Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis


Autoři: Astrid Magele aff001;  Philipp Schoerg aff001;  Barbara Stanek aff001;  Bernhard Gradl aff001;  Georg Mathias Sprinzl aff001
Působiště autorů: University Clinic St. Poelten, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, St. Poelten, Austria aff001;  Karl Landsteiner Institute of Implantable Hearing Devices, St. Poelten, Austria aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221484

Souhrn

Background

In July 2018 the active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant received FDA approval in the US (for patients 12 years and older with conductive and/or mixed hearing loss or single-sided deafness), reflecting the current trend of moving away from percutaneous hearing solutions towards intact skin systems.

Objectives

To critically assess the current literature on safety, efficacy and subjective benefit after implantation with an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device.

Data sources

Literature investigation was performed by electronic database search including PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and manual search of relevant journals and reference lists of included studies.

Study eligibility criteria

Randomized controlled trials, clinical controlled trials and cohort studies, case series and case reports investigating subjective and objective outcomes.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

Retrieved literature was screened and extracted by two reviewers independently. Subgroup analysis of indications (conductive and/or mixed hearing loss, single-sided deafness) and participant ages (pediatric vs. adults) was conducted on patients with active transcutaneous bone conduction devices. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the stability of the results in meta-analysis.

Results

39 citations reporting on pre- and postoperative audiological results, speech performance in quiet and in noise, localization testing as well as subjective outcomes were included in this systematic review. Functional gain as well as word recognition score outcomes could be further investigated via meta-analysis. All outcomes reported and summarized here reflect beneficial audiological performance and high patient satisfaction, accompanied with a low complications rate (minor event incidence rate: 9.9 person-years; major incidence rate: 148.9 person-years) for the indications of conductive and mixed hearing loss as well as in individuals suffering from single-sided deafness for all age groups of subjects who underwent active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device implantation.

Limitations

A limiting factor of this systematic review was the Level of Evidence of the reviewed literature, comprising 2a/3a studies (cohort studies and case-control studies). Furthermore, the reporting standards, especially in outcomes such as word recognition scores in quiet and in noise, vary across study cites from various countries, which impedes comparisons. Last but not least, no other comparable other device was retrieved as the active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device is the only available at the moment.

Conclusion

The device’s transcutaneous technology results in a minor event incidence rate of one in 9.9 person-years and a major incidence rate of one in 148.9 person-years. Based on the audiological outcomes, high patient satisfaction as well as the low complication rate, the authors recommend the active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device as a safe and effective treatment for patients suffering from hearing loss within the device’s indication criteria (conductive and/or mixed hearing loss or single-sided deafness).

Klíčová slova:

Medicine and health sciences – Otorhinolaryngology – Otology – Hearing disorders – Deafness – Audiology – Biology and life sciences – Bioengineering – Biotechnology – Medical devices and equipment – Medical implants – Engineering and technology – Research and analysis methods – Mathematical and statistical techniques – Statistical methods – Metaanalysis – Database and informatics methods – Database searching – Physical sciences – Mathematics – Statistics – Social sciences – Linguistics – Cognitive linguistics – Word recognition


Zdroje

1. Sprinzl G.M., Wolf-Magele A. The Bonebridge Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature. Clinical otolaryngology: official journal of ENT-UK; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery. 2016;41(2):131–43.

2. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2016 [Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.

3. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio: RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA; 2015 [Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/.

4. Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;36(3):48.

5. Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 12958120

6. Der C., Bravo-Torres S., Pons N. Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant: Middle Fossa Placement Technique in Children With Bilateral Microtia and External Auditory Canal Atresia. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2018;39(5):e342–e8.

7. Eberhard K.E., Olsen S.O., Miyazaki H., Bille M., Caye-Thomasen P. Objective and Subjective Outcome of a New Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Device: Half-year Follow-up of the First 12 Nordic Implantations. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2016;37(3):267–75.

8. Kulasegarah J., Burgess H., Neeff M., Brown C.R.S. Comparing audiological outcomes between the Bonebridge and bone conduction hearing aid on a hard test band: Our experience in children with atresia and microtia. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2018;107:176–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.01.032 29501302

9. Laske R.D., Roosli C., Pfiffner F., Veraguth D., Huber A.M. Functional Results and Subjective Benefit of a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Device in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2015;36(7):1151–6.

10. Lassaletta L., Calvino M., Zernotti M., Gavilan J. Postoperative pain in patients undergoing a transcutaneous active bone conduction implant (Bonebridge). European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2016;273(12):4103–10.

11. Law E.K., Bhatia K.S., Tsang W.S., Tong M.C., Shi L. CT pre-operative planning of a new semi-implantable bone conduction hearing device. European radiology. 2016;26(6):1686–95. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3983-x 26385806

12. Salcher R., Zimmermann D., Giere T., Lenarz T., Maier H. Audiological Results in SSD With an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant at a Retrosigmoidal Position. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2017;38(5):642–7.

13. Schmerber S., Deguine O., Marx M., Van de Heyning P., Sterkers O., Mosnier I., et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;274(4):1835–51.

14. Vyskocil E., Riss D., Arnoldner C., Hamzavi J.S., Liepins R., Kaider A., et al. Dura and sinus compression with a transcutaneous bone conduction device—hearing outcomes and safety in 38 patients. Clinical otolaryngology: official journal of ENT-UK; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery. 2017;42(5):1033–8.

15. Wimmer W., Gerber N., Guignard J., Dubach P., Kompis M., Weber S., et al. Topographic bone thickness maps for Bonebridge implantations. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2015;272(7):1651–8.

16. Barbara M., Perotti M., Gioia B., Volpini L., Monini S. Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2013;133(10):1058–64. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.799293 23768011

17. Ngui L.X., Tang I.P. Bonebridge transcutaneous bone conduction implant in children with congenital aural atresia: surgical and audiological outcomes. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2018;132(8):693–7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001123 30008276

18. Riss D., Arnoldner C., Baumgartner W.D., Blineder M., Flak S., Bachner A., et al. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. The Laryngoscope. 2014;124(12):2802–6. doi: 10.1002/lary.24832 25142577

19. Schnabl J., Wolf-Magele A., Pok S.M., Schoerg P., Hirtler L., Schloegel M., et al. Intraoperative measurement for a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2014;35(7):1242–7.

20. Vyskocil E., Liepins R., Kaider A., Blineder M., Hamzavi S. Sound Localization in Patients With Congenital Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss With a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2017;38(3):318–24.

21. Zanetti D., Di Berardino F. A Bone Conduction Implantable Device as a Functional Treatment Option in Unilateral Microtia with Bilateral Stapes Ankylosis: A Report of Two Cases. The American journal of case reports. 2018;19:82–9. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.904907 29358571

22. Gerdes T., Salcher R., Schwab B., Lenarz T., Maier H. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2016.

23. Ihler F., Blum J., Berger M.U., Weiss B.G., Welz C., Canis M. The Prediction of Speech Recognition in Noise With a Semi-Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing System by External Bone Conduction Stimulation With Headband: A Prospective Study. Trends in hearing. 2016;20.

24. Ihler F., Volbers L., Blum J., Matthias C., Canis M. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2014;35(2):211–5.

25. Manrique M., Sanhueza I., Manrique R., de Abajo J. A new bone conduction implant: surgical technique and results. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2014;35(2):216–20.

26. Baumgartner W.D., Hamzavi J.S., Boheim K., Wolf-Magele A., Schlogel M., Riechelmann H., et al. A New Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: Short-term Safety and Efficacy in Children. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2016;37(6):713–20.

27. Bianchin G., Bonali M., Russo M., Tribi L. Active bone conduction system: outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous device. ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties. 2015;77(1):17–26. doi: 10.1159/000371425 25661010

28. Fan X., Wang Y., Wang P., Fan Y., Chen Y., Zhu Y., et al. Aesthetic and hearing rehabilitation in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2017;101:150–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.08.008 28964287

29. Hassepass F., Bulla S., Aschendorff A., Maier W., Traser L., Steinmetz C., et al. The bonebridge as a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system: preliminary surgical and audiological results in children and adolescents. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2015;272(9):2235–41.

30. Kim M. Bonebridge Implantation for Conductive Hearing Loss in a Patient with Oval Window Atresia. The journal of international advanced otology. 2015;11(2):163–6. doi: 10.5152/iao.2015.1341 26381009

31. Lassaletta L., Sanchez-Cuadrado I., Munoz E., Gavilan J. Retrosigmoid implantation of an active bone conduction stimulator in a patient with chronic otitis media. Auris, nasus, larynx. 2014;41(1):84–7. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.04.004 23722197

32. Plontke S.K., Radetzki F., Seiwerth I., Herzog M., Brandt S., Delank K.S., et al. Individual computer-assisted 3D planning for surgical placement of a new bone conduction hearing device. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2014;35(7):1251–7.

33. Rahne T., Seiwerth I., Gotze G., Heider C., Radetzki F., Herzog M., et al. Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2015;272(11):3263–9.

34. Rainsbury J.W., Williams B.A., Gulliver M., Morris D.P. Preoperative headband assessment for semi-implantable bone conduction hearing devices in conductive hearing loss: is it useful or misleading? Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2015;36(2):e58–62.

35. Sprinzl G., Lenarz T., Ernst A., Hagen R., Wolf-Magele A., Mojallal H., et al. First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2013;34(6):1076–83.

36. Tsang W.S., Yu J.K., Bhatia K.S., Wong T.K., Tong M.C. The Bonebridge semi-implantable bone conduction hearing device: experience in an Asian patient. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2013;127(12):1214–21. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113002144 24168962

37. Weiss B.G., Bertlich M., Scheele R., Canis M., Jakob M., Sohns J.M., et al. Systematic radiographic evaluation of three potential implantation sites for a semi-implantable bone conduction device in 52 patients after previous mastoid surgery. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;274(8):3001–9.

38. Weiss R., Leinung M., Baumann U., Weissgerber T., Rader T., Stover T. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;274(5):2107–15.

39. Zhao S., Gong S., Han D., Zhang H., Ma X., Li Y., et al. Round window application of an active middle ear implant (AMEI) system in congenital oval window atresia. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2016;136(1):23–33. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.1003091 26493073

40. Gerdes T., Salcher R.B., Schwab B., Lenarz T., Maier H. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2016;37(6):685–91.

41. Ihler F., Blum J., Berger M.-U., Weiss B.G., Welz C., Canis M. The Prediction of Speech Recognition in Noise With a Semi-Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing System by External Bone Conduction Stimulation With Headband: A Prospective Study. Trends in Hearing. 2016;20:2331216516669330.

42. Vyskocil E., Liepins R., Kaider A., Blineder M., Hamzavi S. Sound Localization in Patients With Congential Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss With a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2017.

43. Weiss R., Leinung M., Baumann U., Weißgerber T., Rader T., Stöver T. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2016:1–9.

44. Monini S., Bianchi A., Talamonti R., Atturo F., Filippi C., Barbara M. Patient satisfaction after auditory implant surgery: ten-year experience from a single implanting unit center. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2017;137(4):389–97. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1258733 27918233

45. Schmerber S., Deguine O., Marx M., Van de Heyning P., Sterkers O., Mosnier I., et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2016.

46. Zernotti M.E., Di Gregorio M.F., Galeazzi P., Tabernero P. Comparative outcomes of active and passive hearing devices by transcutaneous bone conduction. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2016;136(6):556–8. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2016.1143119 26981711

47. Jovankovicova A., Stanik R., Kunzo S., Majakova L., Profant M. Surgery or implantable hearing devices in children with congenital aural atresia: 25 years of our experience. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2015;79(7):975–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.031 25930173

48. Hobson J.C., Roper A.J., Andrew R., Rothera M.P., Hill P., Green K.M. Complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2010;124(2):132–6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109991708 19968889

49. Nelissen R.C., Mylanus E.A., Kunst H.P., Pennings R.J., Snik A.F., Hol M.K. A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2013;270(12):3019–25.

50. Dun C.A., Faber H.T., de Wolf M.J., Mylanus E.A., Cremers C.W., Hol M.K. Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2012;33(2):192–8.

51. Chen S.Y., Mancuso D., Lalwani A.K. Skin Necrosis After Implantation With the BAHA Attract: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2017;38(3):364–7.

52. Baker S., Centric A., Chennupati S.K. Innovation in abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: Updated results and experience. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2015;79(10):1667–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.07.021 26279245

53. Briggs R., Van Hasselt A., Luntz M., Goycoolea M., Wigren S., Weber P., et al. Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2015;36(5):834–41.

54. Carr S.D., Moraleda J., Procter V., Wright K., Ray J. Initial UK Experience With a Novel Magnetic Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Device. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2015;36(8):1399–402.

55. Clamp P.J., Briggs R.J. The Cochlear Baha 4 Attract System—design concepts, surgical technique and early clinical results. Expert review of medical devices. 2015;12(3):223–30. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.990375 25496651

56. Iseri M., Orhan K.S., Kara A., Durgut M., Ozturk M., Topdag M., et al. A new transcutaneous bone anchored hearing device—the Baha(R) Attract System: the first experience in Turkey. Kulak burun bogaz ihtisas dergisi: KBB = Journal of ear, nose, and throat. 2014;24(2):59–64. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2014.45143 24835899

57. Iseri M., Orhan K.S., Tuncer U., Kara A., Durgut M., Guldiken Y., et al. Transcutaneous Bone-anchored Hearing Aids Versus Percutaneous Ones: Multicenter Comparative Clinical Study. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2015;36(5):849–53.

58. Powell H.R., Rolfe A.M., Birman C.S. A Comparative Study of Audiologic Outcomes for Two Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2015;36(9):1525–31.

59. Centric A., Chennupati S.K. Abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: initial results and experience. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2014;78(5):875–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.004 24612554

60. Denoyelle F., Coudert C., Thierry B., Parodi M., Mazzaschi O., Vicaut E., et al. Hearing rehabilitation with the closed skin bone-anchored implant Sophono Alpha1: results of a prospective study in 15 children with ear atresia. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2015;79(3):382–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.032 25617189

61. Denoyelle F., Leboulanger N., Coudert C., Mazzaschi O., Loundon N., Vicaut E., et al. New closed skin bone-anchored implant: preliminary results in 6 children with ear atresia. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society and European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2013;34(2):275–81.

62. Briggs R., et al., Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol, 2015. 36(5): p. 834–41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000712 25634465

63. Carr S.D., et al., Initial UK Experience With a Novel Magnetic Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Device. Otol Neurotol, 2015. 36(8): p. 1399–402. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000830 26196208

64. Hougaard D.D., et al., A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2017. 274(8): p. 3011–3019. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4614-8 28534117

65. Iseri M., et al., Transcutaneous Bone-anchored Hearing Aids Versus Percutaneous Ones: Multicenter Comparative Clinical Study. Otol Neurotol, 2015. 36(5): p. 849–53. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000733 25730451

66. Dimitriadis PA., Carrick S., Jaydip R., Intermediate outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing device in a paediatric population. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2017;94: 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.01.018 28167013


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 9

Nejčtenější v tomto čísle

Tomuto tématu se dále věnují…