Autoři: Hout Van G. 1; Vissers G. 1,2; Thiessen F. 1,2; Tondu T. 1,2 Působiště autorů: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium 1; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium 2 Vyšlo v časopise: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 64, 3-4, 2022, pp. 135-138 doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp2022135
1. Baumeister S., Peek A., Friedman A., et al. Management of postneurosurgical bone flap loss caused by infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 122(6): 195e–208e.
2. Frassanito P., Fraschetti F., Bianchi F., et al. Management and prevention of cranioplasty infections. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019, 35(9): 1499–1506.
3. Hamilton K., Wolfswinkel EM., Weathers WM., et al. The delay phenomenon: a compilation of knowledge across specialties. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014, 7(2): 112–118.
4. da Silva Junior EB., de Aragao AH., de Paula Loureiro M., et al. Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration. 3D Print Med. 2021, 7(1): 4.
5. Kwiecien GJ., Aliotta R., Bassiri Gharb B., et al. The timing of alloplastic cranioplasty in the setting of previous osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019, 143(3): 853–861.
6. Lopez J., Zhong SS., Sankey EW., et al. Time interval reduction for delayed implant-based cranioplasty reconstruction in the setting of previous bone flap osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016, 137(2): 394e–404e.
7. Di Rienzo A., Colasanti R., Gladi M., et al. Timing of cranial reconstruction after cranioplasty infections: are we ready for a re-thinking? A comparative analysis of delayed versus immediate cranioplasty after debridement in a series of 48 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2021, 44(3): 1523–1532.
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte se
Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.
