5 [50]. The activity peaks observed in 48 h samples, are probably due to an adaptive response.

Effect of ibuprofen (IBU), triclosan (TCS) and IBU+TCS mixture on oxidative stress, ROS (A), and esterase (B), glutathione s-transferase, GST (C) and catalase, CAT (D) activities during 14-day assays.
Fig. 3. Effect of ibuprofen (IBU), triclosan (TCS) and IBU+TCS mixture on oxidative stress, ROS (A), and esterase (B), glutathione s-transferase, GST (C) and catalase, CAT (D) activities during 14-day assays.

Typically, ROS are formed in cells through the reduction of oxygen by biological reducing agents such as NADH and NADPH, with the assistance of electron-transfer enzymes or through redox-active chemical species such as quinones and transition metals. Oxidative stress is a key cellular response in organisms exposed to environmental pollutants that takes place when the generation of ROS exceeds the capacity of antioxidant defenses. Low concentrations of ROS may facilitate signal transduction, enzyme activation and other cellular functions, but high concentration of ROS damages DNA, proteins or lipids and can lead to cellular transformations [51, 52]. In the present study, we observed a significant increase in ROS levels with respect to controls in all cases. The results (Fig 3B) show a transient increase of ROS levels during the exposure to the lower concentrations of IBU and TCS (Period I) that turned into a sharp (over three-fold) increase during Period II. The mixture IBU+TCS induced lower ROS levels than IBU and TCS alone, which is noteworthy considering the mixture uses jointly the same concentration of both pollutants when dosed alone. Organic pollutants have been linked to ROS overproduction, but to the best of our knowledge, there is no report on the capacity of ibuprofen and triclosan to induce significant ROS overproduction in AS.

Glutathione transferases are a group of eukaryotic and prokaryotic antioxidant enzymes that prevent the cellular damage caused by metabolically- and environmentally-produced ROS. GST transforms the reduced glutathione (GSH) used as a direct ROS scavenger to a variety of electrophilic compounds in a detoxification pathway. GST plays a crucial role in cell metabolism by protecting against oxidative damage and, therefore, GST has been used widely as a biomarker for assessing the toxic effects of pollutants that generate oxidative stress and moderate GST activity increase has been linked to detoxification routes upon pollutant exposure in bacteria [53]. The effects of TCS and IBU, individually and in combination, on GST activity are shown in Fig 2C. GST activity was raised by TCS, IBU and TCS+IBU after the first 24 h of exposure with an exponential increase to very high values during Period II. Our results demonstrated that the damage associated to IBU and TCS trigger a strong GST activity in AS microorganisms. The dramatic increase in GST activity upon exposure to the higher concentration of pollutants is parallel to the ROS increase observed for the same conditions (Fig 3B).

The increase in GST and esterase activities was linked to the oxidative damage produced to AS microorganisms. A continuous increase in GST activity would be the fingerprint of a non-reversible damage that compromised bacterial viability and led to microbial decline and loss of bioreactor performance. Peaks of esterase activity combined with moderate GST increase would be associated to adaptive responses.

Finally, Fig 3D shows CAT activity profile, which decreased during the first 48 h of Period I to stabilize thereafter irrespective of the higher pollutant concentration used during Period II. CAT is an antioxidant enzyme that indirectly takes part in the contaminant metabolization by targeting hydrogen peroxide. When ROS exceeds the scavenging capacity of superoxide dismutase and CAT, they become CAT inhibitors [54]. An enhancement of CAT activity has also been reported during the first 24 h after pollutant-induced oxidative stress, that recover thereafter [55]. Our data showed that the continuous exposure to 0.05 mg L-1 TCS and/or 2 mg L-1 IBU decreased CAT activity, which was probably the consequence of a damage in the antioxidant defense system that did not revert after acclimation.

Moreover, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the concentrations and the control as well as the time exposure for the end-points assayed in this work. The differences between the concentrations in ROS and CAT measurements for IBU and TCS were not significant (p > 0.05).

The results from fluorescence microscopy are depicted in Fig 4, presenting the viability status of AS bacterial cells before and after exposure to IBU, TCS and IBU+TCS, respectively. During Period I no significant effect was observed maintaining a large majority of viable cells, whereas in Period II the bacteria presented a clear membrane integrity decline. The non-reversible damage on AS viability was associated to the increase of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes levels.

Live/Dead confocal micrographs (scale bar 10 μm) of activated sludge exposed to individual pharmaceuticals (ibuprofen, IBU, and triclosan, TCS) and their mixtures (IBU+TCS) at different time exposure.
Fig. 4. Live/Dead confocal micrographs (scale bar 10 μm) of activated sludge exposed to individual pharmaceuticals (ibuprofen, IBU, and triclosan, TCS) and their mixtures (IBU+TCS) at different time exposure.
Period 0 (control); Period I (7 days) and Period II (14 days).

4. Conclusions

Performance, oxygen respiration rate, viability and microbial enzymatic activity were investigated in AS reactors continuously exposed to IBU and TCS, alone and in combination, for 14 days, and the results related to the oxidative stress suffered by bacterial cells. IBU had no significant impact on reactor performance, while TCS led to significant decrease of COD removal efficiency. Toxic effects occurred upon continuous long-term dosages of the selected PPCPs. The toxicity to AS was caused by ROS generation and membrane integrity decline. Activity of key enzymes was affected by long-term exposure to IBU and TCS. Overall, our results showed for the first time that AS bacteria have the capacity to tolerate oxidative stress by activating their antioxidant system under continuous dosage of IBU and TCS.

Supporting information

S1 File [docx]
Variations in effluent performance of single (ibuprofen, IBU, and triclosan, TCS) and mixed (IBU+TCS) reactors during continuous feeding operation (Figure A. O dissolved; Figure B. pH; Figure C. Biomass conc.).


Zdroje

1. Boxall AB, Rudd MA, Brooks BW, Caldwell DJ, Choi K, Hickmann S, et al. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions? Environmental Health Perspectives. 2012;120(9):1221–9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104477 22647657

2. Wilkinson JL, Hooda PS, Barker J, Barton S, Swinden J. Ecotoxic pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and other emerging contaminants: A review of environmental, receptor-mediated, developmental, and epigenetic toxicity with discussion of proposed toxicity to humans. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;46(4):336–81.

3. Ebele AJ, Abdallah MAE, Harrad S. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerging Contaminants. 2017;3(1):1–16.

4. McNamara PJ, LaPara TM, Novak PJ. The impacts of triclosan on anaerobic community structures, function, and antimicrobial resistance. Environmental science & technology. 2014;48(13):7393–400.

5. Borgman O, Chefetz B. Combined effects of biosolids application and irrigation with reclaimed wastewater on transport of pharmaceutical compounds in arable soils. Water research. 2013;47(10):3431–43. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.045 23591105

6. Paiga P, Correia M, Fernandes MJ, Silva A, Carvalho M, Vieira J, et al. Assessment of 83 pharmaceuticals in WWTP influent and effluent samples by UHPLC-MS/MS: Hourly variation. The Science of the total environment. 2019;648:582–600. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.129 30121536

7. Collado N, Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Gros M, Rubirola A, Barcelo D, Comas J, et al. Pharmaceuticals occurrence in a WWTP with significant industrial contribution and its input into the river system. Environmental pollution. 2014;185:202–12. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.040 24286695

8. Palli L, Spina F, Varese GC, Vincenzi M, Aragno M, Arcangeli G, et al. Occurrence of selected pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants of Tuscany: An effect-based approach to evaluate the potential environmental impact. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2019;222(4):717–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.05.006 31101503

9. Ashfaq M, Li Y, Rehman MSU, Zubair M, Mustafa G, Nazar MF, et al. Occurrence, spatial variation and risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in urban wastewater, canal surface water, and their sediments: A case study of Lahore, Pakistan. The Science of the total environment. 2019;688:653–63. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.285 31254831

10. Thiebault T, Boussafir M, Le Milbeau C. Occurrence and removal efficiency of pharmaceuticals in an urban wastewater treatment plant: Mass balance, fate and consumption assessment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2017;5(3):2894–902.

11. Grandclement C, Seyssiecq I, Piram A, Wong-Wah-Chung P, Vanot G, Tiliacos N, et al. From the conventional biological wastewater treatment to hybrid processes, the evaluation of organic micropollutant removal: A review. Water research. 2017;111:297–317. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.005 28104517

12. Liu JL, Wong MH. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs): a review on environmental contamination in China. Environment international. 2013;59:208–24. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.06.012 23838081

13. Alvarino T, Katsou E, Malamis S, Suarez S, Omil F, Fatone F. Inhibition of biomass activity in the via nitrite nitrogen removal processes by veterinary pharmaceuticals. Bioresource technology. 2014;152:477–83. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.107 24333624

14. Ren S. Assessing wastewater toxicity to activated sludge: recent research and developments. Environment International. 2004;30(8):1151–64. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.06.003 15337358

15. Amorim CL, Maia AS, Mesquita RB, Rangel AO, van Loosdrecht MC, Tiritan ME, et al. Performance of aerobic granular sludge in a sequencing batch bioreactor exposed to ofloxacin, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Water research. 2014;50:101–13. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.043 24361707

16. Jiang C, Geng J, Hu H, Ma H, Gao X, Ren H. Impact of selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals on microbial community assembly and activity in sequencing batch reactors. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179236 28640897

17. Sui Q, Huang J, Deng S, Chen W, Yu G. Seasonal variation in the occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in different biological wastewater treatment processes. Environmental science & technology. 2011;45(8):3341–8.

18. Zhang Y, Geng J, Ma H, Ren H, Xu K, Ding L. Characterization of microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes in activated sludge under tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole selection pressure. Science of The Total Environment. 2016;571:479–86. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.014 27395074

19. Arriaga S, de Jonge N, Nielsen ML, Andersen HR, Borregaard V, Jewel K, et al. Evaluation of a membrane bioreactor system as post-treatment in waste water treatment for better removal of micropollutants. Water research. 2016;107:37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.046 27794216

20. Nguyen LN, Nghiem LD, Pramanik BK, Oh S. Cometabolic biotransformation and impacts of the anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac on activated sludge microbial communities. The Science of the total environment. 2019;657:739–45. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.094 30677939

21. Yu X, Nishimura F, Hidaka T. Impact of Long-Term Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Exposure on Activated Sludge Process. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2018;229(4).

22. Zhang W, Huang MH, Qi FF, Sun PZ, Van Ginkel SW. Effect of trace tetracycline concentrations on the structure of a microbial community and the development of tetracycline resistance genes in sequencing batch reactors. Bioresource technology. 2013;150:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.081 24140945

23. Kraigher B, Kosjek T, Heath E, Kompare B, Mandic-Mulec I. Influence of pharmaceutical residues on the structure of activated sludge bacterial communities in wastewater treatment bioreactors. Water research. 2008;42(17):4578–88. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.006 18786690

24. Collado N, B G, Marti E., Ferrando-Climent L., Rodriguez-Mozaz S., Barceló D., Comasa J. R-R I. Effects on activated sludge bacterial community exposed to sulfamethoxazole. Chemosphere. 2013.

25. Yazdanbakhsh AR, Rafiee M, Daraei H, Amoozegar MA. Responses of flocculated activated sludge to bimetallic Ag-Fe nanoparticles toxicity: Performance, activity enzymatic, and bacterial community shift. Journal of hazardous materials. 2019;366:114–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.098 30504079

26. Nakada N, Tanishima T, Shinohara H, Kiri K, Takada H. Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment. Water research. 2006;40(17):3297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.039 16938339

27. Rosal R, Rodríguez A, Perdigón-Melón JA, Petre A, García-Calvo E, Gómez MJ, et al. Occurrence of emerging pollutants in urban wastewater and their removal through biological treatment followed by ozonation. Water research. 2010;44(2):578–88. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.004 19628245

28. Martin J, Camacho-Munoz D, Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E. Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater and sludge from wastewater treatment plants: removal and ecotoxicological impact of wastewater discharges and sludge disposal. Journal of hazardous materials. 2012;239–240:40–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.068 22608399

29. Bedoux G, Roig B, Thomas O, Dupont V, Le Bot B. Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environmental science and pollution research international. 2012;19(4):1044–65. doi: 10.1007/s11356-011-0632-z 22057832

30. Drury B, Scott J, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Kelly JJ. Triclosan exposure increases triclosan resistance and influences taxonomic composition of benthic bacterial communities. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(15):8923–30. doi: 10.1021/es401919k 23865377

31. Amariei G, Boltes K, Rosal R, Leton P. Toxicological interactions of ibuprofen and triclosan on biological activity of activated sludge. Journal of hazardous materials. 2017;334:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.018 28412629

32. OECD. Test No. 209: Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, No 310. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010.

33. Behera SK, Oh SY, Park HS. Sorption of triclosan onto activated carbon, kaolinite and montmorillonite: Effects of pH, ionic strength, and humic acid. Journal of hazardous materials. 2010;179(1):684–91.

34. Petrie B, McAdam EJ, Lester JN, Cartmell E. Assessing potential modifications to the activated sludge process to improve simultaneous removal of a diverse range of micropollutants. Water research. 2014;62:180–92. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.036 24956600

35. BREEUWER P DROCOURT J-L, BUNSCHOTEN N, ZWIETERING MH, ROMBOUTS FM, ABEE T. Characterization of Uptake and Hydrolysis of Fluorescein Diacetate and Carboxyfluorescein Diacetate by Intracellular Esterases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Which Result in Accumulation of Fluorescent Product. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995;61(4):6.

36. Gomes A, Fernandes E, Lima JL. Fluorescence probes used for detection of reactive oxygen species. Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods. 2005;65(2–3):45–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.10.003 16297980

37. Krah D, Ghattas AK, Wick A, Broder K, Ternes TA. Micropollutant degradation via extracted native enzymes from activated sludge. Water research. 2016;95:348–60. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.037 27017196

38. Nauen R, Stumpf N. Fluorometric microplate assay to measure glutathione S-transferase activity in insects and mites using monochlorobimane. Analytical Biochemistry. 2002;303(2):194–8. doi: 10.1006/abio.2002.5578 11950219

39. Nash T. The colorimetric estimation of formaldehyde by means of the Hantzsch reaction. Biochemical Journal. 1953;55(3):416–21. doi: 10.1042/bj0550416 13105648

40. Gros M, Petrović M, Barceló D. Multi-residue analytical methods using LC-tandem MS for the determination of pharmaceuticals in environmental and wastewater samples: A review. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2006;386(4):941–52. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0586-z 16830112

41. Dhillon GS, Kaur S, Pulicharla R, Brar SK, Cledón M, Verma M, et al. Triclosan: Current status, occurrence, environmental risks and bioaccumulation potential. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015;12(5):5657–84. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120505657 26006133

42. Liu X, Yin H, Tang S, Feng M, Peng H, Lu G, et al. Effects of single and combined copper/perfluorooctane sulfonate on sequencing batch reactor process and microbial community in activated sludge. Bioresource technology. 2017;238:407–15. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.045 28458174

43. Stasinakis AS, Mamais D, Thomaidis NS, Danika E, Gatidou G, Lekkas TD. Inhibitory effect of triclosan and nonylphenol on respiration rates and ammonia removal in activated sludge systems. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2008;70(2):199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.12.011 18237779

44. He H, Chen Y, Li X, Cheng Y, Yang C, Zeng G. Influence of salinity on microorganisms in activated sludge processes: A review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2017;119:520–7.

45. Patel M, Kumar R, Kishor K, Mlsna T, Pittman CU Jr., Mohan D. Pharmaceuticals of Emerging Concern in Aquatic Systems: Chemistry, Occurrence, Effects, and Removal Methods. Chemical reviews. 2019;119(6):3510–673. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 30830758

46. Suarez S, Lema JM, Omil F. Removal of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) under nitrifying and denitrifying conditions. Water research. 2010;44(10):3214–24. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.040 20338614

47. Li ZH, Ma ZB, Yu HQ. Respiration adaptation of activated sludge under dissolved oxygen and hypochlorite stressed conditions. Bioresource technology. 2018;248:171–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.166 28736142

48. Boczar BA, Forney LJ, Begley WM, Larson RJ, Federle TW. Characterization and distribution of esterase activity in activated sludge. Water research. 2001;35(17):4208–16. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00150-6 11791851

49. Klatt CG, LaPara TM. Aerobic biological treatment of synthetic municipal wastewater in membrane-coupled bioreactors. Biotechnology and bioengineering. 2003;82(3):313–20. doi: 10.1002/bit.10572 12599258

50. Martínez-Martínez M, Lores I, Peña-García C, Bargiela R, Reyes-Duarte D, Guazzaroni ME, et al. Biochemical studies on a versatile esterase that is most catalytically active with polyaromatic esters. Microbial Biotechnology. 2014;7(2):184–91. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12107 24418210

51. Reuter S, Gupta SC, Chaturvedi MM, Aggarwal BB. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: How are they linked? Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2010;49(11):1603–16.

52. Cavanagh JE, Trought K, Mitchell C, Northcott G, Tremblay LA. Assessment of endocrine disruption and oxidative potential of bisphenol-A, triclosan, nonylphenol, diethylhexyl phthalate, galaxolide, and carbamazepine, common contaminants of municipal biosolids. Toxicology In Vitro. 2018;48:342–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.02.003 29427707

53. Zhang Y, Meng D, Wang Z, Guo H, Wang Y. Oxidative stress response in two representative bacteria exposed to atrazine. FEMS microbiology letters. 2012;334(2):95–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02625.x 22724442

54. Geret F, Serafim A, Barreira L, Bebianno MJ. Effect of cadmium on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in the gills of the clam Ruditapes decussatus. Biomarkers. 2002;7(3):242–56. doi: 10.1080/13547500210125040 12141067

55. Lü Z, Sang L, Li Z, Min H. Catalase and superoxide dismutase activities in a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia WZ2 resistant to herbicide pollution. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2009;72(1):136–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.01.009 18304632


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2020 Číslo 1
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Svět praktické medicíny 1/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)
nový kurz

Koncepce osteologické péče pro gynekology a praktické lékaře
Autoři: MUDr. František Šenk

Sekvenční léčba schizofrenie
Autoři: MUDr. Jana Hořínková

Hypertenze a hypercholesterolémie – synergický efekt léčby
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Hana Rosolová, DrSc.

Význam metforminu pro „udržitelnou“ terapii diabetu
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Milan Kvapil, CSc., MBA

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#