Gene-Regulatory Logic to Induce and Maintain a Developmental Compartment


article has not abstract


Published in the journal: . PLoS Genet 11(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005543
Category: Perspective
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005543

Summary

article has not abstract

Forty-four years ago, Antonio García-Bellido utilized, for the first time in biology, the clonal analysis technique to characterize the parameters of proliferation and growth of a developing organ—in this case, the highly proliferative wing primordium of Drosophila [1]. A couple of years later, using the same technique, García-Bellido and two of his PhD students, Ginés Morata and Pedro Ripoll, reported the existence of adjacent cell populations that do not mix, which he called compartments [2]. Developmental compartmentalization of growing organs was subsequently demonstrated in all ectodermal derivatives of the fruit fly, as well as in vertebrate limbs and in the central nervous system. One of the most remarkable features of compartments is that their boundaries also act as organizing centers. Compartments are defined by the restricted expression and activity of the so-called selector genes. The homeodomain-encoding gene engrailed was rapidly identified as the one specifying the posterior compartment of all ectodermal derivatives of the fruit fly [3,4]. It was not until the early 1990s that the LIM-homeodomain-encoding gene apterous (ap) was shown to specify the dorsal compartment in the Drosophila wing [5]. These selector genes share three distinct activities: specification of compartment identity, localization of an organizing center at the compartment boundary, and establishment of the lineage restriction border. The ap selector gene rapidly became a paradigm in the identification of the signaling molecules, cell adhesion proteins, and transcription factors that mediate the construction of compartments and organizing centers [69]. However, how ap expression is maintained in order to fulfill its functions in all the cells of the dorsal compartment during the five days of growth and proliferation has remained largely unknown. In this issue of PLOS Genetics, Carlos Estella and colleagues [10] unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying the initiation and maintenance of ap expression in the Drosophila wing primordium. A combination of enhancers, autoregulatory and feed-forward mechanisms, and epigenetics appears to be at play.

Perhaps the best way of identifying the noncoding regions involved in the regulation of expression of a gene of interest is through classical genetics and phenotypic characterization. Indeed, this is the approach taken by Estella and colleagues in their analysis of the ap locus. A series of endogenous deletions were performed to identify the regulatory sequences required to drive ap expression and give rise to normal-looking adult wings. By doing so, the authors functionally identified a proximal region harboring a Polycomb Response Element (PRE) and a distal fragment containing a previously identified enhancer, whose deletions severely compromised ap expression and wing development. The authors next undertook a systematic in situ dissection of the ap cis-regulatory domain by bringing back sub-fragments of a previously deleted region and analyzing their capacity to rescue the wing phenotype. When combined, the PRE and two enhancers located in a distal fragment were sufficient to rescue both ap expression and wing formation.

So far so good, but what is the regulatory logic that combines the input of two distinct enhancers and a PRE to induce the expression and maintenance of ap expression in all dorsal cells throughout development? The authors again approached this issue in a clever manner. They constructed a battery of lacZ reporter lines to decipher how these enhancers were expressed in the wing, to identify the transcription factor involved in their regulation, and to analyze the contribution of the PRE to this process. As expected, the two functional enhancers located in a distal fragment and identified by the in situ rescue experiment drove expression of the lacZ reporter in dorsal cells of the wing primordium. The isolated ap-E enhancer is initially expressed in all dorsal cells and responds to the early activity of the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)-Receptor ligand Vein, as does the whole ap locus [11]. Interestingly, its initial expression coincides in time with the onset of ap expression and the initiation of the organizing activities of the compartment boundary through the activation of the Notch receptor. Later in development, expression of the ap-E enhancer fades away from the dorsal compartment of the wing primordium, and the ap-DV enhancer starts to be expressed in exactly the same region as a consequence of the activity of the Apterous and Vestigial proteins. It is interesting to note that Vestigial is a target of Notch [12]. Thus, both an Apterous-dependent autoregulatory mechanism and a feed-forward mechanism, through the activity of Notch and Vestigial, drive the expression of the ap-DV enhancer. The authors observed that these two enhancers were not able—either alone or in combination—to completely reproduce the ap expression pattern. Thus, additional elements appear to be at work. Following the logic of the in situ rescue experiments, the combination of the ap-E and ap-DV enhancers, together with the ap-PRE, gave rise to robust expression of the lacZ reporter in all dorsal cells throughout wing development. Interestingly, the ability of the ap-PRE to drive robust expression was shown to rely on the activity of the Trithorax group of proteins.

Taken together, the results from Estella and colleagues reveal a three-step molecular mechanism to initiate and maintain ap expression in all dorsal cells throughout development (Fig 1). Whereas the onset of ap expression relies on the restricted expression of the EGF receptor ligand Vein and on the activity of the EGF-Receptor responsive transcription factor Pointed-P1 in the presumptive dorsal compartment, the maintenance of ap expression during the subsequent stages of wing development is led by an Apterous-dependent autoregulatory loop, a Vestigial-mediated feed-forward mechanism, and the activity of the PRE. This initiation and maintenance mechanism has remarkable commonalities with the logic followed by other developmental genes whose expression has to be precisely initiated but also robustly maintained throughout the dramatic increase in tissue size and cell number that occurs in the primordia of the adult fly [13,14]. Forty-two years after the discovery of compartments, the Drosophila wing is still unraveling common principles of development.

Illustration of the <i>apterous</i> locus with its regulatory regions involved in the control of its expression in the <i>Drosophila</i> wing.
Fig. 1. Illustration of the apterous locus with its regulatory regions involved in the control of its expression in the Drosophila wing.
Whereas the onset of apterous expression in the dorsal compartment of the early wing primordium relies on the activity of the EGF receptor ligand Vein, the maintenance of its expression during subsequent developmental stages depends on both autoregulatory and epigenetic mechanisms.


Zdroje

1. García-Bellido A, Merriam JR (1971) Parameters of the wing imaginal disc development of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 24: 61–87. 5001010

2. Garcia-Bellido A, Ripoll P, Morata G (1973) Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nat New Biol 245: 251–253. 4518369

3. Garcia-Bellido A, Santamaria P (1972) Developmental analysis of the wing disc in the mutant engrailed of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72: 87–104. 4627463

4. Morata G, Lawrence PA (1975) Control of compartment development by the engrailed gene in Drosophila. Nature 255: 614–617. 1134551

5. Diaz-Benjumea FJ, Cohen SM (1993) Interaction between dorsal and ventral cells in the imaginal disc directs wing development in Drosophila. Cell 75: 741–752. 8242746

6. Irvine K, Wieschaus E (1994) fringe, a boundary specific signalling molecule, mediates interactions between dorsal and ventral cells during Drosophila wing development. Cell 79: 595–606. 7954826

7. Milan M, Weihe U, Perez L, Cohen SM (2001) The LRR proteins capricious and Tartan mediate cell interactions during DV boundary formation in the Drosophila wing. Cell 106: 785–794. 11572783

8. Milan M, Weihe U, Tiong S, Bender W, Cohen SM (2001) msh specifies dorsal cell fate in the Drosophila wing. Development 128: 3263–3268. 11546743

9. Diaz-Benjumea FJ, Cohen SM (1995) Serrate signals through Notch to establish a Wingless-dependent organizer at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary of the Drosophila wing. Development 121: 4215–4225. 8575321

10. Bieli D, Kanca O, Requena D, Hamaratoglu F, Gohl D, Schedl P, et al. (2015) Establishment of a developmental compartment requires interactions between three synergistic cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet 11(9) e1005376 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005376

11. Wang SH, Simcox A, Campbell G (2000) Dual role for Drosophila epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in early wing disc development. Genes Dev 14: 2271–2276. 10995384

12. Kim J, Sebring A, Esch JJ, Kraus ME, Vorwerk K, et al. (1996) Integration of positional signals and regulation of wing formation by Drosophila vestigial gene. Nature 382: 133–138. 8700202

13. Estella C, McKay DJ, Mann RS (2008) Molecular integration of wingless, decapentaplegic, and autoregulatory inputs into Distalless during Drosophila leg development. Dev Cell 14: 86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.11.002 18194655

14. Pérez L, Barrio L, Cano D, Fiuza U, Muzzopappa M, et al. (2011) Enhancer-PRE communication contributes to expanding the domains of gene expression in proliferating primordia. Development 138: 3135–3145. doi: 10.1242/dev.065599 21715425

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukční medicína

Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2015 Číslo 10

Nejčtenější v tomto čísle

Tomuto tématu se dále věnují…


Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Diabetická neuropatie a její léčba
nový kurz
Autoři: MUDr. Michal Dubský, Ph.D.

Mnohočetný myelom: Úvodní léčba netransplantovatelných pacientů
Autoři:

Proč v prevenci zubního kazu kartáček nestačí?
Autoři: doc. MUDr. Romana Koberová – Ivančaková, CSc.

Hypersenzitivita dentinu jako příznak poškození tvrdých zubních tkání
Autoři: MUDr. Erika Lenčová, Ph.D.

Cesta pacienta s CHOPN
Autoři: doc. MUDr. Vladimír Koblížek, Ph.D.

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se