1,2; C. Povýšil
3; M. Horák
4; K. Kyzlinková
Hrdlička Museum of Man, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague
1; Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague
2; Department of Pathology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, and
3; Radiodiagnostic Clinic, 1st Medical Faculty, University Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic
Vyšlo v časopise:
ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 49, 4, 2007, pp. 103-108
First trepanated skull was discovered in 1868
by Prunieres in France. He later collected 168 prehistoric discoveries. In the
Czech Republic skull trephination was first discovered and described by J.
Pudil in 1876. He found two skulls at the graveyard near Strupčice, West
Bohemia. This discovery triggered a tendency to start collecting trepanated
skulls, as described by Matiegka (15, 16). In recent years the topic of
trepanations has mainly been analyzed in archeological publications (7, 10, 13,
18, 22–26). About 90% of the skulls were older males.
The term trephination comes from the Latin
term trepanum, which means drill and from a Greek term trypanon
(I am drilling). The universal definition of trepanation is quoted as an
opening of a cavity covered by bone, most commonly in the skull; however, it
can be associated with any bone or tooth (19). During his study of historic
findings Matiegka (15, 16) and Vlček (23) described and divided trephinations
into three groups: complete, incomplete and cauterization (burning). Complete
trephination is characterized by the perforation of the external lamina, diploe
and internal lamina. During an incomplete trephination the external lamina
and/or diploe is removed, but the internal lamina remains intact. Cauterization
is intervention with a hot object which causes damage or complete burning of
the bone and its perforation; instead of infection it causes necrosis and
aseptic inflammation which subsequently heals well. Manouvriere described scars
on skulls found near Paris which had been caused by gradual burning which led
to an opening. This type of intervention is described as far back as by
Herodotos as well as Arab doctors in the 11th and 12th centuries.
In historical times as well as in today’s
native cultures the most common method of performing trepanation is by
scratching, which leads to a gradual removal of bone layers and the formation
of a round opening with a wide oblique edge, larger in the area of external
lamina. Another technique is cutting and drilling, and here we can also include
the method according to Lucas-Championniére (12). During the cutting deep grooves are created by a sharp object; these mark the trephination
opening and establish its shape, most commonly a square. Eventually the bone is
extracted. Drilling can be performed in two ways. When a drill is used its size
determines the final size of the opening (circling), while a trepan – an
instrument intended only for trephinations – can also be employed. The method
of Lucas-Championniére uses a sharp
edge for drilling small openings which are organized in a circle and are
connected by cutting; forceful opening follows, and the jagged edge of the
opening is smoothed by scraping. This type of intervention (drilling followed
by forceful opening) is risky, because it can lead to damage to the meninges of
the brain. The broken part (roundel, French rondelle) is characterized
by a jagged edge and can show
signs of drilling, cutting or scraping (16). Peruvian Indians most commonly
used this technique, according to Lucas-Championniére, or bone drilling using chisel-like
were performed by sharp objects (flint or metal blades). In approximately
25–75% of operated skulls signs of healing of the edges of the openings were
found (19). However, in many cases, due to the short healing period, it is not
possible to determine if the surgeries were completed during the person’s
lifetime or posthumously (2). Cases of multiple trephinations are also known,
when the primary opening was widened or
a new opening was created. In the area of Cuzco in Peru a skull was
found with seven trephinations showing obvious signs of regeneration, and it is
likely of course that the person in question survived the interventions (13).
Obtaining a roundel
from a skull or experimenting with surgical intervention could have been
reasons for postmortem trephination. In unhealed trephinations marked signs of
instrumental intervention are usually found, corresponding to the technique
The oldest documented
cases of trephinations are from the Neolithic era; the oldest finding in Europe
so far comes from French Ensisheim and is about 7000 years old (1). The orifice
6.5 x 6 cm on the centre of frontal bone was completely closed; the second
larger trepanation over both parietal bones (9.5 x 9 cm) was partially healed.
Trephinations were found not only in Europe but also in America, mainly in Peru
and in Mexico, where this type of intervention was very common (present in
about 10% of the found skulls). On Pacific Ocean islands or in Africa this
intervention is done in primitive conditions and with simple instruments by
native medicine man even today. As far back as 1928 Broca thought this surgical
technique had been used in northern Africa from ancient times right up to the
In classical as well as
medieval medical literature, ever since the times of Hippocrates, we can find
instructions on performing trephinations, raising the question of whether
classical medicine accommodated the method from ancient folk medicine. It is
interesting that discoveries of prehistoric trepanated skulls became an impulse
for the study of trephination at the end of 19th century, because until then this technique was rejected
by doctors and believed to bring about certain death (15).
Trials on dead people’s
skulls and animals proved that it was really possible to complete trephinations
in prehistoric times by using only flint instruments. Broca accomplished this
intervention by scratching on the head of an adult in an hour and in a child
within four minutes; Lucas-Championniére completed the operation in 35 minutes with his method (15, 16).
is likely that areas for trephinations were not selected accidentally; at the
same time, anatomical rules were not taken into special consideration. Skull
sutures were not considered an obstacle, and on several skulls the intervention
was completed near meningeal arteries; sometimes the trephination opening was
even above the sagittal suture and above the large vein sinus (1, 15). Reasons
for performing trephinations vary. In ethnologic studies (11) these are divided
into three areas. Firstly, therapeutic, where trephination was completed purely
as a form of treatment (for head injury, concussion of the brain, increased
intracranial pressure). Secondly, magic-therapeutical, which assumed that
medical problems are caused by demons and it is necessary to “let go” of them
(long-term headaches, vertigo, convulsions, epilepsy, and mental disorders). In
these cases the resulting effect is comparable with the therapeutic. In the
third case, for magical-ritual reasons, a healthy individual undergoes surgery
as a magic protection against possible future injury or illness. This is not
very likely, though as documented in a Kenyan case from 1970, it can happen
sporadically. Similarly, in postmortem trephinations the roundel extracted
served as a precious amulet (13, 22).
a diagnosis of the origin of the opening it is important to consider other
causes as well: For example, enlarged parietal foramina, congenital herniation,
tangential cutting injury, impressive fractures of the cranial bone, thinning
or perforation due to osteoporosis, bone cysts, benign or malignant tumors or
bone infections during tuberculosis, syphilis and osteomyelitis. Biological and
microscopy methods can help to clarify it or illustrate the facture.
COLLECTION OF HRDLIČKA
In the Hrdlička Museum
of Man, Charles University, 12 more
or less well-preserved trephined skulls from various periods are stored.
Anthropologic and anthropometric analysis, which is not presented in this
paper, could be performed on 9 skulls of which 5 belonged to males, one to a
female and three were of uncertain sex. Four skulls were in the category
adultus/maturus, one senilis and four were too much impaired for age
determination. Signs of bone healing, indicating the survival of the patient,
were evident in 4 skulls, two skulls did not show any signs of healing and in
three skulls survival of the patient was impossible to establish. On one skull
there were two trephination holes (Fig. 1), while the other skulls had one
hole. They were located on os frontale (4x), os parietale (3x), os occipitale
(1), on sutura lambdoidea (1) and sutura coronalis (1). Five skulls were from
the bronze period, while the origin of the others is not known. In three of the skulls CT and histopathological
analysis was performed.
Three of the skulls
having oval-shaped holes were examined. The purpose was to find an answer to
the main question: did these people live after suffering such a major head trauma?
Each skull has been
separately examined using Computed Tomography (CT) (Siemens Sensation 40, 2006,
Erlangen, Germany). Helical examination mode has been chosen using 120 kV, 360
mAs for scanning a normal head. Twenty detectors in a row have collected the
data in 0.6 mm thickness, total pitch 0.5. In recon mode all data have been
reformatted into 0.6 mm slices, increment 0.3 mm kernel 10 used for 3D
modelling and at the same width kernel 60 for better resolution of bone
structure. Each skull has been shaped in a 3D model in various rotations using
volume-rendering technique (VRT).
Skull No. 1 (Fig. 2–4)
The skull was found in
Strupčice, West Bohemia. The oval hole is located only in the squama of right
parietal bone. The inner measurement is 38 mm cranio-caudal and 38 mm
antero-posterior, in anterior oblique 52 mm and posterior oblique 32 mm. No
other traumas such as fractures or fissures are visible outside or inside the
bones of the skull. The inner edges are smoothly rounded with no defects. The
edges are within the borders of the proper cortical bone. There is no spongious
bone on the edges of the hole. This indicates that the person was able to live
for quite a while, at least six months, after surgery. The trauma of the bone
had enough time to produce enough cortical bone to smoothen the edges; there is
almost complete ossification of the edges. There is no real visible evidence of
infection or other defects.
Skull No. 2 (Fig. 5, 6)
skull was found in Chrabřec, North-West Bohemia. The oval hole is located in
the centre of the squama of the left parietal bone. The inner measurement is 28
mm cranio-caudal and 38 mm antero-posterior, in anterior oblique 29 mm and posterior oblique 44 mm. On the
calva there is a sharp cut-like trauma removing the outer cortex of the bone
over a much bigger area than the inner cortex. The spongious bone is uncovered.
There is no particular sign of re-ossification. The trauma was probably made by
a sharp object with one tangential cut. The outer cortex is cut 10–13 mm wider
than the inner cortex. A straight anterio-posterior line of fracture is located
dorsal to the hole on the left parietal bone finishing in the parieto-occipital suture. There is no
evidence of healing processes in the bone. It can be assumed that this person
has died soon after the head injury.
Skull No. 3 (Fig. 7, 8)
skull was found in Prague (Svatý Mikuláš). The oval hole is located in the
dorsal part of squama of right parietal bone. The inner measurement is 25 mm
cranio-caudal and 14 mm antero-posterior, in anterior oblique 28 mm and
posterior oblique 13 mm. On the calva there is sharp cut-like trauma with a
V-shape removing the outer cortex of the bone over a much bigger area than the
inner cortex. The trauma was probably made by a sharp object with tangential
cuts chopping in and out to make the V-shaped cut. The outer cortex is cut 7–16
mm wider than the inner cortex. The spongious bone is not covered by cortex.
There is no particular sign of re-ossification. There is no visible trauma such
as fractures or fissures outside or inside the bones of the skull. There is no
evidence of healing processes in the bone. It is assumed that this person died
soon after the head injury.
CT examination has been
performed on skulls from bronze period with one hole in parietal bone on either
side. The measurements were taken from 3D images (see Fig. 4); the distortion
of VRT images could cause slightly different values than the real measurements.
There is evidence that
in one case (No. 1) the person lived with this injury for quite a long period
of time, because there is almost complete re-ossification of the edges with new
cortex on the edges visible as smoothness of the edges. There is no way of
determining how the injury occurred.
In cases No. 2 and No.
3 there is no evidence of re-ossification on the edges of the holes. The
injuries were probably fatal or led to early death. A sharp object such as a
knife, sword or axe probably caused the traumas in both cases. This is
suggested by the bigger cut off area on the outer cortex than on the inner
of skull bones were taken from three cases in the region of the margin of the
defect. The cut was oriented perpendicularly to the margin of the defect.
Specimens removed from this area were placed in formalin for one day and than
dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Microtomed sections 7 micrometers thick
were stained with haematoxyllin and eosin and Masson’s trichrom.
histopathological examination of bone specimens removed from the edges of the
defects two different patterns were observed.
examination of the sample removed from skull No. 1 showed that the margin of the defect was covered by cortical bone
of an identical structure as the cortical bone of the surrounding skull bones.
No defect or other pathological changes were identified in this site.
Continuity of this cortical bone with the cortex of the inner and outer skull
surface was apparent (Fig. 9).
histological finding in the margin of the defect of skull No. 2 was completely
different. The margin of the defect was not covered by bone of the cortical
type. No signs of healing in this region were observed. The inner and outer
cortical bone of the skull ended sharply, and between them there was cancellous
(spongy) bone with free surface (Fig. 10) lacking in cortical bone.
This study was supported
by Research grant of Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports MSM 0021620843,
and by grant of Ministry of Health IGA No. 8150-4.
Museum of Man
of Science, Charles University
44 Prague 2
1. Alt KW., Jeunesse C., Wachter,R., Boes E., Pilcher SL. Evidence for stone-age cranial surgery. Nature, 387, 1997, p. 360.
2. Bednář B., Dobiáš J., Elleder M., Jirásek A., Lojda Z., Miřejovský P., Motlík K., Pazderka V., Stejskal J., Stejskalová A., Vorreith M., Zavadil M. Atlas of Pathological Anatomy (in Czech), Praha: Avicenum, 1975.
3. Bezděková V. Paleopathological Analysis of Skeletal Collection from The Hrdlička Museum of Man (in Czech). Thesis. Praha: Charles University – Faculty of Science, 1999.
4. Broca P. Sur la trépanation du crČne et les amulettes crČniennes ą l’époque néolithique. Revue d’anthropologie, 6, 1877, p. 193–225.
5. Černý J. Special surgery – surgery of head and throat (in Slovak). Martin SK: Osveta, 1995, p. 139–153.
6. Čihák R. Anatomy 1 (in Czech). Praha: Grada Publishing, 2001.
7. Dočkalová M. Trepanation evidences in collections of Anthropos Institute. Neolit and Eneolit Issues in our Lands. Brno: Ústav archeologické památkové péče, 2001.
8. King MH. Primary Surgery, Vol. 2. Trauma. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 126–138.
9. Kremer K. Grewe HE. Atlas of Surgical Operations (in Czech). Praha: Avicenum, Grada Publishing, 1993, p. 61–67.
10. Likovský J. The trepanation of the skull from the double Únětice grave at Prague – Jelení St. and comparison thereof to trepanations of similar date in Czech Republic (in Czech). Archeologické rozhledy, 4, 2004, p. 841–849.
11. Lisowski FP. Prehistoric and early historic trepanation. American Anthropologist, 49, 1947, p. 25–46.
12. Lucas-Championniére J. Trépanation Néolithique, Trépanation Pré-Columbienne, Trépanation des Kabyles, Trépanation Traditionelle. Paris. 1912, www.bium.univ-paris5.fr
13. Malyková D. Trephined skulls among archeological finds from Bohemia (in Czech). Archeologie ve středních Čechách, 6, 2002, p. 293–314.
14. Malý J. Artificially deformed skulls of Tiahuanaco (in Czech). Anthropologie, 6, 1926, p. 251–333.
15. Matiegka J. Prehistoric trepanations and cautery of skulls in Czech lands (in Czech). Památky archeologické, 30, 1918, p. 74–85.
16. Matiegka J. La trépanation et des autres opérations sur la tźte ą l’époque préhistorique sur le territoire de la Tchécoslovaquie. Anthropologie, 6, 1928, p. 41–55.
17. Rejzek J. Czech Etymological Dictionary. Praha: Leda, 2001, p. 672.
18. Smrčka V. Trephined skull from collections of Sedlčany City Museum (in Czech). Podbrdsko, 9, 2002. Příbram: Státní okresní archiv.
19. Steinbock RT. Paleopathological Diagnosis and Interpretation. Springfield: C.C.Thomas, 1976.
20. Stloukal M., Dobisíková M., Kuželka V., Stránská P., Velemínský P., Vyhnánek L., Zvára K. Skeleton Study Guidebook (in Czech). Praha: Národní muzeum, 1999.
21. Stloukal M., Vyhnánek L. Slavs from Great Moravia Mikulčice (in Czech). Praha: Academia, 1976.
22. Strouhal E. Case of repeated trepanation from Late Bronze Age (in Czech). Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Univ. Comenianae. Anthropologia, 10/1, 1965.
23. Vlček E. Trepanation on prehistoric skulls in north-west Bohemia (in Czech). Krajem Lučanů, 15/5–6, 1949, p. 31–42.
24. Vlček E. Trepanations of skulls from 10th century (in Czech). Archeologické rozhledy, 5, 1953, p. 198–202.
25. Vlček E. Double La Téne trepanation from Dvory nad Žitavou (in Czech). Archeologické rozhledy, 8, 1956, p. 365–370.
26. Wankel J. Prehistoric skull with partially healed wound on forehead which was most probably caused by trepanation (in Czech). Regionální sborník okresu Blansko, 1891, p. 57–63.