Evaluating coral trophic strategies using fatty acid composition and indices


Authors: Veronica Z. Radice aff001;  Michael T. Brett aff003;  Brian Fry aff004;  Michael D. Fox aff005;  Ove Hoegh-Guldberg aff001;  Sophie G. Dove aff001
Authors place of work: Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia aff001;  School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia aff002;  Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America aff003;  Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia aff004;  Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America aff005
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Category: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222327

Summary

The ecological success of shallow water reef-building corals has been linked to the symbiosis between the coral host and its dinoflagellate symbionts (herein ‘symbionts’). As mixotrophs, symbiotic corals depend on nutrients 1) transferred from their photosynthetic symbionts (autotrophy) and 2) acquired by host feeding on particulate organic resources (heterotrophy). However, coral species differ in the extent to which they depend on heterotrophy for nutrition and these differences are typically poorly defined. Here, a multi-tracer fatty acid approach was used to evaluate the trophic strategies of three species of common reef-building coral (Galaxea fascicularis, Pachyseris speciosa, and Pocillopora verrucosa) whose trophic strategies had previously been identified using carbon stable isotopes. The composition and various indices of fatty acids were compared to examine the relative contribution of symbiont autotrophy and host heterotrophy in coral energy acquisition. A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to estimate the contribution of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) derived from various potential sources to the coral hosts. The total fatty acid composition and fatty acid indices revealed differences between the more heterotrophic (P. verrucosa) and more autotrophic (P. speciosa) coral hosts, with the coral host G. fascicularis showing overlap with the other two species and greater variability overall. For the more heterotrophic P. verrucosa, the fatty acid indices and LDA results both indicated a greater proportion of copepod-derived fatty acids compared to the other coral species. Overall, the LDA estimated that PUFA derived from particulate resources (e.g., copepods and diatoms) comprised a greater proportion of coral host PUFA in contrast to the lower proportion of symbiont-derived PUFA. These estimates provide insight into the importance of heterotrophy in coral nutrition, especially in productive reef systems. The study supports carbon stable isotope results and demonstrates the utility of fatty acid analyses for exploring the trophic strategies of reef-building corals.

Keywords:

Biology and life sciences – Biochemistry – Lipids – Fatty acids – Marine biology – Corals – Coral reefs – Microbiology – Medical microbiology – Microbial pathogens – Fungal pathogens – Phialophora verrucosa – Mycology – Fungal pathogens – Phialophora verrucosa – Species interactions – Symbiosis – Organisms – Eukaryota – Animals – Invertebrates – Arthropoda – Crustaceans – Copepods – Earth sciences – Marine and aquatic sciences – Marine biology – Corals – Coral reefs – Reefs – Coral reefs – Medicine and health sciences – Pathology and laboratory medicine – Pathogens – Microbial pathogens – Fungal pathogens – Phialophora verrucosa – Research and analysis methods – Mathematical and statistical techniques – Statistical methods – Linear discriminant analysis – Physical sciences – Mathematics – Statistics – Statistical methods – Linear discriminant analysis – Materials science – Materials – Mixtures – Particulates

2. Introduction

The evolutionary success of symbiotic reef-building corals within typically nutrient-poor oceans is attributed to their symbiosis with dinoflagellates [1]. As mixotrophic organisms, symbiotic reef-building corals have different trophic strategies that support their distribution across a wide range of environmental conditions [2]. Under conditions of reduced light (e.g., shaded areas or deep reefs) and/or in reefs with high food availability (turbid reefs), the translocation of photosynthetically-acquired carbon may be reduced and external food sources can be an important component of coral nutrition [3,4]. Symbiotic corals obtain nutrients from their photosynthetic dinoflagellate endosymbionts (herein ‘symbionts’; autotrophy) and from feeding on particulate resources in the water column (heterotrophy), including bacteria, detritus, flagellates, phytoplankton, and zooplankton [5]. Moreover, heterotrophy can have a positive feedback on symbiont autotrophy [6]. The low bioavailability and concentration of dissolved organic matter makes it a minor potential component of coral nutrition in contrast to nutrients being i) transferred from symbionts and ii) assimilated from heterotrophic feeding on particulates [5,7]. The role of heterotrophy greatly varies in relation to environmental factors and species-specific feeding rates, with heterotrophic carbon accounting for a significant, but highly variable, proportion of daily requirements in some coral species [8]. Indeed, it is challenging to estimate the relative importance of heterotrophy because laboratory-based studies cannot account for in situ environmental effects and calculations require a series of assumptions. The ability of corals to increase heterotrophy and assimilate lipids (as estimated from feeding rates and carbon isotope ratios) is species specific [8,9]. Lipids are important for energy storage and comprise a major constituent of coral carbon content and overall dry weight, with variation in total lipids among species [10].

As the major component isolated from coral total lipids [11,12], fatty acids (up to 73% of total lipids) reflect patterns in coral nutrition and have been used in various ways to assess trophic strategies of corals [13]. Fatty acids are essential for energy use and storage, cell membrane structure, and gene regulation [14]. Focusing on individual fatty acids in attempt to divide the coral holobiont into symbiont (plant) versus coral (animal) synthesized groups as an indication of autotrophic versus heterotrophic contributions must be carefully considered because symbiotic corals are basal animals that have some plant-like capacities [15]. Due to the carbon exchange between coral hosts and symbionts [16], the fatty acid composition of cultured symbionts differ from those of coral-associated symbionts [17,18]. Further, as dinoflagellates can be mixotrophic, coral-associated symbionts are not inherently limited to autotrophy and some symbionts in the family Symbiodiniaceae (formerly Symbiodinium spp.) have been shown to shift to parasitism under some conditions [1921]. Much of the literature on coral fatty acids has assumed that corals, as animals, lack certain desaturases (i.e., Δ12 and Δ15) required for the synthesis of metabolically important PUFA. However, recent work has shown that cnidaria, including scleractinian corals, have genes for de novo biosynthesis of n-3 PUFA and desaturase activity has been functionally characterized for a variety of aquatic invertebrates [2224]. Indeed, certain long-chain fatty acids (i.e., C22) appear to be host-derived rather than symbiont-derived [25]. In addition to the transfer of fatty acids from the symbionts to the coral host [26], the coral host can also transfer PUFA to their symbionts [27]. The ability of both symbiotic partners to synthesize and transfer fatty acids, including PUFA, complicates the delineation between each partner’s biosynthetic pathways and hinders the use of individual fatty acids as trophic biomarkers. Indeed, there has been discrepancy regarding the composition and utility of “autotrophic” fatty acid markers produced by symbionts. Despite these challenges, the application of different metrics for analyzing fatty acids may assist in discerning the differential contributions of autotrophy to heterotrophy, especially when combined with knowledge of key food source fatty acid composition [28].

Fatty acids are good markers for chemotaxonomy that can distinguish between plankton groups [29,30], scleractinian coral genera, and symbiotic and asymbiotic corals [31,32]. Fatty acid biomarkers provide an integrated record of dietary input over time, reflecting the assimilation and translocation of nutrients [33]. Specifically, PUFA composition can resolve scleractinian coral genera and has been used to evaluate potential differences in trophic strategies [28]. However, experimental studies have shown variable effects of feeding on coral host fatty acid composition [11,12,34]. Fatty acid indices are commonly used in aquatic ecology to evaluate trophic strategies, but have yet to be applied in the context of trophic ecology of corals [35]. First, the ratio of fatty acids 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9 is used to evaluate relative herbivory versus carnivory because the former is produced by the elongation of 16:1n-7 that is likely derived in substantial quantities from photosynthetic organisms (e.g., formerly Symbiodinium spp.) and the latter is a major fatty acid in most marine animals [3638]. Although this ratio is not an explicit indicator, recent work showing different proportions of 16:1n-7 in cnidarians hosting diverse Symbiodiniaceae supports the idea that 16:1n-7 may reflect photosynthetically-derived input [39]. Therefore, we also consider a correlated fatty acid index to characterize the ratio of typical photosynthetic input (sum of fatty acids 16:1n-7 and 18:1n-7) to typical animal dietary input (sum of fatty acids 18:1n-9, 20:1n-9, and 22:1n-11) [40]. Another index, the sum of long-chain monounsaturated fatty acids (LC-MUFA = Σ20:1 and Σ22:1), is used to evaluate potential feeding on copepods since herbivorous marine copepods, including tropical copepods, can have elevated concentrations of LC-MUFA [30,35,41]. Tropical symbiotic reef-building corals (e.g., Goniopora) and hydrocorals (e.g., Millepora), which can feed extensively on plankton, have been shown to have elevated proportions of LC-MUFA (~5–6% of total fatty acids) [42]. Further, symbiotic reef-building coral hosts experimentally fed with particulate food sources show higher proportions of LC-MUFA than starved corals while LC-MUFA are often negligible in symbionts [11,43]. The LC-MUFA index has been previously applied to cold-water corals and subtropical symbiotic jellyfish but has yet to be considered for tropical symbiotic corals [44,45]. Despite the taxonomic diversity of planktonic food sources in reef systems, experimental feeding studies on tropical scleractinian corals typically focus on only one potential particulate food source; most often being Artemia nauplii, which are not a natural prey item for corals. Ideally, trophic studies should account for environmental factors that may affect prey and dissolved nutrient composition and availability in reefs, including seasonality if applicable [46,47]. However, temporal and spatial information on plankton community dynamics in tropical coral reef ecosystems remains limited [48,49], especially in relation to the trophic ecology of reef-building corals.

Here, we evaluate the utility of fatty acid biomarkers in characterizing coral trophic strategies by investigating the coral fatty acid composition of three species of reef-building corals (Galaxea fascicularis, Pachyseris speciosa, and Pocillopora verrucosa) and their associated symbionts. Because dietary fatty acids can be modified in consumers, this study focused on corals for which prior knowledge of species-specific trophic strategies is available [50]. The fatty acid composition of coral hosts and symbionts from reefs at different depths (10 and 30 m) were investigated because depth-related factors may affect the fatty acid composition of corals [42,51] and previous research in the same reef system showed differential patterns of carbon stable isotopes in G. fascicularis over depth. We also provide a comprehensive evaluation of the trophic strategies of symbiotic corals by 1) examining the composition of multiple tracers (i.e., total [30] fatty acids, PUFA composition), 2) applying three established fatty acid indices in the novel context of coral trophic ecology, and 3) estimating the contribution of various sources of PUFA (symbionts and diverse plankton groups) to each coral host species. Total fatty acid compositions were used to evaluate patterns in coral trophic strategies while the relationship between host and symbiont proportions of individual fatty acids was used to investigate nutritional cycling between the symbiotic partners. Established fatty acid indices were applied in a novel context to examine relative autotrophy and heterotrophy among the coral species. Two different fatty acid indices were used to evaluate nutritional input from photosynthetic- versus animal-derived sources while another index tested for potential feeding on copepods. We hypothesized that the relatively more autotrophic coral P. speciosa would have a total fatty acid composition that differed from the more heterotrophic coral P. verrucosa. Because G. fascicularis can shift its trophic strategy as a function of environmental conditions [52], it was expected that this species would have a fatty acid composition that shared similarities with both other species. It was expected that the different fatty acid indices would show a greater fatty acid input from symbiont autotrophy for P. speciosa and less for P. verrucosa and G. fascicularis. Further, it was hypothesized that the PUFA composition of the more heterotrophic coral P. verrucosa would be more similar to the plankton prey groups compared to the other two coral species. Using multiple biochemical tracers, our study evaluates trophic strategies among three morphologically diverse species of coral and considers potential sources for coral heterotrophic feeding.

3. Methods

3.1 Sample collection

Fragments of three species of coral (Galaxea fascicularis, Pachyseris speciosa, and Pocillopora verrucosa) were collected by divers from shallow (10 m depth) and deep (30 m depth) reefs in the central Maldives, Indian Ocean, in March-April 2017 (S1 Table). In this study, coral fragments were randomly sampled for fatty acid analyses following a previous study across the central Maldives. This study showed that coral trophic strategies, as characterized by carbon stable isotopes, were not affected by reef site [50]. Coral fragments were rinsed with filtered (0.4 μm) seawater and immediately frozen until analysis. Isolation of the host fraction followed the methodology of Radice et al. [50] where tissue was separated from the coral skeleton with filtered (0.22 μm) seawater using a pressurized airbrush. Host tissue was subsequently separated from symbionts by centrifugation (minimum four times at 3,000×g, symbionts resuspended in filtered seawater each time) with homogenates and pellets both acidified to remove any carbonates, and samples freeze-dried prior to fatty acid analysis.

3.2 Extraction and analysis of fatty acids

Using a modified Folch method [53] following Taipale et al. [54], total lipids were extracted from freeze-dried coral host (n = 10 per coral species) or symbiont (n = 10 per host species) tissue (mean 5.2 mg ± 0.1 SD). First, 4:2:1 CHCl3:MeOH:H2O was added to each sample which was subsequently sonicated, mixed, and centrifuged to separate the phases. The organic phase was transferred and total lipids were extracted for a second time, followed by evaporation under N2 gas with the remaining lipids dissolved in toluene. Methanolic H2SO4 was added to resuspend the total lipids, which were methylated when heated in a water bath (90°C for 90 min). Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted twice with n-hexane (evaporated under N2 gas) and subsequently dissolved in n-hexane (0.5–1.5 mL) for gas chromatography analysis. The fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed using a Gas Chromatograph coupled with a Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID, Hewlett Packard HP6890) and an Agilent DB-23 column with an 85 min run time [55]. Fatty acids were identified by comparing retention times and peak area with reference standards (FAME 37; GLC-68D standard Nu Check-Prep; oyster Ostrea lurida) and a subset of samples were run on a gas chromatograph equipped with a mass spectrometer (GC-MS QP2010 Plus). The total mass of fatty acids of each coral species and tissue type was quantified using a concentration conversion factor that was generated for different concentrations with a standard curve method. Comparing fatty acid peak area versus mass, the slopes of the linear regressions were consistent among fatty acid standards and the calculated fatty acid concentration was within an average of 1.4% [56]. Using the derived average slope, the mass of each fatty acid per dry weight tissue was calculated using tissue mass, volume hexane, and peak area.

3.3 Statistical analyses

Because of the variability of fatty acid composition, data were not transformed in order to avoid falsely inflating the contribution of minor fatty acids [57]. Non-parametric PERMANOVA analyses were used to test whether the relative fatty acid compositions (% total fatty acids) were similar among the hosts and symbionts of the three coral species from shallow and deep reefs (9999 permutations; PRIMER-E version 6 with PERMANOVA add-on, Plymouth, U.K.). PERMDISP, used to test the homogeneity of multivariate dispersion for the significant interaction observed in the PERMANOVA result, showed that the data were homogeneous. To investigate the potential relationship of fatty acid composition between coral host and symbionts, linear regressions were used to compare symbiont and host proportions of individual fatty acids.

To assess coral trophic strategies, established fatty acid indices including 1) the ratio of 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9 fatty acids, 2) the ratio of photosynthetic- (sum of 16:1n-7 and 18:1n-7) versus animal-derived input (sum of 18:1n-9, 20:1n-9, and 22:1n-11), and 3) the sum of LC-MUFA (20:1n-11, 20:1n-9, 20:1n-7, 22:1n-11, 22:1n-9, and 22:1n-7), a trophic index for herbivorous copepod consumption, were analyzed using analysis of variances (ANOVA) with TukeyHSD post-hoc tests where applicable [58].

Principal Component Analysis (PCA), which reduces the dimensionality of data and identifies correlated variables, was used to separately analyze coral hosts and symbionts fatty acid composition for the full suite of 30 fatty acids as well as for PUFA [31,59,60]. For the PUFA analysis, the PCA included all (12) PUFA (18:2n-6, 18:3n-3, 18:3n-6, 18:4n-3, 20:2n-6, 20:3n-6, 20:4n-3, 20:4n-6, 20:5n-3, 22:4n-6, 22:5n-3, and 22:6n-3). Next, the compositions of metabolically important PUFA (18:2n-6, 18:3n-3, 18:3n-6, 18:4n-3, 18:5n-3, 20:4n-6, 20:5n-3, 22:6n-3) were compared among coral hosts, symbionts, and various potential prey sources including diatoms (n = 14), cyanobacteria (n = 11), dinoflagellates (n = 12), cryptophytes (n = 16), and tropical copepods (n = 19) (S3 Table). From a database of phytoplankton fatty acids, selected data i) were presented as proportions (percent of total fatty acids), ii) consisted of more than three individual fatty acids, iii) were of marine origin, iv) were not from polar regions, and v) were not subject to experimental treatments [29]. Phytoplankton were further filtered according to community composition recorded in Maldives reefs [61]. A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) (MASS package) was used to estimate the relative contribution of different sources of PUFA to each coral host species [62]. Using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach to evaluate the classification of potential sources of PUFA, sources with a classification rate <85% were removed from the analysis (S4 Table). The fatty acid 18:5n-3 was removed from the analysis because it was not present in the potential sources (copepods, diatoms, species-specific symbionts) used in the final model for each host species. A training data set was used to predict the contributions of various PUFA sources to coral host PUFA composition. A bootstrap approach was used to account for the within group variation in PUFA composition and to generate confidence estimates for the contribution of each group to coral host PUFA composition in the final model [63]. PUFA were re-sampled from each group (with replacement) and LDA was used to classify coral host samples of each species with each unique permutation of the raw data (n = 10,000). This approach maximized the variation in each putative source and generated a distribution of possible contributions to the diet of each coral species. This distribution of all possible diet combinations was used to determine the proportional contribution of particulate-derived versus symbiont-derived PUFA to each coral host species. To acknowledge that PUFA composition from “pure” autotrophy (only photosynthesis-derived) may differ from host-associated symbiont PUFA composition due to carbon cycling between coral hosts and their symbionts, an additional model including published data from cultured symbionts was considered [18]. Although the small sample size of cultured symbiont data precluded using LDA to classify coral host samples, the cultured symbiont samples appeared to comprise a separate group from the host-associated symbionts (S4 Fig). Therefore, results are discussed in terms of symbiont-derived PUFA rather than autotrophy-derived PUFA.

3.4 Ethics statement

Research was conducted under the Maldives Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture permit (OTHR)30-D/INDIV/2016/556.

4. Results

4.1 Coral host and symbiont fatty acid compositions

The composition of coral host and symbiont fatty acids were analyzed as proportions of total fatty acids (S1 Fig, S2 Table). PERMANOVA results revealed that depth was not a significant factor affecting coral host and symbiont fatty acid compositions (Pseudo-F1,48 = 0.687, P(perm) = 0.542). Therefore, data from both depths were combined for all analyses. Fatty acid composition was significantly affected by the interaction between tissue type (host versus symbiont) and the three coral species (Pseudo-F2,48 = 2.952, P(perm) = 0.019). PERMANOVA pairwise comparisons showed that the fatty acid composition of coral host and symbiont tissue were significantly different (P(perm)<0.001). For the fatty acid composition of host tissue, P. speciosa was significantly different than P. verrucosa (P(perm)<0.001) while G. fascicularis was significantly different than P. speciosa (P(perm) = 0.008) and P. verrucosa (P(perm) = 0.019). The fatty acid composition of P. speciosa symbionts was significantly different than P. verrucosa symbionts (P(perm) = 0.001) while G. fascicularis symbiont fatty acid composition was significantly different than that of P. speciosa symbionts (P(perm) = 0.020) and P. verrucosa symbionts (P(perm) = 0.021). Coral host samples clustered separately from symbiont samples in ordination space (Fig 1).

<h2>Total fatty acid composition by tissue type.</h2>
Fig. 1.

Total fatty acid composition by tissue type.


Principal component analysis of the total fatty acid compositions of coral host species (Galaxea fascicularis, Pachyseris speciosa, Pocillopora verrucosa) and their symbionts with 95% confidence ellipses.

To investigate the similarity between host and symbiont fatty acid composition, the proportion of fatty acids were compared between coral host and symbiont tissue from individual coral colonies. The variation in host fatty acid proportions was reduced by considering symbiont proportions of the fatty acid, of which 14 individual fatty acids (comprising 47% of total fatty acids) had significant models (S2 Fig). The proportion of the MUFA 20:1n-9, a common marker for copepod feeding, showed a strong relationship (adj. R2 = 0.84) between P. verrucosa host and symbionts. The model of the Σ LC-MUFA index was also significant (S3 Fig). The saturated fatty acid 16:0 was the most prevalent fatty acid in both the hosts and symbionts, with means of 31.5–37.2% and 34.2–43.6%, respectively (S1 Fig, S2 Table). With a greater proportion in the different host species (means 22.2–29.0%) compared to symbiont tissues (means 7.0–12.9%), the fatty acid 18:0 appears to be an important component of storage and/or structural lipids in the coral hosts. The fatty acid 22:4n-6 was the third most dominant in the coral hosts (means 4.2–7.9%) but was found in lower proportions in the symbionts (means 1.3–2.8%). There was a significant interaction between Coral species and Tissue type for the fatty acid 22:4n-6 (ANOVA, F2,54 = 5.620, p = 0.006), which was greater in host rather than symbiont tissues for both G. fascicularis and P. speciosa (p<0.001). Further, the fatty acid 22:5n-3 was greater in host P. verrucosa than host P. speciosa (ANOVA, F2,27 = 5.861, p = 0.008; Tukey p = 0.006). The fatty acid 20:4n-6 was significantly higher in coral hosts than symbionts (ANOVA, F2,54 = 4.135, p = 0.047). The factors Coral species and Tissue type also had a significant effect on the fatty acid 18:3n-6 (ANOVA, F2,54 = 3.459, p = 0.039), with differences between G. fascicularis host and symbionts (p<0.001). Overall, G. fascicularis and P. speciosa symbionts had similar proportions of the fatty acid 18:3n-6 (p = 0.190). The fatty acids 18:3n-6 (4.7–8.7%) and 18:4n-3 (5.2–6.9%) were higher in symbionts than in the coral hosts, in which the sum of both fatty acids was <3.5%. Very low proportions of 18:3n-3 were found in the symbionts (mean <0.1%) and this fatty acid was not found in any host samples. In addition to analyzing the proportion of fatty acids, the mass of total fatty acids per tissue type of each coral species was quantified. Symbionts had considerably higher mass (8–16 fold) of total fatty acids compared to their coral hosts (S2 Table).

4.2 Composition of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA)

A PCA was used to examine the PUFA composition of the coral hosts and symbionts (all 12 PUFA, S2 Table), with most important variables listed in order of higher to lower contribution. The 95% confidence interval ellipses showed separation of host P. verrucosa from host P. speciosa and host G. fascicularis (Fig 2A). Principal component Dim1 explained 38.4% of the host PUFA variability, with a majority of the contribution from n-6 PUFA (18:3n-6, 20:4n-6, 22:4n-6, 18:2n-6). Three n-3 PUFAs (22:5n-3, 22:6n-3, 20:4n-3) contributed the most to principal component Dim2, which explained 18.6% of the variability in the host PUFA composition. The fatty acid 20:5n-3 contributed to the similarity among the species along the Dim1 axis. In the PCA of symbiont PUFA, P. verrucosa symbionts were distinctly separated from P. speciosa symbionts and G. fascicularis symbionts, of which the latter two showed some overlap in their ellipses (Fig 2B). Both n-3 and n-6 PUFA (22:4n-6, 18:4n-3, 22:6n-3, 20:4n-6, 22:5n-3, 18:3n-3) contributed to the principal component Dim1, which explained 39.9% of the variability in symbiont PUFA composition. Symbiont PUFA composition was also explained by the principal component Dim2 (28.7%), with contributions from the fatty acids 20:4n-3, 18:2n-6, 18:3n-6, 20:5n-3, and 20:3n-6.

<h2>Comparison of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) composition among coral host species and associated symbionts.</h2>
Fig. 2.

Comparison of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) composition among coral host species and associated symbionts.


Principal component analysis based on the PUFA composition of Galaxea fascicularis, Pachyseris speciosa, and Pocillopora verrucosa a) coral hosts and b) their associated symbionts with 95% concentration ellipses.

4.3 Evaluating coral trophic strategies using fatty acid biomarker indices

An indicator of the degree of photosynthesis- versus animal-derived nutrient input (i.e., ratio of 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9) showed a higher ratio in the host and symbionts of P. speciosa compared to the host and symbionts of P. verrucosa and G. fascicularis (Fig 3). For the ratio of fatty acids 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9, there were significant differences among the coral host species (ANOVA, F2,27 = 17.74, p<0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed that host P. speciosa had significantly higher 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9 ratios than host G. fascicularis (p<0.001) and host P. verrucosa (p<0.001; Fig 3A). Similarly, there were significant differences in the ratio of 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9 among the symbionts (ANOVA, F2,27 = 43.8, p<0.001) with a higher ratio in P. speciosa symbionts compared to G. fascicularis symbionts (p<0.001) and P. verrucosa symbionts (p<0.001; Fig 3B).

<h2>Fatty acid indices in the context of coral trophic strategies.</h2>
Fig. 3.

Fatty acid indices in the context of coral trophic strategies.


Established fatty acid indices are applied in a novel context as potential indicators of coral trophic strategies (autotrophy versus heterotrophy). The ratio of fatty acids 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9 shows the relative proportion of photosynthesis-derived versus animal-derived nutrition for corals Galaxea fascicularis, Pachyseris speciosa, and Pocillopora verrucosa in their a) host tissues and b) symbiont tissues. An additional index of photosynthesis- versus animal-derived nutrition considers the input of typically photosynthesis-derived fatty acids (16:1n-7 and 18:1n-7) relative to typically animal-derived fatty acids (18:1n-9, 20:1n-9, and 22:1n-11) for c) coral host tissues and d) symbiont tissues. Statistical differences are designated within each boxplot with capital letters.

A related index of photosynthesis- (16:1n-7 and 18:1n-7) vs. animal-derived dietary input (18:1n-9, 20:1n-9, and 22:1n-11) differed among coral hosts (ANOVA, F2,27 = 11.76, p<0.001), with a lower ratio in host P. verrucosa compared to host P. speciosa (p<0.001) and host G. fascicularis (p = 0.012; Fig 3C). The photosynthesis- vs. animal-derived dietary input was also different among symbionts (ANOVA, F2,27 = 11.76, p<0.001), with a higher ratio in G. fascicularis symbionts (p<0.001) and P. speciosa symbionts (p = 0.003) compared to P. verrucosa symbionts (Fig 3D).

The effect of Coral species and Tissue type were tested by evaluating the sum of LC-MUFA as an index of potential heterotrophic feeding on copepods. Coral species affected the sum of the LC-MUFA among the coral hosts (ANOVA, F2,27 = 10.52, p<0.001) with host P. verrucosa having a higher proportion of the ΣLC-MUFA than host G. fascicularis (p<0.001) and host P. speciosa (p = 0.036) (Fig 4A). The proportion of the ΣLC-MUFA was the most variable in host P. speciosa. In symbionts, coral species also affected the proportion of ΣLC-MUFA (ANOVA, F2,27 = 28.35, p<0.001). The proportion of the ΣLC-MUFA in P. verrucosa symbionts was greater than P. speciosa symbionts (p = 0.011) and G. fascicularis symbionts (p<0.001) (Fig 4B). Further, the proportion of the ΣLC-MUFA was greater in P. speciosa symbionts than G. fascicularis symbionts (p<0.001).

<h2>Sum of long-chain monounsaturated fatty acids (LC-MUFA).</h2>
Fig. 4.

Sum of long-chain monounsaturated fatty acids (LC-MUFA).


The fatty acid index of the sum of LC-MUFA (Σ20:1 and Σ22:1, as percent of total fatty acids) was used to evaluate the relative proportion of nutrition derived from copepods for the corals Galaxea fascicularis, Pachyseris speciosa, and Pocillopora verrucosa in their a) host tissues and b) symbiont tissues. Statistical differences are designated within each boxplot with capital letters.

4.4 Estimating symbiont- and particulate-derived PUFA in coral hosts

A linear discriminant analysis was used to estimate the proportion of coral PUFA derived from various potential sources including symbionts and various particulate prey items including copepods and diatoms (Fig 5). Overall, 95% confidence intervals indicated that species-specific symbiont PUFA has a lower contribution (0–40%) to coral host PUFA for both G. fascicularis and P. verrucosa while the contribution of symbiont-derived PUFA was variable but may be more important (0–62%) for coral host P. speciosa. Particulate resources are likely an important source of PUFA for all coral hosts especially G. fascicularis and P. verrucosa (60–100%) as indicated by 95% confidence intervals. Between the particulate prey sources examined in the final model, copepod-derived PUFA was more important (mean 12 ± 5%) for host P. verrucosa compared to the other species (mean 1 ± 1%) while diatom-derived PUFA represented an important contribution to all three host species (mean 87%).

<h2>Linear discriminant analysis of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA).</h2>
Fig. 5.

Linear discriminant analysis of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA).


Linear discriminant analysis based on PUFA composition (18:2n-6, 18:3n-3, 18:3n-6, 18:4n-3, 20:4n-6, 20:5n-3, 22:6n-3) was used to estimate the proportional contribution of different sources of PUFA to the host PUFA composition of corals a) Galaxea fascicularis, b) Pachyseris speciosa, and c) Pocillopora verrucosa (95% confidence ellipses).

5. Discussion

Although the mixotrophic nature of symbiotic reef-building corals enables them to live across a variety of environmental conditions, the complexity of symbiosis poses challenges to deciphering the trophic strategies of reef-building corals. Indeed, symbiont type can influence host metabolism and trophic plasticity [64,65]. Biochemical tracers such as fatty acids are key to studying trophic ecology because multiple tracers can provide insight into the origin of dietary resources. Despite the difference in the total mass of fatty acids between coral hosts and symbionts, there were significant relationships in the proportions of 14 individual fatty acids (comprising 47% of total fatty acids). Although early studies showed that fatty acids were synthesized by symbionts and subsequently transferred to the coral host [66], the bidirectional interchange of fatty acids between a coral host and its symbionts is possible given that both partners can synthesize PUFA de novo [22] and/or obtain nutrients from the diet [5,19], with hosts capable of transferring PUFA to symbionts [27]. Our study used several approaches to assess the contribution of host heterotrophy and symbiont autotrophy to coral fatty acid composition.

5.1 Coral trophic strategies as defined by fatty acids

The ratio of 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9 fatty acids, which can reflect photosynthesis- versus animal-derived input, showed patterns that reflect differences in coral trophic strategies (Fig 3). The lower ratios of 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9 fatty acids in P. verrucosa and G. fascicularis corals are consistent with a greater contribution from heterotrophic feeding, which is supported by carbon stable isotopes and experimental feeding studies [50,67,68]. Heterotrophic feeding by G. fascicularis can support symbiont autotrophy [52,69], which is reflected by the different responses of G. fascicularis for the two related fatty acid indices (Fig 3). The more heterotrophic coral, P. verrucosa, had a lower index of photosynthesis- vs. animal-derived dietary input compared to the more autotrophic corals P. speciosa and G. fascicularis. As the fatty acid 22:5n-3 is typically found in higher proportions in asymbiotic corals (without photosynthetic symbionts) that exclusively rely on heterotrophic feeding [32,70], a higher proportion of 22:5n-3 indicates greater heterotrophy in host P. verrucosa compared to host P. speciosa. The coral P. speciosa had the highest ratio of 18:1n-7 to 18:1n-9, indicating a greater contribution from photosynthesis-derived products that may be due to higher symbiont autotrophy and/or nutrients from feeding on phytoplankton. Carbon stable isotope ratios and efficient photosynthesis across different light regimes have shown that autotrophy is the primary trophic strategy of P. speciosa [50,71,72]. Future directions include tracing the origin and relative proportion of energy from different sources [73], such as employing isotopic labeling to trace fatty acids from diverse potential prey.

Several lines of evidence provide support for heterotrophic feeding by P. verrucosa, which can capture prey with its polyps using nematocysts as well as through extruding a mucus web [67]. The sum of the LC-MUFA index indicated that host P. verrucosa had the highest proportion of fatty acids potentially derived from copepods, which is similar to previous results for this species from other reef systems [42]. In particular, there was a strong relationship in the proportion of the common marker for copepod feeding (20:1n-9) between P. verrucosa host and symbionts (S2H Fig). Further, the LDA model estimated that the mean PUFA contribution from copepods was greatest for the coral host P. verrucosa (12%) compared to the other coral species (1%). The convergence of MUFA and PUFA results provide strong support for P. verrucosa heterotrophic feeding. Indeed, pocilloporid corals consume a variety of taxa including copepods, microalgae, planktonic larvae, and rotifers [67,74] and water column primary productivity is an important driver of heterotrophy for Pocillopora species [75]. Despite the importance of plankton as a food source for marine fauna in the Maldives including corals and various megafauna [76], limited information is available about the plankton community in reef waters of the central Indian Ocean [77]. There is a clear need for research on plankton community composition and abundance throughout the reef water column across the Maldives archipelago.

Although PUFA composition is often used for coral chemotaxonomy [31,70], the application of PUFA composition in characterizing coral trophic strategies has yet to be addressed [28]. For coral hosts, n-3 PUFA contributed to the different clustering of the more heterotrophic P. verrucosa while n-6 PUFA drove the separation of the more autotrophic P. speciosa (Fig 2). Symbionts of P. verrucosa consisted of a distinct group in contrast to the clustering of P. speciosa and G. fascicularis symbionts (Fig 2). Symbionts are considered to be the primary source of 18:3n-6, which is found in higher proportions in symbionts than the host tissue [17,27]. In this study, the fatty acid 18:3n-6 was significantly higher in symbionts particularly in the more autotrophic corals G. fascicularis and P. speciosa (S2F Fig). Relatively higher proportions of 18:2n-6 in symbionts of the more autotrophic corals P. speciosa and G. fascicularis may indicate greater symbiont autotrophy compared to P. verrucosa symbionts as previous work has shown lower proportions of this fatty acid in symbionts under low light conditions [78]. In contrast, proportions of the longer chain n-6 PUFA (i.e., 20:4n-6 and 22:4n-6) were significantly higher in host tissue. Experimental evidence for host synthesis of fatty acid 22:4n-6 has been demonstrated in symbiotic anemones [25]. The fatty acid 22:4n-6 is typically abundant in coral host tissue [12,31,78], and has been suggested as a marker of the coral host [27].

5.2 Contribution of PUFA sources to coral host composition

To evaluate the extent of autotrophy and heterotrophy in corals, it is necessary to consider potential sources of fatty acids. Overall, each species of coral host showed a distinct composition of PUFA compared to likely sources of potential prey. PUFA derived from particulate resources was estimated to provide a greater contribution (60–100%) than symbiont-derived PUFA (0–40%) to host PUFA composition of P. verrucosa and G. fascicularis in particular. Indeed, previous work has shown a similar importance of heterotrophic carbon to coral nutrition [8,73,79]. Among the three species of coral hosts, a majority of PUFA (mean 87%) appeared to be derived from diatoms. The larger estimated contribution from diatom-derived fatty acids rather than copepod-derived fatty acids aligns with some of the passive feeding strategies exhibited by the corals (e.g., mucus webs, extracoelenteric feeding, mesenterial feeding) [74,80,81]. Despite the limited information on phytoplankton communities in tropical Indian Ocean reef waters, diatoms are among the dominant taxa recorded [61,82]. Phytoplankton can be an important source of nutrients for reef ecosystems [83,84]. Notably, diatom depletion can be greater than zooplankton depletion in some reef systems [85] and diatom-derived organic matter can be a source of nutrients for coral reef organisms such as sponges [86]. Although zooplankton have been typically considered the primary particulate food source for reef-building corals [2], the extent to which phytoplankton may contribute to coral nutrition remains poorly understood [87,88]. The fatty acid analyses in this study highlight the potential importance of phytoplankton, a source often overlooked in examining coral diets.

Our study demonstrates that the fatty acid composition of corals can be used to understand the trophic strategies of reef-building corals, with the fatty acid results aligning closely with previous carbon stable isotope results for the same three species [50]. Eight months following a thermal stress event in the Maldives, this study shows that PUFA from particulate sources appear to be a major resource for corals in particular G. fascicularis and P. verrucosa. High primary productivity supported by deep-water upwelling sustains relatively high coral heterotrophy in the Maldives relative to corals from less productive reef systems [75]. Whether coral heterotrophy reflects the status quo supported by the productive waters of the Maldives as opposed to a prolonged stress response (i.e., heterotrophic compensation) requires the regular monitoring of coral and symbiont fatty acid composition over time [89]. Mixotrophic organisms may become more heterotrophic under conditions of rising temperatures, but it is unclear if such changes in trophic behavior indicate underlying physiological stress as opposed to a measure of resilience [89,90]. Besides the general importance of heterotrophy in mixotrophic organisms, the ability of corals to obtain nutrients from different resources is critical when the symbiosis and the presumably major autotrophic energy source is compromised [79,91]. Our finding that symbionts have a greater mass of total fatty acids than coral host tissues is similar to previous work [17,92], and also is consistent with the potential depletion of host lipids following the 2016 global thermal stress event that caused mass coral bleaching across the Maldives [93,94]. Although thermal stress conditions can affect coral fatty acid composition and the expression of symbiont fatty acid desaturases [95,96], heterotrophic feeding can lessen the potential impact of thermal stress conditions on coral fatty acids [11]. In particular, feeding on PUFA-enriched particulate food sources can mitigate coral bleaching under thermal stress conditions [34]. Future work should investigate the potential effect of a trophic enrichment factor in the assimilation of fatty acids (host particulate feeding) as well as the synthesis and transfer of fatty acids between coral hosts and their symbionts under normal and thermal stress conditions. Given the frequency of thermal stress events that cause coral bleaching, it is especially important to characterize coral trophic strategies and investigate the mechanisms by which corals survive and recover as species-specific trophic strategies may underlie shifts in coral communities [97].

Supporting information

S1 Table [xlsx]
Collection sites.

S2 Table [xlsx]
Raw data total fatty acid composition.

S3 Table [xlsx]
Raw data polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA).

S4 Table [xlsx]
Linear discriminant analysis source classification.

S1 Fig [red]
Proportional differences in coral host and symbiont fatty acids.

S2 Fig [red]
Relationship between coral host and symbiont fatty acid proportions.

S3 Fig [red]
Relationship between the proportions of coral host and symbiont long-chain monounsaturated fatty acids.

S4 Fig [lda]
Linear discriminant analysis considering cultured symbionts.


Zdroje

1. Frankowiak K, Wang XT, Sigman DM, Gothmann AM, Kitahara M V., Mazur M, et al. Photosymbiosis and the expansion of shallow-water corals. Sci Adv. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2016;2: e1601122–e1601122. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601122 27847868

2. Goreau TF, Goreau NI, Yonge CM. Reef corals: autotrophs or heterotrophs? Biol Bull. 1971;141: 247–260. Available: http://www.biolbull.org/content/141/2/247.short

3. Muscatine L, Porter JW, Kaplan IR. Resource partitioning by reef corals as determined from stable isotope composition: I. d13C of zooxanthellae and animal tissue vs depth. Mar Biol. 1989;100: 185–193. doi: 10.1007/BF00391957

4. Anthony KR., Fabricius KE. Shifting roles of heterotrophy and autotrophy in coral energetics under varying turbidity. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2000;252: 221–253. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00237-9 10967335

5. Houlbrèque F, Ferrier-Pagès C. Heterotrophy in tropical scleractinian corals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009;84: 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00058.x 19046402

6. Houlbrèque F, Tambutté E, Allemand D, Ferrier-Pagès C. Interactions between zooplankton feeding, photosynthesis and skeletal growth in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata. J Exp Biol. The Company of Biologists Ltd; 2004;207: 1461–9. doi: 10.1242/JEB.00911 15037640

7. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Williamson J. Availability of two forms of dissolved nitrogen to the coral Pocillopora damicornis and its symbiotic zooxanthellae. Mar Biol. 1999; Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s002270050496

8. Palardy JE, Rodrigues LJ, Grottoli AG. The importance of zooplankton to the daily metabolic carbon requirements of healthy and bleached corals at two depths. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2008;367: 180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.09.015

9. Rodrigues LJ, Grottoli AG, Pease TK. Lipid class composition of bleached and recovering Porites compressa Dana, 1846 and Montipora capitata Dana, 1846 corals from Hawaii. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2008;358: 136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.02.004

10. Harland AD, Navarro JC, Spencer Davies P, Fixter LM. Lipids of some Caribbean and Red Sea corals: total lipid, wax esters, triglycerides and fatty acids. Mar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 1993;117: 113–117. doi: 10.1007/BF00346432

11. Tolosa I, Treignier C, Grover R, Ferrier-Pagès C. Impact of feeding and short-term temperature stress on the content and isotopic signature of fatty acids, sterols, and alcohols in the scleractinian coral Turbinaria reniformis. Coral Reefs. Springer-Verlag; 2011;30: 763–774. doi: 10.1007/s00338-011-0753-3

12. Treignier C, Grover R, Ferrier-Pagès C, Tolosa I. Effect of light and feeding on the fatty acid and sterol composition of zooxanthellae and host tissue isolated from the scleractinian coral Turbinaria reniformis. Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53: 2702–2710. doi: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.6.2702

13. Teece MA, Estes B, Gelsleichter E, Lirman D. Heterotrophic and autotrophic assimilation of fatty acids by two scleractinian corals, Montastraea faveolata and Porites astreoides. Limnol Oceanogr. 2011;56: 1285–1296. doi: 10.4319/lo.2011.56.4.1285

14. Gurr MI, Harwood JL, Frayn KN. Lipid biochemistry. 5th ed. Blackwell Science; 2002. doi: 10.1002/9780470774366

15. Furla P, Allemand D, Shick JM, Ferrier-Pagès C, Richier S, Plantivaux A, et al. The Symbiotic Anthozoan: A Physiological Chimera between Alga and Animal. Integr Comp Biol. Oxford University Press; 2005;45: 595–604. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.4.595 21676806

16. Patton JS, Abraham S, Benson AA. Lipogenesis in the intact coral Pocillopora capitata and its isolated zooxanthellae: Evidence for a light-driven carbon cycle between symbiont and host. Mar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 1977;44: 235–247. doi: 10.1007/BF00387705

17. Chen H-K, Song S-N, Wang L-H, Mayfield AB, Chen Y-J, Chen W-NU, et al. A Compartmental Comparison of Major Lipid Species in a Coral-Symbiodinium Endosymbiosis: Evidence that the Coral Host Regulates Lipogenesis of Its Cytosolic Lipid Bodies. Pond DW, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0132519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132519 26218797

18. Wang L-H, Chen H-K, Jhu C-S, Cheng J-O, Fang L-S, Chen C-S. Different strategies of energy storage in cultured and freshly isolated Symbiodinium sp. Cock M, editor. J Phycol. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2015;51: 1127–1136. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12349 26987007

19. Jeong H, Yoo Y, Kang N, Lim A, Seong K, Lee S, et al. Heterotrophic feeding as a newly identified survival strategy of the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109: 12604–12609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204302109 22814379

20. Lesser MP, Stat M, Gates RD. The endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium sp.) of corals are parasites and mutualists. Coral Reefs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013;32: 603–611. doi: 10.1007/s00338-013-1051-z

21. Xiang T, Hambleton EA, DeNofrio JC, Pringle JR, Grossman AR. Isolation of clonal axenic strains of the symbiotic dinoflagellate Symbiodinium and their growth and host specificity. J Phycol. 2013;49: 447–458. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12055 27007034

22. Kabeya N, Fonseca MM, Ferrier DEK, Navarro JC, Bay LK, Francis DS, et al. Genes for de novo biosynthesis of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are widespread in animals. Sci Adv. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2018;4: EAAR6849. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar6849 29732410

23. Monroig Ó, Tocher D, Navarro J. Biosynthesis of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Marine Invertebrates: Recent Advances in Molecular Mechanisms. Mar Drugs. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2013;11: 3998–4018. doi: 10.3390/md11103998 24152561

24. Monroig Ó, Kabeya N. Desaturases and elongases involved in polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in aquatic invertebrates: a comprehensive review. Fish Sci. Springer Japan; 2018;84: 911–928. doi: 10.1007/s12562-018-1254-x

25. Dunn SR, Thomas MC, Nette GW, Dove SG. A Lipidomic Approach to Understanding Free Fatty Acid Lipogenesis Derived from Dissolved Inorganic Carbon within Cnidarian-Dinoflagellate Symbiosis. Voolstra CR, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2012;7: e46801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046801 23115631

26. Papina M, Meziane T, van Woesik R. Symbiotic zooxanthellae provide the host-coral Montipora digitata with polyunsaturated fatty acids. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;135: 533–7. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00118-0

27. Imbs AB, Yakovleva IM, Dautova TN, Bui LH, Jones P. Diversity of fatty acid composition of symbiotic dinoflagellates in corals: Evidence for the transfer of host PUFAs to the symbionts. Phytochemistry. Pergamon; 2014;101: 76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.02.012 24612930

28. Meyers PA. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in corals: indicators of nutritional sources. Mar Biol Lett. 1979;1: 69–75.

29. Galloway AWE, Winder M. Partitioning the Relative Importance of Phylogeny and Environmental Conditions on Phytoplankton Fatty Acids. Quigg A, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0130053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130053 26076015

30. Brett MT, Müller-Navarra DC, Persson J. Crustacean zooplankton fatty acid composition. Lipids in Aquatic Ecosystems. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009. pp. 115–146. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-89366-2_6

31. Imbs AB, Demidkova DA, Latypov YY, Pham LQ. Application of Fatty Acids for Chemotaxonomy of Reef-Building Corals. Lipids. 2007;42: 1035–1046. doi: 10.1007/s11745-007-3109-6 17710463

32. Imbs A, Latyshev N, Dautova T, Latypov Y. Distribution of lipids and fatty acids in corals by their taxonomic position and presence of zooxanthellae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;409: 65–75. doi: 10.3354/meps08622

33. Budge SM, Iverson SJ, Koopman HN. Studying trophic ecology in marine ecosystems using fatty acids: a primer on analysis and interpretation. Mar Mammal Sci. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2006;22: 759–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2006.00079.x

34. Tagliafico A, Rudd D, Rangel M, Kelaher B, Christidis L, Cowden K, et al. Lipid-enriched diets reduce the impacts of thermal stress in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017;573: 129–141. doi: 10.3354/meps12177

35. Dalsgaard J, St John M, Kattner G, Müller-Navarra D, Hagen W. Fatty acid trophic markers in the pelagic marine environment. Adv Mar Biol. 2003;46: 225–340. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14601414 14601414

36. Schukat A, Auel H, Teuber L, Lahajnar N, Hagen W. Complex trophic interactions of calanoid copepods in the Benguela upwelling system. J Sea Res. Elsevier; 2014;85: 186–196. doi: 10.1016/J.SEARES.2013.04.018

37. Graeve M, Kattner G, Piepenburg D. Lipids in Arctic benthos: does the fatty acid and alcohol composition reflect feeding and trophic interactions? Polar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 1997;18: 53–61. doi: 10.1007/s003000050158

38. Mansour MP, Volkman JK, Jackson AE, Blackburn SI. THE FATTY ACID AND STEROL COMPOSITION OF FIVE MARINE DINOFLAGELLATES. J Phycol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 1999;35: 710–720. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3540710.x

39. Matthews JL, Oakley CA, Lutz A, Hillyer KE, Roessner U, Grossman AR, et al. Partner switching and metabolic flux in a model cnidarian–dinoflagellate symbiosis. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. The Royal Society; 2018;285: 20182336. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2336 30487315

40. Sargent JR, Falk-Petersen S. Ecological investigations on the zooplankton community in balsfjorden, northern Norway: Lipids and fatty acids in Meganyctiphanes norvegica, Thysanoessa raschi and T. inermis during mid-winter. Mar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 1981;62: 131–137. doi: 10.1007/BF00388175

41. Kattner G, Hagen W. Lipids in marine copepods: latitudinal characteristics and perspective to global warming. Lipids in Aquatic Ecosystems. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009. pp. 257–280. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-89366-2_11

42. Latyshev NA, Naumenko N V., Svetashev VI, Latypov YY. Fatty acids of reef-building corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991;76: 295–301. Available: http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/76/m076p295.pdf

43. Al-Moghrabi S, Allemand D, Couret JM, Jaubert J. Fatty acids of the scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis: effect of light and feeding. J Comp Physiol B. 1995;165: 183–192. doi: 10.1007/BF00260809

44. Mortillaro JM, Pitt KA, Lee SY, Meziane T. Light intensity influences the production and translocation of fatty acids by zooxanthellae in the jellyfish Cassiopea sp. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. Elsevier; 2009;378: 22–30. doi: 10.1016/J.JEMBE.2009.07.003

45. Dodds L, Black K, Orr H, Roberts J. Lipid biomarkers reveal geographical differences in food supply to the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa (Scleractinia). Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2009;397: 113–124. doi: 10.3354/meps08143

46. Sebens KP, Vandersall KS, Savina LA, Graham KR. Zooplankton capture by two scleractinian corals, Madracis mirabilis and Montastrea cavernosa, in a field enclosure. Mar Biol. 1996;127: 303–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00942116

47. Rocker MM, Francis DS, Fabricius KE, Willis BL, Bay LK. Temporal and spatial variation in fatty acid composition in Acropora tenuis corals along water quality gradients on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2019; 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00338-019-01768-x

48. Morales-Ramírez A, Murillo MM. Distribution, abundance and composition of coral reef zooplankton, Cahuita National Park, Limon, Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop. 1996;44: 619–630. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v44i3.30924

49. Nakajima R, Yamazaki H, Lewis LS, Khen A, Smith JE, Nakatomi N, et al. Planktonic trophic structure in a coral reef ecosystem–Grazing versus microbial food webs and the production of mesozooplankton. Prog Oceanogr. 2017;156: 104–120. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2017.06.007

50. Radice VZ, Hoegh‐Guldberg O, Fry B, Fox MD, Dove SG. Upwelling as the major source of nitrogen for shallow and deep reef‐building corals across an oceanic atoll system. Dorrepaal E, editor. Funct Ecol. 2019; 1635–2435.13314. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13314

51. Meyers PA, Porter JW, Chad RL. Depth analysis of fatty acids in two caribbean reef corals. Mar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 1978;49: 197–202. doi: 10.1007/BF00391131

52. Ferrier-Pagès C, Rottier C, Beraud E, Levy O. Experimental assessment of the feeding effort of three scleractinian coral species during a thermal stress: Effect on the rates of photosynthesis. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2010;390: 118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.05.007

53. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226: 497–509. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13428781 13428781

54. Taipale S, Strandberg U, Peltomaa E, Galloway A, Ojala A, Brett M. Fatty acid composition as biomarkers of freshwater microalgae: analysis of 37 strains of microalgae in 22 genera and in seven classes. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2013;71: 165–178. doi: 10.3354/ame01671

55. Taipale SJ, Kainz MJ, Brett MT. Diet-switching experiments show rapid accumulation and preferential retention of highly unsaturated fatty acids in Daphnia. Oikos. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2011;120: 1674–1682. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19415.x

56. Lowe A. Local ecological modulation of global environmental change and its influence on benthic foundation species. University of Washington. 2018.

57. Howell KL, Pond DW, Billett DSM, Tyler PA. Feeding ecology of deep-sea seastars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): a fatty-acid biomarker approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003;255: 193–206.

58. R-Core-Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Available: https://www.r-project.org

59. Le S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. J Stat Softw. 2008;25: 1–18. doi: 10.18637/jss.v025.i01

60. Kassambara A, Mundt F. factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses [Internet]. 2017. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/package=factoextra

61. Stanca E, Roselli L, Durante G, Seveso D, Galli P, Basset A. A checklist of phytoplankton species in the Faafu atoll (Republic of Maldives). Transitional Waters Bull. 2013;7: 133–144. doi: 10.1285/I1825229XV7N2P133

62. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth. New York: Springer; 2002.

63. Fox MD, Smith EA, Smith JE, Newsome SD. Trophic plasticity in a common reef-building coral: Insights from d13C analysis of essential amino acids (Accepted). Funct Ecol. 2019;

64. Leal MC, Hoadley K, Pettay DT, Grajales A, Calado R, Warner ME. Symbiont type influences trophic plasticity of a model cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. J Exp Biol. 2015;218: 858–63. doi: 10.1242/jeb.115519 25617454

65. Matthews JL, Crowder CM, Oakley CA, Lutz A, Roessner U, Meyer E, et al. Optimal nutrient exchange and immune responses operate in partner specificity in the cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. National Academy of Sciences; 2017;114: 13194–13199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710733114 29158383

66. Schlichter D, Kremer BP, Svoboda A. Zooxanthellae providing assimilatory power for the incorporation of exogenous acetate in Heteroxenia fuscescens (Cnidaria: Alcyonaria). Mar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 1984;83: 277–286. doi: 10.1007/BF00397460

67. Séré MG, Massé LM, Perissinotto R, Schleyer MH. Influence of heterotrophic feeding on the sexual reproduction of Pocillopora verrucosa in aquaria. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. Elsevier; 2010;395: 63–71. doi: 10.1016/J.JEMBE.2010.08.014

68. Hoogenboom M, Rottier C, Sikorski S, Ferrier-Pagès C. Among-species variation in the energy budgets of reef-building corals: scaling from coral polyps to communities. J Exp Biol. 2015;218: 3866–77. doi: 10.1242/jeb.124396 26486359

69. Lim C-S, Bachok Z, Hii Y-S. Effects of supplementary polyunsaturated fatty acids on the health of the scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis (Linnaeus, 1767). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2017;491: 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2017.02.009

70. Figueiredo C, Baptista M, Rosa IC, Lopes AR, Dionísio G, Rocha RJM, et al. 3D chemoecology and chemotaxonomy of corals using fatty acid biomarkers: Latitude, longitude and depth. Biochem Syst Ecol. Pergamon; 2017;70: 35–42. doi: 10.1016/J.BSE.2016.10.016

71. Cooper TF, Ulstrup KE, Dandan SS, Heyward AJ, Kühl M, Muirhead A, et al. Niche specialization of reef-building corals in the mesophotic zone: metabolic trade-offs between divergent Symbiodinium types. Proc Biol Sci. The Royal Society; 2011;278: 1840–50. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2321 21106586

72. Browne N, Precht E, Last K, Todd P. Photo-physiological costs associated with acute sediment stress events in three near-shore turbid water corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2014;502: 129–143. doi: 10.3354/meps10714

73. Tremblay P, Maguer JF, Grover R, Ferrier-Pagès C. Trophic dynamics of scleractinian corals: stable isotope evidence. J Exp Biol. 2015;218: 1223–34. doi: 10.1242/jeb.115303 25722004

74. Leray M, Alldredge AL, Yang JY, Meyer CP, Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ, et al. Dietary partitioning promotes the coexistence of planktivorous species on coral reefs. Mol Ecol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2019; mec.15090. doi: 10.1111/mec.15090

75. Fox MD, Williams GJ, Johnson MD, Radice VZ, Zgliczynski BJ, Kelly ELA, et al. Gradients in Primary Production Predict Trophic Strategies of Mixotrophic Corals across Spatial Scales. Curr Biol. Cell Press; 2018;28: 3355–3363.e4. doi: 10.1016/J.CUB.2018.08.057

76. Anderson R, Adam M, Goes J. From monsoons to mantas: seasonal distribution of Manta alfredi in the Maldives. Fish Oceanogr. 2011;20: 104–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2011.00571.x

77. Vinogradov ME, Voronina N. The distribution of different groups of plankton in accordance with their trophic level in the Indian Equatorial Current Area (No. 33). Raport et Proces- Verbaux des Reunions (Vol 153). 1962. pp. 200–205.

78. Papina M, Meziane T, van Woesik R. Acclimation effect on fatty acids of the coral Montipora digitata and its symbiotic algae. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;147: 583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2007.02.011

79. Grottoli AG, Rodrigues LJ, Palardy JE. Heterotrophic plasticity and resilience in bleached corals. Nature. 2006;440: 1186–9. doi: 10.1038/nature04565 16641995

80. Stafford-Smith M, Ormond R. Sediment-rejection mechanisms of 42 species of Australian scleractinian corals. Mar Freshw Res. 1992;43: 683. doi: 10.1071/MF9920683

81. Wijgerde T, Diantari R, Lewaru MW, Verreth JAJ, Osinga R. Extracoelenteric zooplankton feeding is a key mechanism of nutrient acquisition for the scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis. J Exp Biol. 2011;214: 3351–7. doi: 10.1242/jeb.058354 21957098

82. Leonilde R, Elena L, Elena S, Francesco C, Alberto B. Individual trait variation in phytoplankton communities across multiple spatial scales. J Plankton Res. Oxford University Press; 2017;39: 577–588. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbx001

83. Ayukai T. Retention of phytoplankton and planktonic microbes on coral reefs within the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs. Springer-Verlag; 1995;14: 141–147. doi: 10.1007/BF00367231

84. Genin A, Monismith SG, Reidenbach MA, Yahel G, Koseff JR. Intense benthic grazing of phytoplankton in a coral reef. Limnol Oceanogr. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009;54: 938–951. doi: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.3.0938

85. Glynn PW. Ecology of a Caribbean coral reef. The Porites reef-flat biotope: Part II. Plankton community with evidence for depletion. Mar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 1973;22: 1–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00388905

86. de Goeij JM, Moodley L, Houtekamer M, Carballeira NM, van Duyl FC. Tracing 13C-enriched dissolved and particulate organic carbon in the bacteria-containing coral reef sponge Halisarca caerulea: Evidence for DOM-feeding. Limnol Oceanogr. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008;53: 1376–1386. doi: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.4.1376

87. Seemann J, Carballo-Bolaños R, Berry KL, González CT, Richter C, Leinfelder RR. Importance of heterotrophic adaptations of corals to maintain energy reserves. Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium. 2012. pp. 1–6.

88. Leal MC, Ferrier-Pagès C, Calado R, Thompson ME, Frischer ME, Nejstgaard JC. Coral feeding on microalgae assessed with molecular trophic markers. Mol Ecol. 2014;23: 3870–3876. doi: 10.1111/mec.12486 24112432

89. Hughes AD, Grottoli AG. Heterotrophic compensation: a possible mechanism for resilience of coral reefs to global warming or a sign of prolonged stress? PLoS One. 2013;8: e81172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081172 24278392

90. Wilken S, Huisman J, Naus-Wiezer S, Van Donk E. Mixotrophic organisms become more heterotrophic with rising temperature. Fussmann G, editor. Ecol Lett. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2013;16: 225–233. doi: 10.1111/ele.12033 23173644

91. Tremblay P, Gori A, Maguer JF, Hoogenboom M, Ferrier-Pagès C. Heterotrophy promotes the re-establishment of photosynthate translocation in a symbiotic coral after heat stress. Sci Rep. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;6: 38112. doi: 10.1038/srep38112 27917888

92. Quesada A, Schoo K, Bingham B. Effect of symbiotic state on the fatty acid composition of Anthopleura elegantissima. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2016;545: 175–187. doi: 10.3354/meps11606

93. Grottoli AG, Rodrigues LJ, Juarez C. Lipids and stable carbon isotopes in two species of Hawaiian corals, Porites compressa and Montipora verrucosa, following a bleaching event. Mar Biol. Springer-Verlag; 2004;145: 621–631. doi: 10.1007/s00227-004-1337-3

94. Ibrahim N, Mohamed M, Basheer A, Ismail H, Nistharan F, Schmidt A, et al. Status of Coral Bleaching in the Maldives in 2016. Malé, Maldives; 2017.

95. Bachok Z, Mfilinge P, Tsuchiya M. Characterization of fatty acid composition in healthy and bleached corals from Okinawa, Japan. Coral Reefs. Springer-Verlag; 2006;25: 545–554. doi: 10.1007/s00338-006-0130-9

96. Gierz SL, Forêt S, Leggat W. Transcriptomic Analysis of Thermally Stressed Symbiodinium Reveals Differential Expression of Stress and Metabolism Genes. Front Plant Sci. Frontiers; 2017;8: 271. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00271 28293249

97. Schoepf V, Grottoli AG, Levas SJ, Aschaffenburg MD, Baumann JH, Matsui Y, et al. Annual coral bleaching and the long-term recovery capacity of coral. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 2015;282: 20151887.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 9