Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of secondary tropical forests dominated by Tristaniopsis in Bangka Island, Indonesia


Autoři: Helbert aff001;  Maman Turjaman aff002;  Kazuhide Nara aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Natural Environmental Studies, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan aff001;  Forest Research and Development Centre (FRDC), Environment and Forestry Research, Development, Innovation Agency (FORDA), the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Bogor, Indonesia aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221998

Souhrn

In Southeast Asia, primary tropical rainforests are usually dominated by ectomycorrhizal (ECM) trees belonging to Dipterocarpaceae, although arbuscular mycorrhizal trees often outcompete them after disturbances such as forest fires and clear-cutting, thus preventing dipterocarp regeneration. In some secondary tropical forests, however, potentially ECM trees belonging to Tristaniopsis (Myrtaceae) become dominant and may help ECM dipterocarp forests to recover. However, we have no information about their mycorrhizal status in these settings. In this study, we analyzed ECM fungal communities in tropical secondary forests dominated by Tristaniopsis and investigated which ECM fungal species are shared with other tropical or temperate areas. In total, 100 samples were collected from four secondary forests dominated by Tristaniopsis on Bangka Island. ECM tips in the soil samples were subjected to molecular analyses to identify both ECM and host species. Based on a >97% ITS sequence similarity threshold, we identified 56 ECM fungal species dominated by Thelephoraceae, Russulaceae, and Clavulinaceae. Some of the ECM fungal species were shared between dominant Tristaniopsis and coexisting Eucalyptus or Quercus trees, including 5 common to ECM fungi recorded in a primary mixed dipterocarp forest at Lambir Hill, Malaysia. In contrast, no ECM fungal species were shared with other geographical regions, even with Tristaniopsis in New Caledonia. These results imply that secondary tropical forests dominated by Tristaniopsis harbor diverse ECM fungi, including those that inhabit primary dipterocarp forests in the same geographical region. They may function as refugia for ECM fungi, given that dipterocarp forests are disappearing quickly due to human activity.

Klíčová slova:

Biology and life sciences – Ecology – Ecosystems – Forests – Temperate forests – Tropical forests – Forest ecology – Ecological metrics – Species diversity – Organisms – Eukaryota – Fungi – Plants – Trees – Ecology and environmental sciences – Terrestrial environments – Earth sciences – Geomorphology – Topography – Landforms – Islands


Zdroje

1. FAO. State of the World’s Forests 2016. Forests and agriculture: land-use challenges and opportunities. Rome; 2016

2. Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Bruhl CA, Donald PF, et al. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23(10): 538–545. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.012 18775582

3. Perez-Moreno J, Read DJ. Mobilization and Transfer of Nutrients from Litter to Tree Seedlings via the Vegetative Mycelium of Ectomycorrhizal Plants. New Phytol. 2000;145(2): 301–309.

4. Rousseau JVD, Sylvia DM, Fox AJ. Contribution of ectomycorrhiza to the potential nutrient-absorbing surface of pine. New Phytol. 1994;128(4): 639–644.

5. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 3rd ed. Academic press; 2008.

6. Nara K. Ectomycorrhizal networks and seedling establishment during early primary succession. New Phytol. 2006;169(1):169–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01545.x 16390428

7. Qu L, Makoto K, Choi DS, Quoreshi AM, Koike T. The Role of Ectomycorrhiza in Boreal Forest Ecosystem. In: Osawa A, Zyryanova O, Matsuura Y, Kajimoto T, Wein R, editors. Permafrost Ecosystems: Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis), vol 209. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010 pp. 413–425.

8. Twieg BD, Durall DM, Simard SW. Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in mixed temperate forests. New Phytol. 2007;176(2): 437–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02173.x 17888121

9. Toju H, Sato H, Tanabe AS. Diversity and Spatial Structure of Belowground Plant–Fungal Symbiosis in a Mixed Subtropical Forest of Ectomycorrhizal and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Plants. PLoS One. 2014;9(1): e86566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086566 24489745

10. Henkel TW, Terborgh J, Vilgalys RJ. Ectomycorrhizal fungi and their leguminous hosts in the Pakaraima Mountains of Guyana. Mycol Res. 2002;106(May):515–531.

11. Sirikantaramas S, Sugioka N, Lee SS, Mohamed LA, Lee HS, Szmidt AE, et al. Molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Dipterocarpaceae. Tropics. 2003;13(2): 69–77.

12. Peay KG, Kennedy PG, Davies SJ, Tan S, Bruns TD. Potential link between plant and fungal distributions in a dipterocarp rainforest: community and phylogenetic structure of tropical ectomycorrhizal fungi across a plant and soil ecotone. New Phytol. 2010;185(2): 529–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03075.x 19878464

13. Phosri C, Põlme S, Taylor AFS, Kõljalg U, Suwannasai N, Tedersoo L. Diversity and community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a dry deciduous dipterocarp forest in Thailand. Biodivers Conserv. 2012;21(9): 2287–2298.

14. Ferry Slik JW, Keßler PJA, van Welzen PC. Macaranga and Mallotus species (Euphorbiaceae) as indicators for disturbance in the mixed lowland dipterocarp forest of East Kalimantan (Indonesia). Ecol Indic. 2003;2(4): 311–324.

15. Brearley FQ, Prajadinata S, Kidd PS, Proctor J, Suriantata. Structure and floristics of an old secondary rain forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, and a comparison with adjacent primary forest. For Ecol Manage. 2004;195(3): 385–397.

16. Nurtjahya E, Setiadi D, Guhardja E, Muhadiono, Setiadi Y. Succession on tin-mined land in Bangka Island. Blumea. 2009;54(1–3): 131–138.

17. Fukushima M, Kanzaki M, Hara M, Ohkubo T, Preechapanya P, Choocharoen C. Secondary forest succession after the cessation of swidden cultivation in the montane forest area in Northern Thailand. For Ecol Manage. 2008;255(5–6):1994–2006.

18. Adams F, Reddell P, Webb MJ, Shipton WA. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and ectomycorrhizas on Eucalyptus grandis (Myrtaceae) trees and seedlings in native forests of tropical north-eastern Australia. Aust J Bot. 2006;54(3):271–281.

19. Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Beaver K, Kõljalg U. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of the Seychelles: Diversity patterns and host shifts from the native Vateriopsis seychellarum (Dipterocarpaceae) and Intsia bijuga (Caesalpiniaceae) to the introduced Eucalyptus robusta (Myrtaceae), but not Pinus caribea (Pinaceae). New Phytol. 2007;175(2): 321–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02104.x 17587380

20. Ducousso M, Duponnois R, Thoen D, Prin Y. Diversity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Eucalyptus in Africa and Madagascar. Int J For Res. 2012;2012: 1–10.

21. Govaerts R, Sobral M, Ashton P, Barrie F, Holst B, Landrum L, et al. World Checklist of Myrtaceae;2019. Available from: http://wcsp.science.kew.org/.

22. Waseem M, Ducousso M, Prin Y, Domergue O, Hannibal L, Majorel C, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity associated with endemic Tristaniopsis spp. (Myrtaceae) in ultramafic and volcano-sedimentary soils in New Caledonia. Mycorrhiza; 2017;27(4): 407–413. doi: 10.1007/s00572-017-0761-4 28091750

23. Agerer R. Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae: A proposal to classify ectomycorrhizal mycelial systems according to their patterns of differentiation and putative ecological importance. Mycorrhiza. 2001;11(2): 107–114.

24. Murata M, Kinoshita A, Nara K. Revisiting the host effect on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: Implications from host-fungal associations in relict Pseudotsuga japonica forests. Mycorrhiza; 2013: 641–653. doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0504-0 23702643

25. Colwell R. EstimateS: Biodiversity Estimation. Diversity. 2009: 1–23. Available from: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates

26. R Development Core Team R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011: 409. Available from: http://www.r-project.org

27. Tedersoo L, Nara K. General latitudinal gradient of biodiversity is reversed in ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2010;185(2): 351–354. Available from: doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03134.x 20088976

28. Nara K, Nakaya H, Wu B, Zhou Z, Hogetsu T. Underground primary succession of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a volcanic desert on Mount Fuji. New Phytol. 2003;159(3): 743–756.

29. Bahram M, Kõljalg U, Courty P-E, Diédhiou AG, Kjøller R, Põlme S, et al. The distance decay of similarity in communities of ectomycorrhizal fungi in different ecosystems and scales. J Ecol. 2013;101(5):1335–1344.

30. Miyamoto Y, Narimatsu M, Nara K. Effects of climate, distance, and a geographic barrier on ectomycorrhizal fugal communities in Japan: A comparison across Blakiston’s Line. Fungal Ecol. 2018;33: 125–133.

31. Bird MI, Taylor D, Hunt C. Palaeoenvironments of insular Southeast Asia during the Last Glacial Period: A savanna corridor in Sundaland? Quat Sci Rev. 2005;24(20–21): 2228–2242.

32. Cannon CH, Manos PS. Phylogeography of the Southeast Asian stone oaks (Lithocarpus). J Biogeogr. 2003;30(3): 211–226.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 9
Nejčtenější tento týden