SYNDROM ČERVENÉHO PRSU (RBS) SPOJENÝ S POUŽITÍM SYNTETICKÉ SÍŤKY PŘI REKONSTRUKCI PRSU

Stáhnout PDF

Autoři: HF. Mayer; MC. Colman Perez; I. Stoppani
Působiště autorů: Buenos Aires, Argentina ; University of Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Plastic Surgery Department
Vyšlo v časopise: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 62, 1-2, 2020, pp. 50-52

Zdroje

1. Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation: reply. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010, 126 : 1120–1.

2. Newman MI., Hanabergh E., Samson MC. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010, 126 : 1120–1. (author reply)

3. Wu PS., Winocour S., Jacobson SR. Red breast syndrome: a review of available literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015, 39 : 227–30.

4. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995, 21 : 243–8.

5. Breuing KH., Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005, 55 : 232–9.

6. Ortiz JA. Clinical Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction Patients Using a Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017, 41 : 542–50.

7. Jacobs JM., Salzberg CA. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2015, 76 : 211–6.

8. Hallberg H., Lewin R., Søfteland, M.B. et al. Complications, long-term outcome and quality of life following Surgisis^® and muscle-covered implants in immediate breast reconstruction: a case-control study with a 6-year follow-up. Eur J Plast Surg. 2019, 42 : 33–42.

9. Quinn EM., Barry M., Kell M. Immediate implant reconstruction using absorbable TIGR mesh after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Plast Surg. 2019, 42 : 1–6; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-019-01603-0

10. Chen G., Zhang Y., Xue J., Zhu X., Liu C., Sun L., Gu X., Zhang H., Liu C. Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using TiLoop Bra Mesh Combned with Pectoralis Major Disconnection. Ann Plast Surg. 2019, 83(4): 396–400.

11. Mayer HF., de Belaustegui EA., Loustau HD. Current status and trends of breast reconstruction in Argentina. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018, 71 : 607–9.

12. Sharma S., Van Barsel S., Barry, M. et al. De novo experience of resorbable woven mesh in immediate breast reconstruction post-mastectomy. Eur J Plast Surg. 2017, 40 : 17.

13. Loustau H., Mayer HF., Sarrabayrouse M. Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: the ensured subpectoral pocket (ESP). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007, 60 : 1233–8.

14. Loustau HD., Mayer HF. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 12014, 34 : 323e–4e.

15. Lewis P., Jewell J., Mattison G, et al. Reducing postoperative infections and Red Breast Syndrome in patients with acellular dermal matrix-based breast reconstruction: the relative roles of product sterility and lower body mass index. Ann Plast Surg. 2015, 74(Suppl.1):30–2.

16. Ganske I., Hoyler M., Fox SE., Morris DJ., Lin SJ., Slavin SA. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: the red breast syndrome? Ann Plast Surg.2014, 73(Suppl 2):139–43.