A Viral Satellite RNA Induces Yellow Symptoms on Tobacco by Targeting
a Gene Involved in Chlorophyll Biosynthesis using the RNA Silencing
Machinery


Symptoms on virus-infected plants are often very specific to the given virus. The

molecular mechanisms involved in viral symptom induction have been extensively

studied, but are still poorly understood. Cucumber mosaic virus

(CMV) Y satellite RNA (Y-sat) is a non-coding subviral RNA and modifies the

typical symptom induced by CMV in specific hosts; Y-sat causes a bright yellow

mosaic on its natural host Nicotiana tabacum. The Y-sat-induced

yellow mosaic failed to develop in the infected Arabidopsis and

tomato plants suggesting a very specific interaction between Y-sat and its host.

In this study, we revealed that Y-sat produces specific short interfering RNAs

(siRNAs), which interfere with a host gene, thus inducing the specific symptom.

We found that the mRNA of tobacco magnesium protoporphyrin chelatase subunit I

(ChlI, the key gene involved in chlorophyll synthesis) had

a 22-nt sequence that was complementary to the Y-sat sequence, including four

G-U pairs, and that the Y-sat-derived siRNAs in the virus-infected plant

downregulate the mRNA of ChlI by targeting the complementary

sequence. ChlI mRNA was also downregulated in the transgenic

lines that express Y-sat inverted repeats. Strikingly, modifying the Y-sat

sequence in order to restore the 22-nt complementarity to

Arabidopsis and tomato ChlI mRNA resulted

in yellowing symptoms in Y-sat-infected Arabidopsis and tomato,

respectively. In 5′-RACE experiments, the ChlI transcript

was cleaved at the expected middle position of the 22-nt complementary sequence.

In GFP sensor experiments using agroinfiltration, we further demonstrated that

Y-sat specifically targeted the sensor mRNA containing the 22-nt complementary

sequence of ChlI. Our findings provide direct evidence that the

identified siRNAs derived from viral satellite RNA directly modulate the viral

disease symptom by RNA silencing-based regulation of a host gene.


Published in the journal: . PLoS Pathog 7(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002021
Category: Research Article
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002021

Summary

Symptoms on virus-infected plants are often very specific to the given virus. The

molecular mechanisms involved in viral symptom induction have been extensively

studied, but are still poorly understood. Cucumber mosaic virus

(CMV) Y satellite RNA (Y-sat) is a non-coding subviral RNA and modifies the

typical symptom induced by CMV in specific hosts; Y-sat causes a bright yellow

mosaic on its natural host Nicotiana tabacum. The Y-sat-induced

yellow mosaic failed to develop in the infected Arabidopsis and

tomato plants suggesting a very specific interaction between Y-sat and its host.

In this study, we revealed that Y-sat produces specific short interfering RNAs

(siRNAs), which interfere with a host gene, thus inducing the specific symptom.

We found that the mRNA of tobacco magnesium protoporphyrin chelatase subunit I

(ChlI, the key gene involved in chlorophyll synthesis) had

a 22-nt sequence that was complementary to the Y-sat sequence, including four

G-U pairs, and that the Y-sat-derived siRNAs in the virus-infected plant

downregulate the mRNA of ChlI by targeting the complementary

sequence. ChlI mRNA was also downregulated in the transgenic

lines that express Y-sat inverted repeats. Strikingly, modifying the Y-sat

sequence in order to restore the 22-nt complementarity to

Arabidopsis and tomato ChlI mRNA resulted

in yellowing symptoms in Y-sat-infected Arabidopsis and tomato,

respectively. In 5′-RACE experiments, the ChlI transcript

was cleaved at the expected middle position of the 22-nt complementary sequence.

In GFP sensor experiments using agroinfiltration, we further demonstrated that

Y-sat specifically targeted the sensor mRNA containing the 22-nt complementary

sequence of ChlI. Our findings provide direct evidence that the

identified siRNAs derived from viral satellite RNA directly modulate the viral

disease symptom by RNA silencing-based regulation of a host gene.

Introduction

Plants infected with viruses often display various symptoms, which can be very specific to given viruses. Despite past efforts, the molecular bases underlying virus-induced diseases symptoms are still poorly understood. Subviral non-coding RNA molecules such as satellite RNAs (satRNAs) or defective interfering (DI) RNAs are often associated with plant viruses and can modify the symptoms induced by helper viruses [1], [2], [3]. Because such subviral RNAs dramatically modify the symptoms induced by helper viruses, they are potential tools for gaining insights into the molecular mechanisms of symptom development.

SatRNAs of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) are dependent on helper viruses for their replication and encapsidation and often attenuate the disease symptoms induced by CMV. Specifically, Y-satellite RNA (Y-sat) modifies the symptoms and exacerbates the pathogenicity of CMV in specific hosts; Y-sat induces a bright yellowing of leaves of Nicotiana tabacum (the natural host) and other related species (i.e., N. benthamiana), which is yellower than a typical chlorosis, whereas it induces systemic necrosis on tomato [4], [5], [6], [7]. The sequence domains on Y-sat, which are responsible for the symptom induction, have been identified in our previous and several other reports [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. We also suggested that a single, nuclear-encoded, incompletely dominant gene in tobacco controls the Y-sat-mediated yellowing in tobacco plants [11], but no such host genes have ever been shown to be involved in the symptom modification nor has the molecular mechanism been reported. An attractive model based on RNA silencing has been suggested [2], [12], but the solid experimental data are still needed.

RNA silencing is a conserved, sequence-specific gene regulation system, which has an essential role in development and maintenance of genome integrity. RNA silencing relies on short RNA (sRNA) molecules (21–24 nt), which are the key mediators of RNA silencing-related pathways in almost all eukaryotic organisms [13], [14], [15]. In plants, similar to other eukaryotic organisms, there are two main classes of sRNAs: microRNAs (miRNAs) and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), but the latter class contains several different types [16], [17]. These sRNAs are produced from double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or from folded structures by Dicer-like (DCL) proteins and guide Argonaute (AGO) proteins to target cognate RNA or DNA sequences [13], [18]. In higher plants, RNA silencing also operates as an adaptive inducible antiviral defense mechanism. As a counter-defense strategy, plant viruses have evolved viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) [19] that interfere with the RNA silencing pathway at different steps by binding to viral siRNA and/or dsRNAs or directly interacting with AGO1 [20], [21].

Subviral RNAs such as satRNA and DI RNA of tombusvirus have been also used to understand the roles of RNA silencing in viral replication and in symptom development. The DI RNA-induced RNA silencing response is known to control the level of helper virus, facilitating the long-term co-existence of the host and the viral pathogen [20], [22], [23], [24]. In addition, progress in understanding plant antiviral RNA silencing has revealed cross relationships between RNA silencing and viral pathogenicity. Recent studies suggest the possibility that virus-derived siRNA (vsiRNA) could mediate virus–host interactions through a shared sequence identity with the host mRNA, resulting in silencing of the host genes and subsequent viral symptom development. A few interactions between host mRNAs and vsiRNAs that resulted in the vsiRNA-guided cleavages of host mRNAs have been experimentally shown [25], [26], although their roles in the virus–host interaction have not been determined to date.

Magnesium (Mg)-chelatase is the key enzyme in chlorophyll biosynthesis, and three subunits (ChlI, ChlH and ChlD) of the tobacco magnesium protoporphyrin chelatase are required for the proper function of the enzyme [27]. Indeed, tobacco plants defective for ChlI have the yellow phenotype [28], suggesting that chlorophyll biosynthesis is impaired. The same yellow phenotype was observed when the ChlI gene of tobacco or cotton was targeted by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) [29], [30], [31]. Furthermore, an Arabidopsis mutant defective for ChlI also had pale-green to yellow leaves [32]. Importantly, the plants defective in the function of the Mg-chelatase enzyme had a very similar yellow phenotype to plants infected with CMV and Y-sat. Thus, these results raised the possibility that the ChlI is downregulated by Y-sat in the virus-infected plants.

In this study, we show that transgenic N. benthamiana plants develop a yellow phenotype when expressing the inverted-repeat sequence of Y-sat, similar to the symptoms of the Y-sat-infected plants. Moreover, we provided evidence that Y-sat targets the ChlI gene using the host RNA silencing machinery in such a way that Y-sat-derived siRNAs efficiently downregulate ChlI mRNA through RNA silencing-mediated cleavage. Our findings strongly suggest that this yellow phenotype is the result of a disorder in chlorophyll synthesis caused by the downregulation of the ChlI gene.

Results

Biosynthesis of chloroplast pigments is impaired in Nicotiana benthamiana plants that express the dsRNA of Y-sat

To identify host genes involved in the Y-sat-induced symptom modification, we created transgenic N. benthamiana plants that express the Y-sat sequence, expecting the yellow phenotype to be induced without CMV as a helper virus. We have used this strategy to avoid any effect of virus replication on host gene expression, because virus infection itself has been shown to regulate the expression of numerous genes [33]. We first created transgenic plants that expressed the Y-sat sequence either in the sense or antisense orientation, but these transgenic plants failed to have any phenotypic changes (data not shown). However, when the Y-sat inverted-repeat (IR) sequence-expressing cassette (Figure 1A) was introduced into N. benthamiana plants, we observed that the transgenic N. benthamiana lines (16c:YsatIR) had a yellow phenotype (Figure 1B), although the yellow phenotype was less pronounced in the 16c:YsatIR lines than in the Y-sat-replicating system. Of four transgenic lines that we obtained, two had phenotypes with distinct yellowing; line 1 had vein yellowing, and line 2 had a yellow mosaic. No yellow phenotype was observed on the N. benthamiana that expressed dsRNA of GUS (16c:GUSIR), demonstrating that the expression of dsRNA of an unrelated sequence in the same Y-sat IR transformation cassette does not cause a yellow symptom (Figure 1B and 1C). We also confirmed the lack of viral contamination in the 16c:YsatIR lines by RT-PCR using primers that are specific to CMV genomes (data not shown).

Fig. 1.

To identify putative plant genes responsible for the yellow phenotype, we carried out microarray analyses of RNA extracted from the 16c:YsatIR plants (Text S1). In 16c:YsatIR plants, 134 genes were significantly downregulated to levels that are at least 40% lower than in their wild-type counterparts (N. benthamiana 16c) (Table S1). Among them, 31 genes were actually involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast biogenesis (Table S1), further supporting the hypothesis that the yellow phenotype could be the result of downregulation of the host gene(s) involved in the biosynthesis pathway of chloroplast pigments. Indeed, proteome analyses showed that several chloroplast-related proteins, such as RuBisCo small subunit, RuBisCo activase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were significantly affected in 16c:YsatIR plants (Text S1, Figure S1). More interestingly, the mobility of the RuBisCo small subunits was shifted in a two-dimensional gel (Figure S1), indicating that the proteins had been modified. All together, these results suggest that the expression of chloroplast-related genes and subsequent synthesis of proteins were altered in the 16c:YsatIR plants.

ChlI mRNA is downregulated in 16c:YsatIR plants, in N. benthamiana plants infected with Y-sat, and in Y-sat dsRNA-transfected protoplasts

When we aligned the sequences of the 31 genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast biogenesis identified by microarray analysis with the Y-sat sequence, we found a high degree of sequence complementarity (22 nt in a row including four G-U pairs) between the yellow-inducing domain of Y-sat [7], [34] and the tobacco magnesium (Mg) protoporphyrin chelatase subunit I (ChlI) gene (accession AF014053). Because ChlI is a component of the primary enzyme that catalyzes the first step in chlorophyll synthesis via the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway [32], this evidence encouraged us to clone and sequence the ChlI gene of N. benthamiana. We then found that both the ChlI genes from N. tabacum and N. benthamiana had the 22-nt sequence complementary to the Y-sat sequence (Figure 2A). Hereafter, we called the 22-nt complementary sequence for the ChlI gene and the Y-sat sequence as the yellow region (YR) and satellite yellow region (SYR), respectively (Figure 2A). We then examined the mRNA levels of the ChlI gene by Northern blot analysis and quantitative real-time RT-PCRs in 16c:YsatIR and Y-sat-infected N. benthamiana plants. The outputs of these analyses showed that the ChlI mRNA was markedly downregulated in both plants (Figure 2B and C) and confirmed the results of the microarray analysis. To confirm that the downregulation of the ChlI mRNA was due to the satRNA itself, we further conducted a quantitative real-time RT-PCR using RNAs from N. benthamiana protoplasts transfected with the dsRNA of Y-sat. As controls, we transfected protoplasts with dsRNA of three other CMV satRNAs; S19-sat, T73-sat [35] and CM-sat [36]. These satRNAs are different from Y-sat in the corresponding SYR sequences and do not induce any yellow phenotypes in tobacco plants [35]. As shown in Figure 2D, the ChlI mRNA level was lower in protoplasts treated with dsRNA of Y-sat than in those treated with dsRNA of the other satRNAs. In addition, the mRNA level of another chloroplast-related gene, CAB3, decreased in the Y-sat dsRNA-treated protoplasts (Figure 2D), confirming our findings from the microarray analysis. In the proteome analysis, many chloroplast-related proteins were affected in the transgenic 16c plants expressing Y-sat dsRNA; thus, it is conceivable that the down-regulation of the ChlI gene caused a decrease in other chloroplast-related genes expression in the Y-sat dsRNA-treated protoplasts.

Fig. 2.

CMV vector-based gene silencing of the ChlI induces downregulation of the ChlI mRNA and the yellow symptom

We next examined whether silencing of the ChlI gene using VIGS can induce similar yellow symptoms in the absence of Y-sat. The 150-bp of ChlI (817 to 966) was inserted into the two CMV vectors, CMV-A1 and CMV-H1; CMV-A1 lacks the C-terminal one-third of the intact 2b protein [37], while CMV-H1 vector lacks the entire 2b protein [38] (Figure 3A). In the VIGS experiments, we used a pseudorecombinant virus that contains RNA components derived from RNA1 and RNA3 of CMV strain L to avoid the severe mosaic symptoms induced by CMV-Y. N. benthamiana plants infected with either of the viral vectors had systemic yellow symptoms similar to those induced by the replicating Y-sat in the presence of the helper virus (Figure 3B). Although CMV-H1:ChlI150 induced the yellowing more slowly than CMV-A1:ChlI150 in the early stage of infection, the results of quantitative real-time RT-PCR confirmed that the ChlI mRNA was downregulated in both CMV-A1:ChlI150- and CMV-H1:ChlI150-infected N. benthamiana plants compared to control plants infected with one of the empty vectors (Figure 3C). Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we confirmed that both pseudorecombinant viruses carrying the inserted ChlI sequence replicated and accumulated to a similar level in the systemic leaves at 14 days post-inoculation (dpi) (Figure 3D).

Fig. 3.

Sequence complementarity between Y-sat and the ChlI gene is essential for the induction of the yellow phenotype

The ChlI genes of pepper, tomato and Arabidopsis thaliana were obtained from the gene database, and the 22-nt complementary sequences of the ChlI genes and Y-sat were aligned (Figure 4A). Pepper has the same YR sequence in the ChlI gene as those of tobacco and N. benthamiana. Conversely, several mismatches were found in the case of the tomato ChlI and Arabidopsis ChlI (ChlI1 and ChlI2) genes (Figure 4A). We next examined whether the Y-sat can induce yellow symptoms on pepper, tomato and Arabidopsis plants. As expected, infected pepper plants developed bright yellow symptoms (Figure 4B, right plant), whereas tomato plants did not (Figure 4C, right plant). By site-directed mutagenesis of the SYR, we generated three Y-sat derivatives having the 22-nt continuous sequence complementary to the corresponding YRs of tomato ChlI gene, Arabidopsis ChlI1 and ChlI2 genes (Y-sat-Tom, Y-sat-Ara1 and Y-sat-Ara2, respectively) (Figure 4A). When tomato plants were inoculated with the Y-sat mut-Tom and the helper virus, yellow symptoms appeared at 10 dpi (Figure 4C, left plant). However, some of the introduced mutations in individual plants had reverted to the original nucleotides at 21 dpi. Notably, the Y-sat mut-Tom did not induce yellow symptoms in N. benthamiana (Figure 4D, left plant). Similarly, when Arabidopsis plants were infected with CMV-Y and Y-sat mut-Ara1, yellow symptoms appeared (Figure 4E, right plant). On the other hand, Y-sat mut-Ara2 did not induce yellowing (data not shown). The last observation is consistent with the previous studies by Huang and Li [32], who reported that ChlI2 of Arabidopsis has lower functionality than ChlI1 due to a reduced level of expression. In addition, like Y-sat mut-Tom, Y-sat mut-Ara1 did not induce yellowing in N. benthamiana (Figure 4F). Quantitative real-time RT-PCRs confirmed that the mRNA levels of the ChlI gene in the Y-sat mutants-infected N. benthamiana plants were not downregulated, unlike in the Y-sat-infected plant (Figure 4G). There were little differences in satRNA or viral accumulation between Y-sat-infected- and Y-sat mut-Ara1-infected leaves of N. benthamiana (Figure 4H and 4I), confirming that the Y-sat mutant was replicated to a level similar to that of the original Y-sat in the systemic leaves of N. benthamiana. These results, all together, strongly suggest that a specific interaction between Y-sat and the ChlI host gene is involved in development of the yellow symptom.

Fig. 4.

Massive amounts of small RNAs from SYR sequence accumulate in Y-sat-infected plants

Because Y-sat and the host ChlI gene seemed to have a specific interaction through their sequence complementarity, we then examined the possible involvement of RNA silencing in the Y-sat-mediated yellow phenotype. First, we tested whether the Y-sat-derived siRNAs can be hybridized and detected by ChlI mRNA probe. As shown in Figure S2, sense siRNAs from Y-sat in both Y-sat-infected and 16c:YsatIR plants were clearly detected in Northern blots using the ChlI sense RNA probe. On the other hand, we failed to detect antisense siRNAs from Y-sat by Northern blots using the ChlI antisense RNA probe. This result seems reasonable because the YR and SYR sequences do not share complementarity in the antisense orientation (Figure S2). In addition, we also detected siRNAs derived from Y-sat mut-Ara1 using the Arabidopsis ChlI1 sense RNA in Northern blots. As shown in Figure S3, 351-bp Arabidopsis ChlI1 sense RNA probe, which contains the 22-nt sequence complementary to Y-sat mut-Ara1, detected the siRNAs of Y-sat mut-Ara1 in the Arabidopsis leaves infected with CMV and Y-sat mut-Ara1. Assuming that the yellow symptoms are the result of post-transcriptional RNA silencing of host genes directed by Y-sat specific sequences, we further analyzed Y-sat-derived siRNAs profile to find whether Y-sat siRNAs targeting the ChlI mRNA accumulate in the Y-sat-infected plants. We thus conducted small RNA deep sequencing to map the small RNAs on the Y-sat sequence. As the result, Y-sat-derived siRNAs covered almost the entire Y-sat sequence, and the majority of Y-sat siRNAs accumulated in the sense orientation in the Y-sat-infected plants. In addition, 21-nt and 22-nt siRNAs were abundant among the Y-sat small RNAs populations (Figure 5A). Y-sat-derived siRNAs in both sense and antisense orientation were non-uniformly distributed along the sequence with a few small RNA-generating hot spots (Figure 5A). Abundant siRNAs were accumulated from the regions around positions 100, 180, 211 and 280 on the Y-sat. Northern hybridization confirmed that the most abundant siRNAs were generated from the region at positions 1–200 as opposed to 201–369 (Figure S4). Furthermore, we found abundant siRNAs homologous to the SYR (Figure 5B). The accumulation of siRNAs corresponding to SYR in 16c:YsatIR and Ysat-infected plans was confirmed by Northern hybridization using LNA probes specific to SYR of Y-sat (Figure 5C). In deep-sequencing analysis, we also identified the ChlI siRNAs in the Y-sat-infected tissues although the amounts were not very high (Figure S5). The profile of the ChlI siRNAs revealed a very unique feature; all siRNAs derived from ChlI were generated only from the 3′ region downstream of the cleavage site as described below.

Small RNAs generated from SYR in Y-sat sequence.
Fig. 5. Small RNAs generated from SYR in Y-sat sequence.

Small RNAs from Y-sat SYR cleave ChlI mRNA post-transcriptionally

To clarify whether the ChlI mRNA is cleaved in the Y-sat-infected plant, we analyzed the 5′ ends of the cleaved mRNA products with a 5′-RACE assay. Sequencing of the 5′-RACE products revealed two distinct cleavage sites in the YR of the ChlI mRNA. Almost all identified cleavage sites were mapped at the middle position in YR (between 890 and 891), which agrees with the expected cleavage site(s) driven by the 21-nt and 22-nt siRNAs (Figure 6A). To verify that Y-sat can direct sequence-specific cleavage, we created a GFP sensor construct in which the 3′ non-coding region contained the 22-nt YR sequence (Figure 6B). The construct was delivered by agroinfiltration into Y-sat-infected N. benthamiana leaves that had bright yellow symptoms (Figure 6B). GFP accumulation was monitored using UV light after agroinfiltration. As shown in Figure 6B, GFP fluorescence was reduced in the Y-sat-infected tissues, and this observation was supported by the results of quantitative real-time RT-PCR of the GFP mRNA (Figure 6C). The accumulation of GFP protein was also reduced in the Y-sat-infected tissues (Figure 6D). These results clearly demonstrated that the 22-nt YR sequence in the sensor mRNA was sufficient for the sequence-specific downregulation of GFP-YR mRNA in Y-sat-infected tissues.

Fig. 6.

Discussion

Plant RNA silencing has often been implicated as a molecular mechanism for symptom induction caused by viruses or viral subviral agents. Viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) are able to compromise the endogenous RNA silencing pathways [19], [20], and these virus-encoded silencing suppressors have also been identified as pathogenicity determinants. Indeed, virus-induced developmental abnormalities are often explained by the interference of virus-encoded VSRs with host miRNAs involved in the developmental processes [39], [40]. However, no explanation for specific symptoms caused by VSRs has ever been confirmed nor has any report explained the molecular basis for a specific viral symptom including yellowing and necrosis. In recent studies, host mRNAs were identified as potential targets of siRNAs and miRNAs in virus-infected tissues, and several have been proved to be downregulated [25], [26]. For example, Moissiard and Voinnet [25] demonstrated that the RCC1 gene in Arabidopsis infected with Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) was downregulated by virus-derived siRNAs, but contrary to expectations, the decrease in gene expression did not affect either viral accumulation or symptoms. It is, in fact, quite difficult to clarify the relationship between such small RNAs and viral pathogenicity although the idea that host gene silencing against a particular gene might contribute to the specific expression of symptoms is very attractive.

In the present study, we have shown that siRNAs derived from Y-sat induced bright yellow mosaics on tobacco by specifically targeting mRNA of the host ChlI gene, resulting in the inhibition of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Here we provide several lines of evidence that Y-sat-induced bright yellow mosaics are the outcome of specific interference between the pathogen-derived siRNAs and a host gene. First, the 22-nt long region of Y-sat (SYR) produces specific siRNAs that were complementary, including four G-U pairs, to the 22-nt long region of tobacco ChlI mRNA (YR). Second, the ChlI mRNA could detect Y-sat-derived siRNAs in Northern blots. Third, 5′-RACE experiments revealed that the ChlI mRNA was cleaved exactly in the expected middle of the YR. Fourth, the levels of the ChlI transcript significantly decreased in both Y-sat-infected plants and the transgenic plants expressing Y-sat dsRNA. Fifth, the Y-sat mutants that had the modified SYR to either Arabidopsis ChlI1 mRNA or tomato ChlI mRNA were able to induce yellow symptoms in these host plants. In contrast, these modified Y-sat lost the ability to induce yellow symptoms on tobacco. Sixth, the GFP sensor construct carrying the YR sequence was specifically targeted in Y-sat-infected plants. Considering all these results, we propose a model that explains that the Y-sat-mediated yellow symptom results from the cleavage of host ChlI mRNA by RNA silencing machinery (Figure 7).

Fig. 7.

In deep-sequencing analysis, we found abundant Y-sat-derived siRNAs in the Y-sat-infected N. benthamiana. Furthermore, we noticed that the ChlI-derived siRNAs also accumulated in the Y-sat-infected tissues although the amounts were not very high. The profile of the ChlI siRNAs was very unique because all siRNAs derived from ChlI were generated only from the 3′ region downstream of the cleavage site (Figure S5). Importantly, spread of RNA silencing beyond the targeting site in endogenous plant genes has not been shown [30], [41], [42], except for trans-acting siRNAs [43]. Whether secondary siRNAs can be generated from the ChlI mRNA after vsiRNA-directed cleavage, and whether such secondary siRNAs are involved in the downregulation of the ChlI gene still need careful studies.

Here we propose that Y-sat caused the yellow symptoms on tobacco by directing post-transcriptional RNA silencing against the ChlI mRNA. However, yellow symptoms appeared much brighter in Y-sat-infected plants than in 16c:YsatIR plants (Figure 1B). With regard to the observation, the amount of Y-sat-derived siRNAs in 16c:YsatIR plants was lower than in Y-sat-infected plants (Figure 5C), probably leading to different yellow phenotype between 16c:YsatIR plants and Y-sat-infected plants. Indeed, the level of the ChlI transcript analyzed by the Northern blot was higher in the 16c:YsatIR plants than in the Y-sat-infected plants (Figure 2B). Alternatively, as suggested by Du et al. [44], Y-sat siRNAs from secondary structures (T-shaped hairpins) may predominate over the Y-sat siRNAs generated from perfect dsRNA forms. Thus it is likely that RNA silencing against ChlI and subsequent yellow phenotype can vary depending on the qualities and amounts of siRNAs derived from satRNA.

In conclusion, we discovered the molecular basis of the symptom modifications induced by Y-sat: the involvement of RNA silencing mechanism in the pathogenicity of Y-sat. But the molecular mechanism underlying the synergistic and/or antagonistic interaction between satRNAs, helper viruses and host plants still remain to be explored. In addition, the origin(s) of satRNAs, their evolutionary strategy and biological significance have long been intriguing topics. Since the original isolation of Y-sat in Japan more than 30 years ago [4], no other satRNAs that induce yellow mosaics on tobacco have been isolated in the world, suggesting that Y-sat is a rare satRNA that specifically induces yellow mosaics on tobacco. We have observed that Y-sat cannot compete with other similar size satRNAs [35], and thus Y-sat may survive through a different strategy from other satRNAs; the Y-sat-induced yellowing of leaves, which could preferentially attract aphids (the vectors of CMV and its satRNAs), may have favored the transfer of CMV that harbors Y-sat during the its evolutionary history.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Nicotiana benthamiana, Capsicum annuum, Solanum lycopersicum and Arabidopsis thaliana were used as host plants for the analysis. Nicotiana benthamiana line 16c having a single copy of the GFP transgene [45] was obtained from Dr. D. Baulcombe (Sainsbury Laboratory, UK) and was also used for the analysis. All plants were grown in a plant growth room with a 16-h light/8-h dark at 24°C and 50% relative humidity.

Transgenic N. benthamiana lines expressing the inverted repeat (IR) of Y-sat were generated by transforming N. benthamiana 16c with the binary vector pIG121-Hm carrying the IR of Y-sat under the CaMV 35S promoter. In the sense and antisense orientations, the 317-bp (53 to 369) Y-sat sequence (GenBank accession D00542) was inserted in the pJM007 vector [46], then the inverted repeat (IR)-expressing cassette was transferred to a Ti-plasmid vector, pIG121-Hm. The Ti plasmid vector containing the IR (1004 nt) of the GUS sequence (GUS-IR) was previously constructed [47].

Virus materials and inoculation

CMV strain Y (CMV-Y) was used as a helper virus for satellite RNA. To induce gene silencing to the ChlI gene, we used two CMV-based vectors, CMV-A1 and CMV-H1. CMV-A1 and CMV-H1 are derived from RNA2 of CMV-Y, and CMV-A1 lacks the C-terminal one-third of the intact 2b protein as a consequence of introducing a multiple cloning site [37], while CMV-H1 vector lacks the entire 2b protein [38]. The 150-bp of the ChlI gene (817 to 966) was inserted into the CMV vectors to create CMV-A1:ChlI150 and CMV-H1:ChlI150, respectively. To avoid severe mosaic symptom induction by CMV-Y, we used a pseudorecombinant virus that contains RNA components derived from RNA1 and RNA3 of CMV strain L together with RNA2 of the vector. Each plasmid containing a full-length cDNA clone of RNA1 to RNA3 was transcribed in vitro after linearization with a restriction enzyme [37]. Infectious viruses were then created by mixing transcripts of RNAs 1 to 3. For virus propagation, leaves of 4-week-old plants of N. benthamiana were dusted with carborundum and rub-inoculated with the RNA transcripts. For inoculation of tomato plants, leaves of young plants were rub-inoculated with the sap from virus-infected tissues of N. benthamiana. Successful systemic infection with the virus containing the full insert sequence was confirmed by RT-PCRs. Viral accumulation was examined by conventional ELISA [48] using the antibodies raised against the CMV CP.

RNA analyses

Total RNAs were extracted by either a conventional phenol/chloroform method [47] or a method using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. The N. benthamiana ChlI clone including the entire ORF was amplified by RT-PCR using the primer pair designed from the tobacco ChlI sequence (5′-GCTCTAGAATGGCTTCACTACTAGGAAC-3′ for forward primer, 5′-GCCCAAGCTTAGGCGAAAACCTCATAAAATTTC-3′ for reverse primer). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed essentially as described before [37]. Primers for quantitative real-time RT-PCR for the N. benthamiana ChlI gene were as follows: 5′-CTTATTGGTTCGGGTAATCCTG-3′ for forward primer and 5′-GCTGAGTCGATTTGGTTCTG-3′ for reverse primer. The N. benthamiana actin gene was amplified using 5′-GCGGGAAATTGTTAGGGATGT-3′ for forward primer and 5′-CCATCAGGCAGCTCGTAGCT-3′ for reverse primer and used for data normalization. Northern blot hybridization was performed essentially as previously described [49]. Specific probe for the ChlI gene was generated by PCR with the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics) to amplify the 371 bp (634 to 1004) of 3′-terminal regions of the ChlI gene using the primer pair ChlI-634F (5′-GAGCCTGGTCTTCTTGCTAAAGC-3′) and ChlI-1004R (5′-GCTGAGTCGATTTGGTTCTG-3′). In the Northern blots of the small RNAs corresponding to the 22-nt complementary sequence region (satellite yellow region, SYR), the SYRs were detected by using 32P-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotide probes described previously [50].

The ChlI mRNA cleavage sites were analyzed by modified RNA-ligase mediated 5′-RACE [51]. Total RNA (10 µg) was purified using the MicroPoly(A) Purist Kit (Ambion), then the fractionated Poly(A)+ mRNA was ligated to the GeneRacer RNA Oligo adaptor using the GeneRacer Kit (Invitrogen). Ligated RNAs were reverse transcribed using the gene-specific reverse primer for the ChlI gene, ChlI-1004R (5′-GCTGAGTCGATTTGGTTCTG-3′). The 5′end of the cDNA was then amplified by PCR using the GeneRacer 5′ primer and the gene-specific reverse primer used for the reverse transcription for the first PCR. The GeneRacer 5′ nested primer was also used for the subsequent nested PCR. The amplified product from the nested PCR was excised from 1.2% agarose gel and cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) for sequencing.

Protoplast experiments

Protoplasts were prepared from leaves of N. benthamiana as described before [52]. The dsRNA of four satRNAs (Y-sat, S19-sat and T73-sat [35] and CM-sat [36]) were used. DsRNA of satRNA was prepared by in vitro transcription using a PCR-amplified fragment containing the T7 promoter sequence as described previously [52]. The prepared protoplasts were transfected with the satRNA dsRNAs (2 µg) in a PEG–calcium solution as described [52] and then incubated for 20 h. Total RNA was extracted from the harvested protoplasts with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and the mRNA levels of the ChlI and CAB gene were measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (mean ± SE; n = 3). Primers for quantitative real-time RT-PCR for the CAB gene were 5′-CGGCCGATCCAGAAACTTT-3′ for forward primer and 5′-GCCCATCTGCAGTGAATAACC-3′ for reverse primer.

Deep-sequencing analysis

Total RNA was extracted from CMV and Y-sat-infected N. benthamiana plants. Small RNAs were isolated essentially as described [49] and submitted to Hokkaido System Science (Sapporo, Japan), where deep-sequencing analysis was performed on an Illumina Genome Analyzer using the standard protocol of the manufacturer. The 18–45-nt small RNA reads were extracted from raw reads and aligned with the Y-sat sequence using the program SOAP [53] to search for perfectly matched sequences.

GFP sensor experiments

The GFP-YR sensor gene was inserted between the BamHI and SacI sites in the pBE2113 vector. The Ti-plasmid construct was then introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens KYRT1 strain, which was supplied by Dr. G. B. Collins (University of Kentucky, USA). Agrobacterium infiltration was carried out essentially as described [49].

Western blot analysis

Total proteins were extracted from the sample tissues by grinding in Laemmli buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and /transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Immobilon, Millipore). Anti-GFP antibodies were purchased from Roche and used at a 1∶1000 dilution. For immunostaining, an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody was added to the blots at a 1∶3000 dilution followed by colorimetric development with BCIP and NBT.

Supporting Information

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Attachment 3

Attachment 4

Attachment 5

Attachment 6

Attachment 7


Zdroje

1. SimonAERoossinckMJHaveldaZ

2004

Plant virus satellite and defective interfering RNAs: new

paradigms for a new century.

Annu Rev Phytopathol

42

415

437

2. HuCCHsuYHLinNS

2009

Satellite RNAs and satellite viruses of plants.

Viruses

1

1325

1350

3. HuangYWHuCCLinNSHsuYH

2010

Mimicry of molecular pretenders: the terminal structures of

satellites associated with plant RNA viruses.

RNA Biol

7

162

171

4. TakanamiY

1981

A striking change in symptoms on Cucumber mosaic

virus-infected tobacco plants induced by a satellite

RNA.

Virology

109

120

126

5. XuPRoossinckMJ

2000

Cucumber mosaic virus D satellite RNA-induced

programmed cell death in tomato.

Plant Cell

12

1079

1092

6. MasutaCTakanamiY

1989

Determination of sequence and structural requirements for

pathogenicity of a Cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA

(Y-satRNA).

Plant Cell

1

1165

1173

7. KuwataSMasutaCTakanamiY

1991

Reciprocal phenotype alterations between two satellite RNAs of

Cucumber mosaic virus.

J Gen Virol

72

2385

2389

8. DevicMJaegleMBaulcombeD

1989

Symptom production on tobacco and tomato is determined by two

distinct domains of the satellite RNA of Cucumber mosaic

virus (strain Y).

J Gen Virol

70

2765

2774

9. JaegleMDevicMLongstaffMBaulcombeD

1990

Cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA (Y strain):

analysis of sequences which affect yellow mosaic symptoms on

tobacco.

J Gen Virol

71

1905

1912

10. SleatDEPalukaitisP

1992

A single nucleotide change within a plant virus satellite RNA

alters the host specificity of disease induction.

Plant J

2

43

49

11. MasutaCSuzukiMKuwataSTakanamiYKoiwaiA

1993

Yellow mosaic symptoms induced by Y satellite RNA of

Cucumber mosaic virus is regulated by a single

incompletely dominant gene in wild Nicotiana

species.

Phytopathology

83

411

413

12. WangMBBianXYWuLMLiuLXSmithNA

2004

On the role of RNA silencing in the pathogenicity and evolution

of viroids and viral satellites.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

101

3275

3280

13. Ruiz-FerrerVVoinnetO

2009

Roles of plant small RNAs in biotic stress

responses.

Annu Rev Plant Biol

60

485

510

14. PhillipsJRDalmayTBartelsD

2007

The role of small RNAs in abiotic stress.

FEBS Lett

581

3592

3597

15. VoinnetO

2009

Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant

microRNAs.

Cell

136

669

687

16. VaucheretHMalloryACBartelDP

2006

AGO1 homeostasis entails coexpression of MIR168 and AGO1 and

preferential stabilization of miR168 by AGO1.

Mol Cell

22

129

136

17. BrosnanCAVoinnetO

2009

The long and the short of noncoding RNAs.

Curr Opin Cell Biol

21

416

425

18. LlaveC

2004

MicroRNAs: more than a role in plant development?

Mol Plant Pathol

5

361

366

19. DingSWVoinnetO

2007

Antiviral immunity directed by small RNAs.

Cell

130

413

426

20. CsorbaTPantaleoVBurgyánJ

2009

RNA silencing: an antiviral mechanism.

Adv Virus Res

75

35

71

21. MlotshwaSPrussGJVanceV

2008

Small RNAs in viral infection and host defense.

Trends Plant Sci

13

375

382

22. HaveldaZHornyikCValocziABurgyanJ

2005

Defective interfering RNA hinders the activity of a

tombusvirus-encoded posttranscriptional gene silencing

suppressor.

J Virol

79

450

457

23. SzittyaGMolnarASilhavyDHornyikCBurgyánJ

2002

Short defective interfering RNAs of tombusviruses are not

targeted but trigger post-transcriptional gene silencing against their

helper virus.

Plant Cell

14

359

372

24. OmarovRTRezendeJAScholthofHB

2004

Host-specific generation and maintenance of Tomato bushy

stunt virus defective interfering RNAs.

Mol Plant-Microbe Interact

17

195

201

25. MoissiardGVoinnetO

2006

RNA silencing of host transcripts by cauliflower mosaic virus

requires coordinated action of the four Arabidopsis

Dicer-like proteins.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

103

19593

19598

26. QiXBaoFSXieZ

2009

Small RNA deep sequencing reveals role for Arabidopsis

thaliana RNA-dependent RNA polymerases in viral siRNA

biogenesis.

PLoS One

4

e4971

27. MoulinMMcCormacACTerryMJSmithAG

2008

Tetrapyrrole profiling in Arabidopsis seedlings

reveals that retrograde plastid nuclear signaling is not due to

Mg-protoporphyrin IX accumulation.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

105

15178

15183

28. FitzmauriceWPNguyenLVWernsmanEAThompsonWFConklingMA

1999

Transposon tagging of the sulfur gene of tobacco using engineered

maize Ac/Ds elements.

Genetics

153

1919

1928

29. KjemtrupSSampsonKSPeeleCGNguyenLVConklingMA

1998

Gene silencing from plant DNA carried by a

Geminivirus.

Plant J

14

91

100

30. PetersenBOAlbrechtsenM

2005

Evidence implying only unprimed RdRP activity during transitive

gene silencing in plants.

Plant Mol Biol

58

575

583

31. TuttleJRIdrisAMBrownJKHaiglerCHRobertsonD

2008

Geminivirus-mediated gene silencing from

Cotton leaf crumple virus is enhanced by low

temperature in cotton.

Plant Physiol

148

41

50

32. HuangYSLiHM

2009

Arabidopsis CHLI2 can substitute for

CHLI1.

Plant Physiol

150

636

645

33. HaveldaZVarallyayEValocziABurgyánJ

2008

Plant virus infection-induced persistent host gene downregulation

in systemically infected leaves.

Plant J

55

278

288

34. MasutaCKuwataSMatzuzakiTTakanamiYKoiwaiA

1992

A plant virus satellite RNA exhibits a significant sequence

complementarity to a chloroplast tRNA.

Nucleic Acids Res

20

2885

35. MasutaCHayashiYWangWQTakanamiY

1990

Comparison of four satellite RNA isolates of Cucumber

mosaic virus.

Ann Phytopath Soc Japan

56

207

212

36. KosakaYFukunishiT

1997

Multiple inoculation with three attenuated viruses for the

control of cucumber virus disease.

Plant Dis

81

733

738

37. OtagakiSAraiMTakahashiAGotoKHongJS

2006

Rapid induction of transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene

silencing using a novel Cucumber mosaic virus

vector.

Plant Biotechnol

23

259

265

38. MatsuoKHongJSTabayashiNItoAMasutaC

2007

Development of Cucumber mosaic virus as a vector

modifiable for different host species to produce therapeutic

proteins.

Planta

225

277

286

39. KasschauKDXieZAllenELlaveCChapmanEJ

2003

P1/HC-Pro, a viral suppressor of RNA silencing, interferes with

Arabidopsis development and miRNA

function.

Dev Cell

4

205

217

40. ChapmanEJProkhnevskyAIGopinathKDoljaVVCarringtonJC

2004

Viral RNA silencing suppressors inhibit the microRNA pathway at

an intermediate step.

Genes Dev

18

1179

1186

41. VaistijFEJonesLBaulcombeDC

2002

Spreading of RNA targeting and DNA methylation in RNA silencing

requires transcription of the target gene and a putative RNA-dependent RNA

polymerase.

Plant Cell

14

857

867

42. HimberCDunoyerPMoissiardGRitzenthalerCVoinnetO

2003

Transitivity-dependent and -independent cell-to-cell movement of

RNA silencing.

EMBO J

22

4523

4533

43. AllenEXieZGustafsonAMCarringtonJC

2005

MicroRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in

plants.

Cell

121

207

221

44. DuQSDuanCGZhangZHFangYYFangRX

2007

DCL4 targets Cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA

at novel secondary structures.

J Virol

81

9142

9151

45. RuizMTVoinnetOBaulcombeDC

1998

Initiation and maintenance of virus-induced gene

silencing.

Plant Cell

10

937

946

46. SchattatMHKlosgenRBMarquesJP

2004

A novel vector for efficient gene silencing in

plants.

Plant Mol Biol Rep

22

145

153

47. SendaMMasutaCOhnishiSGotoKKasaiA

2004

Patterning of virus-infected Glycine max seed

coat is associated with suppression of endogenous silencing of chalcone

synthase genes.

Plant Cell

16

807

818

48. MasutaCTanakaHUeharaKKuwataSKoiwaiA

1995

Broad resistance to plant viruses in transgenic plants conferred

by antisense inhibition of a host gene essential in

S-adenosylmethionine-dependent transmethylation reactions.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

92

6117

6121

49. GotoKKoboriTKosakaYNatsuakiTMasutaC

2007

Characterization of silencing suppressor 2b of Cucumber

mosaic virus based on examination of its small RNA-binding

abilities.

Plant Cell Physiol

48

1050

1060

50. ValocziAHornyikCVargaNBurgyánJKauppinenS

2004

Sensitive and specific detection of microRNAs by northern blot

analysis using LNA-modified oligonucleotide probes.

Nucleic Acids Res

32

e175

51. LlaveCXieZKasschauKDCarringtonJC

2002

Cleavage of Scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of

Arabidopsis miRNA.

Science

297

2053

2056

52. ShimuraHFukagawaTMeguroAYamadaHOh-HiraM

2008

A strategy for screening an inhibitor of viral silencing

suppressors, which attenuates symptom development of plant

viruses.

FEBS Lett

582

4047

4052

53. LiRLiYKristiansenKWangJ

2008

SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program.

Bioinformatics

24

713

714

Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství Laboratoř

Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Pathogens


2011 Číslo 5

Nejčtenější v tomto čísle

Tomuto tématu se dále věnují…


Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Diabetická neuropatie a její léčba
nový kurz
Autoři: MUDr. Michal Dubský, Ph.D.

Mnohočetný myelom: Úvodní léčba netransplantovatelných pacientů
Autoři:

Proč v prevenci zubního kazu kartáček nestačí?
Autoři: doc. MUDr. Romana Koberová – Ivančaková, CSc.

Hypersenzitivita dentinu jako příznak poškození tvrdých zubních tkání
Autoři: MUDr. Erika Lenčová, Ph.D.

Cesta pacienta s CHOPN
Autoři: doc. MUDr. Vladimír Koblížek, Ph.D.

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se