Medical ethical moral and legal aspects of Jehovah´s Witnesses operations

Česká verze

Authors: Milan Kudela ^1,3 ; R. Pilka ¹; P. Dzvinčuk ¹; R. Marek ¹; O. Klementová ²
Authors place of work: Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc, přednosta prof. MUDr R. Pilka, Ph. D. ¹; Klinika anestezie a resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny LF UP a FN, Olomouc, přednostka MUDr. O. Klementová ²; Ústav zdravotnických věd, FHS UTB, Zlín ³
Published in the journal: Ceska Gynekol 2019; 84(1): 23-27
Category: Retrospektivní studie

Summary

Objective: To point out principles of blood sparing surgery. Medical ethical moral and legal aspects of operations on Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Design: Retrospective clinical study. Review of articles.

Setting: Dept. of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Olomouc; Dept. of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University Zlín.

Materials and methods: 72 Jehovah’s Witnesses patients were operated on for various benign and malignant gynecological diseases since 2007–2017. All patiens were operated according to the rules of blood sparing surgery.

Results: There were no excesive blood loss at any of the operations. The estimated blood loss was between 10 to 550 ml.

Conclusions: The main principles of blood sparing surgery should be applied not only for Jehovah’s Witnesses but for all patients. Even if the blood transfusion is the last resort for excessive blood loss during complicated operations it always carries some health risks. There are also the economical aspects. Blood transfusions should be therefore used only at very rare occasions. Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse blood transfusions at all even if it is the only life saving resort. Our legislation deal with this problem but there are also moral and ethical aspects. The attitude of gynecological surgeons how to solve this problem differ a great deal.

Keywords:

Jehovah´s Witnesses operations – blood sparing surgery – medical ethical aspects

Zdroje

1. Belaouchi, M., Romero, E., Mazzinari, G., et al. Management of massive bleeding in a Jehovah’s Witness obstetrics patients: the owerhelming importace of a pre-established multidisciplinary protokol. Blood Transfusion, 2016, 14, p. 541–544.

2. Durnmousset, E., Chabrot, B., Rabischong, B., et al. Preoperative uterine artery embolisation (PUAE) before uterine fibroid myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2008, 31, p. 514-520.

3. Nimesh, P., Nagarsheth, MD., Fahimeh, S. Bloodless surgery in gynecologic oncology. Mount Sinai J Med, 2009, 76, p. 589–597.

4. Pafko, P. Rozhovor s prof. MUDr P. Pafkem, DrSc. Moderní Gynek Porod, 2009, 18, 4, s. 643–647.

5. Rayburn,WF. Prevention and management of complications from gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynec Clinics, 2010, 37, 3, p. 427–436.

6. Retamales, PA., Cardemil, HG. Benefits from the exercise of autonomy and informed consent: the example of Jehovah´s Witnesses. Rev Med Chil, 2009, 137, 10, p. 1388–1394.

7. Ringnes, HK. Refusal of medical blood transfusions among Jehova’s Witnesses: emotion regulations of the dissonance of saving and sacrificing life. J Relig Health, 2016, 55, p. 1672–1687.

8. Sagy, I., Jotkowitz, A., Barski, L. Reflections on cultural preference and internal medicine: the case of Jehovah’s Witnesses and the changing tresholds for blood transfusion. J Relig Health, 2017, 56, p. 732–738.

9. Santoso, JT., Saunders, BA., Grosshart, K. Massive blood loss and transfusion in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2005, 60, 12, p. 827–837.

10. Seidlová, D., Weinberger, V. Metody bezkrevné péče v gynekologii a onkogynekologii. Čes Gynek, 2014, 79, 6, s. 499–504.

11. Shander, A., Hofmann, A., Ozawa, S., et al. Aktivity-based costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals. Transfusion, 2010, 50, 4, p. 753–765.

12. Shander, A., Javidroozi, M., Perelman, S., Puzio, T., Lobel, G. From bloodless surgery to patients blood management. Mt Sinai J Med, 2012, 79, 1, p. 56–65.

13. Shiroki, R., Maruvama, T., Kusaka, M., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using daVinci S-surgical system for localized renal tumor: report of initial five cases. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, 2011, 102, 5, p. 679–685.

14. Simou, M., Thomakos, N., Zagouri, F., et al. Non-blood medical care in gynecological oncology: a review and update of blood conservation management schemes. World J Surg Oncol, 2011, 9, p. 142.

15. Yorozu, T. Jehovah´s Witness patients. Masui, 2010, 59, 9, p. 1149–1152.

16. Záleská, D. Právní podmínky respektování práva na odmítnutí krevní transfuze. Moderní Gynek Porod, 2009, 18, 4, s. 648–655