Vaccinia Virus Protein Complex F12/E2 Interacts with Kinesin Light Chain Isoform 2 to Engage the Kinesin-1 Motor Complex

Viruses often hijack the cellular transport systems to facilitate their movement within and between cells. Vaccinia virus (VACV), the smallpox vaccine, is very adept at this and exploits cellular transport machinery at several stages during its life cycle. For instance, during transport of new virus particles to the cell surface VACV interacts with a protein motor complex called kinesin-1 that moves cargo on microtubules. However, details of the cellular and viral components needed and the molecular mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Hitherto, only the VACV protein A36 has been shown to interact with kinesin-1, however viruses lacking A36 still reach the cell surface, albeit at reduced efficiency, indicating other factors are involved. Here we describe an interaction between kinesin-1 and a complex of VACV proteins F12 and E2, which are both needed for virus transport. The F12/E2 complex associates with a subset of kinesin-1 molecules (kinesin light chain isoform 2) with a region thought to be involved in modulation of cargo binding and kinesin-1 motor activity. Further study of this interaction will enhance understanding of the VACV life cycle and of the roles of different kinesin-1 subtypes in cellular processes and the mechanisms that regulate them.

Published in the journal: . PLoS Pathog 11(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004723
Category: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004723


Viruses often hijack the cellular transport systems to facilitate their movement within and between cells. Vaccinia virus (VACV), the smallpox vaccine, is very adept at this and exploits cellular transport machinery at several stages during its life cycle. For instance, during transport of new virus particles to the cell surface VACV interacts with a protein motor complex called kinesin-1 that moves cargo on microtubules. However, details of the cellular and viral components needed and the molecular mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Hitherto, only the VACV protein A36 has been shown to interact with kinesin-1, however viruses lacking A36 still reach the cell surface, albeit at reduced efficiency, indicating other factors are involved. Here we describe an interaction between kinesin-1 and a complex of VACV proteins F12 and E2, which are both needed for virus transport. The F12/E2 complex associates with a subset of kinesin-1 molecules (kinesin light chain isoform 2) with a region thought to be involved in modulation of cargo binding and kinesin-1 motor activity. Further study of this interaction will enhance understanding of the VACV life cycle and of the roles of different kinesin-1 subtypes in cellular processes and the mechanisms that regulate them.


Vaccinia virus (VACV) is a member of the Orthopoxvirus genus of the Poxviridae [1] and is the live vaccine that was used to eradicate smallpox [2]. Cells infected by VACV produce multiple structurally distinct forms of infectious virion [reviewed in 3,4]. The first assembles and matures within cytoplasmic viral factories [5], to form DNA-containing protein cores surrounded by a single lipid membrane [6,7] called intracellular mature virus (IMV) or mature virus (MV). Some IMVs are then wrapped by membranes derived from the trans-Golgi network or early-endosomes [reviewed in 4] to form the triple enveloped virion called intracellular enveloped virus (IEV) or wrapped virus (WV). IEV particles move to the cell periphery where the outer membrane fuses with the plasma membrane to expose a virion with 2 membranes outside the cell. Some of these virions are retained on the cell surface and are called cell-associated enveloped virus (CEV), and some are released into the extracellular matrix, called extracellular enveloped virus (EEV). The CEV and EEV forms have collectively also been called enveloped virus (EV) by some authors. Once on the cell surface, CEV particles induce the formation of actin tails to drive virions away from infected cells [813]. EEV particles mediate long range spread of virus. Actin tail formation is also exploited to enhance spread of VACV via the repulsion of superinfecting virions from infected cells [14,15].

Virus entry is mediated by a complex fusion machinery containing more than 10 virus proteins that promotes fusion of the virus envelope with the cell membrane (either at the cell surface [16,17], or after acidification within the endosome [18]) and results in the release of a naked virus core into the cytoplasm [reviewed in 19]. Cores migrate to a perinuclear location in a microtubule-dependent process [20], where they establish viral factories. IMVs formed in these factories are then transported on microtubules [21,22] to the site of wrapping and transport of IEVs to the cell periphery is also mediated by microtubules [8,2326]. Naked virus cores, IMVs and IEVs each have different surfaces but all interact with the cellular microtubule trafficking machinery [reviewed in 3,4]. The mechanisms utilised by each of these particles and the cellular and virus proteins involved remain relatively incompletely understood. The most extensively studied trafficking event is the kinesin-1-mediated movement of IEVs from the site of wrapping to the cell surface [24].

Kinesin-1, or conventional kinesin, is a member of the kinesin superfamily of microtubule-associated motor proteins [reviewed in 27] that is involved in the intracellular trafficking of proteins, ribonucleoproteins and membrane bound organelles along microtubules away from the microtubule organising centre (MTOC). The kinesin-1 complex consists of a dimer of kinesin heavy chains (KHC), often, but not always [28], associated with two copies of a kinesin light chain (KLC). The KHC is composed of an amino-terminal microtubule-binding ATPase motor domain and a coiled-coil dimerisation domain. Three isoforms of KHC exist in mammals, Kif5A and Kif5C expressed in neurones, and Kif5B, which is expressed ubiquitously [29]. Some cargoes interact directly with KHC, such as the mitochondrial-associated protein milton [30], while others require the presence of KLCs. Four isoforms of KLC have been described in both humans and mice; the ubiquitous KLC2, the widely expressed but neuronal tissue enriched KLC1 [31], the testis-specific KLC3 [32] and KLC4, an isoform identified by bioinformatic screens of mouse and human genome sequences.

The envelopes acquired by VACV particles at the site of IMV wrapping to form IEV are associated with several VACV proteins [reviewed in 4]. These include proteins A33, A34, A36, A56, B5 and F13, of which B5 and F13 are required for IEV formation [3335]. Two other proteins, F12 and E2, become associated with IEVs and are needed for transport of IEVs to the cell surface [36,37]. The A36 protein is restricted to the outer IEV envelope and when this envelope fuses with the cell membrane A36 remains localised on the plasma membrane beneath the CEV particle [38] where it induces nucleation of actin polymerisation through the Arp2/3 complex [11,39]. A36 is the only IEV-associated protein reported to interact with the kinesin-1 complex [40], although this has only been demonstrated with over-expressed A36 protein fragments and not with wild-type A36 protein at endogenous levels during infection. Loss of A36 does not prevent transport of IEV on microtubules to the cell periphery although the efficiency is reduced [41] suggesting there are other proteins involved. A36 possesses a bipartite tryptophan-acidic residue (WD/WE) kinesin binding motif [37,42] through which it interacts with the kinesin-1 complex and without which IEV egress is reduced [37,43]. The F12 protein also possesses a single WD/WE type motif critical for its function [37] and shows some similarity to KLCs (though a recent report has suggested that F12 is more closely related to DNA polymerases of bacteriophage origin [44]). To date, however, no interaction between F12 and the kinesin-1 complex has been described. There is evidence that F12 interacts with A36 [45] and E2 [46]. Deletion of either F12 or E2 results in a smaller plaque phenotype and a severe reduction in EEV/CEV formation [47,48]. Although there has been some suggestion that F12 and E2 deletion viruses show a defect in the IEV wrapping process [46,48], fully formed IEV/CEV particles have been documented and quantified to similar levels as wild-type viruses [36,37,48]. Both F12 and E2 remain associated with IEVs during their egress to the cell periphery but dissociate from IEVs prior to virion release at the cell surface [46].

In this report, evidence of an interaction between F12 and the kinesin-1 complex is presented. However, this interaction requires the presence of E2, not A36. Unlike A36, which binds both KLC1 and KLC2, the F12/E2 complex shows a distinct preference for KLC2 association. This preference is due to F12/E2 binding the KLC2 C-terminus, a region with considerable variability between different isoforms. Lastly, siRNA knockdown of KLC1, but not KLC2, results in more efficient transport of IEV particles to the cell surface and a larger plaque phenotype. In contrast, knockdown of KLC2 gave no such alteration, but knockdown of KLC2 and KLC1 simultaneously removed the plaque size enhancement deriving from knockdown of only KLC1. These results suggest redundancy and a potential complex interplay between different KLC isoforms used for VACV transport.


F12 co-immunoprecipitates with kinesin light chain

The VACV F12 protein is associated with IEV particles [36] and has some similarity to KLCs and has a WD/E kinesin binding motif [37], suggesting F12 might form part of the kinesin complex associated with IEV particles. However, attempts to co-precipitate endogenous components of the kinesin-1 complex with an epitope-tagged F12 protein from HeLa or HEK 293T cells infected with a virus expressing a C-terminal HA-tagged F12 protein (vF12-HA) were unsuccessful. Therefore, the experiments were repeated using ectopic overexpression of epitope-tagged components of kinesin-1.

HeLa cells were transfected with plasmids expressing N-terminal Flag-tagged murine alleles of KLC1 and KLC2 and were infected subsequently with a virus expressing the F12 protein fused to an HA-epitope tag (vF12-HA) [36]. Flag-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag antibody-conjugated agarose beads (Fig. 1A i). Samples were immunoblotted for endogenous Kif5B (kinesin heavy chain) as a cell lysate loading control (Fig. 1A ii). Co-precipitation of endogenous Kif5B with ectopically expressed murine KLC1 and KLC2, but not with GFP indicated that both murine KLC isoforms are able to interact with the human kinesin-1 complex. This is consistent with murine KLC1 and KLC2 sharing 98–99% amino acid similarity with their human counterparts (see supplemental information S1 Fig.). HA-tagged F12 co-precipitated with KLC2 and to a much lesser extent with KLC1 (Fig. 1A iii). Quantitation of F12-HA band intensities showed that F12 co-precipitated with KLC1 only slightly above background (with Flag-GFP), while the co-precipitation with KLC2 was higher (Fig. 1C).

F12 co-immunoprecipitates with kinesin light chain isoform 2.
Fig. 1. F12 co-immunoprecipitates with kinesin light chain isoform 2.
(A) SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of anti-Flag immunoprecipitations. HeLa cells were transfected with plasmids expressing Flag-tagged GFP, KLC1 or KLC2 and were infected 24 h later with vF12-HA (5 PFU/cell) for 14 h. Cell lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag antibody. (i) Clarified cell lysate (Input) and immunoprecipitated samples were immunoblotted with an anti-Flag antibody. (ii) As in (i) but immunoblotted with anti-KIF5B to show equal loading of cell lysate (Input) and the ability of Flag-KLC1 and Flag-KLC2 to associate with the endogenous kinesin-1 complex (αFlag IP). (iii) As in (i) but immunoblotted with an anti-HA antibody. (B) The experiment described in (A) was repeated in HeLa cells expressing a V5 epitope-tagged A36 protein. Samples were immunoblotted with anti-V5 antibody. (C) The experiment shown in (A) (iii) was repeated in triplicate and band intensities of co-immunoprecipitated F12 were quantified using a LiCor Odyssey Infrared Imager. Numbers represent the relative integrated intensities (with local background correction) normalised to the intensity of the band in the pFlag-GFP lane of 3 independent experiments ±sd. (D) SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of a reciprocal anti-HA immunoprecipitation. HeLa cells were transfected with plasmids expressing either Flag-tagged KLC1 or KLC2 and were infected 24 h later with vF12-HA or vB14-HA. HA-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-HA antibody-coated beads. Samples were immunoblotted with (i) anti-HA, (ii) anti-Flag and (iii) anti-KIF5B (input loading control) antibodies. The positions of molecular mass markers (kDa) are shown on the left for all immunoblots.

A36 was reported to interact with both KLC1 and KLC2 [43]. To verify that the Flag-tagged KLC isoforms interact with cargo proteins and that the preference of F12 for KLC2 was a genuine property of F12 and not of the KLC alleles being used, the ability of A36 to co-immunoprecipitate with these Flag-tagged KLC isoforms was tested. However, using an anti-A36 monoclonal antibody an interaction between A36 and either KLC isoform during virus infection was not detected. Therefore, the experiment was repeated using a HeLa cell line expressing A36 tagged with a V5 epitope (V5-A36) [15]. Under these conditions V5-A36 co-precipitated with both Flag-KLC1 and Flag-KLC2 (Fig. 1B), consistent with previous reports that A36 binds KLC isoforms 1 and 2 when over-expressed [43].

The F12-KLC2 interaction was investigated with a reciprocal immunoprecipitation. HeLa cells transfected with either Flag-KLC1 or Flag-KLC2 were infected with vF12-HA, or with a VACV expressing HA-tagged B14, a cytoplasmic VACV protein that contributes to virulence [49] and blocks NF-κB activation by binding to IKKβ [50]. HA-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated and KLC2, but not KLC1, co-precipitated with F12-HA and not with B14-HA (Fig. 1D ii). Blotting for endogenous Kif5B failed to detect any KHC co-precipitating with F12 (Fig. 1D iii), suggesting that F12 interacts with the kinesin-1 complex through an interaction with KLC.

Subcellular distribution of ectopically-expressed epitope-tagged KLC mirrors that of its endogenous counterpart

Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy have shown that endogenous KLC associates with IEV particles trafficking to and at the cell periphery [37]. These studies used either the mouse monoclonal 63–90, a pan-specific antibody that recognises an epitope present on all KLC isoforms [51], by immunoelectron microscopy, or the L2 mouse monoclonal that recognises only KLC1 for immunofluorescence. To confirm that endogenous KLC2 associates with virions, HeLa cells were infected with vA5L-GFP [20] and analysed by confocal microscopy using an antibody specific for KLC2 (Fig. 2A). The KLC2 distribution matches the distribution of KLC1 described previously [37]. At late times post infection (pi) KLC2 is highly enriched at peripheral accumulations of GFP-positive virions that have trafficked to the cell periphery (compare 1 hpi with 8 hpi, Fig. 2A inserts).

KLC1 and KLC2 associate with peripheral virions.
Fig. 2. KLC1 and KLC2 associate with peripheral virions.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy of HeLa cells grown on glass coverslips. (A) Cells were infected with vA5GFP at 5 PFU/cell and fixed at 1 or 8 hpi. Cells were immunostained with anti-KLC2 antibody (red) and mounted in Mowiol-containing DAPI to stain DNA (blue). (B) HeLa cells were transfected with Flag-KLC1 or Flag-KLC2 and infected with vA5GFP at 5 PFU/cell, fixed 8 hpi, immunostained with an anti-Flag antibody (red) and mounted in Mowiol containing DAPI (blue). Images shown are maximum intensity projections of z-stack data sets acquired of the complete cell volume. The boxed regions are expanded in the inserts. Scale bars represent 20 μm, or when indicated, 5 μm (inserts).

Fig. 1 showed that murine KLC isoforms expressed from plasmids [52] interacted with endogenous human KHC and they each co-precipitated the A36 protein to similar levels. Consistent with these proteins being functional, immunofluorescence confocal microscopy showed that in HeLa cells infected with vA5L-GFP both Flag-KLC1 and Flag-KLC2 co-localised with GFP-positive virions at the cell periphery late (8 h) during infection, similar to their endogenous counterparts (Fig. 2B, inserts).

Infection is required for the F12-KLC2 interaction

The association of F12 and KLC2 might be direct or require another factor. This was tested by ectopic expression of F12 using a HEK293T cell line expressing codon-optimised F12-HA (HEK TRex-F12co-HA) inducibly upon addition of doxycycline (Dox, see Materials and Methods). These cells were transfected with plasmids expressing Flag-KLC1, Flag-KLC2 or Flag-GFP and 24 h later were infected with vΔF12 [47], followed by addition of doxycycline to induce F12-HA expression. As before, F12-HA co-precipitated with KLC2 during virus infection (Fig. 3A iii), but only background levels were detected with KLC1. This confirmed the interactions seen in Fig. 1 using a different cell type. Notably, both KLC1 and KLC2 did not interact with F12-HA above background levels in mock-infected samples (Fig. 3A iii), suggesting that an additional VACV protein or VACV-induced cellular factor was required. In the reciprocal immunoprecipitation using α-HA, KLC1 co-precipitation was not detected either in the presence or absence of virus infection, while KLC2 co-precipitation was detectable clearly in the presence of virus infection (Fig. 3B ii). In the absence of VACV infection KLC2 co-precipitated with F12 at levels only marginally above background (Fig. 3B ii). This may be a genuine low level interaction, or may represent increased non-specific association of KLC2 when higher levels of F12-HA are made in uninfected cells.

The F12/KLC2 interaction requires virus infection.
Fig. 3. The F12/KLC2 interaction requires virus infection.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of reciprocal F12-HA and Flag-KLC co-immunoprecipitations in the presence and absence of infection. Clarified cell lysates were generated from HEK TRex-F12-HAco cells transfected with either pFlag-KLC1, pFlag-KLC2 or pFlag-GFP and infected 24 h later with vΔF12 or mock-infected for 14 h as indicated. F12-HA expression was induced by addition of doxycycline for all samples in (A) and as indicated (dox +) in (B). Cell lysates were subjected to either anti-Flag IP (A) or anti-HA IP (B) and the levels of co-immunoprecipitated proteins were analysed as in Fig. 1. The positions of molecular mass standards (kDa) are shown on the left.

VACV protein E2 is required for F12-KLC2 co-precipitation

Given that F12-KLC2 co-precipitation was seen only during VACV infection, it is possible that one or more VACV proteins are required for this interaction, and the proteins present associated with the outer membrane of the IEV particle are the most likely candidates. These include A33, A34, A36, A56, B5 and E2, and of these, A36 [45] and E2 [46] were reported to interact with F12. To investigate if particular IEV outer membrane proteins were involved in the F12-KLC interaction, a panel of VACV mutants lacking A33 [53], A34 [1], A36 [54], B5 [55], F13 [34] or E2 [48] were used to infect the F12-HAco-expressing cell line that had been transfected with pFlag-KLC2. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag (Fig. 4B) or anti-HA (Fig. 4C) antibody and samples were analysed by immunoblotting. Using either antibody, the F12-KLC2 association was detected in samples transfected with Flag-KLC2 and infected with vΔF12. The panel of deletion viruses used in this experiment all express untagged F12, the HA-tagged F12 being produced by the host cell. To determine if the presence of untagged F12 interferes with the F12-HA/Flag-KLC2 interaction, a control was included in which the cells were infected with wild-type VACV WR (vvWR), expressing untagged F12, in conjunction with F12-HA expressed by the cell line. No significant difference in the levels of F12-HA/KLC2 co-precipitation were detected in the presence or absence of untagged F12 (compare the second and third lanes from left). The input samples were blotted for tubulin (Fig. 4A iii) to control for the protein levels used in the immunoprecipitation and for the VACV protein D8 (Fig. 4A iv) to control for equal infection. The F12-HA/KLC2 association was maintained in cells infected by all of the viruses tested except vΔE2 (Fig. 4B and Fig. 4C), suggesting a critical requirement for E2 in the F12/KLC2 interaction.

The F12/KLC2 interaction requires expression of E2.
Fig. 4. The F12/KLC2 interaction requires expression of E2.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of F12/KLC2 co-immunoprecipitations carried out in the presence of infection with a panel mutant VACVs lacking individual IEV proteins. Clarified cell lysates were generated from HEK TRex-F12-HAco cells that had been transfected with pFlag-KLC2 and 24 h later infected with VACV WR (vvWR), vΔF12, vΔA33, vΔA34, vΔA36, vΔB5, vΔF13, vΔE2 or mock-infected. These cells had also been induced to express F12-HA by addition of doxycycline (+Dox). One sample was transfected with pFlag-GFP as a negative control to measure background levels of co-immunoprecipitated F12-HA. (A) Input cell lysate samples were immunoblotted for Flag (i, KLC), HA (ii, F12), tubulin (iii, loading control) and D8 (iv, infection level control). Cell lysates were subjected to anti-Flag IP (B) and anti-HA IP (C), and co-precipitating proteins were analysed by blotting for Flag (i) and HA (ii). The positions of molecular mass standards (kDa) are shown on the left.

E2 is necessary and sufficient to mediate the F12/KLC2 interaction

To test if E2 was the only VACV protein required for F12 to associate with KLC2, plasmids expressing epitope-tagged codon-optimised E2 (E2co) carrying either an N-terminal V5-tag or HA-tag, driven by a human cytomegalovirus promoter were constructed (see Materials and Methods). HEK TRex-F12-HAco cells transfected with plasmids expressing Flag-KLC1 or 2 were co-transfected with the V5-E2co expressing plasmid or empty vector control in the absence of virus infection (Fig. 5A). F12-HA expression was induced by treating with doxycycline. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with α-Flag, α-HA and α-V5. Pull-down of Flag-KLC2 (Fig. 5A i) co-precipitated F12-HA only when E2 was present (Fig. 5A ii). However, V5-E2 co-precipitated with Flag-KLC2 whether or not F12 was present (Fig. 5A iii), indicating that F12 is not required for E2 to interact with the kinesin-1 complex. The published F12/E2 interaction [46] was confirmed by the observation that F12 co-precipitated with E2 (Fig. 5A ii) and this interaction was maintained in the reciprocal IP (Fig. 5A iii). The levels of F12-E2 co-precipitation did not differ when KLC1 or 2 was over-expressed. KLC1 did not co-precipitate with F12 to detectable levels in reciprocal IPs (Fig. 5A i and Fig. 5A ii) but some co-precipitation was observed for KLC1 and E2 (Fig. 5A i and Fig. 5A iii), although levels were much lower than observed with KLC2. Repeating the V5-E2 IP in infected cells (Fig. 5B) confirmed the observations using uninfected cells, except that the E2/KLC interaction showed a higher specificity for KLC2 in infected cells (Fig. 5B ii). Taken together, these data show that E2 interacts with KLC2 and F12 interacts with E2 to form the F12/E2/KLC2 complex (Fig. 5C).

E2 interacts with KLC2 and is necessary and sufficient to mediate F12 interaction with KLC2.
Fig. 5. E2 interacts with KLC2 and is necessary and sufficient to mediate F12 interaction with KLC2.
(A) SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of KLC (αFlag-IP), F12 (αHA-IP) and E2 (αV5-IP) immunoprecipitations carried out in parallel on cell lysates generated from HEK TRex-F12-HAco expressing Flag-KLC (isoform 1 or 2 as indicated), and expressing F12-HA (induced by addition of doxycycline) and/or V5-E2 (by transfection of pcDNA3-V5-E2co) as indicated. Clarified cell lysates (Input) and immunoprecipitated samples were immunoblotted with αFlag, αHA, αV5, αKif5B and α-αtubulin. (B) The E2 immunoprecipitation (αV5-IP) was repeated in the presence of virus infection to confirm the KLC isoform specificity. In addition to ectopic expression of Flag-KLC, F12-HA and V5-E2 cells were infected at 5 PFU/cell with either vΔF12 or vΔE2 (as indicated) such that samples only expressed either F12 or E2 or both proteins. Clarified cell lysate samples (Input) were immunoblotted for VACV protein D8 (αD8) to control for equal infection levels. The positions of molecular mass standards (kDa) are shown on the left. (C) Model for the order of interaction of F12, E2 and KLC.

As mentioned, attempts to precipitate endogenous KLC with F12-HA were unsuccessful. This was also true using larger amounts of cell lysate, larger volumes of anti-HA antibody-coated beads and longer incubation times (Fig. 6A). However, because the results shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 indicated that E2 can interact with KLC2 without F12, interactions between endogenous kinesin-1 (KLC and KHC) and epitope-tagged E2 were investigated. The HA-tagged E2co plasmid was transfected into 293T cells, E2co was precipitated with anti-HA beads and samples were analysed by immunoblotting using the 63–90 antibody. This detected several bands in the input lanes (Fig. 6B ii) corresponding to the different KLC isoforms present (possibly including variants of KLC1 produced by differential splicing [56]). Notably, a band corresponding to one of the larger isoforms was detected co-precipitating with HA-E2 but not in the negative control (Fig. 6B ii). In the literature this upper band is often assumed to correspond to KLC2 with the lower band corresponding to KLC1 [31,51]. To confirm that the co-precipitated protein was KLC2, immunoblotted membranes were stripped and re-probed with antibodies specific for KLC1 (Fig. 6B iii) and KLC2 (Fig. 6B iv). Only the anti-KLC2 antibody recognised the band co-precipitating with E2, although the entire kinesin-1 complex co-precipitated with E2 because KHC was also detected (Fig. 6B v). These results indicate that E2 interacts with endogenous human KLC2 but not KLC1 and this specificity is indistinguishable from the murine KLCs expressed ectopically. This retention of this specificity between the human and murine proteins is consistent with the very high amino acid conservation of these proteins (S1 Fig.).

Endogenous KLC2 co-immunoprecipitates with E2.
Fig. 6. Endogenous KLC2 co-immunoprecipitates with E2.
(A) SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of α-HA-IP from HEK 293T cells infected with either vF12-HA or vB14-HA at 5 PFU/cell and harvested 14 hpi. Clarified cell lysates (Input) and α-HA immunoprecipitated samples were immunoblotted with the antibodies indicated on the left of the figure. (B) SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of α-HA immunoprecipitation from lysates generated from HEK 293T cells transfected with a plasmid encoding HA-tagged E2 or a control plasmid as indicated. Samples were probed for the precipitated E2 protein (i) and for co-precipitation of KLC using the 63–90 antibody (ii). The co-precipitating KLC isoform identity was confirmed by immunoblotting with antibodies specific for KLC1 (iii) and KLC2 (iv). Co-precipitation of the entire kinesin-1 complex with E2 was confirmed by immunoblotting with the α-Kif5B antibody (v).

Measuring the effect of KLC1 vs KLC2 siRNA knockdown on virus egress

To dissect the relative contribution of KLC1 and KLC2 to IEV trafficking, the effect on virus egress and plaque size of siRNA-mediated knockdown of the two KLC isoforms 1 and 2 was investigated. Knockdown of KLC1, KLC2 or both was achieved using a mixture of several siRNAs (Fig. 7A). Infection of cells in which KLC2 was knocked down had no discernible effect on plaque size (Fig. 7B) or virus egress to the cell surface as measured by surface B5 staining and flow cytometry (Fig. 7C), despite the F12/E2 complex interacting with KLC2. In contrast, siRNA knockdown of KLC1 caused increased virus egress (Fig. 7C) and plaque size (Fig. 7B). Interestingly, although knockdown of KLC2 had no effect alone, if KLC1 and KLC2 were knocked down together, the increased virus egress and plaque size deriving from loss of KLC1 was abrogated (Fig. 7B and C). To check that alterations in virus egress and plaque size following siRNA treatment were not just a consequence of alterations in virus replication, the virus associated with cells and in the culture medium were measured (Fig. 7D). This showed that there was no significant difference in titres of infectious virus within or attached to cells (Fig. 7D i), but there was a small but significant increase in virus released from the cells after knockdown of siRNA (Fig. 7D ii). This is consistent with knockdown of KLC1 enhancing virus egress to the cell surface.

The effect of KLC knock-down by siRNA on virus egress.
Fig. 7. The effect of KLC knock-down by siRNA on virus egress.
(A) SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting analysis of the efficiency of siRNA knockdown of KLC1 and KLC2 in the human osteosarcoma cell line U-2 OS. Cells were treated with siRNA targeting KLC1 (siKLC1), or KLC2 (siKLC2) or a mix of both (siKLC1 & 2) and compared to cells treated with two independent non-targeting siRNAs (nsA and nsB). Cells were harvested 72 hpi and protein levels were analysed by SDS-PAGE. Tubulin levels were measured to confirm equivalent protein loading levels using an antibody specific to α-tubulin. Levels of KLC1 and KLC2 were measured by staining both with the pan-KLC 63–90 antibody, detecting both KLC1 (lower band) and KLC2 (upper band), and antibodies specific for KLC1 and KLC2. (B) Plaque size determination of vA5GFP on siRNA treated U-2 OS cells. Cells were treated with siRNA to KLC1, KLC2, KLC1&2 or two independent non-silencing RNAs (nsA and nsB). Monolayers of siRNA-treated cells were infected with vA5GFP to generate well separated plaques by 3 dpi. Cells were fixed and plaques positive for GFP expression were imaged using an inverted fluorescence microscope with a mounted digital camera and plaque surface area was measured using Axiovision (Zeiss) software. The average size of 20–35 plaques per sample and 3 replicate samples per condition were calculated and compared by student t-test (**** p<0.0001). (C) Estimation of virus egress from siRNA-treated cells by flow cytometry. Cells infected with vA5GFP at 5 PFU/cell and stained at various times pi prior to fixation for the CEV-associated B5 protein. Levels of staining were quantified by flow cytometry. (i) To validate this method of measuring egress an initial experiment compared three viruses known to display different levels of virion egress; vA5GFP (WT), vA5GFP-ΔA36 (vΔA36) and vA5GFP-ΔF12 (vΔF12). Background staining levels were monitored by including a sample stained with an isotype control antibody (iso). The three viruses showed levels of surface staining similar to their known relative levels of virion egress. (ii) To measure the effect of siRNA treatment on egress, cells were treated with siRNAs for 48 h and then infected with vA5GFP and stained for surface B5 at the indicated times. (D) Single step growth curve of released and cell-associated virus from siRNA-treated cells. U-2 OS cells were treated with siRNA targeting either KLC1 or KLC2 or a non-silencing (ns) control RNA and infected with vA5GFP at 10 PFU/cell 48 h after siRNA treatment. The supernatant (i) and cells (ii) were harvested separately at 1 hpi and 16 hpi. The infectious virus titre of triplicate samples was determined by plaque assay and numbers were analysed by student’s T-test.

Mapping the F12/E2 interaction with KLC2

All KLC isoforms are made up of an N-terminal coiled-coil region that mediates KHC association, and a C-terminal TPR motif-containing region that mediates interaction with cargo proteins [57] (Fig. 8A ii). Sequence alignment of murine KLC1 (spliceform A, accession number NM_008450.2) and KLC2 (accession number NM_008451.2) shows a high level of amino acid identity, particularly in the TPR region. Clusters of sequence variation occur within TPR motifs 4, 5 and 6, the linker region between TPR 5 and 6, and in particular the C-terminal tail region (Fig. 8A i), which could contribute to the selective binding of cargo proteins (such as E2) with a particular KLC isoform.

The F12/E2 interaction with KLC maps to the KLC2 C-terminal tail.
Fig. 8. The F12/E2 interaction with KLC maps to the KLC2 C-terminal tail.
(A) Schematic representation of KLC and chimeric alleles used. (i) Conservation score plot of murine KLC1 and KLC2 protein sequence alignment (shown in supplemental information S2 Fig.). The physiochemical conservation was calculated for each residue using the PET91 matrix (1 = complete conservation, 0 = no conservation, see key for colour values, positions within KLC2 that have no corresponding KLC1 residue are coloured black) and plotted onto the KLC domain organisation diagram to scale (note the alignment of the KLC1 C-terminal tail to a region in the centre of the KLC2 C-terminal tail as denoted by hatched grey lines). (ii) KLC domain organisation. All KLC molecules possess an N-terminal coiled-coil region that mediates interaction with KHC, a TPR region consisting of 6 copies of the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif, that affects interaction with certain cargo proteins containing a tryptophan acidic (WD) motif, and a highly variable C-terminal tail. (iii) Schematic of KLC1/KLC2 chimeric proteins generated. The regions used in each chimera are colour coded; red for KLC1 and green for KLC2. The amino acid positions of KLC1 and KLC2 included in each chimera are listed alongside. A summary of the results described in results below is also shown. (B) and (C) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of the interaction of KLC chimeras with the F12/E2 complex. (i) Cells transfected with FLAG-KLC chimeras were infected with vF12-HA and clarified cell lysates produced 16 hpi. Chimeric Flag-KLC proteins were immunoprecipitated and co-precipitating F12-HA and KHC were analysed by immunoblot as described for Fig. 1A. (ii) The experiment was repeated using vHA-E2 (a virus expressing HA-tagged E2) to analyse the interaction of E2 with the various chimeras. (iii) The experiment was repeated in a HeLa cell line expressing V5-tagged A36 to analyse the ability of A36 to bind to the different chimeras. (B) shows results for the chimeras described in (a iii) and (C) shows the more detailed mapping using the chimeras described in (a iv).

To map the site of interaction between KLC and F12/E2, chimeric KLCs were generated in which regions of KLC1 and KLC2 were switched (Fig. 8A iii), focusing on the TPR domain that showed the lowest conservation scores (Fig. 8A i). Immunoprecipiation of these Flag-tagged KLC chimeras from cells infected with either vF12-HA (Fig. 8B i) or vE2-HA (Fig. 8B ii) showed that only proteins possessing the KLC2 C-terminal TPR co-precipitated the F12/E2 complex. All the chimeric proteins formed part of the kinesin-1 complex, because they interacted with KHC (Fig. 8B i, bottom panel). They also interacted with A36 (Fig. 8B iii), suggesting each chimera, particularly its TPR domain, remained functional.

Additional KLC1/2 chimeras were constructed to determine the contribution of the C-terminal tail or TPR6 in the KLC interaction with E2 (Fig. 8A iv). The E2/F12 complex only immunoprecipitated with KLCs possessing the isoform 2 C-terminal tail (Fig. 8C) regardless of which TPR 6 was present. These results explain the preference of E2 for KLC2 over KLC1 (spliceform A, which lacks this tail).


The VACV F12 protein is involved in IEV egress via an unknown mechanism. F12 shares similarity with both KLC and the proteins that interact with KLC [37] and is associated with IEVs during microtubule-based movement and then dissociates from IEVs prior to the switch to actin-based motility [46]. Therefore, we investigated whether F12 was itself a kinesin-1-interacting protein. Both ourselves and other labs [46] had been unable to detect F12/kinesin-1 interaction by affinity tag pull-down of F12. However, data presented here showed an interaction when epitope-tagged KLC was expressed ectopically. Interestingly F12, unlike A36, discriminated between different KLC isoforms, associating with KLC2 but not KLC1 and the F12/KLC2 association was only detectable in the presence of virus infection. These observations may explain why a F12/KLC interaction had not been detected previously, because those experiments had used reagents specific for KLC1 or had been done in the absence of virus infection. Using a panel of viruses lacking expression of individual IEV-associated proteins, E2 was identified as critical for the F12-KLC interaction. Furthermore, E2 proved to be both necessary and sufficient to mediate the F12/KLC interaction, even in the absence of virus infection.

RNAi knockdown of either KLC1 or KLC2 failed to demonstrate a critical role for VACV egress or spread. However, KLC1 knock-down enhanced virus egress and plaque size. While KLC1 knock-down did not have a statistically significant effect on total virus replication, a slightly increased amount of released virus was observed (Fig. 7D). Knock-down of KLC2 alone had no discernible effect on virus egress or spread, however knockdown of KLC2 and KLC1 reversed the effect of knocking down KLC1 alone (Fig. 7B and C). Until recently it had been accepted that all kinesin-1 complexes contain homologous pairs of KLCs [58]. However, recent proteomics studies have suggested that complexes with different KLC isoforms also exist [59]. results presented here suggest a possible functional interplay between KLC1 and KLC2.

The interaction of F12/E2 with KLC2 requires the C-terminal tail of KLC2, although binding may also involve other regions of the KLC molecule. The interaction with the C-terminal tail of KLC2 may explain why siRNA knockdown of KLC2 does not block VACV egress for the F12/E2 complex might associate with any KLC isoform that possesses a KLC2-like C-terminal tail. Humans and mice express at least 4 different KLC isoforms, each encoded by a different gene but showing high degrees of sequence similarity. For example, mice and humans KLC1A shares 97% amino acid identity and 99% amino acid similarity, while KLC2 shares 95% identity and 98% similarity, see supplemental information S1 Fig.). KLC1 and KLC2 are expressed most abundantly and ubiquitously, although KLC1 is described as enriched in neuronal cells [31]. KLC3 has been described as specific to developing spermatids [32] and the tissue distribution of KLC4 remains uncharacterised, although expression of both KLC3 and KLC4 has been detected in laboratory cell lines [59]. All isoforms possess a highly conserved KHC-interacting domain, a conserved TPR region (with minor differences as shown in Fig. 9A i) and a highly variable C-terminal tail. The KLC1 locus can produce at least 16 different spliced mRNAs, each encoding a KLC1 differing in the sequence and length of the C-terminal tail [56]. The allele of KLC1 used in this study corresponds to KLC1A, the shortest KLC1 spliceform. Several of the larger KLC1 spliceforms, KLC3 and KLC4 encode C-terminal tails that show strong similarity to KLC2 [56,60]. The larger KLC1 isoforms were detected with the 63–90 and KLC1-specific antibodies after siRNA knockdown of KLC2, but were absent when both KLC1 and KLC2 were knocked down (Fig. 7A lanes 2 and 3). Such KLC1 isoforms, KLC3 and KLC4 may be capable of interacting with F12/E2, suggesting there may be a redundancy in the function of different KLC isoforms in cells and the ability of VACV to utilise them. Different cells express different KLC repertoires and so it may be advantageous for VACV to utilise multiple KLC isoforms to exploit kinesin-based transport in different cell types. However, KLC2, being ubiquitously expressed would be the most attractive target.

F12 and E2 form part of the IEV trafficking complex.
Fig. 9. F12 and E2 form part of the IEV trafficking complex.
(A) Schematic model (not to scale) of the IEV/kinesin-1 interaction complex showing the potential spacial arrangement of A36, F12 and E2 in relation to the KLC2 TPR structural model (shown as a surface rendering) published by Pernigo et al [67] (PDB # 3ZFW). The A36 WD/E motif interacts with the TPR groove in a similar manner to that shown for SifA-kinesin interacting protein (shown as an atomic space filling model) while E2 interacts with the C-terminal tail of KLC. F12 can interact with both A36 and E2. (B) (i) For fully wrapped IEVs to be transported efficiently from the site of wrapping to the cell surface the presence of A36, F12 and E2 is required. (ii) In the absence of either F12 or E2 IEV trafficking is almost entirely abrogated. (iii) In the absence of A36 some IEV egress can still take place. The E2/F12 complex might mediate the interaction between IEVs and kinesin-1 either directly or via another viral or cell protein present in IEVs. (iv) siRNA knockdown of KLC1 may result in an increased association of IEVs with KLC2 containing motor complexes, increasing the efficiency of trafficking.

It has been proposed that the KLC C-terminal tail plays a role in targeting kinesin-1 complexes to specific subcellular structures, with spliceforms of KLC1 displaying distinct subcellular localisation [61] and differentially affecting the trafficking of different subcellular structures (KLC1B associates with rough endoplasmic reticulum, KLC1D with Golgi [62]). Additionally, the KLC C-terminal tail is the target of a number of post translational modifications that modulate KLC interaction with its binding partners. For example, the C-terminal 25 amino acids of KLC2 contains a motif that can be phosphorylated by casein kinase II, which in turn primes the molecule for phosphorylation by glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) at multiple serines [63]. This phosphorylation reduces association of kinesin-1 with membrane-bound organelles, suggesting this may be a mechanism of inducing cargo release once at its destination. The putative GSK3 target sequence is conserved between mouse, rat and human KLC2 but not KLC3, KLC4 or many of the characterised KLC1 spliceforms [60]. Two additional serine residues, targeted for phosphorylation by protein kinase A, have also been identified in the KLC2 C-terminal tail (S545 and S582 in human KLC2, S542 and S579 in mouse KLC2 and conserved in KLC3 and KLC4, and several of the KLC1 spliceforms possess one or both). Phosphorylation of both sites is required for the association of the KLC interacting scaffolding protein 14–3–3, which, like F12/E2, shows specificity for KLC2 [60,64].

The role of F12/E2 association with the KLC C-terminal tail remains uncertain. Binding of multiple cargo proteins to different regions of the KLC TPR domain can be cooperative [65]. Structural studies have suggested that association of a WD/E motif (like the ones present in A36 [43]) containing peptide induces a conformational shift in the KLC TPR domain [66,67] and such cargo-induced conformational changes may influence kinesin-1 motor activation. This report is the first confirmation that the F12/E2 complex interacts with the kinesin-1 complex, making it a prime candidate as a regulatory element influencing kinesin-1 activity during egress of IEVs. A36 associates with KLC via interaction of its WD/E motif (shown as an atomic space filling model in Fig. 9A) with the KLC TPR groove (located in the N-terminal half of the TPR domain, Fig. 9A). F12 can bind A36 [45] and E2 [46], though it is unclear if these interactions are cooperative or mutually exclusive, E2 in turn associates with the C-terminal tail of KLC (shown in red, Fig. 9A) forming the IEV trafficking complex. It is possible that the F12/E2 association stabilises or enhances a cargo-induced TPR domain conformational shift. Formation of the trafficking complex is required for IEV kinesin-1 trafficking (Fig. 9B i). F12 and E2 are essential in this complex because viruses lacking expression of either of these proteins produce IEVs that are retained at the site of wrapping [36] (Fig. 9B ii). Viruses lacking F12 or E2 fail to bind kinesin-1 even though A36 is present [37], although we and others found a A36-KLC interaction using over-expressed A36 in the absence of F12 or E2 [40]. Deletion of A36 does not result in a complete loss of IEV egress [41] and so another element connecting IEVs to kinesin-1 must exist (Fig. 9B iii). F12 or E2 might provide the link between kinesin 1 and IEVs either directly or via another IEV protein. Alternatively, the trans-Golgi or early-endosomal membranes used to form IEVs contain cellular membrane proteins, some of which are incorporated into IEVs [68]. Some of these proteins likely affect vesicle trafficking and could form alternative connections between IEVs and the kinesin-1 complex. Both KLC1 and KLC2 associate with trafficking IEVs. If the F12/E2 association is critical for kinesin-1 activation then the association of KLC1 with IEVs might be detrimental to VACV egress, because it would block association with KLC2 and potentially act as a tether. Increased expression of the KLC1E spliceform in the brain has been linked to increased levels of amyloid β plaque formation and the development of Alzheimers disease in mouse models [69], and one model suggested to explain this is that the increased levels of KLC1E interferes with the ability of other KLCs to transport amyloid β precursors correctly [70]. The observation that siRNA-mediated knock-down of KLC1 resulted in enhanced egress suggests there might be a similar interaction between KLC1 and KLC2 during VACV trafficking (Fig. 9B iv). VACV provides a useful tool to enhance our understanding of the cellular roles and properties of the different KLC isoforms and spliceforms.

A36 and F12 each affect IEV egress from the site of wrapping to the cell surface [36,38,40]. The observation that F12 and E2 form a complex and that both proteins are required for the other to associate with IEVs has added E2 to this list [46]. The integral membrane protein A36 is the only reported direct link between IEVs and the kinesin-1 complex, although this has not been shown during infection with wild-type endogenous protein. Here the first evidence of a direct interaction of F12/E2 with the kinesin-1 complex through an interaction between E2 and the C-terminal tail of KLC2 is presented. Whether this interaction is direct or via other cellular or viral proteins remains to be determined.

In summary, data presented here demonstrate a role for the F12/E2 complex in kinesin-1-mediated IEV trafficking and reveal that this complex binds to KLC isoform 2 via the C-terminal region that varies between different KLC isoforms. The F12/E2 complex represents the second example of a KLC-binding protein with specificity for the KLC2 C-terminal tail and the first example of a virus protein with this specificity.

Materials and Methods


pCIneo-Flag-KLC1A (pFlag-KLC1) and pCIneo-Flag-KLC2 (pFlag-KLC2) have been described [52,71]. These plasmids express N-terminal Flag-tagged full length versions of murine kinesin-1 light chain isoform 1A (accession number NM_008450.2) and 2 (accession number NM_008451.2) respectively.

Chimeric KLC1/2 alleles were generated by splicing by overlap extension [72] (using the combination of primers listed in S1 and S2 Tables). Briefly the 5’ and 3’ fragments were generated by PCR using a high fidelity DNA polymerase (platinum Pfx, Invitrogen) with short complementary overlapping regions. These were spliced together and amplified using overlapping PCR and cloned into the EcoRI and XbaI sites of pCI-neo (Promega).

An E2 open reading frame (ORF, codon optimised for expression in human cells, GeneArt), was subcloned into the NotI-XbaI restriction site of pcDNA3-HA and pcDNA3-V5. These plasmids are two pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) variants containing the coding sequence for either an N-terminal HA-epitope tag with alanine linker (MYPYDVPDYAAAA) or a V5-epitope tag with alanine linker (MGKPIPNPLLGLDSTAAA) inserted into the EcoRI-NotI site.

Cells and viruses

The human embryonic kidney cell line HEK 293T (ATCC CRL-11268), human osteosarcoma cell line U-2 OS (ATCC HTB-96) and the African green monkey kidney cell lines BS-C-1 (ATCC CCL-26) and CV-1 (ATCC CCL70) were maintained in DMEM (Gibco Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-treated (56°C, 1 h) foetal bovine serum (FBS). HeLa cells (ATCC CCL-2) were maintained in MEM (Gibco Invitrogen) supplemented with non-essential amino acids and 10% FBS. RK-13 cells were maintained in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS.

All wild type and recombinant viruses were derivatives of VACV strain Western Reserve (WR). The viruses expressing a GFP-tagged capsid protein (A5) have been described (vA5-GFP [20], vA5GFP-ΔA36 and vA5GFP-ΔF12 [41]). Virus stocks were amplified in RK-13 cells (ATCC CCL-37) and titrated by plaque assay on BS-C-1 cells. Viruses used for the flow cytometry egress assay were purified by centrifugation through a 36% (w/v) sucrose cushion as described [33].

Construction of vE2-HA

The 680 nucleotides upstream of the VACV WR e2l ORF were amplified by PCR using primers E3F-HindIII (gaccaagcttacgagcgttctaacgcagag) and HAE2R (cgcggccgcagcgtaatctggaacatcgtatgggtacatctttagagaatatactagtc) incorporating an HA-epitope tag encoding region and a NotI site. The e2l ORF and 533 nucleotides downstream were amplified by PCR using primers E1R-ApaI-BamHI (gaccgggcccggatcctggcgtctaagatattcttccat) and E2FDC1 (gaacgcggccgcgatgatatctgtcacagatattcgta).This added a NotI site to the 5’ end of the ORF allowing in frame splicing to the HA-epitope tag-encoding sequence. The spliced product was cloned into the HindIII-ApaI site of pUC13-EcoGPTmCherry, a derivative of pUC13-EcoGPTEGFP [73] in which the ORF encoding the green fluorescent protein was replaced by an ORF encoding the mCherry red fluorescent protein, to create the plasmid pUC12-EcoGPT-mC-HAE2. This plasmid was transfected into CV-1 cells and infected with VACV WR lacking E2 (vΔE2, [48]), and recombinant viruses were isolated by transient dominant selection as described [73,74]. Recombinant vE2-HA was easily distinguishable from vΔE2 parental virus due to the rescue of a wild-type plaque size phenotype. The presence of the E2-HA allele and the absence of the EcoGPT-GFP in the resolved virus was confirmed by PCR, and E2-HA expression was confirmed by immunoblot analysis.

Generation of F12-HA expressing cell line HEK TRex-F12co-HA

A HEK 293 cell line inducibly-expressing HA epitope-tagged VACV F12 protein was created using the T-REx system (Invitrogen). T-REx-293 cells (expressing the Tet repressor) were transfected with a pcDNA4/TO plasmid into which the ORF for F12-HA, codon optimised for expression in Human cells (GeneArt), was inserted under control of an inducible promoter. Cells were grown and selected using Blasticidin and Zeocin as per the T-REx manufacturer’s instructions to generate a stable polyclonal cell line. Doxycycline-inducible (0.5 μg/ml) expression of F12-HA was confirmed by immunoblot and Immunofluorescence analysis.

Immunofluorescence (IF) confocal microscopy

HeLa cells seeded onto glass coverslips (thickness no. 1.5) were transfected with pFlag-KLC1 or pFLAG-KLC2 (when appropriate) and 24 h later were infected with vA5-GFP at 5 plaque forming units (PFU)/cell. Cells were fixed 14 h post infection (hpi) for 30 mins in 4% paraformaldehyde followed by 15 mins in 8% paraformaldehyde (in 250 mM HEPES, pH 7.4), permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X-100 and stained using a polyclonal rabbit anti-Flag antibody (Sigma) or rabbit anti-KLC isoform 2 (AbCam ab95881) and anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with AlexaFluor546 secondary antibodies (Life Technologies). Coverslips were mounted in Mowiol (10% w/v Mowiol4–88 (CalBiochem), 25% v/v glycerol, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 0.5 μg/ml DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Sigma). Fluorescence images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM780 confocal laser scanning microscopy system mounted on an AxioObserver.Z1 inverted microscope using a 64x Plan Apochromat objective (NA; 1.4) and Zen (Zeiss, 2011 version) acquisition software. Images were processed and analysed using Zen, ImageJ and Photoshop (Adobe) software.

Immunoprecipitation (IP)

HEK 293T, HeLa or HEK TRex-F12-HAco cells were seeded in 10-cm dishes and transfected 1 day later with the chosen plasmid using TransIT-LTI transfection reagent (Mirius). If required, cells were infected 24 h later at 5 PFU/cell. Cell lysates were generated 8 or 14 h later as follows: cells were washed once with PBS and lysed in Immunoprecipitation (IP) lysis buffer (10 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 0.25% NP-40, 150 mM NaCl) supplemented with cOmplete Mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Lysates were clarified by centrifugation (15000 × g, 15 mins) to remove insoluble material. For anti-HA immunoprecipitations, lysates were incubated with anti-HA mouse monoclonal antibody (clone HA-7)-conjugated agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich, A-2095). For anti-Flag immunoprecipitations, lysates were incubated with anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (Sigma-Aldrich). For anti-V5 immunoprecipitations, lysates were incubated with 1:300 dilution of an anti-V5 antibody (see below) and protein G-conjugated FastFlow sepharose beads (GE Healthcare). Immunoprecipitations were incubated on a rotator for 4 h or overnight and then washed 4 times with IP lysis buffer. Beads were collected by centrifugation and re-suspended in Laemmli SDS-PAGE loading buffer and precipitated proteins were analysed by SDS-PAGE (10% or 12% acrylamide as required) and immunoblotting.


Proteins were transferred onto Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare) and incubated with rabbit polyclonal α-HA (Sigma-Aldrich, H6908), rabbit polyclonal α-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, F7425), mouse monoclonal α-V5 (clone SV5-Pk1, AbD Serotec), mouse monoclonal 63–90 (α-KLC1/2, kind gift from Professor Scott Brady University of Illinois), rabbit polyclonal α-KLC1 (GeneTex, GTX114510), rabbit α-KLC2 (AbCam, ab95881), rabbit polyclonal α-KIF5B (AbCam, ab5629), mouse monoclonal anti-α tubulin (clone DM1A, Millipore) and mouse monoclonal AB1.1 specific for the VACV protein D8 [54]. Blots were imaged and quantified using IRDye-conjugated secondary antibodies (LI-COR) and a LI-COR Odyssey scanner. The secondary antibody used for the α-V5 blots was a Biotin-SP-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG light chain specific antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and bound Ig was detected with IRDye-conjugated streptavidin (LI-COR). All blots shown are representative of a minimum of are representative of experiments repeated at least 3 times.

Measurement of VACV egress by flow cytometry after siRNA treatment

Virion egress has been measured either by counting surface virions by live cell staining with anti- B5 antibody and imaging by confocal microscopy [38,41], or by measuring the total integrated fluorescence intensity by epi-fluorescence microscopy [43]. Here, measurement of surface B5 staining of many cells by flow cytometry was used to assess surface virion levels. First, the relative egress of a panel of viruses, vA5GFP, vA5GFP-ΔA36 and vA5GFP-ΔF12, that are known to produce high, low and negligible levels of surface virions, respectively [41], was measured (Fig. 7C i) and this showed a similar trend to that observed by other methods. Then the effects of siRNA knockdown of KLC1, KLC2 or KLC1 and 2 were measured.

Short interfering RNAs (siRNA) targeting KLC isoform 1 (siKLC1) and 2 (siKLC2) each consisting of a pool of two to five 19–25-nucleotide siRNAs (Santa Cruz Biotech) were transfected into HeLa or U-2 OS cells at 50% confluence using the INTERFERin transfection reagent (Polyplus) at an optimised concentration of 10 nM. The efficiency of RNAi-mediated reduction in protein levels was monitored by SDS-PAGE and immunobloting. U-2 OS cells were infected with vA5-GFP or vA5-GFP-ΔA36 at 5 PFU/ml 48–72 h post siRNA treatment. At various time points live cells were stained for VACV protein B5 [38,41]. Briefly, cells were placed on ice and stained with anti-B5 rat monoclonal antibody (19C2, [75]) or anti-F13 rat monoclonal antibody (15B6, used as isotype control, [75]) for 45 mins. The cells were then washed with cold medium and stained on ice with an AlexFluor647-conjugated anti-rat antibody (Invitrogen). Cells were washed with cold PBS, dissociated using the non-enzymatic AccuEasy cell dissociation buffer, fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde to inactivate any remaining virus and analysed by Flowcytometry using a Cyan ADP MLE (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and Summit 4.3 for Windows software.

Virus growth curve analysis

For the single step virus growth curve analysis, U-2 OS cells were infected at 5 PFU/cell with vA5-GFP with or without prior siRNA treatment and the culture medium and cell pellets were harvested from infected cells at 1 h pi (to measure input virus levels) and 16 h pi (after measurable levels of EEV have been released but before significant cell lysis has contributed IMVs to the supernatant fraction). The titre of infectious virus was determined by plaque assay on BS-C-1 cells as described [17,76]. All conditions were carried out in triplicate for statistical analysis using GraphPad Prism 5 software for Windows.

Plaque size measurement

The size of plaques formed on untreated or siRNA-treated U-2 OS cells was measured as follows. U-2 OS cells were infected 48 h post siRNA treatment with vA5-GFP to give well separated plaques (using ∼40 PFU per 35-mm tissue culture dish containing a monolayer of siRNA treated cells) and left for 3 days with a semi-solid overlay (1.5% carboxymethylcellulose) [17,76]. Cells were washed with PBS and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Individual green plaques were imaged using an AxioVert.A1 inverted fluorescence microscope connected to a Zeiss MRc colour camera. The plaque surface area was measured using Zeiss AxioVision software and statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 5 software for Windows. The human U-2 OS osteosarcoma cell line was chosen for these experiments because, like the more traditionally used BS-C-1 cells they form even monolayers of cells producing clear plaques upon infection, but being human they can be efficiently treated using prevalidated commercially available siRNA targeting human mRNAs.

Supporting Information

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Attachment 3

Attachment 4


1. Moss B (2013) Poxviridae. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Cohen JI, Griffin DE, Lamb RA et al., editors. Fields Virology. Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, London, Buenos Aires, Hong Kong, Sydney, Tokyo: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

2. Fenner F, Anderson DA, Arita I, Jezek Z, Ladnyi ID (1988) Smallpox and its Eradication. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

3. Roberts KL, Smith GL (2008) Vaccinia virus morphogenesis and dissemination. Trends Microbiol 16: 472–479. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.009 18789694

4. Smith GL, Vanderplasschen A, Law M (2002) The formation and function of extracellular enveloped vaccinia virus. J Gen Virol 83: 2915–2931. 12466468

5. Liu L, Cooper T, Howley PM, Hayball JD (2014) From crescent to mature virion: vaccinia virus assembly and maturation. Viruses 6: 3787–3808. doi: 10.3390/v6103787 25296112

6. Dales S, Mosbach EH (1968) Vaccinia as a model for membrane biogenesis. Virology 35: 564–583. 5677800

7. Hollinshead M, Vanderplasschen A, Smith GL, Vaux DJ (1999) Vaccinia virus intracellular mature virions contain only one lipid membrane. J Virol 73: 1503–1517. 9882356

8. Hollinshead M, Rodger G, Van Eijl H, Law M, Hollinshead R, et al. (2001) Vaccinia virus utilizes microtubules for movement to the cell surface. J Cell Biol 154: 389–402. 11470826

9. Newsome TP, Weisswange I, Frischknecht F, Way M (2006) Abl collaborates with Src family kinases to stimulate actin-based motility of vaccinia virus. Cell Microbiol 8: 233–241. 16441434

10. Humphries AC, Dodding MP, Barry DJ, Collinson LM, Durkin CH, et al. (2012) Clathrin potentiates vaccinia-induced actin polymerization to facilitate viral spread. Cell Host Microbe 12: 346–359. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.002 22980331

11. Frischknecht F, Moreau V, Rottger S, Gonfloni S, Reckmann I, et al. (1999) Actin-based motility of vaccinia virus mimics receptor tyrosine kinase signalling. Nature 401: 926–929. 10553910

12. Cudmore S, Cossart P, Griffiths G, Way M (1995) Actin-based motility of vaccinia virus. Nature 378: 636–638. 8524400

13. Cudmore S, Reckmann I, Griffiths G, Way M (1996) Vaccinia virus: a model system for actin-membrane interactions. J Cell Sci 109 1739–1747. 8832396

14. Doceul V, Hollinshead M, Breiman A, Laval K, Smith GL (2012) Protein B5 is required on extracellular enveloped vaccinia virus for repulsion of superinfecting virions. J Gen Virol 93: 1876–1886. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.043943-0 22622330

15. Doceul V, Hollinshead M, van der Linden L, Smith GL (2010) Repulsion of superinfecting virions: a mechanism for rapid virus spread. Science 327: 873–876. doi: 10.1126/science.1183173 20093437

16. Carter GC, Law M, Hollinshead M, Smith GL (2005) Entry of the vaccinia virus intracellular mature virion and its interactions with glycosaminoglycans. J Gen Virol 86: 1279–1290. 15831938

17. Law M, Carter GC, Roberts KL, Hollinshead M, Smith GL (2006) Ligand-induced and nonfusogenic dissolution of a viral membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 5989–5994. 16585508

18. Vanderplasschen A, Hollinshead M, Smith GL (1998) Intracellular and extracellular vaccinia virions enter cells by different mechanisms. J Gen Virol 79 877–887. 9568984

19. Moss B (2006) Poxvirus entry and membrane fusion. Virology 344: 48–54. 16364735

20. Carter GC, Rodger G, Murphy BJ, Law M, Krauss O, et al. (2003) Vaccinia virus cores are transported on microtubules. J Gen Virol 84: 2443–2458. 12917466

21. Ward BM (2005) Visualization and characterization of the intracellular movement of vaccinia virus intracellular mature virions. J Virol 79: 4755–4763. 15795261

22. Sanderson CM, Hollinshead M, Smith GL (2000) The vaccinia virus A27L protein is needed for the microtubule-dependent transport of intracellular mature virus particles. J Gen Virol 81: 47–58. 10640541

23. Geada MM, Galindo I, Lorenzo MM, Perdiguero B, Blasco R (2001) Movements of vaccinia virus intracellular enveloped virions with GFP tagged to the F13L envelope protein. J Gen Virol 82: 2747–2760. 11602786

24. Rietdorf J, Ploubidou A, Reckmann I, Holmstrom A, Frischknecht F, et al. (2001) Kinesin-dependent movement on microtubules precedes actin-based motility of vaccinia virus. Nat Cell Biol 3: 992–1000. 11715020

25. Ward BM, Moss B (2001) Vaccinia virus intracellular movement is associated with microtubules and independent of actin tails. J Virol 75: 11651–11663. 11689647

26. Ward BM, Moss B (2001) Visualization of intracellular movement of vaccinia virus virions containing a green fluorescent protein-B5R membrane protein chimera. J Virol 75: 4802–4813. 11312352

27. Hirokawa N, Noda Y, Tanaka Y, Niwa S (2009) Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 682–696. doi: 10.1038/nrm2774 19773780

28. Palacios IM, St Johnston D (2002) Kinesin light chain-independent function of the kinesin heavy chain in cytoplasmic streaming and posterior localisation in the Drosophila oocyte. Development 129: 5473–5485. 12403717

29. Kanai Y, Okada Y, Tanaka Y, Harada A, Terada S, et al. (2000) KIF5C, a novel neuronal kinesin enriched in motor neurons. J Neurosci 20: 6374–6384. 10964943

30. Rice SE, Gelfand VI (2006) Paradigm lost: milton connects kinesin heavy chain to miro on mitochondria. J Cell Biol 173: 459–461. 16717123

31. Rahman A, Friedman DS, Goldstein LS (1998) Two kinesin light chain genes in mice. Identification and characterization of the encoded proteins. J Biol Chem 273: 15395–15403. 9624122

32. Junco A, Bhullar B, Tarnasky HA, van der Hoorn FA (2001) Kinesin light-chain KLC3 expression in testis is restricted to spermatids. Biol Reprod 64: 1320–1330. 11319135

33. Engelstad M, Smith GL (1993) The vaccinia virus 42-kDa envelope protein is required for the envelopment and egress of extracellular virus and for virus virulence. Virology 194: 627–637. 8503178

34. Blasco R, Moss B (1991) Extracellular vaccinia virus formation and cell-to-cell virus transmission are prevented by deletion of the gene encoding the 37,000-Dalton outer envelope protein. J Virol 65: 5910–5920. 1920620

35. Wolffe EJ, Isaacs SN, Moss B (1993) Deletion of the vaccinia virus B5R gene encoding a 42-kilodalton membrane glycoprotein inhibits extracellular virus envelope formation and dissemination. J Virol 67: 4732–4741. 8331727

36. van Eijl H, Hollinshead M, Rodger G, Zhang WH, Smith GL (2002) The vaccinia virus F12L protein is associated with intracellular enveloped virus particles and is required for their egress to the cell surface. J Gen Virol 83: 195–207. 11752717

37. Morgan GW, Hollinshead M, Ferguson BJ, Murphy BJ, Carpentier DC, et al. (2010) Vaccinia protein F12 has structural similarity to kinesin light chain and contains a motor binding motif required for virion export. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000785. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000785 20195521

38. van Eijl H, Hollinshead M, Smith GL (2000) The vaccinia virus A36R protein is a type Ib membrane protein present on intracellular but not extracellular enveloped virus particles. Virology 271: 26–36. 10814567

39. Scaplehorn N, Holmstrom A, Moreau V, Frischknecht F, Reckmann I, et al. (2002) Grb2 and Nck act cooperatively to promote actin-based motility of vaccinia virus. Curr Biol 12: 740–745. 12007418

40. Ward BM, Moss B (2004) Vaccinia virus A36R membrane protein provides a direct link between intracellular enveloped virions and the microtubule motor kinesin. J Virol 78: 2486–2493. 14963148

41. Herrero-Martinez E, Roberts KL, Hollinshead M, Smith GL (2005) Vaccinia virus intracellular enveloped virions move to the cell periphery on microtubules in the absence of the A36R protein. J Gen Virol 86: 2961–2968. 16227217

42. Konecna A, Frischknecht R, Kinter J, Ludwig A, Steuble M, et al. (2006) Calsyntenin-1 docks vesicular cargo to kinesin-1. Mol Biol Cell 17: 3651–3663. 16760430

43. Dodding MP, Mitter R, Humphries AC, Way M (2011) A kinesin-1 binding motif in vaccinia virus that is widespread throughout the human genome. EMBO J 30: 4523–4538. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.326 21915095

44. Yutin N, Faure G, Koonin EV, Mushegian AR (2014) Chordopoxvirus protein F12 implicated in enveloped virion morphogenesis is an inactivated DNA polymerase. Biol Direct 9: 22. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-9-22 25374149

45. Johnston SC, Ward BM (2009) Vaccinia virus protein F12 associates with intracellular enveloped virions through an interaction with A36. J Virol 83: 1708–1717. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01364-08 19052096

46. Dodding MP, Newsome TP, Collinson LM, Edwards C, Way M (2009) An E2-F12 complex is required for intracellular enveloped virus morphogenesis during vaccinia infection. Cell Microbiol 11: 808–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01296.x 19207726

47. Zhang WH, Wilcock D, Smith GL (2000) Vaccinia virus F12L protein is required for actin tail formation, normal plaque size, and virulence. J Virol 74: 11654–11662. 11090164

48. Domi A, Weisberg AS, Moss B (2008) Vaccinia virus E2L null mutants exhibit a major reduction in extracellular virion formation and virus spread. J Virol 82: 4215–4226. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00037-08 18287229

49. Chen RA, Jacobs N, Smith GL (2006) Vaccinia virus strain Western Reserve protein B14 is an intracellular virulence factor. J Gen Virol 87: 1451–1458. 16690909

50. Chen RA, Ryzhakov G, Cooray S, Randow F, Smith GL (2008) Inhibition of IkappaB kinase by vaccinia virus virulence factor B14. PLoS Pathog 4: e22. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040022 18266467

51. Stenoien DL, Brady ST (1997) Immunochemical analysis of kinesin light chain function. Mol Biol Cell 8: 675–689. 9247647

52. Vagnoni A, Rodriguez L, Manser C, De Vos KJ, Miller CC (2011) Phosphorylation of kinesin light chain 1 at serine 460 modulates binding and trafficking of calsyntenin-1. J Cell Sci 124: 1032–1042. doi: 10.1242/jcs.075168 21385839

53. Ploubidou A, Moreau V, Ashman K, Reckmann I, Gonzalez C, et al. (2000) Vaccinia virus infection disrupts microtubule organization and centrosome function. EMBO J 19: 3932–3944. 10921875

54. Parkinson JE, Smith GL (1994) Vaccinia virus gene A36R encodes a M(r) 43–50 K protein on the surface of extracellular enveloped virus. Virology 204: 376–390. 8091668

55. Brum LM, Turner PC, Devick H, Baquero MT, Moyer RW (2003) Plasma membrane localization and fusion inhibitory activity of the cowpox virus serpin SPI-3 require a functional signal sequence and the virus encoded hemagglutinin. Virology 306: 289–302. 12642102

56. McCart AE, Mahony D, Rothnagel JA (2003) Alternatively spliced products of the human kinesin light chain 1 (KNS2) gene. Traffic 4: 576–580. 12839500

57. Kamal A, Goldstein LS (2002) Principles of cargo attachment to cytoplasmic motor proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14: 63–68. 11792546

58. Gyoeva FK, Sarkisov DV, Khodjakov AL, Minin AA (2004) The tetrameric molecule of conventional kinesin contains identical light chains. Biochemistry 43: 13525–13531. 15491159

59. Maliga Z, Junqueira M, Toyoda Y, Ettinger A, Mora-Bermudez F, et al. (2013) A genomic toolkit to investigate kinesin and myosin motor function in cells. Nat Cell Biol 15: 325–334. doi: 10.1038/ncb2689 23417121

60. Johnson C, Tinti M, Wood NT, Campbell DG, Toth R, et al. (2011) Visualization and biochemical analyses of the emerging mammalian 14-3-3-phosphoproteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 10: M110 005751.

61. Gyoeva FK, Bybikova EM, Minin AA (2000) An isoform of kinesin light chain specific for the Golgi complex. J Cell Sci 113 2047–2054. 10806115

62. Wozniak MJ, Allan VJ (2006) Cargo selection by specific kinesin light chain 1 isoforms. EMBO J 25: 5457–5468. 17093494

63. Morfini G, Szebenyi G, Elluru R, Ratner N, Brady ST (2002) Glycogen synthase kinase 3 phosphorylates kinesin light chains and negatively regulates kinesin-based motility. EMBO J 21: 281–293. 11823421

64. Ichimura T, Wakamiya-Tsuruta A, Itagaki C, Taoka M, Hayano T, et al. (2002) Phosphorylation-dependent interaction of kinesin light chain 2 and the 14–3–3 protein. Biochemistry 41: 5566–5572. 11969417

65. Hammond JW, Griffin K, Jih GT, Stuckey J, Verhey KJ (2008) Co-operative versus independent transport of different cargoes by Kinesin-1. Traffic 9: 725–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00722.x 18266909

66. Zhu H, Lee HY, Tong Y, Hong BS, Kim KP, et al. (2012) Crystal structures of the tetratricopeptide repeat domains of kinesin light chains: insight into cargo recognition mechanisms. PLoS One 7: e33943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033943 22470497

67. Pernigo S, Lamprecht A, Steiner RA, Dodding MP (2013) Structural basis for kinesin-1:cargo recognition. Science 340: 356–359. doi: 10.1126/science.1234264 23519214

68. Krauss O, Hollinshead R, Hollinshead M, Smith GL (2002) An investigation of incorporation of cellular antigens into vaccinia virus particles. J Gen Virol 83: 2347–2359. 12237415

69. Morihara T, Hayashi N, Yokokoji M, Akatsu H, Silverman MA, et al. (2014) Transcriptome analysis of distinct mouse strains reveals kinesin light chain-1 splicing as an amyloid-beta accumulation modifier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 2638–2643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307345111 24497505

70. Gan KJ, Morihara T, Silverman MA (2014) Atlas stumbled: Kinesin light chain-1 variant E triggers a vicious cycle of axonal transport disruption and amyloid-beta generation in Alzheimer's disease. Bioessays.

71. Manser C, Guillot F, Vagnoni A, Davies J, Lau KF, et al. (2012) Lemur tyrosine kinase-2 signalling regulates kinesin-1 light chain-2 phosphorylation and binding of Smad2 cargo. Oncogene 31: 2773–2782. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.437 21996745

72. Higuchi R, Krummel B, Saiki RK (1988) A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 7351–7367. 3045756

73. Unterholzner L, Sumner RP, Baran M, Ren H, Mansur DS, et al. (2011) Vaccinia virus protein C6 is a virulence factor that binds TBK-1 adaptor proteins and inhibits activation of IRF3 and IRF7. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002247. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002247 21931555

74. Falkner FG, Moss B (1990) Transient dominant selection of recombinant vaccinia viruses. J Virol 64: 3108–3111. 2159565

75. Schmelz M, Sodeik B, Ericsson M, Wolffe EJ, Shida H, et al. (1994) Assembly of vaccinia virus: the second wrapping cisterna is derived from the trans Golgi network. J Virol 68: 130–147. 8254722

76. Law M, Smith GL (2004) Studying the binding and entry of the intracellular and extracellular enveloped forms of vaccinia virus. Methods Mol Biol 269: 187–204. 15114017

Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství Laboratoř

Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Pathogens

2015 Číslo 3

Nejčtenější v tomto čísle

Tomuto tématu se dále věnují…

Kurzy Doporučená témata Časopisy
Zapomenuté heslo

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.


Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

VIRTUÁLNÍ ČEKÁRNA ČR Jste praktický lékař nebo pediatr? Zapojte se! Jste praktik nebo pediatr? Zapojte se!