1. KlecknerN (1996) Meiosis: how could it work? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 8167–8174.
2. KeeneyS (2008) Spo11 and the Formation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Meiosis. Genome Dyn Stab 2: 81–123.
3. KeeneyS, GirouxCN, KlecknerN (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375–384.
4. MimitouEP, SymingtonLS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770–774.
5. SchwartzEK, HeyerWD (2011) Processing of joint molecule intermediates by structure-selective endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Chromosoma 120: 109–127.
6. HunterN, KlecknerN (2001) The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59–70.
7. PaquesF, HaberJE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 349–404.
8. De MuytA, JessopL, KolarE, SourirajanA, ChenJ, et al. (2012) BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. Mol Cell 46: 43–53.
9. SchwachaA, KlecknerN (1995) Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83: 783–791.
10. YoudsJL, BoultonSJ (2011) The choice in meiosis - defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation. J Cell Sci 124: 501–513.
11. AllersT, LichtenM (2001) Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47–57.
12. StorlazziA, XuL, CaoL, KlecknerN (1995) Crossover and noncrossover recombination during meiosis: timing and pathway relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 8512–8516.
13. BornerGV, KlecknerN, HunterN (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29–45.
14. LynnA, SoucekR, BornerGV (2007) ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res 15: 591–605.
15. ShinoharaM, OhSD, HunterN, ShinoharaA (2008) Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat Genet 40: 299–309.
16. FalkJE, ChanAC, HoffmannE, HochwagenA (2010) A Mec1- and PP4-dependent checkpoint couples centromere pairing to meiotic recombination. Dev Cell 19: 599–611.
17. ZakharyevichK, TangS, MaY, HunterN (2012) Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 149: 334–347.
18. de los SantosT, HunterN, LeeC, LarkinB, LoidlJ, et al. (2003) The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164: 81–94.
19. HollowayJK, BoothJ, EdelmannW, McGowanCH, CohenPE (2008) MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1–MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet 4: e1000186.
20. OsmanF, DixonJ, DoeCL, WhitbyMC (2003) Generating crossovers by resolution of nicked Holliday junctions: a role for Mus81-Eme1 in meiosis. Mol Cell 12: 761–774.
21. SmithGR, BoddyMN, ShanahanP, RussellP (2003) Fission yeast Mus81.Eme1 Holliday junction resolvase is required for meiotic crossing over but not for gene conversion. Genetics 165: 2289–2293.
22. CromieG, SmithGR (2008) Meiotic Recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: A Paradigm for Genetic and Molecular Analysis. Genome Dyn Stab 3: 195.
23. CromieGA, HyppaRW, SmithGR (2008) The fission yeast BLM homolog Rqh1 promotes meiotic recombination. Genetics 179: 1157–1167.
24. CromieGA, HyppaRW, TaylorAF, ZakharyevichK, HunterN, et al. (2006) Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination. Cell 127: 1167–1178.
25. FilipskiJ, MuchaM (2002) Structure, function and DNA composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin loops. Gene 300: 63–68.
26. BlatY, ProtacioRU, HunterN, KlecknerN (2002) Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 111: 791–802.
27. KlecknerN (2006) Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma 115: 175–194.
28. AcquavivaL, SzekvolgyiL, DichtlB, DichtlBS, de La Roche Saint AndreC, et al. (2013) The COMPASS subunit Spp1 links histone methylation to initiation of meiotic recombination. Science 339: 215–218.
29. SommermeyerV, BeneutC, ChaplaisE, SerrentinoME, BordeV (2013) Spp1, a member of the Set1 Complex, promotes meiotic DSB formation in promoters by tethering histone H3K4 methylation sites to chromosome axes. Mol Cell 49: 43–54.
30. PanizzaS, MendozaMA, BerlingerM, HuangL, NicolasA, et al. (2011) Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 146: 372–383.
31. StorlazziA, GarganoS, Ruprich-RobertG, FalqueM, DavidM, et al. (2010) Recombination proteins mediate meiotic spatial chromosome organization and pairing. Cell 141: 94–106.
32. SchwachaA, KlecknerN (1997) Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90: 1123–1135.
33. BishopDK, ParkD, XuL, KlecknerN (1992) DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69: 439–456.
34. ShinoharaA, GasiorS, OgawaT, KlecknerN, BishopDK (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells 2: 615–629.
35. NiuH, WanL, BaumgartnerB, SchaeferD, LoidlJ, et al. (2005) Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol Biol Cell 16: 5804–5818.
36. HollingsworthNM, PonteL (1997) Genetic interactions between HOP1, RED1 and MEK1 suggest that MEK1 regulates assembly of axial element components during meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147: 33–42.
37. CarballoJA, JohnsonAL, SedgwickSG, ChaRS (2008) Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132: 758–770.
38. RevenkovaE, JessbergerR (2006) Shaping meiotic prophase chromosomes: cohesins and synaptonemal complex proteins. Chromosoma 115: 235–240.
39. KugouK, FukudaT, YamadaS, ItoM, SasanumaH, et al. (2009) Rec8 guides canonical Spo11 distribution along yeast meiotic chromosomes. Mol Biol Cell 20: 3064–3076.
40. KimKP, WeinerBM, ZhangL, JordanA, DekkerJ, et al. (2010) Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 143: 924–937.
41. GoldfarbT, LichtenM (2010) Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol 8: e1000520.
42. SchwachaA, KlecknerN (1994) Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Cell 76: 51–63.
43. PetersJM, NishiyamaT (2012) Sister chromatid cohesion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a011130.
44. FousteriMI, LehmannAR (2000) A novel SMC protein complex in Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains the Rad18 DNA repair protein. EMBO J 19: 1691–1702.
45. AndrewsEA, PalecekJ, SergeantJ, TaylorE, LehmannAR, et al. (2005) Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25: 185–196.
46. LehmannAR, WalickaM, GriffithsDJ, MurrayJM, WattsFZ, et al. (1995) The rad18 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe defines a new subgroup of the SMC superfamily involved in DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 15: 7067–7080.
47. KegelA, Betts-LindroosH, KannoT, JeppssonK, StromL, et al. (2011) Chromosome length influences replication-induced topological stress. Nature 471: 392–396.
48. StromL, LindroosHB, ShirahigeK, SjogrenC (2004) Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol Cell 16: 1003–1015.
49. LindroosHB, StromL, ItohT, KatouY, ShirahigeK, et al. (2006) Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol Cell 22: 755–767.
50. De PiccoliG, Cortes-LedesmaF, IraG, Torres-RosellJ, UhleS, et al. (2006) Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1032–1034.
51. BranzeiD, SollierJ, LiberiG, ZhaoX, MaedaD, et al. (2006) Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509–522.
52. SollierJ, DriscollR, CastellucciF, FoianiM, JacksonSP, et al. (2009) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1671–1682.
53. ChavezA, GeorgeV, AgrawalV, JohnsonFB (2010) Sumoylation and the structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) 5/6 complex slow senescence through recombination intermediate resolution. J Biol Chem 285: 11922–11930.
54. MorikawaH, MorishitaT, KawaneS, IwasakiH, CarrAM, et al. (2004) Rad62 protein functionally and physically associates with the smc5/smc6 protein complex and is required for chromosome integrity and recombination repair in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9401–9413.
55. HwangJY, SmithS, CeschiaA, Torres-RosellJ, AragonL, et al. (2008) Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications. DNA Repair (Amst) 7: 1426–1436.
56. ChenYH, ChoiK, SzakalB, ArenzJ, DuanX, et al. (2009) Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21252–21257.
57. BickelJS, ChenL, HaywardJ, YeapSL, AlkersAE, et al. (2010) Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins promote homolog-independent recombination repair in meiosis crucial for germ cell genomic stability. PLoS Genet 6: e1001028.
58. PebernardS, McDonaldWH, PavlovaY, YatesJR3rd, BoddyMN (2004) Nse1, Nse2, and a novel subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 complex, Nse3, play a crucial role in meiosis. Mol Biol Cell 15: 4866–4876.
59. Wehrkamp-RichterS, HyppaRW, PruddenJ, SmithGR, BoddyMN (2012) Meiotic DNA joint molecule resolution depends on Nse5-Nse6 of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 9633–9646.
60. FarmerS, San-SegundoPA, AragonL (2011) The Smc5-Smc6 complex is required to remove chromosome junctions in meiosis. PLoS One 6: e20948.
61. OnodaF, TakedaM, SekiM, MaedaD, TajimaJ, et al. (2004) SMC6 is required for MMS-induced interchromosomal and sister chromatid recombinations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 429–439.
62. LeeBH, AmonA (2003) Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation. Science 300: 482–486.
63. GrandinN, ReedSI (1993) Differential function and expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae B-type cyclins in mitosis and meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 13: 2113–2125.
64. DahmannC, FutcherB (1995) Specialization of B-type cyclins for mitosis or meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Genetics 140: 957–963.
65. NeimanAM (2011) Sporulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 189: 737–765.
66. SymM, EngebrechtJA, RoederGS (1993) ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72: 365–378.
67. RoederGS, BailisJM (2000) The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet 16: 395–403.
68. TungKS, HongEJ, RoederGS (2000) The pachytene checkpoint prevents accumulation and phosphorylation of the meiosis-specific transcription factor Ndt80. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 12187–12192.
69. ChuS, HerskowitzI (1998) Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. Mol Cell 1: 685–696.
70. XuL, AjimuraM, PadmoreR, KleinC, KlecknerN (1995) NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 15: 6572–6581.
71. KatisVL, MatosJ, MoriS, ShirahigeK, ZachariaeW, et al. (2004) Spo13 facilitates monopolin recruitment to kinetochores and regulates maintenance of centromeric cohesion during yeast meiosis. Curr Biol 14: 2183–2196.
72. KlapholzS, EspositoRE (1980) Isolation of SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 from a natural variant of yeast that undergoes a single meiotic division. Genetics 96: 567–588.
73. MichaelisC, CioskR, NasmythK (1997) Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91: 35–45.
74. TanakaT, CosmaMP, WirthK, NasmythK (1999) Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell 98: 847–858.
75. KleinF, MahrP, GalovaM, BuonomoSB, MichaelisC, et al. (1999) A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98: 91–103.
76. BuonomoSB, ClyneRK, FuchsJ, LoidlJ, UhlmannF, et al. (2000) Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin. Cell 103: 387–398.
77. XuL, KlecknerN (1995) Sequence non-specific double-strand breaks and interhomolog interactions prior to double-strand break formation at a meiotic recombination hot spot in yeast. EMBO J 14: 5115–5128.
78. CaoL, AlaniE, KlecknerN (1990) A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell 61: 1089–1101.
79. AlaniE, PadmoreR, KlecknerN (1990) Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 61: 419–436.
80. JessopL, LichtenM (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31: 313–323.
81. OhSD, LaoJP, TaylorAF, SmithGR, HunterN (2008) RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. Mol Cell 31: 324–336.
82. CarlileTM, AmonA (2008) Meiosis I is established through division-specific translational control of a cyclin. Cell 133: 280–291.
83. BenjaminKR, ZhangC, ShokatKM, HerskowitzI (2003) Control of landmark events in meiosis by the CDK Cdc28 and the meiosis-specific kinase Ime2. Genes Dev 17: 1524–1539.
84. SourirajanA, LichtenM (2008) Polo-like kinase Cdc5 drives exit from pachytene during budding yeast meiosis. Genes Dev 22: 2627–2632.
85. AllersT, LichtenM (2001) Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA. Mol Cell 8: 225–231.
86. JessopL, AllersT, LichtenM (2005) Infrequent co-conversion of markers flanking a meiotic recombination initiation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169: 1353–1367.
87. BellL, ByersB (1983) Separation of Branched from Linear DNA by Two-Dimensional Gel-Electrophoresis. Analytical Biochemistry 130: 527–535.
88. HollingsworthNM, GoetschL, ByersB (1990) The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes. Cell 61: 73–84.
89. Bermudez-LopezM, CeschiaA, de PiccoliG, ColominaN, PaseroP, et al. (2010) The Smc5/6 complex is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 6502–6512.
90. BlitzblauHG, BellGW, RodriguezJ, BellSP, HochwagenA (2007) Mapping of meiotic single-stranded DNA reveals double-stranded-break hotspots near centromeres and telomeres. Curr Biol 17: 2003–2012.
91. KaneSM, RothR (1974) Carbohydrate metabolism during ascospore development in yeast. J Bacteriol 118: 8–14.
92. LongtineMS, McKenzieA3rd, DemariniDJ, ShahNG, WachA, et al. (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953–961.
93. ElrodSL, ChenSM, SchwartzK, ShusterEO (2009) Optimizing sporulation conditions for different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain backgrounds. Methods Mol Biol 557: 21–26.
94. OhSD, JessopL, LaoJP, AllersT, LichtenM, et al. (2009) Stabilization and electrophoretic analysis of meiotic recombination intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 557: 209–234.
95. AllersT, LichtenM (2000) A method for preparing genomic DNA that restrains branch migration of Holliday junctions. Nucleic Acids Res 28: e6.
96. NairzK, KleinF (1997) mre11S–a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev 11: 2272–2290.