Euthanasia: legal comparison in selected European countries

Česká verze

Authors: Adam Doležal
Authors place of work: Ústav státu a práva Akademie věd ČR, v. v. i., Praha
Published in the journal: Vnitř Lék 2018; 64(3): 257-265
Category: Přehledné referáty

Summary

This article deals with the subject of euthanasia (all its forms) and other end-of-life decisions, such as assisted suicide, withdrawing and whithholding life-sustaining treatments. Among other things, the article will also deal with the issue of the offense of Homicide by the Victim’s Request. Based on an empirical historical method, the article compares the various selected legal orders. From this analysis, it draws some conclusions that have an impact on ethical discourse. First of all, the terminology is defined in the article, which is very important in this area. Further, German law is being analysed, with emphasis on Nazi Germany. On that basis, the so-called reductio ad Hitlerum argument is rejected. Research continues and is followed by another states, the Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. By analysing them, the following ethical arguments used in euthanasia debates are examined: the argument of a slippery slope and the argument of respect for autonomy. Finally, the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Pretty case is also analysed. On this case, we can demonstrate, how insufficient is argument of human dignity. The last part is dedicated to the Czech Republic and its legal order. Firstly, it focuses on the history of the legal regulation of euthanasia, but the main part deals with the current legal situation. In addition to the recent state of affairs, the bill of Death with dignity act is also being examined. At the end of the article it is pointed out that the Czech regulation is insufficient and changes are necessary. However, the proposed bill of Death with dignity act is not the right way to follow. Rather, it may be wise to adopt an amendment to the Penal Code that would introduce the offense of Homicide by the Victim’s Request.

Key words:
assisted suicide –⁠ euthanasia –⁠ Homicide by the Victim’s Request –⁠ medical futility –⁠ withdrawing and whithholding life-sustaining treatment

Zdroje

1. Munzarová M. Lékařská etika a eutanazie. In: Ptáček R, Bartůněk P (eds) et al. Eutanazie –⁠ pro a proti. Grada Publishing: Praha 2012 : 31–41. ISBN 978–80–247–4659–3.

2. Griffiths J, Weyers HA, Adams M (eds.) et al. Euthanasia And Law In Europe. 2nd ed. Hart Pub: Portland 2008. ISBN 978–1841137001.

3. Jones DA, Gastmans CH, Mackellar AC (eds) et al. Euthanasia and assisted suicide: Lessons from Belgium (Cambridge Bioethics and Law). Cambridge University Press: New York 2017. ISBN 978–1107198869.

4. Stutsman E. Twenty Years of Living with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. GPSolo 2013; 30(4): 49–52. Dostupné z WWW: <https://www.americanbar.org/publications/gp_solo/2013/july_august/twenty_years_living_the_oregon_death_dignity_act.html>.

5. Gert B, Culver CM. Distinguishing between active and passive euthanasia. Clin Geriatr Med 1986; 2(1): 29–36.

6. Čadová N. Veřejné mínění o interrupci, eutanazii a trestu smrti –⁠ červen 2016. [2017–12–15]. Dostupné z WWW: <https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/cz/vyhledavani?q=eutanazie>

7. Hope R. Medical ethics: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press: New York 2004. ISBN 978–0192802828.

8. Gavela K. Ärztlich assistierter Suizid und organisierte Sterbehilfe (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales. Heidelberg und Mannheim) (German Edition). Springer Berlin: Berlin 2013. ISBN 978–3642311727.

9. Binding K, Hoche A. Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens: Ihr Maß und ihre Form (1920). Felix Meiner Verlag: Leipzig 1920. Taschenbuch –⁠ 2. Mai 2006. ISBN 978–3830511694.

10. Strauss L. Natural Right and history. University of Chicago Press: Chicago 1953. ISBN 978–0226776927.

11. Teninbaum GH. Reductio ad Hitlerum: Trumping the Judicial Nazi Card. Mich St L Rev 2009; 9 : 541–578.

12. van den Berg JH. Medical power and medical ethics. Norton: New York 1978. ISBN 978–0393064285.

13. Doležal A. Eutanazie a rozhodnutí na konci života: právní aspekty. Academia: Praha 2017 : 74 a 96. ISBN 978–80–200–2687–3.

14. Cohen-Almagor R. Belgian euthanasia law: a critical analysis. J Med Ethics 2009; 35(7): 436–439. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.026799>.

15. Pirie M. How to win every argument: the use and abuse of logic. Rev ed. Continuum: London 2006. ISBN 978–0826490063.

16. Doležal A. Kritická analýza autonomie v bioetice. Filosofický časopis 2014; 62(6): 877–893.

17. Griffiths J, Bood A, Weyers H. Euthanasia and law in the Netherlands. Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam 1998. ISBN 978–9053562758.

18. Malíř J, Doležal T. Evropská úmluva o ochraně lidských práv a základních svobod a zdravotnictví: současný stav a perspektivy. Wolters Kluwer: Praha 2016. ISBN 978–80–7552–224–5.

19. Stolínová J, Mach J. Právní odpovědnost v medicíně. Galén: Praha 1998. ISBN 8085824884.

20. Krejčíková H. Ukončování léčby pacienta a trestní odpovědnost lékaře. Galén: Praha 2014. ISBN 9788074921674.

21. Císařová D, Sovová O. Trestní právo a zdravotnictví. Orac: Praha 2000. ISBN 80–86199–09–6.