#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Outcomes of Chandelier-Assisted Segmental Scleral Buckling Compared to Conventional Scleral Buckling for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A comparative retrospective study


Outcomes of Chandelier-Assisted Segmental Scleral Buckling Compared to Conventional Scleral Buckling for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A comparative retrospective study

Purpose: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes, surgical duration, and complication rates between chandelier-assisted segmental scleral buckling (SB) and conventional SB in the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Material and Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 19 phakic patients with primary RRD who underwent either conventional SB (Group 1, n = 9) or chandelier-assisted segmental SB (Group 2, n = 10). Patients were selected based on specific inclusion criteria including presence of anterior retinal breaks and PVR ≤ Grade C1. Group 1 underwent standard 360-degree SB with indirect ophthalmoscopy, while Group 2 underwent segmental SB with limited peritomy and chandelier-assisted wide-angle visualization under a surgical microscope. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical reattachment at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included surgical duration and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation.

Results: Both groups demonstrate successful retinal reattachment in all cases and significant improvement in BCVA at one year, with no statistically significant intergroup difference. Mean surgical duration was significantly shorter in the chandelier-assisted group (35.1 ±21.2 minutes) compared to the conventional group (70.2 ±23.2 minutes, p < 0.05). ERM formation was not significantly different between the groups, and no major intraoperative complications were noted.

Conclusion: Chandelier-assisted segmental SB is a safe and effective technique for managing selected cases of primary RRD. It offers comparable anatomical and visual outcomes to conventional SB, with the added advantages of reduced surgical time and improved intraoperative visualization.

Keywords:

outcomes – chandelier-assisted – segmental scleral buckling – conventional scleral buckling – RRD


Autoři: Ashish Markan 1;  Manasi Tripathi 2;  Shivani Chhabra 3;  Pawan Gupta 3
Působiště autorů: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India 1;  I Clinix Advanced Eye and Retina Centre, New Delhi, India 2;  Eye7 Chaudhary Eye Hospitals, New Delhi, India 3
Vyšlo v časopise: Čes. a slov. Oftal., 81, 2025, No. Ahead of Print, p. 1-6
Kategorie: Původní práce
doi: https://doi.org/10.31348/2025/41

Souhrn

Purpose: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes, surgical duration, and complication rates between chandelier-assisted segmental scleral buckling (SB) and conventional SB in the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Material and Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 19 phakic patients with primary RRD who underwent either conventional SB (Group 1, n = 9) or chandelier-assisted segmental SB (Group 2, n = 10). Patients were selected based on specific inclusion criteria including presence of anterior retinal breaks and PVR ≤ Grade C1. Group 1 underwent standard 360-degree SB with indirect ophthalmoscopy, while Group 2 underwent segmental SB with limited peritomy and chandelier-assisted wide-angle visualization under a surgical microscope. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical reattachment at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included surgical duration and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation.

Results: Both groups demonstrate successful retinal reattachment in all cases and significant improvement in BCVA at one year, with no statistically significant intergroup difference. Mean surgical duration was significantly shorter in the chandelier-assisted group (35.1 ±21.2 minutes) compared to the conventional group (70.2 ±23.2 minutes, p < 0.05). ERM formation was not significantly different between the groups, and no major intraoperative complications were noted.

Conclusion: Chandelier-assisted segmental SB is a safe and effective technique for managing selected cases of primary RRD. It offers comparable anatomical and visual outcomes to conventional SB, with the added advantages of reduced surgical time and improved intraoperative visualization.

Stránka

Štítky
Oftalmologie

Článek vyšel v časopise

Česká a slovenská oftalmologie

Číslo Ahead of Print

2025 Číslo Ahead of Print
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Cesta od prvních příznaků RS k optimální léčbě
nový kurz
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Eva Kubala Havrdová, DrSc.

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2025 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Mepolizumab v reálné klinické praxi
Autoři: MUDr. Eva Voláková, Ph.D.

BONE ACADEMY 2025
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Pavel Horák, CSc., doc. MUDr. Ludmila Brunerová, Ph.D., doc. MUDr. Václav Vyskočil, Ph.D., prim. MUDr. Richard Pikner, Ph.D., MUDr. Olga Růžičková, MUDr. Jan Rosa, prof. MUDr. Vladimír Palička, CSc., Dr.h.c.

Cesta pacienta nejen s SMA do nervosvalového centra
Autoři: MUDr. Jana Junkerová, MUDr. Lenka Juříková

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#