1. Gerwing TG, Plate E. Effectiveness of nutrient enhancement as a remediation or compensation strategy of salmonid fisheries in culturally oligotrophic lakes and streams in temperate climates. Restoration Ecology. 2018;27(2):278–88.
2. Kritzer JP, DeLucia M-B, Greene E, Shumway C, Topolski MF, Thomas-Blate J, et al. The Importance of Benthic Habitats for Coastal Fisheries. BioScience. 2016;66(4):274–84. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw014
3. Carr-Harris C, Gottesfeld AS, Moore JW. Juvenile Salmon usage of the Skeena River Estuary. PloS One. 2015;10(3):e0118988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118988 25749488
4. Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD, Moore JW, Gende SM, Francis TB, Palen WJ. Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2003;1(1):31–7.
5. Gerwing TG, Gerwing AMA, Macdonald T, Cox K, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Intertidal soft-sediment community does not respond to disturbance as postulated by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Journal of Sea Research. 2017;129:22–8.
6. Gerwing TG, Allen Gerwing AM, Drolet D, Barbeau MA, Hamilton DJ. Spatiotemporal variation in biotic and abiotic features of eight intertidal mudflats in the Upper Bay of Fundy, Canada. Northeastern Naturalist. 2015;22(12):1−44.
7. Kritzer JP, DeLucia M, Greene E, Shumway C, Topolski MF, Thomas-Blate J, et al. The importance of benthic habitats for coastal fisheries. BioScience. 2016;66(4):274–84.
8. Amoozadeh E, Malek M, Rashidinejad R, Nabavi S, Karbassi M, Ghayoumi R, et al. Marine organisms as heavy metal bioindicators in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2014;21(3):2386–95. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1890-8 23775003
9. Gómez Gesteira JL, Dauvin J-C. Amphipods are good bioindicators of the impact of oil spills on soft-bottom macrobenthic communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2000;40(11):1017–27.
10. Gerwing TG, Hamilton DJ, Barbeau MA, Haralampides KA, Yamazaki G. Short-term response of a downstream marine system to the partial opening of a tidal-river causeway. Estuaries and Coasts 2017;40(3):717–25. doi: 10.1007/s12237-016-0173-2
11. Gerwing TG, Allen Gerwing AM, Macdonald T, Cox K, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Assessing the relationship between community dispersion and disturbance in a soft‐sediment ecosystem. Marine Ecology. 2018;39(4):e12505.
12. Scholz B, Liebezeit G. Microphytobenthic dynamics in a Wadden Sea intertidal flat–Part II: Seasonal and spatial variability of non-diatom community components in relation to abiotic parameters. European Journal of Phycology. 2012;47(2):120–37.
13. van Proosdij D, Milligan T, Bugden G, Butler K. A tale of two macro tidal estuaries: differential morphodynamic response of the intertidal zone to causeway construction. Journal of Coastal Research. 2009;56:772−6.
14. Pourret O, Bollinger J-C. “Heavy metal”—What to do now: To use or not to use? Science of The Total Environment. 2018;610–611:419–20. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.043 28810151
15. Majer AP, Petti MAV, Corbisier TN, Ribeiro AP, Theophilo CYS, de Lima Ferreira PA, et al. Bioaccumulation of potentially toxic trace elements in benthic organisms of Admiralty Bay (King George Island, Antarctica). Marine pollution bulletin. 2014;79(1–2):321–5. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.015 24368117
16. Wang X, Yang H, Gong P, Zhao X, Wu G, Turner S, et al. One century sedimentary records of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, mercury and trace elements in the Qinghai Lake, Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Pollution. 2010;158(10):3065–70. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.034 20650556
17. de Souza Machado AA, Spencer K, Kloas W, Toffolon M, Zarfl C. Metal fate and effects in estuaries: A review and conceptual model for better understanding of toxicity. Science of The Total Environment. 2016;541:268–81. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.045 26410702
18. Moore JW, Gordon J, Carr-Harris C, Gottesfeld AS, Wilson SM, Russell JH. Assessing estuaries as stopover habitats for juvenile Pacific salmon. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2016;559:201–15.
19. Tuominen TM, Sekela MA. Dioxins and furans in sediment and fish from the vicinity of four inland pulp and/or paper mills and one petroleum refinery in British Columbia: Environment Canada. Conservation and Protection; 1992.
20. Wilkes B, Dwernychuk LW. Environment studies in the marine receiving environment at the Skeena Cellulose pulp mill, Watson Island, BC. Pulp & Paper Canada. 1991:92:10.
21. Pearson TH, Rosenberg R. A comparative study of the effects on the marine environment of wastes from cellulose industries in Scotland and Sweden. Ambio. 1976:77–9.
22. Waldichuk M, Bousfield EL. Amphipods in low-oxygen marine waters adjacent to a sulphite pulp mill. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada. 1962;19(6):1163–5.
23. Gerwing TG. Preliminary report of intertidal research along the north coast of British Columbia: Summer 2016. Report to the Kitsumkalum First Nations. 34 p. 2016.
24. Gerwing TG, Cox K, Gerwing AMA, Carr-Harris CN, Dudas SE, Juanes F. Depth to the apparent redox potential discontinuity (aRPD) as a parameter of interest in marine benthic habitat quality models. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2018;33(2):149–56.
25. Pearson TH, Rosenberg R. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. 1978;16:229–331.
26. Allen L. The application of biodiversity indicators to infer ecosystem health in regenerating tropical forest: University of Glasgow; 2019.
27. Zhang W, Dulloo E, Kennedy G, Bailey A, Sandhu H, Nkonya E. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Elsevier; 2019. p. 137–52.
28. Smith MD, Knapp AK. Exotic plant species in a C 4-dominated grassland: invasibility, disturbance, and community structure. Oecologia. 1999;120(4):605–12. doi: 10.1007/s004420050896 28308312
29. Burke MJW, Grime JP. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology. 1996;77(3):776–90.
30. Guerra-García JM, García-Gómez JC. Polychaete assemblages and sediment pollution in a harbour with two opposing entrances. Helgoland Marine Research. 2004;58(3):183–91.
31. Gerwing TG, Campbell L, Allen Gerwing AM, Allen S, Cox K, Rogers M, et al. Potential impacts of logging on intertidal infaunal communities within the Kitimat River estuary. Journal of Natural History. 2018;52(43–44):2833–55.
32. HC. Hatfield Consultants Ltd. Skeena environmental effects monitoring (EEM) pre-design reference document. Prepared for Skeena Cellulose Inc. 1994.
33. Hoos LM. The Skeena River Estuary: status of environmental knowledge to 1975: Report of the Estuary Working Group, Department of the Environment, Regional Board, Pacific Region. Environment Canada, 1975 Contract No.: 3.
34. NIBR. Northwest Institute for Bioregional Research: Valuation of the wild Salmon economy of the Skeena River watershed. 1–30 2006.
35. Hilborn R, Walters CJ. Differing goals of salmon management on the Skeena River. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada. 1977;34(1):64–72.
36. Higgins RJ, Schouwenburg WJ. A biological assessment of fish utilization of the Skeena River Estuary, with special reference to port development in Prince Rupert. Technical Report 1973–1. Department of Environment, Fisheries and Marine Services. Vancouver, BC, 1973.
37. Faggetter BA. Review of the Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Marine Pollution in the North and Central Coast Regions of British Columbia. 2008.
38. Yunker MB, Cretney WJ, Ikonomou MG. Assessment of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran trends in sediment and crab hepatopancreas from pulp mill and harbor sites using multivariate- and index-based approaches. Environmental Science & Technology. 2002;36(9):1869–78. doi: 10.1021/es0112893 WOS:000175311900006. 12026964
39. Akenhead S. A review of the oceanography and marine ecology of Prince Rupert Harbour a propos sewage outfalls. 1992.
40. Cox K, Black M, Filip N, Miller M, Mohns K, Mortimor J, et al. Comparison of community assessment techniques and implications for diversity indices and species accumulation curves. Ecology and Evolution. 2017; doi: 10.1002/ece3.3580
41. Gerwing TG, Gerwing AMA, Cox K, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Relationship between apparent redox potential discontinuity (aRPD) depth and environmental variables in soft-sediment habitats. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2017;32(4):472–80.
42. BS7755-3.2. Soil Quality. Part 3: Chemical Methods. Section 3.2: Determination of pH British Standards Institution, London, UK. 1995.
43. EPA US. Method 3051A (SW-846): Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Oils, Revision 1. Washington, DC. 2007.
44. EPA US. Method 7473 (SW-846): Mercury in Solids and Solutions by Thermal Decomposition, Amalgamation, and Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, Revision 0. Washington, DC. 1998.
45. Muller G. Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. Geojournal. 1969;2:108–18.
46. Anderson M, Gorley RN, Clarke RK. Permanova+ for Primer: Guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth, United Kingdom: PRIMER-E Ltd; 2008.
47. Gerwing TG, Drolet D, Hamilton DJ, Barbeau MA. Relative importance of biotic and abiotic forces on the composition and dynamics of a soft-sediment intertidal community PLoS One. 2016;11(1):11:e0147098.
48. Clarke KR, Gorley RN. PRIMER v7: user manual/tutorial 3rd ed. Plymouth, United Kingdom: Primer-E Ltd; 2015.
49. McLaren P. The environmental implications of sediment transport in the waters of Prince Rupert, British Columbia, Canada: A comparison between kinematic and dynamic approaches. Journal of Coastal Research. 2016;32(3):465–82.
50. Monte MC, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C. Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste management. 2009;29(1):293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.002 18406123
51. Hoffman E, Lyons J, Boxall J, Robertson C, Lake CB, Walker TR. Spatiotemporal assessment (quarter century) of pulp mill metal (loid) contaminated sediment to inform remediation decisions. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2017;189(6):257. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5952-0 28478542
52. Borah P, Singh P, Rangan L, Karak T, Mitra S. Mobility, bioavailability and ecological risk assessment of cadmium and chromium in soils contaminated by paper mill wastes. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 2018;6:189–99.
53. Nriagu JO, Nieboer E. Chromium in the natural and human environments: John Wiley & Sons; 1988.
54. Kienle C, Langer-Jaesrich M, Baumberger D, Hohmann D, Santiago S, Köhler H-R, et al. Integrated toxicity evaluation of a pulp deposit using organisms of different trophic levels. Journal of soils and sediments. 2013;13(9):1611–25.
55. Apler A, Snowball I, Frogner-Kockum P, Josefsson S. Distribution and dispersal of metals in contaminated fibrous sediments of industrial origin. Chemosphere. 2019;215:470–81. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.010 30340155
56. Alvarez MB, Malla ME, Batistoni DA. Comparative assessment of two sequential chemical extraction schemes for the fractionation of cadmium, chromium, lead and zinc in surface coastal sediments. Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry. 2001;369(1):81–90. 11210236
57. Chakraborty P, Babu PVR, Sarma VV. A study of lead and cadmium speciation in some estuarine and coastal sediments. Chemical Geology. 2012;294:217–25.
58. Sizmur T, Canário J, Gerwing TG, Mallory ML, O'Driscoll NJ. Mercury and methylmercury bioaccumulation by polychaete worms is governed by both feeding ecology and mercury bioavailability in coastal mudflats. Environmental Pollution. 2013;176:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.008 23395989
59. Weimin Y, Batley G, Ahsanullah M. The ability of sediment extractants to measure the bioavailability of metals to three marine invertebrates. Science of the Total Environment. 1992;125:67–84.
60. Burton ED, Phillips IR, Hawker DW. Geochemical partitioning of copper, lead, and zinc in benthic, estuarine sediment profiles. Journal of environmental quality. 2005;34(1):263–73. 15647557
61. Luoma SN. Processes affecting metal concentrations in estuarine and coastal marine sediments. Heavy metals in the marine environment: CRC Press; 2017. p. 51–66.
62. Riba I, Delvalls TÁ, Forja JM, Gómez‐Parra A. The influence of pH and salinity on the toxicity of heavy metals in sediment to the estuarine clam Ruditapes philippinarum. Environmental toxicology and chemistry. 2004;23(5):1100–7. 15180359
63. Zhang C, Yu Z-g, Zeng G-m, Jiang M, Yang Z-z, Cui F, et al. Effects of sediment geochemical properties on heavy metal bioavailability. Environment International. 2014;73:270–81. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.010 25173943
64. DelValls TÁ, Forja J, González-Mazo E, Gómez-Parra A, Blasco J. Determining contamination sources in marine sediments using multivariate analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 1998;17(4):181–92.
65. Chapman PM, Anderson J. A decision‐making framework for sediment contamination. Integrated environmental assessment and management. 2005;1(3):163–73. 16639882
66. Ciutat A, Boudou A. Bioturbation effects on cadmium and zinc transfers from a contaminated sediment and on metal bioavailability to benthic bivalves. Environmental toxicology and chemistry. 2003;22(7):1574–81. 12836984
67. Sizmur T, Canário J, Edmonds S, Godfrey A, O'Driscoll NJ. The polychaete worm Nereis diversicolor increases mercury lability and methylation in intertidal mudflats. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2013;32(8):1888–95. doi: 10.1002/etc.2264 23633443
68. Gerwing TG, Allen Gerwing AM, Macdonald T, Cox K, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Intertidal soft-sediment community does not respond to disturbance as postulated by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Journal of Sea Research. 2017;129:22–8.
69. Light SF. The Light and Smith manual: intertidal invertebrates from central California to Oregon. 4 ed. Cameron JT, editor: University of California Press, Berkely, CA, USA; 2007.
70. Gerwing TG, Kim JH, Hamilton DJ, Barbeau MA, Addison JA. Diet reconstruction using next-generation sequencing increases the known ecosystem usage by a shorebird. The Auk. 2016;133(2):168−77.
71. Rainbow PS. Biomonitoring of heavy metal availability in the marine environment. Marine pollution bulletin. 1995;31(4–12):183–92.
72. Fauchald K, Jumars PA. The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review. 1979;17:193–284.
73. Pagliosa PR. Another diet of worms: the applicability of polychaete feeding guilds as a useful conceptual framework and biological variable. Marine Ecology. 2005;26:246–54.
74. Howard L, Brown B. Natural variations in tissue concentration of copper, zinc and iron in the polychaete Nereis diversicolor. Marine biology. 1983;78(1):87–97.
75. Saha M, Sarkar S, Bhattacharya B. Interspecific variation in heavy metal body concentrations in biota of Sunderban mangrove wetland, northeast India. Environment International. 2006;32(2):203–7. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.08.012 16213017
76. Saiz‐Salinas J, Francés‐Zubillaga G. Nereis diversicolor: an unreliable biomonitor of metal contamination in the ‘Ría de Bilbao’(Spain). Marine Ecology. 1997;18(2):113–25.
77. Schöne BR, Krause RA Jr. Retrospective environmental biomonitoring–Mussel Watch expanded. Global and Planetary Change. 2016;144:228–51.
78. Zuykov M, Pelletier E, Harper DAT. Bivalve mollusks in metal pollution studies: from bioaccumulation to biomonitoring. Chemosphere. 2013;93(2):201–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.001 23751124
79. Caçador I, Costa J, Duarte B, Silva G, Medeiros J, Azeda C, et al. Macroinvertebrates and fishes as biomonitors of heavy metal concentration in the Seixal Bay (Tagus Estuary): which species perform better? Ecological Indicators. 2012;19:184–90.
80. Sarkar SK, Cabral H, Chatterjee M, Cardoso I, Bhattacharya AK, Satpathy KK, et al. Biomonitoring of heavy metals using the bivalve molluscs in Sunderban mangrove wetland, northeast coast of Bay of Bengal (India): possible risks to human health. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water. 2008;36(2):187–94.
81. Bard S M,. A biological index to predict pulp mill pollution levels. Water environment research. 1998;70(1):108–22.
82. Sibley PK, Dixon DG, Barton DR. Impact of bleached kraft pulp mill effluent on benthic community structure in relation to environmental factors. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery. 2000;7(3):229–46. doi: 10.1023/A:1009987123319
83. Leonardsson K. Long-term ecological effects of bleached pulp-mill effluents on benthic macrofauna in the Gulf of Bothnia. Ambio. 1993:359–62.
84. Pearson T. The effect of industrial effluent from pulp and paper mills on the marine benthic environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences. 1972;180(1061):469–85.
85. Robin J, Harger E, Nassichuk MD. Marine intertidal community responses to Kraft pulp mill effluent. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 1974;3(1):107–22.