Copy number variants and fixed duplications among 198 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)
Autoři:
Marina Brasó-Vives aff001; Inna S. Povolotskaya aff004; Diego A. Hartasánchez aff001; Xavier Farré aff001; Marcos Fernandez-Callejo aff005; Muthuswamy Raveendran aff006; R. Alan Harris aff006; Douglas L. Rosene aff008; Belen Lorente-Galdos aff009; Arcadi Navarro aff001; Tomas Marques-Bonet aff001; Jeffrey Rogers aff006; David Juan aff001; Inna S. Povolotskaya aff003; Marcos Fernandez-Callejo aff004; Muthuswamy Raveendran aff005; R. Alan Harris aff005; Douglas L. Rosene aff007; Belen Lorente-Galdos aff008; Jeffrey Rogers aff005
Působiště autorů:
Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff001; Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff002; Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive UMR 5558, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Villeurbanne, France
aff002; Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
aff003; Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive UMR 5558, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Villeurbanne, France
aff003; National Centre for Genomic Analysis-Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff004; Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
aff004; Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
aff005; National Centre for Genomic Analysis-Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff005; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
aff006; Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
aff006; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
aff007; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
aff007; Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
aff008; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
aff008; National Institute for Bioinformatics (INB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff009; Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
aff009; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff010; National Institute for Bioinformatics (INB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff010; Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain
aff011; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
aff011; Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain
aff012
Vyšlo v časopise:
Copy number variants and fixed duplications among 198 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). PLoS Genet 16(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008742
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008742
Souhrn
The rhesus macaque is an abundant species of Old World monkeys and a valuable model organism for biomedical research due to its close phylogenetic relationship to humans. Copy number variation is one of the main sources of genomic diversity within and between species and a widely recognized cause of inter-individual differences in disease risk. However, copy number differences among rhesus macaques and between the human and macaque genomes, as well as the relevance of this diversity to research involving this nonhuman primate, remain understudied. Here we present a high-resolution map of sequence copy number for the rhesus macaque genome constructed from a dataset of 198 individuals. Our results show that about one-eighth of the rhesus macaque reference genome is composed of recently duplicated regions, either copy number variable regions or fixed duplications. Comparison with human genomic copy number maps based on previously published data shows that, despite overall similarities in the genome-wide distribution of these regions, there are specific differences at the chromosome level. Some of these create differences in the copy number profile between human disease genes and their rhesus macaque orthologs. Our results highlight the importance of addressing the number of copies of target genes in the design of experiments and cautions against human-centered assumptions in research conducted with model organisms. Overall, we present a genome-wide copy number map from a large sample of rhesus macaque individuals representing an important novel contribution concerning the evolution of copy number in primate genomes.
Klíčová slova:
Comparative genomics – Copy number variation – Genome-wide association studies – Human genomics – Macaque – Mammalian genomics – Primates – Rhesus monkeys
Zdroje
1. Keeney JG, Davis JM, Siegenthaler J, Post MD, Nielsen BS, Hopkins WD, et al. DUF1220 protein domains drive proliferation in human neural stem cells and are associated with increased cortical volume in anthropoid primates. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220: 3053–3060. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0814-9 24957859
2. Pouw RB, Brouwer MC, Geissler J, van Herpen LV, Zeerleder SS, Wuillemin WA, et al. Complement Factor H-Related Protein 3 Serum Levels Are Low Compared to Factor H and Mainly Determined by Gene Copy Number Variation in CFHR3. PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0152164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152164 27007437
3. Bekpen C, Künzel S, Xie C, Eaaswarkhanth M, Lin YL, Gokcumen O, et al. Segmental duplications and evolutionary acquisition of UV damage response in the SPATA31 gene family of primates and humans. BMC Genomics. 2017;18: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3406-7
4. Kondrashov F. Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012; 5048–5057. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1108 22977152
5. Sudmant PH, Huddleston J, Catacchio CR, Malig M, Hillier LW, Baker C, et al. Evolution and diversity of copy number variation in the great ape lineage. Genome Res. 2013;23: 1373–1382. doi: 10.1101/gr.158543.113 23825009
6. Dennis MY, Harshman L, Nelson BJ, Penn O, Cantsilieris S, Huddleston J, et al. The evolution and population diversity of human-specific segmental duplications. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017;1: 69. doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0069 28580430
7. Kronenberg ZN, Fiddes IT, Gordon D, Murali S, Cantsilieris S, Meyerson OS, et al. High-resolution comparative analysis of great ape genomes. Science. 2018;360: aar6343.
8. Gokcumen O, Tischler V, Tica J, Zhu Q, Iskow RC, Lee E, et al. Primate genome architecture influences structural variation mechanisms and functional consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110: 15764–15769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305904110 24014587
9. Zimin AV, Cornish AS, Maudhoo MD, Gibbs RM, Zhang X, Pandey S, et al. A new rhesus macaque assembly and annotation for next-generation sequencing analyses. Biol Direct. 2014;9: 20. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-9-20 25319552
10. Sato K, Kuroki Y, Kumita W, Fujiyama A, Toyoda A, Kawai J, et al. Resequencing of the common marmoset genome improves genome assemblies and gene-coding sequence analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 16894. doi: 10.1038/srep16894 26586576
11. Larsen PA, Harris RA, Liu Y, Murali SC, Campbell CR, Brown AD, et al. Hybrid de novo genome assembly and centromere characterization of the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). BMC Biol. 2017;15: 110. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0439-6 29145861
12. Rogers J, Raveendran M, Harris RA, Mailund T, Leppälä K, Athanasiadis G, et al. The comparative genomics and complex population history of Papio baboons. Science Advances. 2019;5. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau6947 30854422
13. Rigau M, Juan D, Valencia A, Rico D. Intronic CNVs and gene expression variation in human populations. PLoS Genet. 2019;15: e1007902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007902 30677042
14. Stankiewicz P, Lupski J. Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. Annu Rev Med. 2010;61: 437–455. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-100708-204735 20059347
15. Shishido E, Aleksic B, Ozaki N. Copy-number variation in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2014;68: 85–95. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12128 24372918
16. Neira-Fresneda J, Potocki L. Neurodevelopmental Disorders Associated with Abnormal Gene Dosage: Smith–Magenis and Potocki–Lupski Syndromes. Journal of Pediatric Genetics. 2015;04: 159–167.
17. Leu C, Coppola A, Sisodiya SM. Progress from genome-wide association studies and copy number variant studies in epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29: 158–167. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000296 26886358
18. Hollox EJ, Hoh B-P. Human gene copy number variation and infectious disease. Human Genetics. 2014;133: 1217–1233. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1457-x 25110110
19. Liedigk R, Roos C, Brameier M, Zinner D. Mitogenomics of the Old World monkey tribe Papionini. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14: 176. doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0176-1 25209564
20. Phillips KA, Bales KL, Capitanio JP, Conley A, Czoty PW, ‘t Hart BA, et al. Why primate models matter. American Journal of Primatology. 2014;76: 801–827. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22281 24723482
21. Peters A, Kemper T. A review of the structural alterations in the cerebral hemispheres of the aging rhesus monkey. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33: 2357–2372. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.11.015 22192242
22. Rogers J, Raveendran M, Fawcett GL, Fox AS, Shelton SE, Oler JA, et al. CRHR1 genotypes, neural circuits and the diathesis for anxiety and depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18: 700. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.152 23147386
23. Bauman MD, Schumann CM. Advances in nonhuman primate models of autism: Integrating neuroscience and behavior. Exp Neurol. 2018;299: 252–265. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.07.021 28774750
24. Janssen P, Verhoef B-E, Premereur E. Functional interactions between the macaque dorsal and ventral visual pathways during three-dimensional object vision. Cortex. 2018;98: 218–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.021 28258716
25. Bakken TE, Miller JA, Ding S-L, Sunkin SM, Smith KA, Ng L, et al. A comprehensive transcriptional map of primate brain development. Nature. 2016;535: 367–375. doi: 10.1038/nature18637 27409810
26. Loffredo JT, Friedrich TC, León EJ, Stephany JJ, Rodrigues DS, Spencer SP, et al. CD8+ T cells from SIV elite controller macaques recognize Mamu-B*08-bound epitopes and select for widespread viral variation. PLoS One. 2007;2: e1152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001152 18000532
27. Hansen SG, Piatak M Jr, Ventura AB, Hughes CM, Gilbride RM, Ford JC, et al. Immune clearance of highly pathogenic SIV infection. Nature. 2013;502: 100–104. doi: 10.1038/nature12519 24025770
28. Sandler NG, Bosinger SE, Estes JD, Zhu RTR, Tharp GK, Boritz E, et al. Type I interferon responses in rhesus macaques prevent SIV infection and slow disease progression. Nature. 2014;511: 601–605. doi: 10.1038/nature13554 25043006
29. Kuroda MJ, Sugimoto C, Cai Y, Merino KM, Mehra S, Araínga M, et al. High Turnover of Tissue Macrophages Contributes to Tuberculosis Reactivation in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Macaques. J Infect Dis. 2018;217: 1865–1874. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix625 29432596
30. Groves C. Primate Taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC; 2001.
31. Xue C, Raveendran M, Harris RA, Fawcett GL, Liu X, White S, et al. The population genomics of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) based on whole genome sequences. Genome Res. 2016;26: 1651–1662. doi: 10.1101/gr.204255.116 27934697
32. Bimber BN, Ramakrishnan R, Cervera-Juanes R, Madhira R, Peterson SM, Norgren RB, et al. Whole genome sequencing predicts novel human disease models in rhesus macaques. Genomics. 2017;109: 214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.04.001 28438488
33. Marques-Bonet T, Eichler EE. The evolution of human segmental duplications and the core duplicon hypothesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2009;74: 355–362. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.011 19717539
34. Lorente-Galdos B, Bleyhl J, Santpere G, Vives L, Ramírez O, Hernandez J, et al. Accelerated exon evolution within primate segmental duplications. Genome Biol. 2013;14: R9. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-1-r9 23360670
35. Marques-Bonet T, Girirajan S, Eichler EE. The origins and impact of primate segmental duplications. Trends in Genetics. 2009. pp. 443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.08.002 19796838
36. Lee AS, Gutiérrez-Arcelus M, Perry GH, Vallender EJ, Johnson WE, Miller GM, et al. Analysis of copy number variation in the rhesus macaque genome identifies candidate loci for evolutionary and human disease studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17: 1127–1136. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn002 18180252
37. Degenhardt JD, De Candia P, Chabot A, Schwartz S, Henderson L, Ling B, et al. Copy number variation of CCL3-like genes affects rate of progression to simian-AIDS in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). PLoS Genet. 2009;5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000346 19165326
38. Hellmann I, Lim SY, Gelman RS, Letvin NL. Association of activating KIR copy number variation of NK cells with containment of SIV replication in rhesus monkeys. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: 1–12.
39. Hellmann I, Schmitz JE, Letvin NL. Activating KIR Copy Number Variation Is Associated with Granzyme B Release by NK Cells during Primary Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Rhesus Monkeys. J Virol. 2012;86: 13103–13107. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00325-12 23015705
40. Hellmann I, Letvin NL, Schmitz JE. KIR2DL4 Copy Number Variation Is Associated with CD4+ T-Cell Depletion and Function of Cytokine-Producing NK Cell Subsets in SIV-Infected Mamu-A*01-Negative Rhesus Macaques. J Virol. 2013;87: 5305–5310. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02949-12 23449795
41. Ottolini B, Hornsby MJ, Abujaber R, MacArthur JAL, Badge RM, Schwarzacher T, et al. Evidence of convergent evolution in humans and macaques supports an adaptive role for copy number variation of the β-defensin-2 gene. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6: 3025–3038. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu236 25349268
42. de Groot NG, Blokhuis JH, Otting N, Doxiadis GGM, Bontrop RE. Co-evolution of the MHC class I and KIR gene families in rhesus macaques: Ancestry and plasticity. Immunol Rev. 2015;267: 228–245. doi: 10.1111/imr.12313 26284481
43. Serres-Armero A, Povolotskaya IS, Quilez J, Ramirez O, Santpere G, Kuderna LFK, et al. Similar genomic proportions of copy number variation within gray wolves and modern dog breeds inferred from whole genome sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2017;18: 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3406-7
44. Dobrynin P, Liu S, Tamazian G, Xiong Z, Yurchenko AA, Krasheninnikova K, et al. Genomic legacy of the African cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus. Genome Biol. 2015;16: 277. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0837-4 26653294
45. Warren WC, Kuderna L, Alexander A, Catchen J, Pérez-Silva JG, López-Otín C, et al. The Novel Evolution of the Sperm Whale Genome. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9: 3260–3264. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx187 28985367
46. Librado P, Gamba C, Gaunitz C, Der Sarkissian C, Pruvost M, Albrechtsen A, et al. Ancient genomic changes associated with domestication of the horse. Science. 2017;356: 442–445. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5298 28450643
47. Tollis M, Robbins J, Webb AE, Kuderna LFK, Caulin AF, Garcia JD, et al. Return to the Sea, Get Huge, Beat Cancer: An Analysis of Cetacean Genomes Including an Assembly for the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36: 1746–1763. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz099 31070747
48. Alkan C, Kidd JM, Marques-Bonet T, Aksay G, Antonacci F, Hormozdiari F, et al. Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat Genet. 2009;41: 1061–1067. doi: 10.1038/ng.437 19718026
49. Bailey JA, Gu Z, Clark RA, Reinert K, Samonte RV, Schwartz S, et al. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science. 2002;297: 1003–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1072047 12169732
50. Hartasánchez DA, Brasó-Vives M, Heredia-Genestar JM, Pybus M, Navarro A. Effect of collapsed duplications on diversity estimates: what to expect. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10: 2899–2905. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy223 30364947
51. Mallick S, Li H, Lipson M, Mathieson I, Gymrek M, Racimo F, et al. The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 genomes from 142 diverse populations. Nature. 2016;538: 201–206. doi: 10.1038/nature18964 27654912
52. She X, Horvath JE, Jiang Z, Liu G, Furey TS, Christ L, et al. The structure and evolution of centromeric transition regions within the human genome. Nature. 2004;430: 857–864. doi: 10.1038/nature02806 15318213
53. Bailey JA, Eichler EE. Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7: 552–564. 16770338
54. Jiang Z, Tang H, Ventura M, Cardone MF, Marques-Bonet T, She X, et al. Ancestral reconstruction of segmental duplications reveals punctuated cores of human genome evolution. Nat Genet. 2007;39: 1361–1368. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.9 17922013
55. Karolchik D, Hinrichs AS, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Sugnet CW, Haussler D, et al. The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: D493–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh103 14681465
56. Juan D, Rico D, Marques-Bonet T, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Valencia A. Late-replicating CNVs as a source of new genes. Biol Open. 2013;2: 1402–1411. doi: 10.1242/bio.20136924 24285712
57. Grimwood J, Gordon LA, Olsen A, Terry A, Schmutz J, Lamerdin J, et al. The DNA sequence and biology of human chromosome 19. Nature. 2004;428: 529–535. doi: 10.1038/nature02399 15057824
58. Kim PM, Lam HYK, Urban AE, Korbel JO, Affourtit J, Grubert F, et al. Analysis of copy number variants and segmental duplications in the human genome: Evidence for a change in the process of formation in recent evolutionary history. Genome Res. 2008;18: 1865–1874. doi: 10.1101/gr.081422.108 18842824
59. Iskow RC, Gokcumen O, Lee C. Exploring the role of copy number variants in human adaptation. Trends Genet. 2012;28: 245–257. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.002 22483647
60. Zerbino DR, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Amode MR, Barrell D, Bhai J, et al. Ensembl 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: D754–D761. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1098 29155950
61. Ezkurdia I, Juan D, Rodriguez JM, Frankish A, Diekhans M, Harrow J, et al. Multiple evidence strands suggest that there may be as few as 19 000 human protein-coding genes. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23: 5866–5878. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu309 24939910
62. Abascal F, Juan D, Jungreis I, Martinez L, Rigau M, Rodriguez JM, et al. Loose ends: almost one in five human genes still have unresolved coding status. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: 7070–7084. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky587 29982784
63. Sudmant PH, Rausch T, Gardner EJ, Handsaker RE, Abyzov A, Huddleston J, et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature. 2015;526: 75–81. doi: 10.1038/nature15394 26432246
64. MacArthur J, Bowler E, Cerezo M, Gil L, Hall P, Hastings E, et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45: D896–D901. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1133 27899670
65. Piñero J, Bravo À, Queralt-Rosinach N, Gutiérrez-Sacristán A, Deu-Pons J, Centeno E, et al. DisGeNET: a comprehensive platform integrating information on human disease-associated genes and variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45: D833–D839. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw943 27924018
66. Alison M, Heron EA, Hughes G, McGrath J, Tansey K, Gallagher L, et al. A genome-wide scan for common alleles affecting risk for autism. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19: 4072–4082. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq307 20663923
67. Zou M, Li S, Klein WH, Xiang M. Brn3a/Pou4f1 regulates dorsal root ganglion sensory neuron specification and axonal projection into the spinal cord. Dev Biol. 2012;364: 114–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.01.021 22326227
68. Furney SJ, Simmons A, Breen G, Pedroso I, Lunnon K, Proitsi P, et al. Genome-wide association with MRI atrophy measures as a quantitative trait locus for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16: 1130–1138. doi: 10.1038/mp.2010.123 21116278
69. Lanni C, Nardinocchi L, Puca R, Stanga S, Uberti D, Memo M, et al. Homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2: a target for Alzheimer’s beta amyloid leading to misfolded p53 and inappropriate cell survival. PLoS One. 2010;5: e10171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010171 20418953
70. Wiggins AK, Wei G, Doxakis E, Wong C, Tang AA, Zang K, et al. Interaction of Brn3a and HIPK2 mediates transcriptional repression of sensory neuron survival. J Cell Biol. 2004;167: 257–267. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200406131 15492043
71. Salyakina D, Cukier HN, Lee JM, Sacharow S, Nations LD, Ma D, et al. Copy number variants in extended autism spectrum disorder families reveal candidates potentially involved in autism risk. PLoS One. 2011;6: e26049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026049 22016809
72. Miyamoto T, Hasuike S, Yogev L, Maduro MR, Ishikawa M, Westphal H, et al. Azoospermia in patients heterozygous for a mutation in SYCP3. The Lancet. 2003;362: 1714–1719.
73. Bollschweiler D, Radu L, Joudeh L, Plitzko JM, Henderson RM, Mela I, et al. Molecular architecture of the SYCP3 fibre and its interaction with DNA. Open Biol. 2019;9: 190094. doi: 10.1098/rsob.190094 31615332
74. Richard AF, Goldstein SJ, Dewar RE. Weed macaques: The evolutionary implications of macaque feeding ecology. Int J Primatol. 1989;10: 569–594.
75. Stratonovich RL. Conditional Markov Processes. Theory Probab Appl. 1960;5: 156–178.
76. Smit AFA. The origin of interspersed repeats in the human genome. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 1996;6: 743–748.
77. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27: 573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573 9862982
78. Marco-Sola S, Sammeth M, Guigó R, Ribeca P. The GEM mapper: fast, accurate and versatile alignment by filtration. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 1185–1188. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2221 23103880
79. Rabiner LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE. 1989;77: 257–286.
80. Bayes FRSLRM. LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S. Philosophical Transactions. 1763;53: 370–418.
81. Abel HJ, Duncavage E. Detection of structural DNA variation from next generation sequencing data: a review of informatic approaches. Cancer Genet. 2013;206: 432–440. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2013.11.002 24405614
82. Massey FJ Jr. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 1951;46: 68–78.
83. Pearson K. Notes on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proc R Soc Lond. 1895;58: 240–242.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2020 Číslo 5
- Případ Bulovka: Jak postupují jiné nemocnice, aby podobným tragédiím zabránily?
- Jak často se u masových střelců vyskytují duševní choroby?
- FDA varuje před selfmonitoringem cukru pomocí chytrých hodinek. Jak je to v Česku?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Není statin jako statin aneb praktický přehled rozdílů jednotlivých molekul
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- The domesticated transposase ALP2 mediates formation of a novel Polycomb protein complex by direct interaction with MSI1, a core subunit of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2)
- Polyploidy breaks speciation barriers in Australian burrowing frogs Neobatrachus
- Congenital hearing impairment associated with peripheral cochlear nerve dysmyelination in glycosylation-deficient muscular dystrophy
- A new neuropeptide insect parathyroid hormone iPTH in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum