The impact of door-to-electrocardiogram time on door-to-balloon time after achieving the guideline-recommended target rate
aff001; Shih-Wei Meng
aff001; Ming-Hsien Lee
aff002; Hsiu-Chi Chen
aff002; Chia-Ling Wang
aff002; Hui-Ning Wang
aff003; Min-Tsun Liao
aff001; Mu-Yang Hsieh
aff001; Yung-Chung Huang
aff005; Edward Pei-Chuan Huang
aff006; Chih-Cheng Wu
Authors place of work:
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
aff001; Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
aff002; Quality Control Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
aff003; College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
aff004; Department of Emergency, Taipei City Hospital, Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
aff005; Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
aff006; Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
aff007; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing-Hwa University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
aff008; Institute of Cellular and System Medicine, National Health Research Institute, Miaoli, Taiwan
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(9)
Little is known about the components and contributing factors of door-to-balloon time after implementation of Door-to-Balloon Alliance quality-improving (QI) strategies, including the impact of door-to-ECG time on door-to-balloon time.
We investigated whether modification of emergency department (ED) triage processes could improve door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon times after implementation of QI strategies.
This was a retrospective before-and-after study of a prospectively collected database. From June 2014 to October 2014, interventions were implemented in our ED, including a protocol-driven ECG initiation and moving an ECG station and technician to the triage area. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who received ECG within 10 min of arrival; the secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with door-to-balloon times of <90 min from arrival. Patients from the year pre- and post-QI initiative were defined as the control and intervention groups, respectively.
Enrollment comprised 214 patients with STEMI: 109 before the intervention and 105 after the intervention. We analyzed the components of the door-to-balloon process and found the door-to-ECG process was the most critical interval of delay (20.8%). Unrecognized symptoms were the most common cause of delay in the door-to-ECG process resulting in a significant impact on the door-to-balloon time. The intervention group had a higher percentage of patients with door-to-ECG times <10 min than did the control group (93.3% vs. 79.8%, p = 0.005), with a corresponding improvement in door-to-balloon times <90 min (91.1% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.007). In subgroup analysis, the intervention benefits occurred only in non-transferred or walk-in patients. After adjustment for possible co-variates, the QI interventions remained a significant contributing factor for achieving the door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon targets.
The modification of ED triage processes through implementation of QI strategies are effective in achieving better door-to-ECG times and thus, achieving door-to-balloon times <90 min. In patients presenting with ambiguous symptoms, improved door-to ECG target achievement rates, through a protocol-driven and multidisciplinary approach allows for earlier identification of STEMI.
Research and analysis methods – Bioassays and physiological analysis – Electrophysiological techniques – Cardiac electrophysiology – Electrocardiography – Medicine and health sciences – Critical care and emergency medicine – Triage – Resuscitation – Health care – Health care providers – Nurses – Vascular medicine – Coronary heart disease – Cardiology – Coronary heart disease – People and places – Population groupings – Professions – Medical personnel – Nurses – Technicians – Engineering and technology – Transportation – Ambulances – Science policy – Science and technology workforce – Careers in research – Technicians
National guidelines recommend that, if immediately available, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be performed in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [1,2]. The time from the patient’s arrival at hospital to reperfusion is strongly associated with the morbidity and mortality of patients with STEMI. Therefore, a 90 min target for door-to-balloon time is generally recommended as the most critical quality measure of hospital performance in acute coronary care . In 2006, Bradly et al. identified 6 key strategies for reducing door-to-balloon time, which included having a single call to a page operator to activate the catheterization (cath) lab, having the emergency department (ED) activate the cath lab, pre-hospital cath lab activation, expecting cath lab staff to arrive within 20 min of being paged, having an attending cardiologist on site at all times, and having staff in the ED and cath lab use real-time feedback . Later, the Door-to-Balloon Alliance suggested adapting these strategies to shorten the door-to-balloon times . Despite the improvements from the Door-to-Balloon Alliance, a substantial portion of STEMI patients’ door-to-balloon times still exceeded the 90 min target [6–9]. Although further reduction of the door-to-balloon time below the 90 min target showed no mortality benefit, continuous efforts to minimize the outliers that fall above the 90 min target should be emphasized .
Although door-to-balloon times are decreasing, current strategies focus on the process after a STEMI diagnosis is established. Rapid recognition of STEMI is the first step in achieving a timely reperfusion. The diagnosis of STEMI is based on a combination of electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, clinical history, and cardiac enzyme levels. Early acquisition of ECGs in the ED plays a central role in the decision for reperfusion therapy. Therefore, a 10 min target for door-to-ECG time is recommended in the majority of national guidelines [1, 2, 11]. Nonetheless, several studies have shown that only one-third of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) achieved the ECG acquisition target of 10 min. Although societies have made suggestions for performing ECG in the ED, only a minority of the literature addresses how to adhere to the 10 min goal [12–15]. In addition, it is not clear how great the impact of door-to-ECG time is, especially after the implantation of best-practice techniques.
Accordingly, the aims of this study were to evaluate whether changes in triage and ECG processes could minimize the outliers of the door-to-ECG time target and to determine the impact of door-to-ECG time on the door-to-balloon process.
Materials and methods
Study design and setting
This was a retrospective before-and-after study of a prospectively collected database from an urban teaching hospital with an annual census of approximately 80,000 ED visits. Our government audited the quality of care for ACS in 3 year intervals, according to the regulations for emergency-care-capacity-accreditation (ECCA). Four quality indicators were defined, including the target rates of door-to-ECG time <10 min, door-to-balloon time <90 min or door-to-needle time <30 min, door-to-cardiac enzyme time <120 min, and prescription of dual antiplatelet agents. These quality indicators had been collected by our quality control center since 2005 with a monthly analysis of cases that did not fulfill any 1 of the 4 quality indicators. From the first ECCA audit in 2008, the best practice strategies suggested by the door-to-balloon Alliance were implemented gradually, including ED activation, single call to central page, staff arrival within 20 minutes, cardiologist on site, real-time feedback, team approach, and action plans [4,16]. In 2014, facing the coming audit by the ECCA and variations in the rate of meeting the door-to-ECG target time, a working group composed of cardiology, emergency medicine, nursing, and quality control center specialists was formed. According to the feedback from the previous audit, the primary goal of the initiative was to improve the rate of meeting the door-to-ECG target time. To achieve this goal, a series of interventions were implemented from June 2014 to October 2014. From the database, we extracted patients with a discharge diagnosis of STEMI within 1 year before and 1 year after the quality-improving initiative.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch. All data applied from the quality control center were fully anonymized and our Institutional Review Board waived the requirement for informed consent.
Before the intervention, when a patient came to our ED, the patient would be directed to a triage area for a brief registration that included the chief complaint. The triage nurse would make the decision whether to perform an ECG immediately, depending on the chief complaint and the general appearance of the patient. If an immediate ECG was indicated, the patient would be directed to the ECG room in the ED, about 37 meters from the triage area (Fig 1). Unstable patients were escorted to the treatment area where an ECG would be performed at the bedside.
The interventions included 4 components, implemented step by step. Firstly, pre-defined criteria for initiating an ECG immediately were set up at the triage station, including chest pain, chest tightness, shortness of breath, upper abdominal discomfort (if more than 40 years old), syncope, and hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg or heart rate less than 50/min). When either one of these criteria were found during the triage process, the triage nurse would initiate an ECG examination immediately. Secondly, one of the two ECG machines in ED was moved to a designated area just beside the triage area to shorten the transportation time (Fig 1). In cases that fulfilled the immediate ECG criteria, a triage nurse would page an ECG technician to perform the ECG examination using the machine near the triage area. Thirdly, a technician was assigned to be on duty and carried a cell phone to respond to immediate ECG activation. The technician’s primary responsibility was performing ECGs initiated by the triage nurse and delivering them to attending physicians, with priority over other ED duties. Fourthly, the triage nurse would assist in preparing the patient for the ECG process before the arrival of the ECG technician. All triage nurses had to undergo training of ECG examination before they could participate in the ECG examination. These measures were introduced step by step and fully implemented by November 2014.
After intervention, the implementation of these measures was reviewed in the monthly performance meetings. The door-to-ECG time of all patients with a discharge diagnosis of ACS was monitored by our quality control center. Causes of delay were analyzed for all outliers. The reports of audits were fed back to the responsible personnel and their group leaders. The fidelity of protocol-driven ECG initiation was measured by the protocol-adherence rate of patients who fulfill the pre-specified criteria of immediate ECG initiation. The protocol-adherence rates were prospectively monitored for all patients with a discharge diagnosis of ACS. They were also retrospectively audited by selecting patients who visited the ED on the first day of a month. The results of fidelity measurement by protocol-adherence rates are provided in Fig 2.
Data collection and outcomes
We arbitrarily choose patients within 1 year before the quality-improving initiative was implemented (June 2013 to May 2014) as the control group and patients within 1 year after the initiative was implemented (November 2014 to October 2015) as the intervention group. The data were extracted from the prospectively-collected ACS database from the quality control center of our hospital. In the database, the arrival time was extracted from the Electronic Medical Record System (EMRS). The ECG time was extracted from the electronic copy of the ECG stored in the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). The balloon time was recorded from the angiographic image of thrombus aspiration or balloon dilatation in the PACS system. The date and time settings of the ECG machines in the ED and the hemodynamic recording system in the catheterization laboratory were synchronized to the computer-based health information system every day. All the data captured were double-checked by the case manager in the quality control center. The primary outcome for this study was the rate of meeting the door-to-ECG target time of <10 min and the secondary outcome was the rate of meeting the door-to-balloon target time of <90 min.
Data are presented as means (standard deviation, SD) for normally distributed variables and medians (interquartile range, IQR) for non-normally distributed variables. Comparisons of continuous variables were made using the Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate, and comparisons of proportions were made using the chi-squared test. We assumed the baseline door-to-ECG target rate to be 70%, and a 20% improvement would be achieved after the quality initiative. The required sample size for analysis was 62 patients in each group with 80% power and a type 1 error of 0.05. Because the number of STEMI patients was around 100 patients per year in our hospital, the interval of enrollment was arbitrarily selected as 1 year before and after intervention to balance the seasonal effect. To adjust for possible confounders, relative risk of door-to-ECG <10 min and door-to-balloon <90 min was analyzed using logistic regression. All the analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY USA). A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Characteristics of study participants
In the study period, 214 patients with STEMI were enrolled: 109 patients before the intervention and 105 patients after the intervention (Table 1). Their mean age was 62 (SD, 15) years and 163 (76%) of them were male. One hundred and two patients (48%) arrived in the ED on their own and 112 patients (52%) arrived in the ED by ambulance. One hundred and sixteen patients (54%) were transferred from another hospital. Sixty-three patients (29%) presented as acute during daytime and 151 patients (71%) arrived at the ED during the night. Primary PCI was not performed in 12 patients due to the following reasons: terminal stage (n = 1), refusal by patient (n = 3), unsuitable coronary anatomy (n = 5), and insignificant stenosis (n = 3) (Fig 3). Patients in the control and intervention groups were comparable regarding their age, sex, risk factors, history of coronary artery disease, instability, and mode of arrival (Table 1).
The distribution of door-to-ECG times before and after intervention is displayed in Fig 4. The intervention group had significantly higher rates of meeting the door-to-ECG target time of within 10 minutes than did the control group: 98 of the 105 patients (93.3%) in the intervention group and 87 of the 109 patients (79.8%) in the control group. No significant difference in door-to-ECG time was observed: 5 minutes (IQR = 3–6 minutes) in the intervention group and 4 minutes (IQR = 2–7) in the control group. (Table 2) The improvement in the rate of meeting the door-to-ECG target time was observed in the subgroup of non-transferred STEMI (91.2% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.008) and in the subgroup of walk-in patients with STEMI (91.2% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.030). In univariate analysis, male sex, increase in age, smoking history, arrival by ambulance, transferred patients, and the quality-improving interventions were associated with the attainment of door-to-ECG target time. After adjustment for co-variates including age, sex, risk factors, unstable vital signs, and mode of arrival, the quality-improving interventions remained a significant contributing factor for achieving door-to-ECG time within 10 minutes. (Table 3).
A total of 202 patients underwent primary PCI for STEMI: 101 patients before and after intervention, respectively. No significant difference in the median door-to-balloon time between the control (median, 64 min; IQR, 51–83 min) and the intervention group (median, 65 min; IQR, 50–78 min) was observed. Nonetheless, the intervention group had a higher rate of meeting the door-to-balloon target time than the control group (91.1% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.007). The improvement in the rate of meeting the door-to-balloon target time was observed in the subgroup of non-transferred STEMI (83.0% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.017) and in the subgroup of walk-in patients with STEMI (83% vs. 68.3%, p<0.001) (Table 2). In univariate analysis, arrival by ambulance, transferred patients, and the quality-improving interventions were associated with the attainment of door-to-balloon target time. After adjustment for co-variates, including age, sex, risk factors, unstable vital signs, and mode of arrival, the quality-improving interventions remained a significant contributing factor for achieving door-to-balloon time within 90 min. (Table 3).
The impact and contributors of door-to-ECG times
Before the intervention, the door-to-ECG interval had the highest incidence of delay (20.8%), followed by the ECG-to-activation interval (9.9%), activation to catheterization laboratory interval (2.0%), and catheterization laboratory to balloon interval (2.0%). After the quality-improving initiative, the most common interval for delay was still the door-to-ECG interval, but the incidence decreased to only 6.7% (Table 4).
The most common cause of door-to-balloon delay before intervention was unrecognized symptoms (13.9%), followed by delayed interpretation of the ECG (4.0%), delay in performing the ECG (4.0%), and resuscitation (3.0%). After the intervention, the most significant difference arose from a decrease in the proportion of delays caused by unrecognized symptoms (from 13.9% to 3.0%) (Table 4).
When the outliers of door-to-ECG times were stratified by their causes, the group of unrecognized symptoms had both longer median time and wider variation of door-to-ECG time, compared to that caused by resuscitation or performing ECG. (Fig 5) The median door-to-balloon times of patients with unrecognized symptoms or resuscitation were both above the 90 min target, but not the group due to delayed performance of the ECG. Most of the patients who were delayed due to resuscitation and unrecognized symptoms failed the 90 min door-to-balloon target. (Fig 5).
The cost for improving door-to-ECG times
In the first year after interventions, the number of ECGs performed in the ED was 2067 per month (census of ED visits, 6110 per month; 0.338 ECG per visit), 31% more than that in the year before interventions (1517 ECGs per month; census of ED visits, 5859 per month; 0.259 ECG per visit). After adjusting for the census of ED visits, additional 485 ECGs (6110–6110 x 0.259) were performed per month after the quality-improving initiative. Because no facility or personnel was added for the initiative, the increase in cost was estimated to be 2425 US dollar per month (5 US dollar per ECG examination in our country). Based on the improvement of door-to-ECG target rate by 14% (from 79% to 93%), an additional 14.7 patients (105 x 14%) achieved door-to-ECG target in the first year after intervention. Therefore, the cost to increase one patient achieving door-to-ECG time target would be 1980 US dollars.
Brief summary of the findings
In this study we found that the contribution of door-to-ECG times in door-to-balloon times increased after implementation of best practice techniques for door-to-balloon times recommended by the guidelines. We could also optimize the rate of meeting the door-to-ECG target time through modification of the triage process. Finally, the optimization of the door-to-ECG process further improves the rate of meeting the door-to-balloon target time, especially for patients who are not transferred from another hospital.
Impact of door-to-ECG time
National guidelines have focused on the adoption of best practice techniques to improve door-to-balloon times. Although door-to-balloon times are decreasing, current techniques focus on the processes after STEMI diagnosis. Nonetheless, the processes before the diagnosis of STEMI were also relevant determinants of the door-to-balloon times . Even after the implementation of best practice techniques suggested by the door-to-balloon Alliance, door-to-activation times remained a key determinant of overall door-to-balloon times, and were highly variable, as demonstrated by the Activate-SF registry . Our study provided novel information because the components and contribution factors of door-to-activation times were parsed out for analysis. Our data suggested that the contribution of processes after the STEMI is recognized, such as arrival of the cardiac catheterization team, transportation to the catheterization lab, and the process of intervention lessened. In contrast, the process before the STEMI is recognized, especially door-to-ECG time, became more paramount for the door-to-balloon process.
Although there is a relative lack of research on door-to-ECG times, data from previous studies suggested that the triage process in the ED is critically important. In a study of patients with STEMI at triage, one-fourth of the patients with STEMI were placed in the low-priority group, which was associated with significant delay in door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon times . Our data identified that atypical symptoms, such as shortness of breath, syncope, weakness, and gastrointestinal discomfort, were the main sources of delay in door-to-ECG times. Moreover, the impact of identification failure on door-to-balloon times was more prominent than delay in performing the ECGs. When a STEMI was not recognized in the triage stage, the average time to diagnosis was usually more than 30 min, making the door-to-balloon threshold difficult to achieve. In contrast, the delay in time due to performing the ECG was usually less than 5 min, which could be compensated for in the subsequent processes. Our results were supported by previous studies that demonstrated that atypical symptoms are an important cause of delayed reperfusion [19–21]. Accordingly, after the implementation of best practice techniques suggested by the door-to-balloon Alliance, a reliable process to recognize patients with STEMI at triage becomes paramount for timely reperfusion.
Strategies to improve door-to-ECG time
The sources of delays in door-to-ECG times could be classified into 2 types: failed recognition or delayed performance. According to the review of our cases, the majority of door-to-ECG delays came from failed recognition . Although it is intuitive to obtain ECGs for all symptoms possible for coronary ischemia, STEMI being missed was common for the one-third of patients without chest pain . Before the modification of our ECG process, performing ECG at triage depended on the judgement of the triage nurse. Despite the knowledge of ischemic symptoms other than chest pain, their judgement was still biased by the appearance of the patients and the severity of their symptoms. Therefore, failed recognition still occurred, especially in patients with symptoms other than chest pain. After strict implementation of a protocol-driven ECG in the triage process, less patients with STEMI were missed due to failed recognition. This measure was supported by similar protocol-driven triage processes in previous studies [23–25].
Before the initiative, the delay in performing an ECG usually occurred when the ECG technician had other work at hand. It might also have occurred when the ED was overcrowded, or the ECG area was occupied. To further expedite the door-to-ECG process, an additional ECG machine and a pre-specified bed for ECG was set up near the triage area. This modification expedited the ECG process. Furthermore, it created a friendly setting that made assistance by the triage nurse easier.
Strategies in previous studies focused on the identification of eligible patients at the door. Usually, an extra staff member, a greeter, or a trained registration clerk was needed for the assessment of patients at arrival [12–14]. Different from previous studies, we focused on the standardization of the criteria to initiate an immediate ECG at the triage stage. A major concern of this strategy was an increase in the number of ECGs in the ED. In addition, the ECG technicians might be overworked not only because of the increase in the number of ECGs to be performed but also the urgency under the new protocol. We found a 30% increase in the number of ECGs after the protocol-driven ECG process was applied. The extra load on the ECG technicians could be lessened by the assistance of the triage nurse and no increase in manpower will be needed. Nonetheless, a detailed cost-effectiveness analysis for this approach deserves further evaluation.
Improving target rate of door-to-balloon times
Although the national guidelines recommended a door-to-ECG time of less than 10 minutes, the impact of door-to-ECG time on outcomes or on door-to-balloon time of patients with STEMI has seldom been addressed. Multiple strategies were usually used in previous studies to the effect that individual techniques were hard to quantify. Furthermore, their effects on door-to-balloon times were rarely reported. Among these studies of door-to-ECG times, only one study demonstrated a parallel decrease in door-to-balloon times. Our study was unique because it was conducted under the implementation of best practice techniques suggested by the door-to-balloon Alliance. We demonstrated that failed recognition at the triage stage played a more prominent role. Furthermore, we demonstrated a corresponding improvement in the rate of meeting the door-to-balloon target time.
Nonetheless, the benefit on door-to-balloon time was not observed in the subgroup of patients who were transferred from another hospital. These patients usually already have had an ECG performed to establish diagnosis prior to transfer. The pre-hospital transmission of ECGs or diagnosis would reduce the relevance of door-to-ECG process on door-to-balloon times. The benefit on door-to-balloon time was also absent in the subgroup of patients who were transferred by ambulance. Previous studies have demonstrated that the utilization of emergency medical service (EMS) among STEMI patients was associated with faster symptom-to-balloon times [9,26]. Nonetheless, in our country and other Asia countries, a substantial proportion of STEMI patients were not transferred from another hospital or EMS [7,27,28]. Therefore, our data suggest that continued emphasize on the triage process of walk-in patients is paramount for a timely reperfusion therapy.
Some limitations should be addressed. First, this study was performed at a single center in an urban environment and therefore may lack external validity. Second, for a before-and-after study design, there may be unmeasured confounders that could not be adjusted in multivariate analysis. The evidence is less robust compared with that generated from randomized controlled trials. Although we have analyzed the increase in the number of ECGs before and after the interventions, a more comprehensive cost-effective analysis is needed for this protocol-driven ECG initiation process.
Although further effort to reduce door-to-balloon time below the 90-minutes target may not reduce mortality, the value to minimize outliers of the 90-minute target cannot be denied. After implementation of the best practice techniques suggested by the door-to-balloon Alliance, early recognition of patients with STEMI was paramount for the optimization of patients achieving the 90-minute target. A multidisciplinary approach, especially with protocol-driven ECG initiation at triage, could decrease the outliers of door-to-ECG times with a corresponding decrease in outliers of door-to-balloon times, especially for patients who are not transferred from another hospital.
1. Kastrati A, Caforio ALP, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Varenhorst C, Prescott E, Crea F, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2017;39(2):119–77. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393 28886621
2. Antman Elliott M, Anbe Daniel T, Armstrong Paul W, Bates Eric R, Green Lee A, Hand Mary et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive Summary. Circulation. 2004;110(5):588–636.
3. Jneid H, Addison D, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Gokak S, Grady KL, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. 2017;70(16):2048–90.
4. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, Barton BA, Webster TR, Mattera JA, et al. Strategies for Reducing the Door-to-Balloon Time in Acute Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355(22):2308–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa063117 17101617.
5. Krumholz HM, Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH, Batchelor WB, Kline-Rogers E, et al. A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon: An Alliance for Quality. JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2008;1(1):97–104. Epub 2008/02/01. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2007.10.006 19393152.
6. Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, Herrin J, Ting HH, Stern AF, Nembhard IM, et al. National Efforts to Improve Door-to-Balloon Time: Results From the Door-to-Balloon Alliance. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;54(25):2423–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.003. 20082933
7. Wu CK, Juang JJ, Chiang JY, Li YH, Tsai CT, Chiang FT. The Taiwan Heart Registries: Its Influence on Cardiovascular Patient Care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(11):1273–83. Epub 2018/03/17. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.006 29544612.
8. Ikemura N, Sawano M, Shiraishi Y, Ueda I, Miyata H, Numasawa Y, et al. Barriers Associated With Door-to-Balloon Delay in Contemporary Japanese Practice. Circulation journal: official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2017;81(6):815–22. Epub 2017/02/24. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0905 28228609.
9. Ho AF, Loy EY, Pek PP, Wah W, Tan TX, Liu N, et al. Emergency Medical Services Utilization among Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Observations from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry. Prehospital emergency care: official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors. 2016;20(4):454–61. Epub 2016/03/18. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1128032 26986553.
10. Menees DS, Peterson ED, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Messenger JC, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Door-to-Balloon Time and Mortality among Patients Undergoing Primary PCI. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(10):901–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208200 24004117.
11. Li YH, Wang YC, Wang YC, Liu JC, Lee CH, Chen CC, et al. 2018 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology, Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine and Taiwan Society of Cardiovascular Interventions for the management of non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi. 2018;117(9):766–90. Epub 2018/07/19. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.06.002 30017533.
12. Phelan MP, Glauser J, Smith E, Martin C, Schrump S, Mahone P, et al. Improving emergency department door-to-electrocardiogram time in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Critical pathways in cardiology. 2009;8(3):119–21. Epub 2009/09/04. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181b5a6f3 19726931.
13. Purim-Shem-Tov YA, Rumoro DP, Veloso J, Zettinger K. Emergency Department greeters reduce door-to-ECG time. Critical pathways in cardiology. 2007;6(4):165–8. Epub 2007/12/20. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31815b565d 18091406.
14. Takakuwa KM, Burek GA, Estepa AT, Shofer FS. A method for improving arrival-to-electrocardiogram time in emergency department chest pain patients and the effect on door-to-balloon time for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2009;16(10):921–7. Epub 2009/09/17. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00493.x 19754862.
15. Coyne CJ, Testa N, Desai S, Lagrone J, Chang R, Zheng L, et al. Improving door-to-balloon time by decreasing door-to-ECG time for walk-in STEMI patients. The western journal of emergency medicine. 2015;16(1):184–9. Epub 12/09. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23277 25671039.
16. Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, Stern AF, Cherlin EJ, Wang Y, Byrd JR, et al. The door-to-balloon alliance for quality: who joins national collaborative efforts and why? Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety. 2009;35(2):93–9. 19241729.
17. Parikh Shailja V, Treichler DB, DePaola S, Sharpe J, Valdes M, Addo T, et al. Systems-Based Improvement in Door-to-Balloon Times at a Large Urban Teaching Hospital. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2009;2(2):116–22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.820134 20031823
18. McCabe JM, Armstrong EJ, Hoffmayer KS, Bhave PD, MacGregor JS, Hsue P, et al. Impact of door-to-activation time on door-to-balloon time in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions: a report from the Activate-SF registry. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2012;5(5):672–9. Epub 2012/09/06. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966382 22949494.
19. Wu EB, Arora N, Eisenhauer AC, Resnic FS. An analysis of door-to-balloon time in a single center to determine causes of delay and possibilities for improvement. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2008;71(2):152–7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21315 17985378
20. Miedema MD, Newell MC, Duval S, Garberich RF, Handran CB, Larson DM, et al. Causes of delay and associated mortality in patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2011;124(15):1636–44. Epub 2011/09/21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.033118 21931079.
21. Sim WJ, Ang AS, Tan MC, Xiang WW, Foo D, Loh KK, et al. Causes of delay in door-to-balloon time in south-east Asian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0185186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185186 28934306
22. Eiselt J, Racek J, Opatrny K Jr., Trefil L, Stehlik P. The effect of intravenous iron on oxidative stress in hemodialysis patients at various levels of vitamin C. Blood purification. 2006;24(5–6):531–7. Epub 2006/11/02. doi: 10.1159/000096474 17077626
23. Graff L, Palmer AC, LaMonica P, Wolf S. Triage of patients for a rapid (5-minute) electrocardiogram: A rule based on presenting chief complaints. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2000;36(6):554–60. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.111057 11097694
24. Markel KN, Marion SA. CQI: Improving the time to thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1996;14(6):685–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(96)00184-9. 8969986
25. Zarich SW, Sachdeva R, Fishman R, Werd A, Michael J., Parniawski M, et al. Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Initiative in Reducing Door-to-Balloon Times in Primary Angioplasty. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2004;17(4):191–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2004.00383.x 15318889
26. Ho AF, Fook-Chong S, Pek PP, Ng YY, Wong AS, Ong ME. Prehospital presentation of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Singapore. International journal of cardiology. 2013;168(4):4273–6. Epub 2013/05/25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.04.204 23701931.
27. Wah W, Pek PP, Ho AF, Fook-Chong S, Zheng H, Loy EY, et al. Symptom-to-door delay among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Singapore. Emerg Med Australas. 2017;29(1):24–32. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12689 27728959
28. Ho AF, Pek PP, Fook-Chong S, Wong TH, Ng YY, Wong AS, et al. Prehospital system delay in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Singapore. World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(4):277–82. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.04.005 26693262