1. CoxMM, GoodmanMF, KreuzerKN, SherrattDJ, SandlerSJ, et al. (2000) The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 404: 37–41.
2. WhitakerSJ (1992) DNA damage by drugs and radiation: what is important and how is it measured? European journal of cancer 28: 273–276.
3. HeyerW-D, EhmsenKT, LiuJ (2010) Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annual review of genetics 44: 113–139.
4. WaterworthWM, DruryGE, BrayCM, WestCE (2011) Repairing breaks in the plant genome: the importance of keeping it together. The New phytologist 192: 805–822.
5. MassonJY, TarsounasMC, StasiakAZ, StasiakA, ShahR, et al. (2001) Identification and purification of two distinct complexes containing the five RAD51 paralogs. Genes & development 15: 3296–3307.
6. KrejciL, AltmannovaV, SpirekM, ZhaoX (2012) Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucleic acids research 40: 5795–5818.
7. SuwakiN, KlareK, TarsounasM (2011) RAD51 paralogs: roles in DNA damage signalling, recombinational repair and tumorigenesis. Seminars in cell & developmental biology 22: 898–905.
8. ThackerJ (2005) The RAD51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer. Cancer letters 219: 125–135.
9. LiuJ, RenaultL, VeauteX, FabreF, StahlbergH, et al. (2011) Rad51 paralogues Rad55-Rad57 balance the antirecombinase Srs2 in Rad51 filament formation. Nature 479: 245–248.
10. BernsteinKA, ReidRJD, SunjevaricI, DemuthK, BurgessRC, et al. (2011) The Shu complex, which contains Rad51 paralogues, promotes DNA repair through inhibition of the Srs2 anti-recombinase. Molecular biology of the cell 22: 1599–1607.
11. MartinV, ChahwanC, GaoH, BlaisV, WohlschlegelJ, et al. (2006) Sws1 is a conserved regulator of homologous recombination in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J 25: 2564–2574.
12. SasanumaH, TawaramotoMS, LaoJP, HosakaH, SandaE, et al. (2013) A new protein complex promoting the assembly of Rad51 filaments. Nature communications 4: 1676.
13. ShorE, WeinsteinJ, RothsteinR (2005) A genetic screen for top3 suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies SHU1, SHU2, PSY3 and CSM2: four genes involved in error-free DNA repair. Genetics 169: 1275–1289.
14. MankouriHW, NgoHP, HicksonID (2007) Shu proteins promote the formation of homologous recombination intermediates that are processed by Sgs1-Rmi1-Top3. Mol Biol Cell 18: 4062–4073.
15. GodinS, WierA, KabbinavarF, Bratton-PalmerDS, GhodkeH, et al. (2013) The Shu complex interacts with Rad51 through the Rad51 paralogues Rad55-Rad57 to mediate error-free recombination. Nucleic acids research 41: 4525–4534.
16. SheZ, GaoZQ, LiuY, WangWJ, LiuGF, et al. (2012) Structural and SAXS analysis of the budding yeast SHU-complex proteins. FEBS Lett 586: 2306–2312.
17. TaoY, LiX, LiuY, RuanJ, QiS, et al. (2012) Structural analysis of Shu proteins reveals a DNA binding role essential for resisting damage. J Biol Chem 287: 20231–20239.
18. LiuT, WanL, WuY, ChenJ, HuangJ (2011) hSWS1.SWSAP1 is an evolutionarily conserved complex required for efficient homologous recombination repair. J Biol Chem 286: 41758–41766.
19. BleuyardJ-Y, GallegoME, WhiteCI (2006) Recent advances in understanding of the DNA double-strand break repair machinery of plants. DNA repair 5: 1–12.
20. KarpenshifY, BernsteinKA (2012) From yeast to mammals: recent advances in genetic control of homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 11: 781–788.
21. GodthelpBC, WiegantWW, van Duijn-GoedhartA, SchärerOD, van BuulPPW, et al. (2002) Mammalian Rad51C contributes to DNA cross-link resistance, sister chromatid cohesion and genomic stability. Nucleic acids research 30: 2172–2182.
22. TakataM, SasakiMS, TachiiriS, FukushimaT, SonodaE, et al. (2001) Chromosome instability and defective recombinational repair in knockout mutants of the five Rad51 paralogs. Molecular and cellular biology 21: 2858–2866.
23. TakataM, SasakiMS, SonodaE, FukushimaT, MorrisonC, et al. (2000) The Rad51 paralog Rad51B promotes homologous recombinational repair. Molecular and cellular biology 20: 6476–6482.
24. JohnsonRD, LiuN, JasinM (1999) Mammalian XRCC2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Nature 401: 397–399.
25. PierceAJ, JohnsonRD, ThompsonLH, JasinM (1999) XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes & development 13: 2633–2638.
26. LiuN, LamerdinJE, TebbsRS, SchildD, TuckerJD, et al. (1998) XRCC2 and XRCC3, new human Rad51-family members, promote chromosome stability and protect against DNA cross-links and other damages. Molecular cell 1: 783–793.
27. TebbsRS, ZhaoY, TuckerJD, ScheererJB, SicilianoMJ, et al. (1995) Correction of chromosomal instability and sensitivity to diverse mutagens by a cloned cDNA of the XRCC3 DNA repair gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 6354–6358.
28. DeansB, GriffinCS, MaconochieM, ThackerJ (2000) Xrcc2 is required for genetic stability, embryonic neurogenesis and viability in mice. The EMBO journal 19: 6675–6685.
29. KuznetsovSG, HainesDC, MartinBK, SharanSK (2009) Loss of Rad51c leads to embryonic lethality and modulation of Trp53-dependent tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Res 69: 863–872.
30. PittmanDL, SchimentiJC (2000) Midgestation lethality in mice deficient for the RecA-related gene, Rad51d/Rad51l3. Genesis 26: 167–173.
31. ShuZ, SmithS, WangL, RiceMC, KmiecEB (1999) Disruption of muREC2/RAD51L1 in mice results in early embryonic lethality which can Be partially rescued in a p53(-/-) background. Molecular and cellular biology 19: 8686–8693.
32. BleuyardJ-Y, WhiteCI (2004) The Arabidopsis homologue of Xrcc3 plays an essential role in meiosis. The EMBO journal 23: 439–449.
33. LiW, YangX, LinZ, TimofejevaL, XiaoR, et al. (2005) The AtRAD51C gene is required for normal meiotic chromosome synapsis and double-stranded break repair in Arabidopsis. Plant physiology 138: 965–976.
34. LiuN, SchildD, ThelenMP, ThompsonLH (2002) Involvement of Rad51C in two distinct protein complexes of Rad51 paralogs in human cells. Nucleic acids research 30: 1009–1015.
35. MillerKA, SawickaD, BarskyD, AlbalaJS (2004) Domain mapping of the Rad51 paralog protein complexes. Nucleic acids research 32: 169–178.
36. MillerKA, YoshikawaDM, McConnellIR, ClarkR, SchildD, et al. (2002) RAD51C interacts with RAD51B and is central to a larger protein complex in vivo exclusive of RAD51. The Journal of biological chemistry 277: 8406–8411.
37. OsakabeK, AbeK, YamanouchiH, TakyuuT, YoshiokaT, et al. (2005) Arabidopsis Rad51B is important for double-strand DNA breaks repair in somatic cells. Plant molecular biology 57: 819–833.
38. OsakabeK, YoshiokaT, IchikawaH, TokiS (2002) Molecular cloning and characterization of RAD51-like genes from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant molecular biology 50: 71–81.
39. SchildD, LioYC, CollinsDW, TsomondoT, ChenDJ (2000) Evidence for simultaneous protein interactions between human Rad51 paralogs. The Journal of biological chemistry 275: 16443–16449.
40. WieseC, CollinsDW, AlbalaJS, ThompsonLH, KronenbergA, et al. (2002) Interactions involving the Rad51 paralogs Rad51C and XRCC3 in human cells. Nucleic acids research 30: 1001–1008.
41. BadieS, LiaoC, ThanasoulaM, BarberP, HillMA, et al. (2009) RAD51C facilitates checkpoint signaling by promoting CHK2 phosphorylation. The Journal of cell biology 185: 587–600.
42. BrennemanMA, WagenerBM, MillerCA, AllenC, NickoloffJA (2002) XRCC3 controls the fidelity of homologous recombination: roles for XRCC3 in late stages of recombination. Molecular cell 10: 387–395.
43. ChunJ, BuechelmaierES, PowellSN (2013) Rad51 paralog complexes BCDX2 and CX3 act at different stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-dependent homologous recombination pathway. Molecular and cellular biology 33: 387–395.
44. Da InesO, DegrooteF, AmiardS, GoubelyC, GallegoME, et al. (2013) Effects of XRCC2 and RAD51B mutations on somatic and meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 74: 959–970.
45. LiuY, MassonJ-Y, ShahR, O'ReganP, WestSC (2004) RAD51C is required for Holliday junction processing in mammalian cells. Science 303: 243–246.
46. LiuY, TarsounasM, O'ReganP, WestSC (2007) Role of RAD51C and XRCC3 in genetic recombination and DNA repair. The Journal of biological chemistry 282: 1973–1979.
47. NagarajuG, HartlerodeA, KwokA, ChandramoulyG, ScullyR (2009) XRCC2 and XRCC3 regulate the balance between short- and long-tract gene conversions between sister chromatids. Molecular and cellular biology 29: 4283–4294.
48. RodrigueA, CoulombeY, JacquetK, GagneJP, RoquesC, et al. (2013) The RAD51 paralogs ensure cellular protection against mitotic defects and aneuploidy. J Cell Sci 126: 348–359.
49. ComptonSA, OzgurS, GriffithJD (2010) Ring-shaped Rad51 paralog protein complexes bind Holliday junctions and replication forks as visualized by electron microscopy. J Biol Chem 285: 13349–13356.
50. YokoyamaH, SaraiN, KagawaW, EnomotoR, ShibataT, et al. (2004) Preferential binding to branched DNA strands and strand-annealing activity of the human Rad51B, Rad51C, Rad51D and Xrcc2 protein complex. Nucleic acids research 32: 2556–2565.
51. IvanovEL, SugawaraN, Fishman-LobellJ, HaberJE (1996) Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 142: 693–704.
52. MansourWY, SchumacherS, RosskopfR, RheinT, Schmidt-PetersenF, et al. (2008) Hierarchy of nonhomologous end-joining, single-strand annealing and gene conversion at site-directed DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 4088–4098.
53. RothN, KlimeschJ, Dukowic-SchulzeS, PacherM, MannussA, et al. (2012) The requirement for recombination factors differs considerably between different pathways of homologous double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells. The Plant journal 72: 781–790.
54. StarkJM, PierceAJ, OhJ, PastinkA, JasinM (2004) Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9305–9316.
55. KroghBO, SymingtonLS (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annual review of genetics 38: 233–271.
56. McDonaldJP, RothsteinR (1994) Unrepaired heteroduplex DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is decreased in RAD1 RAD52-independent recombination. Genetics 137: 393–405.
57. MozlinAM, FungCW, SymingtonLS (2008) Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 paralogs in sister chromatid recombination. Genetics 178: 113–126.
58. OrelN, KyrykA, PuchtaH (2003) Different pathways of homologous recombination are used for the repair of double-strand breaks within tandemly arranged sequences in the plant genome. The Plant Journal 35: 604–612.
59. CermakT, DoyleEL, ChristianM, WangL, ZhangY, et al. (2011) Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic acids research 39: e82.
60. HeacockM, SpanglerE, RihaK, PuizinaJ, ShippenDE (2004) Molecular analysis of telomere fusions in Arabidopsis: multiple pathways for chromosome end-joining. The EMBO journal 23: 2304–2313.
61. MillerJC, TanS, QiaoG, BarlowKA, WangJ, et al. (2011) A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nature biotechnology 29: 143–148.
62. PuchtaH (2005) The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. Journal of experimental botany 56: 1–14.
63. SalomonS, PuchtaH (1998) Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells. The EMBO journal 17: 6086–6095.
64. MalkovaA, IvanovEL, HaberJE (1996) Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 7131–7136.
65. WatanabeK, PacherM, DukowicS, SchubertV, PuchtaH, et al. (2009) The Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes 5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid alignment and homologous recombination after DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21: 2688–2699.
66. Da InesO, DegrooteF, GoubelyC, AmiardS, GallegoME, et al. (2013) Meiotic Recombination in Arabidopsis Is Catalysed by DMC1, with RAD51 Playing a Supporting Role. PLoS genetics 9: e1003787.
67. YonetaniY, HocheggerH, SonodaE, ShinyaS, YoshikawaH, et al. (2005) Differential and collaborative actions of Rad51 paralog proteins in cellular response to DNA damage. Nucleic acids research 33: 4544–4552.
68. LioYC, MazinAV, KowalczykowskiSC, ChenDJ (2003) Complex formation by the human Rad51B and Rad51C DNA repair proteins and their activities in vitro. J Biol Chem 278: 2469–2478.
69. KurumizakaH, IkawaS, NakadaM, EnomotoR, KagawaW, et al. (2002) Homologous pairing and ring and filament structure formation activities of the human Xrcc2*Rad51D complex. J Biol Chem 277: 14315–14320.
70. SigurdssonS, Van KomenS, BussenW, SchildD, AlbalaJS, et al. (2001) Mediator function of the human Rad51B-Rad51C complex in Rad51/RPA-catalyzed DNA strand exchange. Genes Dev 15: 3308–3318.
71. TarsounasM, MunozP, ClaasA, SmiraldoPG, PittmanDL, et al. (2004) Telomere maintenance requires the RAD51D recombination/repair protein. Cell 117: 337–347.
72. LinFL, SperleK, SternbergN (1984) Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Molec Cell Biol 4: 1020–1034.
73. PradoF, AguileraA (1995) Role of reciprocal exchange, one-ended invasion crossover and single-strand annealing on inverted and direct repeat recombination in yeast: different requirements for the RAD1, RAD10, and RAD52 genes. Genetics 139: 109–123.
74. BleuyardJ-Y, GallegoME, SavignyF, WhiteCI (2005) Differing requirements for the Arabidopsis Rad51 paralogs in meiosis and DNA repair. The Plant Journal 41: 533–545.
75. FauserF, RothN, PacherM, IlgG, Sánchez-FernándezR, et al. (2012) In planta gene targeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 7535–7540.
76. CurtisMD, GrossniklausU (2003) A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant physiology 133: 462–469.
77. CloughSJ, BentAF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 16: 735–743.
78. GallegoME, WhiteCI (2001) RAD50 function is essential for telomere maintenance in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 1711–1716.