Gene disruption by structural mutations drives selection in US rice breeding over the last century
Autoři:
Justin N. Vaughn aff001; Walid Korani aff002; Joshua C. Stein aff003; Jeremy D. Edwards aff004; Daniel G. Peterson aff005; Sheron A. Simpson aff001; Ramey C. Youngblood aff005; Jane Grimwood aff006; Kapeel Chougule aff003; Doreen H. Ware aff003; Anna M. McClung aff004; Brian E. Scheffler aff001
Působiště autorů:
USDA-ARS, Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America
aff001; University of Georgia, Athens, Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
aff002; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Springs Harbor, New York, United States of America
aff003; USDA-ARS, Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States of America
aff004; Mississippi State University, Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing & Biotechnology, Starkville, Mississippi, United States of America
aff005; Hudson-Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, United States of America
aff006; USDA-ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
aff007
Vyšlo v časopise:
Gene disruption by structural mutations drives selection in US rice breeding over the last century. PLoS Genet 17(3): e1009389. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009389
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009389
Souhrn
The genetic basis of general plant vigor is of major interest to food producers, yet the trait is recalcitrant to genetic mapping because of the number of loci involved, their small effects, and linkage. Observations of heterosis in many crops suggests that recessive, malfunctioning versions of genes are a major cause of poor performance, yet we have little information on the mutational spectrum underlying these disruptions. To address this question, we generated a long-read assembly of a tropical japonica rice (Oryza sativa) variety, Carolina Gold, which allowed us to identify structural mutations (>50 bp) and orient them with respect to their ancestral state using the outgroup, Oryza glaberrima. Supporting prior work, we find substantial genome expansion in the sativa branch. While transposable elements (TEs) account for the largest share of size variation, the majority of events are not directly TE-mediated. Tandem duplications are the most common source of insertions and are highly enriched among 50-200bp mutations. To explore the relative impact of various mutational classes on crop fitness, we then track these structural events over the last century of US rice improvement using 101 resequenced varieties. Within this material, a pattern of temporary hybridization between medium and long-grain varieties was followed by recent divergence. During this long-term selection, structural mutations that impact gene exons have been removed at a greater rate than intronic indels and single-nucleotide mutations. These results support the use of ab initio estimates of mutational burden, based on structural data, as an orthogonal predictor in genomic selection.
Klíčová slova:
Alleles – Genetic loci – Genomics – Haplotypes – Mutation – Rice – Sequence alignment – Single nucleotide polymorphisms
Zdroje
1. Gaut BS, Seymour DK, Liu Q, Zhou Y. Demography and its effects on genomic variation in crop domestication. Nat Plants. 2018;4:512. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0210-1 30061748
2. Moyers BT, Morrell PL, McKay JK. Genetic Costs of Domestication and Improvement. J Hered. 2018;109:103–116. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esx069 28992310
3. Lu J, Tang T, Tang H, Huang J, Shi S, Wu C-I. The accumulation of deleterious mutations in rice genomes: a hypothesis on the cost of domestication. Trends Genet TIG. 2006;22:126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.004 16443304
4. Wallace JG, Rodgers-Melnick E, Buckler ES. On the Road to Breeding 4.0: Unraveling the Good, the Bad, and the Boring of Crop Quantitative Genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2018;52:421–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024846 30285496
5. Yang J, Mezmouk S, Baumgarten A, Buckler ES, Guill KE, McMullen MD, et al. Incomplete dominance of deleterious alleles contributes substantially to trait variation and heterosis in maize. PLOS Genet. 2017;13:e1007019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007019 28953891
6. Rodríguez-Leal D, Lemmon ZH, Man J, Bartlett ME, Lippman ZB. Engineering Quantitative Trait Variation for Crop Improvement by Genome Editing. Cell. 2017;171:470–480.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.030 28919077
7. Kremling KAG, Chen S-Y, Su M-H, Lepak NK, Romay MC, Swarts KL, et al. Dysregulation of expression correlates with rare-allele burden and fitness loss in maize. Nature. 2018;555:520–523. doi: 10.1038/nature25966 29539638
8. Fuentes RR, Chebotarov D, Duitama J, Smith S, Hoz JFD la, Mohiyuddin M, et al. Structural variants in 3000 rice genomes. Genome Res. 2019 [cited 1 May 2019]. doi: 10.1101/gr.241240.118 30992303
9. Mahmoud M, Gobet N, Cruz-Dávalos DI, Mounier N, Dessimoz C, Sedlazeck FJ. Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it. Genome Biol. 2019;20:246. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1828-7 31747936
10. Tabien RE, Samonte SOP, McClung AM. Forty-eight Years of Rice Improvement in Texas since the Release of Cultivar Bluebonnet in 1944. Crop Sci. 2008;48:2097–2106. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.12.0680
11. Williams VR, Wu W-T, Tsai HY, Bates HG. Rice Starch, Varietal Differences in Amylose Content of Rice Starch. J Agric Food Chem. 1958;6:47–48. doi: 10.1021/jf60083a009
12. Wang X, Jia Y, Wamishe Y, Jia MH, Valent B. Dynamic Changes in the Rice Blast Population in the United States Over Six Decades. Mol Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 2017;30:803–812. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-04-17-0101-R 28677493
13. Ma J, Bennetzen JL. Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12404–12410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403715101 15240870
14. Carpentier M-C, Manfroi E, Wei F-J, Wu H-P, Lasserre E, Llauro C, et al. Retrotranspositional landscape of Asian rice revealed by 3000 genomes. Nat Commun. 2019;10:24. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07974-5 30604755
15. Read AC, Moscou MJ, Zimin AV, Pertea G, Meyer RS, Purugganan MD, et al. Genome assembly and characterization of a complex zfBED-NLR gene-containing disease resistance locus in Carolina Gold Select rice with Nanopore sequencing. PLOS Genet. 2020;16:e1008571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008571 31986137
16. Wang M, Yu Y, Haberer G, Marri PR, Fan C, Goicoechea JL, et al. The genome sequence of African rice (Oryza glaberrima) and evidence for independent domestication. Nat Genet. 2014;46:982–988. doi: 10.1038/ng.3044 25064006
17. Vaughn JN, Bennetzen JL. Natural insertions in rice commonly form tandem duplications indicative of patch-mediated double-strand break induction and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:6684–6689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321854111 24760826
18. Kosugi S, Momozawa Y, Liu X, Terao C, Kubo M, Kamatani Y. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing. Genome Biol. 2019;20:117. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1720-5 31159850
19. Puchta H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:1–14. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri025 15557293
20. Schiml S, Fauser F, Puchta H. Repair of adjacent single-strand breaks is often accompanied by the formation of tandem sequence duplications in plant genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 201603823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603823113 27307441
21. Messer PW, Arndt PF. The majority of recent short DNA insertions in the human genome are tandem duplications. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1190–1197. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm035 17322553
22. Wang W, Mauleon R, Hu Z, Chebotarov D, Tai S, Wu Z, et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature. 2018;557:43. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0063-9 29695866
23. Alexander DH, Lange K. Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-246 21682921
24. Vaughn JN, Li Z. Genomic Signatures of North American Soybean Improvement Inform Diversity Enrichment Strategies and Clarify the Impact of Hybridization. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2016;6:2693–2705. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.029215 27402364
25. van Heerwaarden J, Hufford MB, Ross-Ibarra J. Historical genomics of North American maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:12420–12425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209275109 22802642
26. Gan X, Stegle O, Behr J, Steffen JG, Drewe P, Hildebrand KL, et al. Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2011;477:419–423. doi: 10.1038/nature10414 21874022
27. Hill WG, Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966;8:269–294. 5980116
28. Lin Z, Qin P, Zhang X, Fu C, Deng H, Fu X, et al. Divergent selection and genetic introgression shape the genome landscape of heterosis in hybrid rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:4623–4631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919086117 32071222
29. Beissinger TM, Hirsch CN, Vaillancourt B, Deshpande S, Barry K, Buell CR, et al. A Genome-Wide Scan for Evidence of Selection in a Maize Population Under Long-Term Artificial Selection for Ear Number. Genetics. 2014;196:829–840. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.160655 24381334
30. Pritchard JK, Pickrell JK, Coop G. The Genetics of Human Adaptation: Hard Sweeps, Soft Sweeps, and Polygenic Adaptation. Curr Biol CB. 2010;20:R208–R215. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055 20178769
31. Bersaglieri T, Sabeti PC, Patterson N, Vanderploeg T, Schaffner SF, Drake JA, et al. Genetic Signatures of Strong Recent Positive Selection at the Lactase Gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:1111–1120. doi: 10.1086/421051 15114531
32. Athwal DS. Semidwarf Rice and Wheat in Global Food Needs. Q Rev Biol. 1971;46:1–34. doi: 10.1086/406754 4927378
33. Angira B, Addison CK, Cerioli T, Rebong DB, Wang DR, Pumplin N, et al. Haplotype Characterization of the sd1 Semidwarf Gene in United States Rice. Plant Genome. 2019;12. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2019.02.0010 33016579
34. Rybka K, Miyamoto M, Ando I, Saito A, Kawasaki S. High Resolution Mapping of the Indica-Derived Rice Blast Resistance Genes II. Pi-ta2 and Pi-ta and a Consideration of Their Origin. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1997;10:517–524. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.4.517
35. Messer PW, Petrov DA. Population genomics of rapid adaptation by soft selective sweeps. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28:659–669. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.08.003 24075201
36. Lorenz AJ, Chao S, Asoro FG, Heffner EL, Hayashi T, Iwata H, et al. Chapter Two—Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Knowledge and Prospects. In: Sparks DL, editor. Advances in Agronomy. Academic Press; 2011. pp. 77–123. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385531-2.00002–5
37. Stewart-Brown BB, Song Q, Vaughn JN, Li Z. Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2019;9:2253–2265. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200917 31088906
38. Doyle J, Doyle JL, Doyle JJ, Doyle J, Doyle JL, Doyle JJ, et al. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. 1987 [cited 7 Apr 2020]. Available from: https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=1cd6f3da-bc63-466b-9990-270af0960e2a.
39. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017; gr.215087.116. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116 28298431
40. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: An Integrated Tool for Comprehensive Microbial Variant Detection and Genome Assembly Improvement. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 25409509
41. Cantarel BL, Korf I, Robb SMC, Parra G, Ross E, Moore B, et al. MAKER: An easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 2008;18:188–196. doi: 10.1101/gr.6743907 18025269
42. Stein JC, Yu Y, Copetti D, Zwickl DJ, Zhang L, Zhang C, et al. Genomes of 13 domesticated and wild rice relatives highlight genetic conservation, turnover and innovation across the genus Oryza. Nat Genet. 2018;50:285–296. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0040-0 29358651
43. Copetti D, Zhang J, El Baidouri M, Gao D, Wang J, Barghini E, et al. RiTE database: a resource database for genus-wide rice genomics and evolutionary biology. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:538. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1762-3 26194356
44. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PloS One. 2010;5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 20593022
45. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 20003500
46. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 24695404
47. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 19451168
48. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011;43:491–498. doi: 10.1038/ng.806 21478889
49. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2633–2635. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308 17586829
50. Endelman JB, Jannink J-L. Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3 Bethesda Md. 2012;2:1405–1413. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.004259 23173092
51. He J, Meng S, Zhao T, Xing G, Yang S, Li Y, et al. An innovative procedure of genome-wide association analysis fits studies on germplasm population and plant breeding. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130:2327–2343. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2962-9 28828506
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2021 Číslo 3
- Zvoní budík? Přispěte si ještě chvilku, bude vám to myslet rychleji!
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Není statin jako statin aneb praktický přehled rozdílů jednotlivých molekul
- Umíme správně řešit osteporotické zlomeniny?
- Vědci vytvořili první funkční mozkovou tkáň pomocí 3D tisku
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- DNA polymerase theta suppresses mitotic crossing over
- activin-2 is required for regeneration of polarity on the planarian anterior-posterior axis
- A cohesin cancer mutation reveals a role for the hinge domain in genome organization and gene expression
- Behavior of dicentric chromosomes in budding yeast