Evaluation of a very brief pedometer-based physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks in England: The VBI randomised controlled trial
Wendy Hardeman aff001; Joanna Mitchell aff002; Sally Pears aff002; Miranda Van Emmenis aff002; Florence Theil aff002; Vijay S. Gc aff003; Joana C. Vasconcelos aff005; Kate Westgate aff006; Søren Brage aff006; Marc Suhrcke aff004; Simon J. Griffin aff006; Ann Louise Kinmonth aff008; Edward C. F. Wilson aff003; A. Toby Prevost aff005; Stephen Sutton aff002;
Působiště autorů: Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom aff001; Behavioural Science Group, Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom aff002; Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom aff003; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom aff004; Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom aff005; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom aff006; Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg aff007; Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom aff008; Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom aff009
Vyšlo v časopise: Evaluation of a very brief pedometer-based physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks in England: The VBI randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 17(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003046
Kategorie: Research Article
The majority of people do not achieve recommended levels of physical activity. There is a need for effective, scalable interventions to promote activity. Self-monitoring by pedometer is a potentially suitable strategy. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief (5-minute) pedometer-based intervention (‘Step It Up’) delivered as part of National Health Service (NHS) Health Checks in primary care.
Methods and findings
The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial was a two parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 3-month follow-up, conducted in 23 primary care practices in the East of England.
Participants were 1,007 healthy adults aged 40 to 74 years eligible for an NHS Health Check. They were randomly allocated (1:1) using a web-based tool between October 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, to either intervention (505) or control group (502), stratified by primary care practice. Participants were aware of study group allocation. Control participants received the NHS Health Check only. Intervention participants additionally received Step It Up: a 5-minute face-to-face discussion, written materials, pedometer, and step chart. The primary outcome was accelerometer-based physical activity volume at 3-month follow-up adjusted for sex, 5-year age group, and general practice. Secondary outcomes included time spent in different intensities of physical activity, self-reported physical activity, and economic measures. We conducted an in-depth fidelity assessment on a subsample of Health Check consultations.
Participants’ mean age was 56 years, two-thirds were female, they were predominantly white, and two-thirds were in paid employment. The primary outcome was available in 859 (85.3%) participants. There was no significant between-group difference in activity volume at 3 months (adjusted intervention effect 8.8 counts per minute [cpm]; 95% CI −18.7 to 36.3; p = 0.53). We found no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes of step counts per day, time spent in moderate or vigorous activity, time spent in vigorous activity, and time spent in moderate-intensity activity (accelerometer-derived variables); as well as in total physical activity, home-based activity, work-based activity, leisure-based activity, commuting physical activity, and screen or TV time (self-reported physical activity variables). Of the 505 intervention participants, 491 (97%) received the Step it Up intervention. Analysis of 37 intervention consultations showed that 60% of Step it Up components were delivered faithfully. The intervention cost £18.04 per participant. Incremental cost to the NHS per 1,000-step increase per day was £96 and to society was £239. Adverse events were reported by 5 intervention participants (of which 2 were serious) and 5 control participants (of which 2 were serious). The study’s limitations include a participation rate of 16% and low return of audiotapes by practices for fidelity assessment.
In this large well-conducted trial, we found no evidence of effect of a plausible very brief pedometer intervention embedded in NHS Health Checks on objectively measured activity at 3-month follow-up.
Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN72691150).
Accelerometers – Behavioral and social aspects of health – Cardiovascular diseases – Cost-effectiveness analysis – Nurses – Physical activity – Primary care – Randomized controlled trials
1. Sallis JF, Bull F, Guthold R, Heath GW, Inoue S, Kelly P, et al. Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet 2016; 388: 1325–1336. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30581-5 27475270
2. Aresu M, Bécares L, Brage S, Chaudhury M, Doyle-Francis M, Esliger D, et al. Health Survey for England 2008. Volume 1: Physical activity and fitness. Leeds: 2009.
3. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012; 380: 219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9 22818936
4. Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katzmarzyk PT, van Mechelen W, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet 2016; 388:1311–1324. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X 27475266
5. Scarborough P, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe KK, Allender S, Foster C, Rayner M. The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: an update to 2006–07 NHS costs. J Public Health 2011; 33: 527–535. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr033 21562029
6. Pears S, Morton K, Bijker M, Sutton S, Hardeman W, on behalf of the VBI Programme Team. Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 333. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1703-8 25887643
7. Making Every Contact Count. NHS Health Education England. www.makingeverycontactcount.co.uk. [cited 28 March 2018].
8. Making Every Contact Count (MECC): Consensus Statement. NHS Publich Health England. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/515949/Making_Every_Contact_Count_Consensus_Statement.pdf. April 2016. [cited 18 January 2019].
9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Physical activity: brief advice for adults in primary care. NICE public health guidance 44. 2013.
10. Gc V, Wilson EC, Suhrcke M, Hardeman W, Sutton S, on behalf of the VBI Programme Team. Are brief interventions to increase physical activity cost-effective? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 408–417. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094655 26438429
11. Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: A systematic review. JAMA 2007; 298: 2296–2304. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296 18029834
12. Kang M, Marshall SJ, Barreira TV, Lee JO. Effect of pedometer-based physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2009; 80: 648–655. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599604 19791652
13. Pears S, Bijker M, Morton K, Vasconcelos J, Parker RA, Westgate K, et al. A randomised controlled trial of three very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care. BMC Public Health 2016; 16: 1033. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3684-7 27716297
14. Mitchell J, Hardeman W, Pears S, Vasconcelos JC, Prevost AT, Wilson E, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks (VBI Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17: 303. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1413-2 27350131
15. Public Health England. NHS Health Check implementation review and action plan. London: 2013.
16. NHS Health Check. Available from: http://www.healthcheck.nhs.uk/. [cited 18 January 2019].
17. Medical Research Council. MRC guidelines for good clinical practice in clinical trials. London: 1998.
18. Department of Health. General practice physical activity questionnaire (GPPAQ). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/general-practice-physical-activity-questionnaire-gppaq. 2013. [cited 18 January 2019].
19. Public Health England. NHS Health Check. Best practice guidance. London: 2016.
20. Michie S, Wood CE, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis JJ, Hardeman W. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). Health Technol Assess 2015; 19: 1–188. doi: 10.3310/hta19990 26616119
21. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport 2011; 14: 411–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003 21616714
22. Besson H, Brage S, Jakes RW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ. Estimating physical activity energy expenditure, sedentary time, and physical activity intensity by self-report in adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010; 91: 106–114. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28432 19889820
23. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics 1993; 4: 353–365. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006 10146874
24. White IR, Carpenter J, Horton NJ. Including all individuals is not enough: lessons for intention-to-treat analysis. Clin Trials. 2012; 9: 396–407. doi: 10.1177/1740774512450098 22752633
25. Motl RW, McAuley E, Dlugonski D. Reactivity in baseline accelerometer data from a physical activity behavioral intervention. Health Psychol 2012; 31: 172–175. doi: 10.1037/a0025965 22023436
26. Lamming L, Pears S, Mason D, Morton K, Bijker M, Sutton S, et al. What do we know about brief interventions for physical activity that could be delivered in primary care consultations? A systematic review of reviews. Prev Med 2017; 99: 152–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.017 28232098
27. Harris T, Kerry SM, Limb ES, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Ussher M, et al. Effect of a primary care walking intervention with and without nurse support on physical activity levels in 45- to 75-year-olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) cluster randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med 2017; 14: e1002210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002210 28045890
28. Harris T, Kerry SM, Victor CR, Ekelund U, Woodcock A, Iliffe S, et al. A primary care nurse-delivered walking intervention in older adults: PACE (pedometer accelerometer consultation evaluation)-Lift cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 2015; 12: e1001783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783 25689364
29. Simmons RK, van Sluijs EM, Hardeman W, Sutton S, Griffin SJ. Who will increase their physical activity? Predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity over 12 months in the ProActive cohort. BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 226. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-226 20433700
30. Kuznetsov L, Simmons RK, Sutton S, Kinmonth AL, Griffin SJ, Hardeman W, et al. Predictors of change in objectively measured and self-reported health behaviours among individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes: longitudinal results from the ADDITION-Plus trial cohort. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013; 10: 118. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-118 24152757
31. Mok A, Khaw KT, Luben R, Wareham N, Brage S. Physical activity trajectories and mortality: population based cohort study. BMJ 2019; 365: l2323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2323 31243014
32. Webber L, Chalkidou K, Morrow S, Ferguson B, McPherson K. What are the best societal investments for improving people's health? BMJ 2018; 362: k3377. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3377 30166316
33. Van Sluijs EMF, Van Poppel MNN, Twisk JWR, Van Mechelen W. Physical activity measurements affected participants' behavior in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006; 59: 404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.016 16549263
34. Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ, Hardeman W, Sutton S, Prevost AT, Fanshawe T, et al. Efficacy of a theory-based behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in an at-risk group in primary care (ProActive UK): A randomised trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 41–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60070-7 18177774
35. Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Amireault S, Vohl MC, Perusse L. The effect of mere-measurement of cognitions on physical activity behavior: a randomized controlled trial among overweight and obese individuals. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 2. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-2 21223565
36. NHS Health Check. Available from: https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/nhs-health-check-detailed. [cited 23 October 2019].
Článek vyšel v časopise
2020 Číslo 3
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Není statin jako statin aneb praktický přehled rozdílů jednotlivých molekul
- Metamizol v léčbě bolesti u pacientů se subarachnoidálním krvácením
- Stillova choroba: vzácné a závažné systémové onemocnění
- Nedostatek hořčíku se projevuje u stále více lidí
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- An Integrative Adapt Therapy for common mental health symptoms and adaptive stress amongst Rohingya, Chin, and Kachin refugees living in Malaysia: A randomized controlled trial
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for the improvement of metabolism in obesity: The FMT-TRIM double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial
- Dietary fibre and whole grains in diabetes management: Systematic review and meta-analyses
- Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination with a high-density microarray patch: Results from a randomized, controlled phase I clinical trial
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova