The da Vinci robot in the field of vascular surgery

Česká verze

Authors: P. Štádler; L. Dvořáček; P. Vitásek; P. Matouš
Authors place of work: Oddělení cévní chirurgie Nemocnice Na Homolce primář: prof. MUDr. P. Štádler, Ph. D.
Published in the journal: Rozhl. Chir., 2017, roč. 96, č. 2, s. 63-68.
Category: Původní práce

Summary

Introduction:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical experience with 379 robot-assisted vascular procedures performed from November 2005 to December 2016 at our institution.

Methods:
A total of 366 cases (96.6%) were successfully completed using the robotic surgical systems da Vinci Standard and da Vinci Xi.

Results:
Conversion was necessary in 13 patients (3.4%). The 30-day mortality was 0.26% and 2 (0.5%) late prosthetic infections occurred.

Conclusions:
From a practical point of view, the greatest advantage of robot-assisted procedures has been the speed and relative simplicity of vascular anastomosis construction. Our experience with robot-assisted surgery has demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this technique in different areas of vascular surgery.

Key words:
robotic vascular surgery −⁠ aortic and non-aortic surgery

Zdroje

1. Nio D, Diks J, Linsen MAM, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease: Early clinical experience. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2005; 29 : 586–90.

2. Štádler P, Šebesta P, Vitásek P, et al. A modified technique of transperitoneal direct approach for totally laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;3 : 266−9.

3. Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Wetscher G, et al. First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25 : 844−51.

4. Štádler P, Dvořáček L, Vitásek, et al. Is robotic surgery appropriate for vascular procedures? Report of 100 aortoiliac cases. Eur J Vas. Endovasc Surg 2008;36 : 401−4.

5. Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Addeo P, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms. J. Vasc Surg 2010;51 : 842−9.

6. Thoolen SJ, van der Vliet WJ, Kent TS, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted median arcuate ligament release for celiac artery compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2015;61 : 1278−84.

7. Štádler P, Vitásek P, Matouš P, et al. Hybridní roboticky asistovaná operace, aortobifemorální bypass s rekonstrukcí kýly v jizvě. Rozhl Chir 2008;11 : 590−2.

8. Stádler P, Dvoracek L, Vitasek P, et al. Robotic vascular surgery, 150 cases. Int J Med Robot 2010;6 : 394−8.

9. Lin JC, Eun D, Shrivastava A, et al. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23 : 255.

10. Štádler P, Dvořáček L, Vitásek P, et al. Robot assisted aortic and non-aortic vascular operations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016;52 : 22−8.

11. Bonatti J, Vetrovec G, Riga C, et al. Robotic technology in cardiovascular medicine. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11 : 266−75.

12. Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, et al. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg, Endosc 2011;25 : 855−60.

13. Feuer G, Hernandez P, Barker J. Surgical technique enhances the efficiency of robotic hysterectomy. Int J Med Robot 2011;7 : 1−6.

14. Patel VR, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Schatloff O, et al. Critical review of ‚pentafecta‘ outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres. BJU Int 2011;108 : 1007−17.

15. Park YM, Lee WJ, Lee JG, et al. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2009;19 : 361−8.

16. Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ, et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93 : 1296−9.

17. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int 2009; 103 : 366−9.