Effects of turning frequency on the nutrients of Camellia oleifera shell co-compost with goat dung and evaluation of co-compost maturity
Autoři:
Jinping Zhang aff001; Yue Ying aff001; Xiaohua Yao aff001
Působiště autorů:
Research Institue of subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
aff001
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222841
Souhrn
Composting is an important treatment method for Camellia oleifera shell and goat dung, which is crucial for the development of tea oil industry and goat breeding industry. Ventilation is the important regulatory factor in composting process, and high degree of maturity is the principal requirement for safe application of composting product. In the study, four treatments were designed as every 5 days turning (A1), every 7 days turning (A2), every 10 days turning(A3), and every 15 days turning (A4) for evaluating the maturity of Camellia oleifera shell co-composted with goat dung and optimizing turning frequency. During composting, TN, NO3‐‑N, GI, Solvita maturity index was increased along with composting process, while NH4+‑N, C/N shown an opposite trend. For all treatments, the longest thermophilic period (over 50°C), highest total nutrient and lowest C/N ratio were observed in A2. A turning frequency of every 7 days for co-compost of Camellia oleifera shell and goat dung could enhance the composting product quality. According to the analysis of spearman correlation, TN, C/N ratio, and GI could be used to comprehensively evaluate the compost maturity.
Klíčová slova:
Ammonia – Fertilizers – Nutrients – Plant growth and development – principal component analysis – Raw materials – Soil mineralization – Goats
Zdroje
1. Yao X, Wang K, Ren H, Lin P. The Research on Oil Camellia Resources and Its Scientific Utilization. Science Press, Beijing. 2012.
2. Jiang Z, Lin M, Li X, Bai X. Research progress on main extracts and biological activities of Camellia oleifera fruit hull. Journal of Hainan Normal University (Natural Science). 2018; 31(1).
3. Zhang J, Ying Y, Li X, Yao X. Evaluation of Three Kinds of Nutshell with Respect to Utilization as Culture Media. Bioresources. 2018; 13(4):7508–7518. doi: 10.15376/biores.13.4.7508–7518
4. Zhu J, Zhu Y, Jiang F, Xu Y, Ouyang J, Yu S. An integrated process to produce ethanol, vanillin, and xylooligosaccharides from camellia oleifera shell. Carbohydrate Research.2013; 382, 52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2013.10.007 24188806
5. Xie Y, Ge S, Jiang S, Liu Z, Chen L, Wang L, et al. Biomolecules in extractives of camellia oleifera fruit shell by GC-MS. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018; 25(2), 234. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.08.006 29472770
6. National Development Plan of Camellia oleifera Industry. The state forestry administration of the People's Republic of China. 2009. Available from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbghwb/200911/W020140220607252029036.pdf
7. Report of market demand and investment strategy planning analysis on China Camellia oil industry (2019–2025). Forward Business Information Co., Ltcl, Shonzhon. Available from: https://www.qianzhan.com/analyst/detail/220/190412-93f64348.html
8. Liu X, Chen J, Wang Y. Research progress in preparation and application of camellia oleifera shell activated carbon. Applied Chemical Industry. 2018; 47(1):190–192.
9. Sykes P, Jones K, Wildsmith JD. Managing the potential public health risks from bioaerosol liberation at commercial composting sites in the uk: an analysis of the evidence base. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2007; 52(2), 410–424. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.05.005
10. Meng X, Liu B, Xi C, Luo X, Yuan X, Wang X, et al. Effect of pig manure on the chemical composition and microbial diversity during co-composting with spent mushroom substrate and rice husks. Bioresour. Technol. 2018a; 251:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.077 29257993
11. Qian X, Shen G, Wang Z, Guo C, Liu Y, Lei Z, et al. Co-composting of livestock manure with rice straw: characterization and establishment of maturity evaluation system. Waste Management, 2014; 34(2): 530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.007 24188923
12. Khan N, Clark I, Sánchez-Monedero Miguel A, Shea S, Meier S, Bolan N. Maturity indices in co-composting of chicken manure and sawdust with biochar. Bioresource Technology. 2014; 168: 245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.123 24666624
13. Wang Y. Changes of culturable microorganisms, humus content and enzyme activities in comosting of four kinds of livestock dung. M.Sc. Thesis. Gansu Agricultural University. 2016. Available from: http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10733-1016902590.htm
14. Cao Y, Chang Z, Huang H, Xu Y, Wu H. Chemical and biological changes during early stage of composting of different animal wastes. Journal of Agro-Environment Science. 2015; 34(11): 2198–2207. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2015.11.023
15. Ramaswamy J, Prasher SO, Patel RM, Hussain SA, Barrington SF. The effect of composting on the degradation of a veterinary pharmaceutical. Bioresource Technology. 2010; 101(7), 2294–2299. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.089 19944598
16. Bernal MP, Alburquerque JA, Moral R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. a review. Bioresource Technology, 2009;100(22), 5444–5453. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027 19119002
17. Ogunwande GA, Osunade JA, Adekalu KO, Ogunjimi LAO. Nitrogen loss in chicken litter compost as affected by carbon to nitrogen ratio and turning frequency. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 99(16): 7495–7503. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.020 18367393
18. Wang Y, Schuchardt F, Chen H, An P, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. Effects of turning frequency on chemical and physical properties in windrow composting of spent Chinese herbal Medicine. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2012; 28(29):247–252.
19. Himanen M, Hänninen M. Composting of bio-waste, aerobic and anaerobic sludges—Effect of feedstock on the process and quality of compost. Bioresour. Technol. 2011; 102: 2842–2852. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.059 21095117
20. Nolan T, Troy SM, Healy MG, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ, Lawlor PG. Characterization of compost produced from separated pig manure and a variety of bulking agents at low initial C/N ratios. Bioresour. Technol. 2011; 102: 7131–7138. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.066 21570832
21. Grube M, Lin JG, Lee PH, Kokorevicha S. Evaluation of sewage sludge-based compost by FT-IR spectroscopy. Geoderma. 2006;130: 324–333. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.02.005
22. Gómez-Brandón M, Lazcano C, Domínguez J. The evaluation of stability and maturity during the composting of cattle manure. Chemosphere, 2008; 70: 436–444. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.065 17689588
23. Ko HJ, Kim KY, Kim HT, Kim CN, Umeda M. Evaluation of maturity parameters and heavy metal contents in composts made from animal manure. Waste Manage. 2008; 28: 813–820.
24. Zhao H, Li J, Liu J, Lü Y, Wang X, Cui Z. Microbial community dynamics during biogas slurry and cow manure compost. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2013;12(6), 1087–1097. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60488-8
25. Meng X, Dai J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhu W, Yuan X, et al. Composted biogas residue and spent mushroom substrate as a growth medium for tomato and pepper seedlings. J. Environ. Manage.2018b; 216: (SI), 62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.056 28958462
26. Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Perez-Espinosa A, Bernal MP, Moral R. Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures: Carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere. 2008; 72(4); 551–557. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.03.030 18466954
27. Troy SM, Nolan T, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ, Healy MG. Effect of sawdust addition on composting of separated raw and anaerobically digested pig manure. J. Environ. Manage. 2012;111: 70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.035 22824375
28. Ahmed M, Idris A, Omar SRS. Physicochemical characterization of compost of the industrial tannery sludge. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2007; 2 (1): 81–94
29. Getahun T, Nigusie A, Entele T, Gerven TV, Bruggen BVD. Effect of turning frequencies on composting biodegradable municipal solid waste quality. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 2012; 65: 79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.007
30. Huang GF, Wong JWC, Wu QT, Nagar BB. Effect of c/n on composting of pig manure with sawdust. Waste Management. 2004; 24(8): 805–813. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.03.011 15381232
31. Rashad FM, Saleh WD, Moselhy MA. Bioconversion of rice straw and certain agro-industrial wastes to amendments for organic farming systems: 1. composting, quality, stability and maturity indices. Bioresource Technology. 2010; 101(15), 5952–5960. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.103 20335032
32. Li, Z. The relationship of microbial biodiversity and the transformation of materials in the composting process of agricultural organic solids matter. (Doctoral dissertation, Nanjing Agricultural University). 2006.
33. Xiao B, Li Y. Effects of organic fertilizers on nitrogen transformation in vegetable soil. Anhui Agri. Sci. Bull. 2017; 23(02–03): 48–50+72.
34. Itavaara M, Vikma M, Venelampi O. Windrow Composting of Biodegradable Packaging Materials.Compost Science & Utilization. 1997;(2): 84–92. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.1997.10701877
35. Arja HV, Maritla HS. Evolution of microbiolgical and chemical parameters during manure and straw co-composting in a drum composting system. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment. 1997; 66:19–29. doi: 10.1016/S01678809(97)00069-8
36. Kalemelawa F, Nishihara E, Endo T, Ahmad Z, Yamamoto S. An Evaluation of Aerobic and Anaerobic Composting of Banana Peels Treated with Different Inoculums for Soil Nutrient Replenishment. Bioresource Technology. 2012; 126: 375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.030 22608289
37. Meng X, Liu B, Zhang H, Wu J, Yuan X, Cui Z. Co-composting of the biogas residues and spent mushroom substrate: Physicochemical properties and maturity assessment. Bioresource Technology. 2019; 276(3), 281–287
38. Haney RL, Brinton WF, Evans E. Soil co2 respiration: comparison of chemical titration, co2 irga analysis and the solvita gel system. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2008; 23(02): 171–176. doi: 10.1017/S174217050800224X
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 9
- Proč se v Česku šíří několik „vymýcených“ infekcí najednou? Ptáme se odborníků
- ADHD jako evoluční výhoda? Výzkum se zaměřil na lovce a sběrače
- Není migréna jako migréna: Co pociťují ženy a co muži?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Není statin jako statin aneb praktický přehled rozdílů jednotlivých molekul
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Graviola (Annona muricata) attenuates behavioural alterations and testicular oxidative stress induced by streptozotocin in diabetic rats
- CH(II), a cerebroprotein hydrolysate, exhibits potential neuro-protective effect on Alzheimer’s disease
- Comparison between Aptima Assays (Hologic) and the Allplex STI Essential Assay (Seegene) for the diagnosis of Sexually transmitted infections
- Assessment of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity using CareStart G6PD rapid diagnostic test and associated genetic variants in Plasmodium vivax malaria endemic setting in Mauritania
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy