1. Kumar N, Mandal A. Surfactant Stabilized Oil-Water Nanoemulsion: Stability, and Interfacial Tension and Rheology for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Energy and Fuel. 2018; 32, 6, 6452–6466.
2. Agi A, Junin R, Gbonhinbor J, Onyekonwu M. Natural Polymer Flow behaviour in Porous Media for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications: A Review. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-018-0434-7
3. Agi A, Junin R, Shirazi M, Gbadamosi A, Yekeen N. Comparative Study of Ultrasound Assisted Surfactant and Water Flooding. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences. 2019, 31, 3, 296–303
4. Bayat A., Junin R., Samsuri A., Piroozian A., Hokmabadi M. Impact of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Enhanced Oil Recovery from Limestone Media at Several Temperatures. Energy Fuels. 2014. 28, 10, 6255–6266.
5. Trache D, Hussin MH, Haafiz MK, Thakur VK. Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale. 2017; 9, 1763–1786 doi: 10.1039/c6nr09494e 28116390
6. Ghori MU, Alba K, Smith AM, Conway BR. Okra Extract in Pharmaceutical and Food Applications. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014. 42, 342–347.
7. Chin S, Pang S, Tay S. Size Controlled Synthesis of Starch Nanoparticles by a Simple Nanoprecipitation Method. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2011; 86, 1817–1819.
8. Bel Haaj S, Magnin A, Petrier C, Boufi S Starch Nanoparticles Formation via High Power Ultrasonication, Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013; 92, 1625–1632. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.022 23399199
9. LeCorre D, Bras J, Dufresne A. Starch Nanoparticles: A Review. Bio-Macromolecules. 2010; 11, 1139–1153.
10. Shahrodin NS, Rahmat AR, Arsad A. Synthesis and Characterisation of Cassava Starch Nanocrystals by Hydrolysis Method. Advanced Material Research. 2015; 1113, 446–452.
11. Dufresne A. Cellulose-Based Composites and Nanocomposites. Monomers, Polymers, Composites from Renewable Resources. 2008; 401–418.
12. Suslick KS. Sonoluminescence and Sonochemistry. In: Meyers RA (ed) Enyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology. Academic, San Diego 2011.
13. Kim H, Park D, Kim J, Lim S. Preparation of Crystalline Starch Nanoparticles using Cold Acid Hydrolysis and Ultrasonication. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013; 98, 295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.085 23987348
14. Goncalves P, Norena C, Silveira N, Brandelli A. Characterization of Starch Nanoparticles Obtained from Acraucaria angustifolia Seeds by Acid Hydrolysis and Ultrasound. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2014; 58, 21–27.
15. Agi A, Junin R, Alqatta AY, Gbadamosi A, Yahya A, Abbas A. Ultrasonic Assisted Ultrafiltration Process for Emulsification of Oil Field Produced Water Treatment. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 2019, 51, 214–222.
16. Zabala R, Franco C, Fortes C. Application of nanofluid for improving oil mobility in heavy oil and extra-heavy oil: a field test. paper SPE-179677-MS, presented at the SPE improved oil recovery conference, held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 11–13 April (2016)
17. Zaharuddin N, Nordin M, Kadivar A. The Use of Hibiscus esculenta (Okra) Gum in Sustaining the Release of Propranolol Hydrochloride in a Solid Oral Dosage Form, BioMed Research International. 2014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/735891.
18. De Rosa IM, Kenny JM, Puglia D, Santulli C, Sarasini F. Morphology, Thermal and Mechanical Characterisation of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Fibres as Potential Reinforcement in Polymer Composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2010; 70, 116–122.
19. Acikgoz C, Borazan A, Andoglu E, Gokdai D. Chemical Composition of Turkish Okra Seed (Hibiscus esculenta L.) and the Total Phenolic Content of the Okra Seed Flour. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A-Applied Science and Engineering. 2016; 17, 5, 766–774.
20. Agi A, Junin R., Gbadamosi A, Abbas A, Azli NB, Oseh J. Influence of Nanoprecipitation on Crystalline Starch Nanoparticles formed by Ultrasonic Assisted Weak-Acid Hydrolysis of Cassava Starch and the Rheology of their Solutions. Chemical Engineering and Processing- Process Intensification, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107556
21. Boufi S, Bel Haaj S, Magnin A, Pignon F, Imperor-Clerc M, Mortha G. Ultrasonic Production of Starch Nanoparticles: Structural Characterization and Mechanism of Disintegration. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 2018, 41, 327–336.
22. Sengkhamparn N, Sagis L, Vries R, Schols HA, Sajjaanantakul T, Voragen A. Physiochemical Properties of Pectins from Okra (Abelmoschus esculenta (L) Moench). Food Hydrocolloids. 2010; 24, 35–41.
23. Dickinson E, Ritzoulis C, Yamamoto H, Logan H. Oswald Ripening of Protein-Stabilized Emulsion: Effect of Transglutaminase Crosslinking. Coll. Surf. B. 1999; 139–146.
24. Haldorai Y, Shim JJ. Chitosan-Zinc Oxide Hybrid Composite for Enhanced Dye Degradation and Antibacterial Activity. Composite Interfaces. 2013; 20, 5, 365–377.
25. Wongsagonsup R, Shobsngob S, Oonkhanond B, Varavinit S. Zeta Potential (ζ) and Pasting Properties of Phosphorylated or Crosslinked Rice Starches. Starch/Stärke, 2015, 57, 32–37
26. Patel VR, Agrawal YK. Nanosuspensions: An Approach to Enhance Solubility of Drugs, J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2011; 2, 81–87. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.82950 22171298
27. Sigh V, Ali SZ, Somashekar R, Mukherjee PS. Nature of Crystallinity in Native and Acid Modified Starches. International Journal of Food Properties, 2006, 9, 4, 845–854.
28. Qin Y, Liu C, Jiang S, Xiong L, Sun Q. Characterisation of Starch Nanoparticles Prepared by Nanoprecipitation: Influence of Amylose Content and Starch Type. Industrial Crops and Products, 2016, 87, 182–190.
29. Ouajai S, Shanks R. Composition, Structure and Thermal Degradation of Hemp Cellulose after Chemical Treatment, Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2005; 89, 327–335.
30. Alba K. Ritoulis C, Georgiadis N, Kontogiorgos V. Okra Extracts as Emulsifiers for Acidic Emulsions. Food Research International. 2013; 54, 1730–1737.
31. Li M, Wu Q, Song K, Lee S, Yan Q, Wu Y. Cellulose Nanoparticles: Structure-Morphology-Rheology Relationship. ACS Sustainable Chem. and Eng. 2015; 3, 5, 821–832.
32. Zhou L, He H, Li M, Song K, Cheng H, Wu Q. Morphological Influence of Cellulose Nanoparticles (CNs) from Cotton Seed Hulls on Rheological Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol/CN Suspensions. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016; 153, 445–454. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.119 27561516
33. Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG. Ionic Strength Effects on the Microstructure and Shear Rheology of Cellulose Nanocrystals Suspension. Cellulose. 2014; 21, 3347–3359.
34. Moon R, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose Nanomaterial Review: Structure, Properties and Nanocomposites. Chemical Society Reviews. 2011; 7, 40, 3941–3994.
35. Qiao C, Chen G, Zhang J, Yao J. Structure and Rheology of Cellulose nanocrystals Suspension. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016; 55, 19–25.
36. Agoda-Tandjawa G, Durand S, Berot S, Blassel C, Gaillard C, Garnier C. Rheological Characterisation of Microfibrillated Cellulose Suspension after Freezing. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010; 80, 3, 677–686.
37. Chen W, Abe K, Uetani K, Yu H, Liu Y, Yano H. Individual Cotton Cellulose Nanofibers: Pretreatment and Fibrillation Technique. Cellulose. 2014; 21, 3, 1517–1528.
38. Garcia-Ochoa F, Casas JA. Viscosity of Locust Bean (Ceratonis siliqua) Gum Solution. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture. 1992; 59, 97–100.
39. Pei X, Zhai K, Liang X, Deng Y, Tan Y, Wang P, et al. Interfacial Activity of Starch-Based Nanoparticles at the Oil-Water Interface. Langmuir. 2017; 33, 15, 3787–3793. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00035 28343397
40. Ogunlaja S, Pal R, Sarikhani K. Effects of Starch Nanoparticles on Phase Inversion of Pickering Emulsions. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2017; 9999, 1–9.
41. Ye F, Miao M, Lu K, Jiang B, Li X, Cui S. Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Modified Starch-Based Nanoparticles from Different Maize Properties. Food Hydrocolloids. 2017; 67, 37–44.
42. O’Sullivan J, Murray B, Flynn C, Norton I. Effect of Ultrasound Treatment on the Structural, Physical and Emulsifying Properties of Animal and Vegetable Protein. Food and Hydrocolloids. 2016; 53, 141–151.
43. Gaikwad S, Pandit A. Ultrasound Emulsification: Effect of Ultrasound and Physicochemical Properties on Disperse Phase Volume and Droplet Size. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry. 2008; 15, 554–563.
44. Ghorbanizadeh S, Rostami B. Surface and Interfacial Tension Behaviour of Saltwater Containing Dissolved Amphiphilic Compounds of Crude Oil: The Role of Single-Salt Ionic Composition. Energy and Fuel. 2017; 31, 9, 9117–9124.
45. Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R. Controlling the Reflection of Iridescent Solid Films of Nanocrystalline Cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 2011; 12, 167–172. doi: 10.1021/bm1010905 21133373
46. Bera A, Mandal A, Guha B. Synergistic Effect of Surfactant and Salt Mixture on Interfacial Tension Reduction Between Crude Oil and Water in Enhanced Oil Recovery. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data. 2014; 59, 1, 89–96.
47. Murshed SS, Tan SH, Nguyen NT. Temperature Dependence of Interfacial Properties and Viscosities of Nanofluid for Droplet-Based Microfluidics. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phy. 2008; 41, 8, 1–16
48. Thanatcha R, Pranee A. Extraction and Characterisation of Mucilage in Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. International Food Research Journal, 2011, 18, 201–212.
49. Li X, Shu Z, Luo P, Ye Z. Associating Polymer Networks Based on Cyclodextrin Inclusion Compounds for Heavy Oil Recovery. Journal of Chemistry, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7218901
50. Pei H, Zhang G, Ge J, Tang M, Zheng Y. Comparative Effectiveness of Alkaline Flooding and Alkaline- Surfactant Flooding for Improved Heavy Oil Recovery. Energy Fuels. 2012; 26, 5, 2911–2919.
51. Shiran BS, Skauge A. Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Combined Low Salinity Water/Polymer Flooding. Energy Fuels. 2013; 27, 1223–1235.
52. Hatcher S. Schizophyllan as Biopolymer for EOR Lab and Field Results. Bockstedt -Wintershall, Germany. 2016; 1–18.
53. Mohammadi H, Jerauld GR. Mechanistic Modelling of Benefit of Combining Polymer with Low Salinity Water for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Paper SPE-153161, presented at the 18th SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 14–18 April 2012.
54. Agi A., Radzuan J, Chong AS. Intermittent Ultrasonic Wave to Improve Oil Recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 166, 577–591
55. Faiyas A, Erich S, Huinink H, Adan O. Transport of a Water Soluble Polymer during Drying of a Model Porous Media. Drying Technology, 2017, 35, 15, 1874–1886
56. Dong M, Ma S, Liu Q. Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery Through Interfacial Instability: A Study of Chemical Flooding for Brintnell Heavy Oil. Fuel. 2009; 88, 1049–1056.
57. Karambeigi MS, Abbassi R, Roayaei E, Emadi MA. Emulsion Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Interactive Optimization of Phase Behaviour, Microvisual and Core-Flood Experiments. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2015; 29, 382–391.
58. Saha R, Uppaluri RV, Tiwari P. Silica nanoparticle assisted polymer flooding of heavy crude oil: Emulsification, Rheology and Wettability Alteration characteristics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018; 57, 18, 6364–63-76.
59. Adewuyi YG, Deshmane V. Intensification of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose Using High-Frequency Ultrasound: An Investigation of the Effects of Process Parameters on Glucose Yield. Energy Fuels\. 2015; 29, 4998–5006
60. Velmurugan R, Muthukumar K. Sono-Assisted enzymatic Saccharification of Sugarcane Bagasse for Bioethanol Production. Biochem. Eng. J. 2012; 63, 1–9
61. Nitayavardhana S, Shrestha P, Rasmussen M, Lamsal BP, Van Leeuwen JH, Khanal SK. Ultrasound Improved Ethanol Fermentation from Cassava Chips in Cassava Based Ethanol Plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2010; 101, 2741–2747 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.075 19939670
62. Bubalo MC, Sabotin I, Rados I, Valentincic J, Bosiljkov T, Brncic M, et al. A Comparative Study of Ultrasound, Microwave, and Microreactor-assisted Imidazolium-based Ionic Liquid Synthesis. Green Process Synthesis. 2013; 2, 579–590
63. Mullick A, Neogi S 2018. Acoustic Cavitation Induced Synthesis of Zirconium Impregnated Activated Carbon for Effective Fluoride Scavenging from Water by Adsorption. Ultrasonic Sonochemistry, 45, (2018) 65–77.
64. Montalbo-Lomboy M, Khanal SK, Van Leeuwen JH, Raj Raman D, Grewell D. 2011. Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation and Economic Evaluation of Ultrasonic and Jet Cooking Pre-treatment of Corn Slurry. Biotechnol. Prog., 27, 1561–1569 22235486
65. James B, Baum G, Perez J, Baum K. Technoeconomic Analysis of Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Hydrogen Production. Directed Technologies, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2009.
66. Hielscher T. Ultrasonic Production of Nano-Size Dispersion and Emulsions. ENS. 2005, 138–143.
67. Lionelli C, Mason TJ. Microwave and Ultrasonic Processing: Now a Realistic Option for Industry. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2010, 885–900
68. Peshkovsky A, Bystryak S. Continuous-Flow Production of a Pharmaceutical Nanoemulsion by High-Amplitude Ultrasound: Process Scale-up. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2014. 82, 132–136.