Correction: People making deontological judgments in the Trapdoor dilemma are perceived to be more prosocial in economic games than they actually are
Authors:
Valerio Capraro; Jonathan Sippel; Bonan Zhao; Levin Hornischer; Morgan Savary; Zoi Terzopoulou; Pierre Faucher; Simone F. Griffioen
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(11)
Category:
Correction
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225850
In Fig 1, the columns that depict the average amount transferred by Player A to Player B as a function of whether Player B is a Trapdoor-deontologist or a Trapdoor-consequentialist report incorrect values. The average amounts should be 57.7% and 69.2%. Please see the correct Fig 1 here.
Zdroje
1. Capraro V, Sippel J, Zhao B, Hornischer L, Savary M, Terzopoulou Z, et al. (2018) People making deontological judgments in the Trapdoor dilemma are perceived to be more prosocial in economic games than they actually are. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0205066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205066 30307977
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 11
- Popcorn versus chipsy: Co je lepší pro bezstarostné mlsání?
- Proč může netopýr sníst hromady cukru, a přesto netrpí diabetem?
- Proč se australská vakomyš potýká s nedostatkem spánku? Odpověď je poněkud pikantní…
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Čtyřlístek odborností bude koordinovat péči o pacienty s demencí
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- A daily diary study on maladaptive daydreaming, mind wandering, and sleep disturbances: Examining within-person and between-persons relations
- Molecular validation of clinical Pantoea isolates identified by MALDI-TOF
- Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit’s conspiracy theory forum
- Urticating setae of tarantulas (Araneae: Theraphosidae): Morphology, revision of typology and terminology and implications for taxonomy
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy