1. GertonJL, HawleyRS (2005) Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation. Nat Rev Gen 6: 477–487.
2. TsaiJH, McKeeBD (2011) Homologous pairing and the role of pairing centers in meiosis. J Cell Sci 124: 1955–1963.
3. HuntPA, HassoldTJ (2008) Human female meiosis: What makes a good egg go bad? Trends Genet 24: 86–93.
4. Jinks-RobertsonS, PetesTD (1986) Chromosomal translocations generated by high-frequency meiotic recombination between repeated yeast genes. Genetics 114: 731–752.
5. GoldmanA, LichtenM (1996) The Efficiency of meiotic recombination between dispersed sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends upon their chromosomal location. Genetics 144: 43–55.
6. LichtenM, BortsRH, HaberJE (1987) Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over between dispersed homologous sequences occurs frequently in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 115: 233–246.
7. MisteliT, SoutoglouE (2009) The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 243–254.
8. BarzelA, KupiecM (2008) Finding a match: How do homologous sequences get together for recombination? Nat Rev Gen 9: 27–37.
9. MekhailK, SeebacherJ, GygiSP, MoazedD (2008) Role for perinuclear chromosome tethering in maintenance of genome stability. Nature 456: 667–670.
10. TaddeiA, SchoberH, GasserSM (2010) The budding yeast nucleus. Cold Spring Har Perspect Biol 2: a000612.
11. SchoberH, FerreiraH, KalckV, GehlenLR, GasserSM (2009) Yeast telomerase and the SUN domain protein Mps3 anchor telomeres and repress subtelomeric recombination. Genes Dev 23: 928–938.
12. DavisL, SmithGR (2006) The meiotic bouquet promotes homolog interactions and restricts ectopic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 174: 167–177.
13. GoldmanASH, LichtenM (2000) Restriction of ectopic recombination by interhomolog interactions during Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 9537–9542.
14. BhallaN, DernburgAF (2008) Prelude to a division. Ann Rev Cell and Dev Biol 24: 397–424.
15. WeinerBM, KlecknerN (1994) Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast. Cell 77: 977–991.
16. StorlazziA, TesseS, GarganoS, JamesF, KlecknerN, et al. (2003) Meiotic double-strand breaks at the interface of chromosome movement, chromosome remodeling, and reductional division. Genes Dev 17: 2675–2687.
17. BowringFJ, YeadonPJ, StainerRG, CatchesideDE (2006) Chromosome pairing and meiotic recombination in Neurospora crassa spo11 mutants. Curr Gen 50: 115–123.
18. LoidlJ, KleinF, ScherthanH (1994) Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast. J Cell Biol 125: 1191–1200.
19. BaudatF, ManovaK, YuenJP, JasinM, KeeneyS (2000) Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell 6: 989–998.
20. DingDQ, YamamotoA, HaraguchiT, HiraokaY (2004) Dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. Dev Cell 6: 329–341.
21. PeoplesTL, DeanE, GonzalezO, LambourneL, BurgessSM (2002) Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts. Genes Dev 16: 1682–1695.
22. RomanienkoPJ, Camerini-OteroRD (2000) The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell 6: 975–987.
23. PawlowskiWP, GolubovskayaIN, TimofejevaL, MeeleyRB, SheridanWF, et al. (2004) Coordination of meiotic recombination, pairing, and synapsis by PHS1. Science 303: 89–92.
24. McKimKS, Green-MarroquinBL, SekelskyJJ, ChinG, SteinbergC, et al. (1998) Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination. Science 279: 876–878.
25. HughesSE, GillilandWD, CotittaJL, TakeoS, CollinsKA, et al. (2009) Heterochromatic threads connect oscillating chromosomes during prometaphase I in Drosophila oocytes. PLoS Genet 5: e1000348 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000348.
26. DernburgAF, McDonaldK, MoulderG, BarsteadR, DresserM, et al. (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94: 387–398.
27. MacQueenAJ, PhillipsCM, BhallaN, WeiserP, VilleneuveAM, et al. (2005) Chromosome sites play dual roles to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 123: 1037–1050.
28. DernburgAF, SedatJW, HawleyRS (1996) Direct evidence of a role for heterochromatin in meiotic chromosome segregation. Cell 86: 135–146.
29. KempB, BoumilRM, StewartMN, DawsonDS (2004) A role for centromere pairing in meiotic chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 18: 1946–1951.
30. HawleyRS, TheurkaufWE (1993) Requiem for distributive segregation: achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females. Trends Gen 9: 310–317.
31. StewartMN, DawsonDS (2008) Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis. Trends Gen 24: 564–573.
32. BurgessSM, KlecknerN (1999) Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization. Genes Dev 13: 1871–1883.
33. BurgessSM, KlecknerN, WeinerBM (1999) Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation. Genes Dev 13: 1627–1641.
34. DekkerJ, RippeK, DekkerM, KlecknerN (2002) Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295: 1306–1311.
35. TsubouchiT, RoederGS (2005) A Synaptonemal Complex Protein Promotes Homology-Independent Centromere Coupling. Science 308: 870–873.
36. MolnarM, KlecknerN (2008) Examination of interchromosomal interactions in vegetatively growing diploid Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells by Cre/loxP site-specific recombination. Genetics 178: 99–112.
37. LorenzA, FuchsJ, BurgerR, LoidlJ (2003) Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells. Euk Cell 2: 856–866.
38. JinQW, FuchsJ, LoidlJ (2000) Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. J Cell Sci 113: 1903–1912.
39. MeaburnKJ, MisteliT, SoutoglouE (2007) Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations. Sem Cancer Biol 17: 80–90.
40. KleinF, MahrP, GalovaM, BuonomoSB, MichaelisC, et al. (1999) A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98: 91–103.
41. HollingsworthNM, GoetschL, ByersB (1990) The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes. Cell 61: 73–84.
42. SmithAV, RoederGS (1997) The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol 136: 957–967.
43. BailisJM, RoederGS (1998) Synaptonemal complex morphogenesis and sister-chromatid cohesion require Mek1-dependent phosphorylation of a meiotic chromosomal protein. Genes Dev 12: 3551–3563.
44. BlatY, ProtacioRU, HunterN, KlecknerN (2002) Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 111: 791–802.
45. PanizzaS, MendozaMA, BerlingerM, HuangL, NicolasA, et al. (2011) Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 146: 372–383.
46. ZicklerD, KlecknerN (1999) Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet 33: 603–754.
47. NagDK, ScherthanH, RockmillB, BhargavaJ, RoederGS (1995) Heteroduplex DNA formation and homolog pairing in yeast meiotic mutants. Genetics 141: 75–86.
48. LatypovV, RothenbergM, LorenzA, OctobreG, CsutakO, et al. (2010) Roles of Hop1 and Mek1 in meiotic chromosome pairing and recombination partner choice in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol 30: 1570–1581.
49. BrarGA, HochwagenA, EeLS, AmonA (2009) The multiple roles of cohesin in meiotic chromosome morphogenesis and pairing. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1030–1047.
50. CarballoJA, JohnsonAL, SedgwickSG, ChaRS (2008) Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132: 758–770.
51. KimKP, WeinerBM, ZhangL, JordanA, DekkerJ, et al. (2010) Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 143: 924–937.
52. GoldfarbT, LichtenM (2010) Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol 8: e1000520 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000520.
53. Trelles-StickenE, AdelfalkC, LoidlJ, ScherthanH (2005) Meiotic telomere clustering requires actin for its formation and cohesin for its resolution. J Cell Biol 170: 213–223.
54. LinW, JinH, LiuX, HamptonK, YuHG (2011) Scc2 regulates gene expression by recruiting cohesin to the chromosome as a transcriptional activator during yeast meiosis. Mol Biol Cell 22: 1985–1996.
55. ChaRS, WeinerBM, KeeneyS, DekkerJ, KlecknerN (2000) Progression of meiotic DNA replication is modulated by interchromosomal interaction proteins, negatively by Spo11p and positively by Rec8p. Genes Dev 14: 493–503.
56. BardhanA, ChuongH, DawsonDS (2010) Meiotic cohesin promotes pairing of nonhomologous centromeres in early meiotic prophase. Mol Biol Cell 21: 1799–1809.
57. BlatY, KlecknerN (1999) Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98: 249–259.
58. KugouK, FukudaT, YamadaS, ItoM, SasanumaH, et al. (2009) Rec8 guides canonical Spo11 distribution along yeast meiotic chromosomes. Mol Biol Cell 20: 3064–3076.
59. ZicklerD, KlecknerN (1998) The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet 32: 619–697.
60. KoszulR, KlecknerN (2009) Dynamic chromosome movements during meiosis: a way to eliminate unwanted connections? Trends Cell Biol 19: 716–724.
61. StarrDA, FridolfssonHN (2010) Interactions between nuclei and the cytoskeleton are mediated by SUN-KASH nuclear-envelope bridges. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 26: 421–444.
62. KoszulR, KimKP, PrentissM, KlecknerN, KameokaS (2008) Meiotic chromosomes move by linkage to dynamic actin cables with transduction of force through the nuclear envelope. Cell 133: 1188–1201.
63. ConradMN, LeeCY, ChaoG, ShinoharaM, KosakaH, et al. (2008) Rapid telomere movement in meiotic prophase is promoted by NDJ1, MPS3, and CSM4 and is modulated by recombination. Cell 133: 1175–1187.
64. BrownMS, ZandersS, AlaniE (2011) Sustained and rapid chromosome movements are critical for chromosome pairing and meiotic progression in budding yeast. Genetics 188: 21–32.
65. ScherthanH, WangH, AdelfalkC, WhiteEJ, CowanC, et al. (2007) Chromosome mobility during meiotic prophase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA104: 16934–16939.
66. StarrDA (2009) A nuclear-envelope bridge positions nuclei and moves chromosomes. J Cell Sci 122: 577–586.
67. HiraokaY, DernburgAF (2009) The SUN rises on meiotic chromosome dynamics. Dev Cell 17: 598–605.
68. ChuaPR, RoederGS (1997) Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. Genes Dev 11: 1786–1800.
69. ConradMN, DominguezAM, DresserME (1997) Ndj1p, a meiotic telomere protein required for normal chromosome synapsis and segregation in yeast. Science 276: 1252–1255.
70. Trelles-StickenE, DresserME, ScherthanH (2000) Meiotic Telomere Protein Ndj1p Is Required for Meiosis-specific Telomere Distribution, Bouquet Formation and Efficient Homologue Pairing. J Cell Biol 151: 95–106.
71. ConradMN, LeeCY, WilkersonJL, DresserME (2007) MPS3 mediates meiotic bouquet formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 8863–8868.
72. KosakaH, ShinoharaM, ShinoharaA (2008) Csm4-dependent telomere movement on nuclear envelope promotes meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet 4: e1000196 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000196.
73. WanatJJ, KimKP, KoszulR, ZandersS, WeinerB, et al. (2008) Csm4, in collaboration with Ndj1, mediates telomere-led chromosome dynamics and recombination during yeast meiosis. PLoS Genet 4: e1000188 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000188.
74. Peoples-HolstTL, BurgessSM (2005) Multiple branches of the meiotic recombination pathway contribute independently to homolog pairing and stable juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast. Genes Dev 19: 863–874.
75. LuiDY, Peoples-HolstTL, MellJC, WuHY, DeanEW, et al. (2006) Analysis of close stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173: 1207–1222.
76. HochwagenA, AmonA (2006) Checking your breaks: surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr Biol 16: R217–228.
77. MellJC, WienholzBL, SalemA, BurgessSM (2008) Sites of recombination are local determinants of meiotic homolog pairing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 773–784.
78. JessopL, RockmillB, RoederGS, LichtenM (2006) Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of sgs1. PLoS Genet 2: e155 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020155.
79. OhSD, LaoJP, HwangPY, TaylorAF, SmithGR, et al. (2007) BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130: 259–272.
80. ShinoharaM, Shita-YamaguchiE, BuersteddeJM, ShinagawaH, OgawaH, et al. (1997) Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 147: 1545–1556.
81. KleinHL (1997) RDH54, a RAD54 homologue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for mitotic diploid-specific recombination and repair and for meiosis. Genetics 147: 1533–1543.
82. ShinoharaM, GasiorSL, BishopDK, ShinoharaA (2000) Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of Rad51 and Dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 10814–10819.
83. BornerGV, KlecknerN, HunterN (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29–45.
84. TothA, RabitschKP, GalovaM, SchleifferA, BuonomoSB, et al. (2000) Functional genomics identifies monopolin: a kinetochore protein required for segregation of homologs during meiosis I. Cell 103: 1155–1168.
85. BuhlerC, ShroffR, LichtenM (2009) Genome-wide mapping of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 557: 143–164.
86. GlynnEF, MegeePC, YuHG, MistrotC, UnalE, et al. (2004) Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 2: e259 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020259.
87. BlitzblauHG, BellGW, RodriguezJ, BellSP, HochwagenA (2007) Mapping of meiotic single-stranded DNA reveals double-stranded-break hotspots near centromeres and telomeres. Curr Biol 17: 2003–2012.
88. HochwagenA, ThamWH, BrarGA, AmonA (2005) The FK506 binding protein Fpr3 counteracts protein phosphatase 1 to maintain meiotic recombination checkpoint activity. Cell 122: 861–873.
89. Trelles-StickenE, LoidlJ, ScherthanH (1999) Bouquet formation in budding yeast: initiation of recombination is not required for meiotic telomere clustering. J Cell Sci 112(Pt 5): 651–658.
90. SpectorI, ShochetNR, BlasbergerD, KashmanY (1989) Latrunculins–novel marine macrolides that disrupt microfilament organization and affect cell growth: I. Comparison with cytochalasin D. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 13: 127–144.
91. MichaelisC, CioskR, NasmythK (1997) Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91: 35–45.
92. CioskR, ZachariaeW, MichaelisC, ShevchenkoA, MannM, et al. (1998) An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 93: 1067–1076.
93. RabitschKP, TothA, GalovaM, SchleifferA, SchaffnerG, et al. (2001) A screen for genes required for meiosis and spore formation based on whole-genome expression. Curr Biol 11: 1001–1009.
94. KoszulR, KameokaS, WeinerBM (2009) Real-time imaging of meiotic chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 558: 81–89.
95. HarperL, GolubovskayaI, CandeWZ (2004) A bouquet of chromosomes. J Cell Sci 117: 4025–4032.
96. ObesoD, DawsonDS (2010) Temporal characterization of homology-independent centromere coupling in meiotic prophase. PLoS ONE 5: e10336 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010336.
97. WynneDJ, RogO, CarltonPM, DernburgAF (2012) Dynein-dependent processive chromosome motions promote homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. The Journal of cell biology 196: 47–64.
98. PenknerA, TangL, NovatchkovaM, LadurnerM, FridkinA, et al. (2007) The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 12: 873–885.
99. YamamotoA, WestRR, McIntoshJR, HiraokaY (1999) A Cytoplasmic Dynein Heavy Chain Is Required for Oscillatory Nuclear Movement of Meiotic Prophase and Efficient Meiotic Recombination in Fission Yeast. J Cell Biol 145: 1233–1250.
100. SatoA, IsaacB, PhillipsCM, RilloR, CarltonPM, et al. (2009) Cytoskeletal forces span the nuclear envelope to coordinate meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis. Cell 139: 907–919.
101. WynneDJ, RogO, CarltonPM, DernburgAF (2012) Dynein-dependent processive chromosome motions promote homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. J Cell Biol 196: 47–64.
102. Sonntag BrownM, ZandersS, AlaniE (2011) Sustained and rapid chromosome movements are critical for chromosome pairing and meiotic progression in budding yeast. Genetics 188: 21–32.
103. LeeCY, ConradMN, DresserME (2012) Meiotic chromosome pairing is promoted by telomere-led chromosome movements independent of bouquet formation. PLoS Genet 8: e1002730 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002730.
104. CremerT, CremerM (2010) Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a003889.
105. MarshallWF, StraightA, MarkoJF, SwedlowJ, DernburgA, et al. (1997) Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr Biol 7: 930–939.
106. DionV, ShimadaK, GasserSM (2010) Actin-related proteins in the nucleus: life beyond chromatin remodelers. Curr Opin Cell Biol
107. YoshidaT, ShimadaK, OmaY, KalckV, AkimuraK, et al. (2010) Actin-related protein Arp6 influences H2A.Z-dependent and -independent gene expression and links ribosomal protein genes to nuclear pores. PLoS Genet 6: e1000910 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000910.
108. VisaN, PercipalleP (2010) Nuclear functions of actin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000620.
109. StephensAD, HaaseJ, VicciL, TaylorRM2nd, BloomK (2011) Cohesin, condensin, and the intramolecular centromere loop together generate the mitotic chromatin spring. J Cell Biol 193: 1167–1180.
110. BloomK, JoglekarA (2010) Towards building a chromosome segregation machine. Nature 463: 446–456.
111. DingDQ, SakuraiN, KatouY, ItohT, ShirahigeK, et al. (2006) Meiotic cohesins modulate chromosome compaction during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 174: 499–508.
112. MolnarM, BahlerJ, SipiczkiM, KohliJ (1995) The rec8 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is involved in linear element formation, chromosome pairing and sister-chromatid cohesion during meiosis. Genetics 141: 61–73.
113. KaneSM, RothR (1974) Carbohydrate metabolism during ascospore development in yeast. J Bacteriol 118: 8–14.
114. WachA, BrachatA, PohlmannR, PhilippsenP (1994) New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10: 1793–1808.
115. GoldsteinLA, McCuskerHJ (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541–1553.
116. OhSD, LaoJP, TaylorAF, SmithGR, HunterN (2008) RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. Mol Cell 31: 324–336.
117. LuiD, BurgessSM (2009) Measurement of spatial proximity and accessibility of chromosomal loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using Cre/loxP site-specific recombination. Methods Mol Biol 557: 55–63.
118. DresserME (2009) Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in meiosis. Methods Mol Biol 558: 65–79.
119. HeunP, LarocheT, ShimadaK, FurrerP, GasserSM (2001) Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus. Science 294: 2181–2186.