1. LeachDR (1994) Long DNA palindromes, cruciform structures, genetic instability and secondary structure repair. Bioessays 16: 893–900.
2. GordeninDA, LobachevKS, DegtyarevaNP, MalkovaAL, PerkinsE, et al. (1993) Inverted DNA repeats: a source of eukaryotic genomic instability. Mol Cell Biol 13: 5315–5322.
3. RuskinB, FinkGR (1993) Mutations in POL1 increase the mitotic instability of tandem inverted repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 134: 43–56.
4. LobachevKS, ShorBM, TranHT, TaylorW, KeenJD, et al. (1998) Factors affecting inverted repeat stimulation of recombination and deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 148: 1507–1524.
5. LobachevKS, GordeninDA, ResnickMA (2002) The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 108: 183–193.
6. NarayananV, MieczkowskiPA, KimHM, PetesTD, LobachevKS (2006) The pattern of gene amplification is determined by the chromosomal location of hairpin-capped breaks. Cell 125: 1283–1296.
7. LemoineFJ, DegtyarevaNP, LobachevK, PetesTD (2005) Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120: 587–598.
8. FarahJA, HartsuikerE, MizunoK, OhtaK, SmithGR (2002) A 160-bp palindrome is a Rad50.Rad32-dependent mitotic recombination hotspot in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 161: 461–468.
9. LobachevKS, StengerJE, KozyrevaOG, JurkaJ, GordeninDA, et al. (2000) Inverted Alu repeats unstable in yeast are excluded from the human genome. EMBO J 19: 3822–3830.
10. AkgunE, ZahnJ, BaumesS, BrownG, LiangF, et al. (1997) Palindrome resolution and recombination in the mammalian germ line. Mol Cell Biol 17: 5559–5570.
11. WaldmanAS, TranH, GoldsmithEC, ResnickMA (1999) Long inverted repeats are an at-risk motif for recombination in mammalian cells. Genetics 153: 1873–1883.
12. CollickA, DrewJ, PenberthJ, BoisP, LuckettJ, et al. (1996) Instability of long inverted repeats within mouse transgenes. EMBO J 15: 1163–1171.
13. Kehrer-SawatzkiH, HausslerJ, KroneW, BodeH, JenneDE, et al. (1997) The second case of a t(17;22) in a family with neurofibromatosis type 1: sequence analysis of the breakpoint regions. Hum Genet 99: 237–247.
14. KurahashiH, ShaikhT, TakataM, TodaT, EmanuelBS (2003) The constitutional t(17;22): another translocation mediated by palindromic AT-rich repeats. Am J Hum Genet 72: 733–738.
15. NimmakayaluMA, GotterAL, ShaikhTH, EmanuelBS (2003) A novel sequence-based approach to localize translocation breakpoints identifies the molecular basis of a t(4;22). Hum Mol Genet 12: 2817–2825.
16. GotterAL, ShaikhTH, BudarfML, RhodesCH, EmanuelBS (2004) A palindrome-mediated mechanism distinguishes translocations involving LCR-B of chromosome 22q11.2. Hum Mol Genet 13: 103–115.
17. GotterAL, NimmakayaluMA, JalaliGR, HackerAM, VorstmanJ, et al. (2007) A palindrome-driven complex rearrangement of 22q11.2 and 8q24.1 elucidated using novel technologies. Genome Res 17: 470–481.
18. SheridanMB, KatoT, Haldeman-EnglertC, JalaliGR, MilunskyJM, et al. (2010) A palindrome-mediated recurrent translocation with 3∶1 meiotic nondisjunction: the t(8;22)(q24.13;q11.21). Am J Hum Genet 87: 209–218.
19. RooksH, ClarkB, BestS, RushtonP, OakleyM, et al. (2012) A novel 506 kb deletion causing epsilongammadeltabeta thalassemia. Blood Cells Mol Dis 49: 121–127.
20. ZhuH, ShangD, SunM, ChoiS, LiuQ, et al. (2011) X-linked congenital hypertrichosis syndrome is associated with interchromosomal insertions mediated by a human-specific palindrome near SOX3. Am J Hum Genet 88: 819–826.
21. TanakaH, BergstromDA, YaoMC, TapscottSJ (2005) Widespread and nonrandom distribution of DNA palindromes in cancer cells provides a structural platform for subsequent gene amplification. Nat Genet 37: 320–327.
22. TanakaH, BergstromDA, YaoMC, TapscottSJ (2006) Large DNA palindromes as a common form of structural chromosome aberrations in human cancers. Hum Cell 19: 17–23.
23. TanakaH, CaoY, BergstromDA, KooperbergC, TapscottSJ, et al. (2007) Intrastrand annealing leads to the formation of a large DNA palindrome and determines the boundaries of genomic amplification in human cancer. Mol Cell Biol 27: 1993–2002.
24. GuenthoerJ, DiedeSJ, TanakaH, ChaiX, HsuL, et al. (2012) Assessment of palindromes as platforms for DNA amplification in breast cancer. Genome Res 22: 232–245.
25. NeimanPE, KimmelR, IcreverziA, ElsaesserK, BowersSJ, et al. (2006) Genomic instability during Myc-induced lymphomagenesis in the bursa of Fabricius. Oncogene 25: 6325–6335.
26. NeimanPE, ElsaesserK, LoringG, KimmelR (2008) Myc oncogene-induced genomic instability: DNA palindromes in bursal lymphomagenesis. PLoS Genet 4: e1000132.
27. ManganoR, PiddiniE, CarramusaL, DuhigT, FeoS, et al. (1998) Chimeric amplicons containing the c-myc gene in HL60 cells. Oncogene 17: 2771–2777.
28. FordM, FriedM (1986) Large inverted duplications are associated with gene amplification. Cell 45: 425–430.
29. ConnellyJC, LeachDR (1996) The sbcC and sbcD genes of Escherichia coli encode a nuclease involved in palindrome inviability and genetic recombination. Genes Cells 1: 285–291.
30. LeachDR, OkelyEA, PinderDJ (1997) Repair by recombination of DNA containing a palindromic sequence. Mol Microbiol 26: 597–606.
31. CromieGA, MillarCB, SchmidtKH, LeachDR (2000) Palindromes as substrates for multiple pathways of recombination in Escherichia coli. Genetics 154: 513–522.
32. EykelenboomJK, BlackwoodJK, OkelyE, LeachDR (2008) SbcCD causes a double-strand break at a DNA palindrome in the Escherichia coli chromosome. Mol Cell 29: 644–651.
33. DarmonE, EykelenboomJK, LinckerF, JonesLH, WhiteM, et al. (2010) E. coli SbcCD and RecA control chromosomal rearrangement induced by an interrupted palindrome. Mol Cell 39: 59–70.
34. FarahJA, CromieG, SteinerWW, SmithGR (2005) A novel recombination pathway initiated by the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex eliminates palindromes during meiosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 169: 1261–1274.
35. CasperAM, GreenwellPW, TangW, PetesTD (2009) Chromosome aberrations resulting from double-strand DNA breaks at a naturally occurring yeast fragile site composed of inverted ty elements are independent of Mre11p and Sae2p. Genetics 183: 423–426SI, 423-439, 421SI-426SI.
36. CoteAG, LewisSM (2008) Mus81-dependent double-strand DNA breaks at in vivo-generated cruciform structures in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 31: 800–812.
37. KurahashiH, InagakiH, OhyeT, KogoH, KatoT, et al. (2006) Palindrome-mediated chromosomal translocations in humans. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 1136–1145.
38. KogoH, InagakiH, OhyeT, KatoT, EmanuelBS, et al. (2007) Cruciform extrusion propensity of human translocation-mediating palindromic AT-rich repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 1198–1208.
39. KurahashiH, EmanuelBS (2001) Unexpectedly high rate of de novo constitutional t(11;22) translocations in sperm from normal males. Nat Genet 29: 139–140.
40. InagakiH, OhyeT, KogoH, TsutsumiM, KatoT, et al. (2013) Two sequential cleavage reactions on cruciform DNA structures cause palindrome-mediated chromosomal translocations. Nat Commun 4: 1592.
41. StengerJE, LobachevKS, GordeninD, DardenTA, JurkaJ, et al. (2001) Biased distribution of inverted and direct Alus in the human genome: implications for insertion, exclusion, and genome stability. Genome Res 11: 12–27.
42. TongAH, EvangelistaM, ParsonsAB, XuH, BaderGD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364–2368.
43. ZhangY, ShishkinAA, NishidaY, Marcinkowski-DesmondD, SainiN, et al. (2012) Genome-wide screen identifies pathways that govern GAA/TTC repeat fragility and expansions in dividing and nondividing yeast cells. Mol Cell 48: 254–265.
44. BelliG, GariE, AldeaM, HerreroE (1998) Functional analysis of yeast essential genes using a promoter-substitution cassette and the tetracycline-regulatable dual expression system. Yeast 14: 1127–1138.
45. AlcasabasAA, OsbornAJ, BachantJ, HuF, WerlerPJ, et al. (2001) Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol 3: 958–965.
46. OsbornAJ, ElledgeSJ (2003) Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 17: 1755–1767.
47. Navadgi-PatilVM, BurgersPM (2009) A tale of two tails: activation of DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1/ATR by the 9-1-1 clamp and by Dpb11/TopBP1. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 996–1003.
48. StehlingO, VashishtAA, MascarenhasJ, JonssonZO, SharmaT, et al. (2012) MMS19 assembles iron-sulfur proteins required for DNA metabolism and genomic integrity. Science 337: 195–199.
49. GariK, Leon OrtizAM, BorelV, FlynnH, SkehelJM, et al. (2012) MMS19 links cytoplasmic iron-sulfur cluster assembly to DNA metabolism. Science 337: 243–245.
50. KerrestA, AnandRP, SundararajanR, BermejoR, LiberiG, et al. (2009) SRS2 and SGS1 prevent chromosomal breaks and stabilize triplet repeats by restraining recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 159–167.
51. AshtonTM, HicksonID (2010) Yeast as a model system to study RecQ helicase function. DNA Repair (Amst) 9: 303–314.
52. MankouriHW, HicksonID (2007) The RecQ helicase-topoisomerase III-Rmi1 complex: a DNA structure-specific ‘dissolvasome’? Trends Biochem Sci 32: 538–546.
53. GrandinN, DamonC, CharbonneauM (2001) Ten1 functions in telomere end protection and length regulation in association with Stn1 and Cdc13. EMBO J 20: 1173–1183.
54. MimitouEP, SymingtonLS (2010) Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J 29: 3358–3369.
55. AylonY, KupiecM (2003) The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice. Mol Cell Biol 23: 6585–6596.
56. LeeSE, MooreJK, HolmesA, UmezuK, KolodnerRD, et al. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94: 399–409.
57. SandellLL, ZakianVA (1993) Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75: 729–739.
58. GordeninDA, MalkovaAL, PeterzenA, KulikovVN, PavlovYI, et al. (1992) Transposon Tn5 excision in yeast: influence of DNA polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon and repair genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 3785–3789.
59. WuPY, NurseP (2009) Establishing the program of origin firing during S phase in fission Yeast. Cell 136: 852–864.
60. LetessierA, MillotGA, KoundrioukoffS, LachagesAM, VogtN, et al. (2011) Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site. Nature 470: 120–123.
61. NetzDJ, StithCM, StumpfigM, KopfG, VogelD, et al. (2012) Eukaryotic DNA polymerases require an iron-sulfur cluster for the formation of active complexes. Nat Chem Biol 8: 125–132.
62. KatouY, KanohY, BandoM, NoguchiH, TanakaH, et al. (2003) S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424: 1078–1083.
63. ZegermanP, DiffleyJF (2003) Lessons in how to hold a fork. Nat Struct Biol 10: 778–779.
64. TourriereH, VersiniG, Cordon-PreciadoV, AlabertC, PaseroP (2005) Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 19: 699–706.
65. BhattacharyyaS, LahueRS (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 DNA helicase selectively blocks expansions of trinucleotide repeats. Mol Cell Biol 24: 7324–7330.
66. CejkaP, PlankJL, BachratiCZ, HicksonID, KowalczykowskiSC (2010) Rmi1 stimulates decatenation of double Holliday junctions during dissolution by Sgs1-Top3. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1377–1382.
67. GrandinN, BaillyA, CharbonneauM (2005) Activation of Mrc1, a mediator of the replication checkpoint, by telomere erosion. Biol Cell 97: 799–814.
68. TsolouA, LydallD (2007) Mrc1 protects uncapped budding yeast telomeres from exonuclease EXO1. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 1607–1617.
69. SunJ, YuEY, YangYT, ConferLA, SunSH, et al. (2009) Stn1-Ten1 is an Rpa2-Rpa3-like complex at telomeres. Genes Dev 23: 2900–2914.
70. MiyakeY, NakamuraM, NabetaniA, ShimamuraS, TamuraM, et al. (2009) RPA-like mammalian Ctc1-Stn1-Ten1 complex binds to single-stranded DNA and protects telomeres independently of the Pot1 pathway. Mol Cell 36: 193–206.
71. GrossiS, PuglisiA, DmitrievPV, LopesM, ShoreD (2004) Pol12, the B subunit of DNA polymerase alpha, functions in both telomere capping and length regulation. Genes Dev 18: 992–1006.
72. QiH, ZakianVA (2000) The Saccharomyces telomere-binding protein Cdc13p interacts with both the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase alpha and the telomerase-associated est1 protein. Genes Dev 14: 1777–1788.
73. KroghBO, SymingtonLS (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38: 233–271.
74. HashimotoY, Ray ChaudhuriA, LopesM, CostanzoV (2010) Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1305–1311.
75. SchlacherK, ChristN, SiaudN, EgashiraA, WuH, et al. (2011) Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell 145: 529–542.
76. Gonzalez-PrietoR, Munoz-CabelloAM, Cabello-LobatoMJ, PradoF (2013) Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance. EMBO J 32: 1307–21.
77. SirbuBM, CouchFB, FeigerleJT, BhaskaraS, HiebertSW, et al. (2011) Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks. Genes Dev 25: 1320–1327.
78. PetermannE, OrtaML, IssaevaN, SchultzN, HelledayT (2010) Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell 37: 492–502.
79. SchlacherK, WuH, JasinM (2012) A distinct replication fork protection pathway connects Fanconi anemia tumor suppressors to RAD51-BRCA1/2. Cancer Cell 22: 106–116.
80. MizunoK, LambertS, BaldacciG, MurrayJM, CarrAM (2009) Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. Genes Dev 23: 2876–2886.
81. MizunoK, MiyabeI, SchalbetterSA, CarrAM, MurrayJM (2013) Recombination-restarted replication makes inverted chromosome fusions at inverted repeats. Nature 493: 246–249.
82. ZhangH, LawrenceCW (2005) The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15954–15959.
83. BugreevDV, RossiMJ, MazinAV (2011) Cooperation of RAD51 and RAD54 in regression of a model replication fork. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 2153–2164.
84. GangavarapuV, PrakashS, PrakashL (2007) Requirement of RAD52 group genes for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 27: 7758–7764.
85. ZhabinskayaD, BenhamCJ (2013) Competitive superhelical transitions involving cruciform extrusion. Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt733
86. WachA, BrachatA, PohlmannR, PhilippsenP (1994) New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10: 1793–1808.
87. GoldsteinAL, McCuskerJH (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541–1553.
88. AlaniE, CaoL, KlecknerN (1987) A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics 116: 541–545.
89. DrakeJW (1991) A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 7160–7164.
90. Dixon W.J., and Massey F.J. Jr. (1969) Introduction to statistical analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. p. 349.
91. OhSD, JessopL, LaoJP, AllersT, LichtenM, et al. (2009) Stabilization and electrophoretic analysis of meiotic recombination intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 557: 209–234.
92. BrewerBJ, FangmanWL (1987) The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51: 463–471.
93. FriedmanKL, BrewerBJ (1995) Analysis of replication intermediates by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 262: 613–627.