Autoři: R. C. Suteja 1; I. G. Prawista 1; A. Salim 1; I. K. Adiputra 1; G. V. Purnama 1; I. P. Suryanov 1; D. Junior 1; I. G. Diksha 1; S. Christian 1; G. W. Samsarga 2 Působiště autorů: Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia 1; Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University/ Udayana University, Academic Hospital, Bali, Indonesia 2 Vyšlo v časopise: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 67, 3, 2025, pp. 189-202 doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp2025189
1. Siegel RL., Giaquinto AN., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024, 74 (1): 12–49.
2. Moo TA., Sanford R., Dang C., et al. Overview of breast cancer therapy. PET Clin. 2018, 13 (3): 339–354.
3. Rodica E. The relationship between anxiety, depression and self-esteem in women with breast cancer after surgery. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012, 33 : 124–127.
4. Fortunato L., Loreti A., Cortese G., et al. Regret and quality of life after mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021, 21 (3): 162–169.
5. Ng SK., Hare RM., Kuang RJ., et al. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy patient satisfaction and decision making. Ann Plast Surg. 2016, 76 (6): 640–644.
6. Pirzadi L., Vakilian K., Azar FF., et al. Effect of solution-focused counseling on depression and quality of life in women under mastectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Open Public Health J. 2024, 16 (1).
7. Hammond JB., Kandi LA., Armstrong VL., et al. Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2022, 75 (9): 2914–2919.
8. Wei CH., Scott AM., Price AN., et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J. 2016, 22 (1): 10–17.
9. Bykowski MR., Emelife PI., Emelife NN., et al. Nipple–areola complex reconstruction improves psychosocial and sexual well-being in women treated for breast cancer. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2017, 70 (2): 209–214.
10. Tuturov AO. The role of peripheral nerve surgery in a tissue reinnervation. Chin Neurosurg J. 2019, 5 : 5.
11. Rayyan: AI-powered systematic review management platform. 2025 [online]. Available from: www.rayyan.ai.
12. Bijkerk E., van Kuijk SMJ., Lataster A., et al. Breast sensibility in bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with unilateral sensory nerve coaptation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020, 181 (3): 599–610.
13. Levin S., Pearsall G., Ruderman RJ. Von Frey’s method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg Am. 1978, 3 (3): 211–216.
14. Bubberman JM., Brandts L., van Kuijk SMJ., et al. The efficacy of sensory nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction – preliminary results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Breast. 2024, 74 : 103691.
15. Mori H., Okazaki M. Is the sensitivity of skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy superior to conventional mastectomy with innervated flap? Microsurgery. 2011, 31 (6): 428–433.
16. Puonti HK., Jääskeläinen SK., Hallikainen HK., et al. Improved sensory recovery with a novel dual neurorrhaphy technique for breast reconstruction with free muscle sparing TRAM flap technique. Microsurgery. 2017, 37 (1): 21–28.
17. Blondeel PN., Demuynck M., Mete D., et al. Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: sensational or senseless? Br J Plast Surg. 1999, 52 (1): 37–44.
18. Spiegel AJ., Menn ZK., Eldor L., et al. Breast reinnervation: DIEP neurotization using the third anterior intercostal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013, 1 (8): e72.
19. Djohan R., Scomacao I., Knackstedt R., et al. Neurotization of the nipple-areola complex during implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of early sensation recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020, 146 (2): 250–254.
20. Peled AW., von Eyben R., Peled ZM. Sensory outcomes after neurotization in nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023, 11 (12): e5437.
21. Beugels J., Cornelissen AJM., van Kuijk SMJ., et al. Sensory recovery of the breast following innervated and noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019, 144 (2): 178e–188e.
22. Beugels J., van Kuijk SMJ., Lataster A., et al. Sensory recovery of the breast following innervated and noninnervated lateral thigh perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021, 147 (2): 281–292.
23. Beugels J., Bijkerk E., Lataster A., et al. Nerve coaptation improves the sensory recovery of the breast in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021, 148 (2): 273–284.
24. Cage TA., Simon NG., Bourque S., et al. Dual reinnervation of biceps muscle after side-to-side anastomosis of an intact median nerve and a damaged musculocutaneous nerve. J Neurosurg. 2013, 119 (4): 929–933.
25. Rönkkö H., Göransson H., Taskinen HS., et al. Comparison of peripheral nerve regeneration with side-to-side, end-to-side, and end-to-end repairs: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016, 4 (12): e1179.
26. Viterbo F., Brock RS., Maciel F., et al. End-to-side versus end-to-end neurorrhaphy at the peroneal nerve in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2017, 32 (9): 697–705.
27. Bibbo C., Rodrigues-Colazzo E., Finzen AG. Superficial peroneal nerve to deep peroneal nerve transfer with allograft conduit for neuroma in continuity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018, 57 (3): 514–517.
28. Bhangra KS., Busuttil F., Phillips JB., et al. Using stem cells to grow artificial tissue for peripheral nerve repair. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016 : 7502178.
29. Baas M., Duraku LS., Corten EML., et al. A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2015, 68 (8): 1025–1035.
30. Lee YS., Ahn JH., Park HJ., et al. Dual coaptation of facial nerve using masseteric branch of trigeminal nerve for iatrogenic facial palsy: preliminary reports. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020, 129 (5): 505–511.
31. Gontre G., Polmear M., Carter JT., et al. Primary repair versus reverse end-to-side coaptation by anterior interosseous nerve transfer in proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023, 152 (2): 384–393.
32. Hardcastle N., Texakalidis P., Nagarajan P., et al. Recovery of shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nerve transfer versus nerve graft. Neurosurg Rev. 2020, 43 (3): 951–956.
33. Page MJ., McKenzie JE., Bossuyt PM., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372 : 71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
34. Sterne JA., Hernán MA.., Reeves BC., et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ, 2016; 355 : 4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919“10.1136/bmj.i4919.
35. http: //www.prisma-statement.org/.
36. Yap LH., Whiten SC., Forster A., et al. Sensory recovery in the sensate free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005, 115 (5): 1280–1288. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000156988.78391.d6.
Richard Christian Suteja
Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University,
Jl. Raya Kampus UNUD
Bukit Jimbaran, Kuta Selatan, Badung
Bali 80361
Indonesia
richardcs88@gmail.com
Submitted: 20. 9. 2024
Accepted: 20. 6. 2025
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte se
Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.
