Group conquers efficacy: Preschoolers’ imitation under conflict between minimal group membership and behavior efficacy

Autoři: Yuanyuan Li aff001;  Yifan Liao aff001;  Yuang Cheng aff001;  Jie He aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223101


Research has found that preschoolers’ imitation demonstrates in-group bias and is guided by behavior efficacy. However, little is known about whether children’s sensitivity to behavior efficacy affects their in-group imitation. This study aimed to investigate preschoolers’ imitation tendency when group preference and behavior efficacy are in conflict. Participants were 4-year-old (N = 72) and 6-year-old (N = 72) preschoolers in China. They observed two demonstrators (one in-group and one out-group) pressing two different buttons, respectively, to turn on a music box, and were then asked to try it themselves. In the experimental condition, the out-group demonstrator always succeeded, whereas the in-group demonstrator failed half the time. The results showed that more 6-year-old children imitated the less-effective behaviors of the in-group demonstrator, whereas 4-year-old children showed no such inclination. Two control conditions confirmed that children chose to imitate in-group rather than out-group members (Control 1: both in-group and out-group demonstrators succeeded all four times), and could imitate according to efficacy (Control 2: two in-group demonstrators succeeded two and four times, respectively). These results indicated that 6-year-olds faithfully followed the in-group modeled behavior, regardless of behavior efficacy. Results are discussed through the social function of in-group imitative learning.

Klíčová slova:

Age groups – Behavior – Decision making – Human learning – Children – Imitation – Learning – Antisocial behavior


1. Aronson E. The social animal. 11th ed. New York: Worth; 2011.

2. Plötner M, Over H, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. The effects of collaboration and minimal-group membership on children’s prosocial behavior, liking, affiliation, and trust. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2015;139:161–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.008 26112747

3. Shutts K, Banaji MR, Spelke ES. Social categories guide young children's preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science. 2010;13(4):599–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00913.x 20590724

4. Kelly DJ, Quinn PC, Slater AM, Kang L, Ge L, Pascalis O. The Other-Race Effect Develops during Infancy: Evidence of Perceptual Narrowing. Psychological Science. 2007;18(12):1084–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02029.x 18031416

5. Kinzler KD, Dupoux E, Spelke ES. The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(30):12577–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705345104 17640881

6. Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1971;1(2):149–78. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202

7. Billig M, Tajfel H. Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1973;3(1):27–52. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420030103

8. Mullen B, Brown R, Smith C. Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1992;22(2):103–22. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220202

9. McAuliffe K, Dunham Y. Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;371(1686):20150073. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0073 26644592

10. Bowles S. Group Competition, Reproductive Leveling, and the Evolution of Human Altruism. Science. 2006;314(5805):1569–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1134829 17158320

11. Wilks M, Kirby J, Nielsen M. Children imitate antisocial in-group members. Developmental Science. 2018;21(6):e12675. doi: 10.1111/desc.12675 29691975

12. Watson-Jones RE, Whitehouse H, Legare CH. In-Group Ostracism Increases High-Fidelity Imitation in Early Childhood. Psychological Science. 2016;27(1):34–42. doi: 10.1177/0956797615607205 26573906

13. Richter N, Over H, Dunham Y. The Effects of Minimal Group Membership on Young Preschoolers’ Social Preferences, Estimates of Similarity, and Behavioral Attribution. Collabra. 2016;2(1):1–8. doi: 10.1525/collabra.44

14. Dunham Y, Baron AS, Carey S. Consequences of "Minimal" Group Affiliations in Children. Child Development. 2011;82(3):793–811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01577.x 21413937

15. Want SC, Harris PL. How do children ape? Applying concepts from the study of non-human primates to the developmental study of ‘imitation’ in children. Developmental Science. 2002;5(1):1–14. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00194

16. Carr K, Kendal RL, Flynn EG. Imitate or innovate? Children’s innovation is influenced by the efficacy of observed behaviour. Cognition. 2015;142:322–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.005 26072278

17. Kushnir T, Gopnik A. Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology. 2007;43(1):186–96. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.186 17201518

18. Kushnir T, Gopnik A. Young children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions. Psychological Science. 2005;16(9):678–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01595.x 16137252

19. Bonawitz EB, Lombrozo T. Occam's rattle: Children's use of simplicity and probability to constrain inference. Developmental Psychology. 2012;48(4):1156–64. doi: 10.1037/a0026471 22201450

20. Denison S, Bonawitz E, Gopnik A, Griffiths TL. Rational variability in children’s causal inferences: The Sampling Hypothesis. Cognition. 2013;126(2):285–300. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.010 23200511

21. Schulz LE, Bonawitz EB, Griffiths TL. Can being scared cause tummy aches? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence, and preschoolers' causal inferences. Developmental Psychology. 2007;43(5):1124–39. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1124 17723040

22. Gopnik A, Glymour C, Sobel DM. A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review. 2004;111(1):3. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.3 14756583

23. Koenig MA, Clément F, Harris PL. Trust in Testimony: Children's Use of True and False Statements. Psychological Science. 2004;15(10):694–8. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00742.x 15447641

24. Birch SAJ, Vauthier SA, Bloom P. Three- and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition. 2008;107(3):1018–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.008 18295193

25. VanderBorght M, Jaswal VK. Who knows best? Preschoolers sometimes prefer child informants over adult informants. Infant & Child Development. 2009;18(1):61–71. doi: 10.1002/icd.591 20047013

26. Williamson RA, Meltzoff AN, Markman EM. Prior experiences and perceived efficacy influence 3-year-olds' imitation. Developmental psychology. 2008;44(1):275–85. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.275 18194026

27. Williamson RA, Meltzoff AN. Own and others’ prior experiences influence children's imitation of causal acts. Cognitive Development. 2011;26(3):260–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.04.002 21966091

28. Schulz LE, Hooppell C, Jenkins AC. Judicious Imitation: Children Differentially Imitate Deterministically and Probabilistically Effective Actions. Child Development. 2008;79(2):395–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01132.x 18366430

29. Hoffman PT. Why Was It Europeans Who Conquered the World. The Journal of Economic History. 2012;72(03):601–33. doi: 10.1017/S0022050712000319

30. Lyons DE, Young AG, Keil FC. The Hidden Structure of Overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(50):19751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704452104 18056814

31. Gruber T, Deschenaux A, Frick A, Clément F. Group Membership Influences More Social Identification Than Social Learning or Overimitation in Children. Child Development. 2017;0(0). doi: 10.1111/cdev.12931 28846135

32. Wood LA, Harrison RA, Lucas AJ, McGuigan N, Burdett ERR, Whiten A. “Model age-based” and “copy when uncertain” biases in children’s social learning of a novel task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2016;150:272–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.005 27371768

33. Wilks M, Collierbaker E, Nielsen M. Preschool children favor copying a successful individual over an unsuccessful group. Developmental Science. 2015;18(6):1014–24. doi: 10.1111/desc.12274 25529854

34. Dunham Y, Emory J. Of Affect and Ambiguity: The Emergence of Preference for Arbitrary Ingroups. Journal of Social Issues. 2014;70(1):81–98. doi: 10.1111/josi.12048

35. Howard LH, Henderson AM, Carrazza C, Woodward AL. Infants' and Young Children's Imitation of Linguistic In-Group and Out-Group Informants. Child Development. 2015;86(1):259. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12299 25263528

36. Whiten A, McGuigan N, Marshall-Pescini S, Hopper LM. Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364(1528):2417–28. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0069 19620112

37. Frick A, Clément F, Gruber T. Evidence for a sex effect during overimitation: boys copy irrelevant modelled actions more than girls across cultures. Royal Society Open Science. 2017;4(12):170367. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170367 29308216

38. Legare CH, Nielsen M. Imitation and Innovation: The Dual Engines of Cultural Learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2015;19(11):688–99. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.005 26440121

39. Chartrand TL, Lakin JL. The Antecedents and Consequences of Human Behavioral Mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;64(1):285–308. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754 23020640

40. Cordonier L, Nettles T, Rochat P. Strong and strategic conformity understanding by 3‐ and 5‐year‐old children. British Journal of Development Psychology. 2018;36(3):438–51. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12229 29265381

41. Yu Y, Kushnir T. Social context effects in 2- and 4-year-olds’ selective versus faithful imitation. Developmental Psychology. 2014;50(3):922–33. doi: 10.1037/a0034242 23978298

42. Chudek M, Baron AS, Birch S. Unselective Overimitators: The Evolutionary Implications of Children's Indiscriminate Copying of Successful and Prestigious Models. Child Development. 2016;87(3):782–94. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12529 27189405

43. Buttelmann D, Bohm R. The Ontogeny of the Motivation That Underlies In-Group Bias. Psychological Science. 2014;25(4):921–7. doi: 10.1177/0956797613516802 24474724

Článek vyšel v časopise


2019 Číslo 9

Nejčtenější v tomto čísle

Tomuto tématu se dále věnují…


Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Antiseptika a prevence ve stomatologii
nový kurz
Autoři: MUDr. Ladislav Korábek, CSc., MBA

Citikolin v neuroprotekci a neuroregeneraci: od výzkumu do klinické praxe nejen očních lékařů
Autoři: MUDr. Petr Výborný, CSc., FEBO

Zánětlivá bolest zad a axiální spondylartritida – Diagnostika a referenční strategie
Autoři: MUDr. Monika Gregová, Ph.D., MUDr. Kristýna Bubová

Diagnostika a léčba deprese pro ambulantní praxi
Autoři: MUDr. Jan Hubeňák, Ph.D

Význam nemocničního alert systému v době SARS-CoV-2
Autoři: doc. MUDr. Helena Lahoda Brodská, Ph.D., prim. MUDr. Václava Adámková

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Doporučená témata