HIV infection and adverse perinatal outcomes – a meta-analysis of premature births, low birth weights, and small for gestational age newborns
Authors:
K. Hurt 1; J. Rakovic 2; J. Matěcha 1; M. Mojhova 1; F. Zahálka 3; M. Zikán 1
Authors‘ workplace:
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Bulovka Teaching Hospital, Prague
1; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amedeana, Prague
2; Sports Motoric Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague
3
Published in:
Ceska Gynekol 2025; 90(4): 269-277
Category:
Original Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2025269
Overview
HIV remains a significant global public health challenge, affecting millions of individuals with a disproportionate burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) and global efforts to control transmission, the impact of HIV on pregnancy outcomes remains a topic of concern. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the association between maternal HIV infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes, specifically preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA) infants through a comprehensive meta-analysis. Materials and methods: A systematic search of English-language databases, including Medline, Web of Science, Ovid, Scopus, and Google Scholar, was conducted to identify relevant studies published between 2014 and 2024. Eligible studies included retrospective and prospective cohort studies with well-defined control groups of HIV-negative mothers. Studies that lacked appropriate control groups, included multiple pregnancies, or did not report adjusted statistical outcomes were excluded. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria for PTB analysis, five studies for LBW analysis, and five studies were selected for SGA analysis. Results: Meta-analysis using a random-effects model demonstrated a statistically significant association between maternal HIV infection and PTB (OR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.38–1.74; p < 0.001), LBW (OR = 1.57; 95% CI 1.24–1.98; p < 0.001), and an increased risk of SGA (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.10–1.40; p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was moderate for PTB (I² = 38.2%) and LBW (I² = 55.9%) while it was low for SGA (I² = 7.6%), indicating consistency across studies. Egger’s test showed minimal publication bias. Discussion: These findings highlight the adverse effects of HIV on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for continued monitoring and optimization of ART regimens to mitigate risks. Further research is warranted to explore the influence of different ART combinations and immune system dynamics on fetal development.
Keywords:
HIV – Preterm birth – Antiretroviral therapy – small for gestational age – low birth weight – SGA meta-analysis
Introduction
HIV remains a public health problem all over the world. It is estimated that 42.3 million HIV-positive individuals were alive by mid-2024. The spread of HIV involves all countries globally, and 65% of those affected live in sub-Saharan Africa. In 2023, 630,000 people died from HIV-related causes, and around 1.3 million people were infected. Even though there is no definite treatment, the trend of stopping HIV multiplication in the body and infecting other people could, according to World Health Organization (WHO) plans, help end the HIV epidemic by 2030 [1]. According to the WHO strategy, by 2030, 95% of people living with HIV should receive a diagnosis, 95% of those diagnosed should be taking life-saving antiretroviral treatment, and 95% of those treated should have therapy that suppresses their viral load to reduce further virus transmission and benefit their health status. In 2023, these percentages were 86%, 89%, and 93%, resp. WHO presently defines advanced HIV disease as a CD4 cell count lower than 200 cells per mm³. It also includes WHO stage 3 or 4 HIV in adolescents and adults and all HIV-positive children under the age of 5. Maternal HIV viral load is categorized as undetectable (HIV viral load ≤ 20 copies/mL), low-level viremia (21–999 copies/mL), or high-level viremia (viral load ≥ 1,000 copies/mL). A substantial problem is mother-to - -child transmission (MTCT), also referred to as vertical HIV transmission during pregnancy and birth [2]. Many maternity hospitals previously tried to solve this problem by performing a primary cesarean section [3,4]. At present, as mentioned above, the vast majority of pregnant women worldwide receive suitable antiretroviral therapy (ART), which significantly lowers the possibility of vertical transmission to the child during pregnancy and delivery. Moreover, ART improves the mothers quality of life and decreases the probability of transmitting the infection to her sexual partner [1]. Other notable obstetrical problems are frequently discussed [5]. One such concern is adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth (PTB) or preterm delivery (PTD), low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) newborn babies in HIV-positive women. Several studies have been conducted on these topics, often with contradictory results. According to WHO, PTB is defined as the delivery of a live-born baby before completed 37 weeks of gestation. It is often associated with poorer neonatal adaptation and many other important complications. According to WHO, LBW is defined as the delivery of a live-born baby with a weight of < 2,500 g. In conformity with WHO, SGA newborns are smaller than expected for a particular gestational age, mostly defined as having a weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age, adjusted for gender and geographical factors. Due to these adjustments, SGA is often considered a very accurate method of evaluation. Babies born preterm or classified as LBW or SGA are at an increased risk of perinatal mortality, lung disease, hypotension, necrotizing enterocolitis, poor thermoregulation, hypoglycemia, and polycythemia. Long-term risks of LBW and SGA include insulin resistance, type II diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, neurodevelopmental delays, cognitive impairment, and short adult stature [1,6–9].
Aim
The aim of our research was to gather plausible studies that include birth data on PTB, LBW and SGA in HIV-positive mothers, comparing them with control groups of HIV-negative mothers who gave birth to their babies. We evaluated these data using a meta-analysis technique in order to elucidate the debated adverse effect of HIV on delivery outcomes.
Materials and methods
Study selection
English-language databases were searched via Medline, Web of Science, Ovid, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The relevant articles were gathered from 2014 to 2024 (inclusive). Earlier trends were often influenced by a large percentage of planned primary C-sections, sometimes performed before completing 37 weeks of pregnancy [3]. Even now, the probability of a caesarean section is two times higher in HIV-positive patients compared to HIV-negative patients [4]. We selected retrospective and prospective cohort studies that included comparable control groups of HIV-negative patients. Unsystematic studies, case-control studies, or case series were excluded from our analysis. Similarly, studies without an appropriate control group were also excluded. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were considered. Additionally, studies involving multiple pregnancies were excluded due to potential bias.
We searched for PTB, LBW and SGA studies [9]. All included studies reported statistical outcomes using adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-value. Studies that did not adjust for covariates were also excluded.
The selected search techniques and results are presented in the Flow Diagram for meta-analyses.
Statistical analysis
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software and SPSS were used for calculations. A random-effects model for binomial meta-analysis was chosen. The OR and CI from individual studies were transformed into their natural logarithm form for more precise meta-analysis calculations. The pooled overall results are presented in exponential form, including OR and 95% CI. P values are presented.
Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic, which measures the percentage of variability between studies not due to chance. It describes how cohesive the particular components of the study are. The interpretation is as follows:
- 0–30% = not important;
- > 30–60% = moderate heterogeneity;
- > 60–80% = substantial heterogeneity;
- > 80–100% = considerable heterogeneity.
Egger’s test was used to perform weighted regression analysis. A significant intercept with p < 0.05 (considered statistically significant) suggests the presence of publication bias.
The forest plot provides a graphical representation of the included studies. The boxes represent study sample sizes, while the CI whiskers indicate the range of dispersion within each study. The red diamond-shaped structure in the lower section of the plot represents the overall study impact, as indicated by its OR and CI.
Heterogeneity and bias were also assessed using a funnel plot. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on all datasets. After sequentially removing individual studies, no significant change in results was observed.
Results
Recognized studies
A total of 18 records were identified during the database search. Eight studies focused on PTB, while five addressed LBW and five examined SGA [10–17]. The Flow Chart Diagram describes the technique used for specifying the selected studies (Fig. 1).
PTB meta-analysis
For the PTB meta-analysis, eight studies were selected. They are listed in (Tab. 1), ranked according to the year of publication. Their adjusted OR and CI are specified in the table, resp., along with their percentage influence on the overall analysis (totaling 100%), which is presented in the last column.
The overall pooled effect size for PTB is OR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.38–1.74; and p < 0.001; indicating the statistical significance of the PTB meta-analysis. The study’s homogeneity remains intact (p = 0.24). This p-value indicates a lack of statistical significance, suggesting that there is no homogeneity distortion. The measure of heterogeneity is I² = 38.2%, which indicates moderate heterogeneity in the overall analysis. Egger’s test, with a significant intercept of p = 0.007, reveals mild publication bias.
The forest plot provides a graphical interpretation of the PTB analysis, with the diamond-shaped marker in the lower section representing the overall effect size and 95% CI (Fig. 2).
The funnel plot illustrates the cohesiveness of the studies and minimal bias, as it appears nearly complete without significant distortion (Fig. 3).
The PTB meta-analysis confirms a significant influence of HIV positivity on preterm births.
LBW meta-analysis
For the LBW meta-analysis, five studies were selected. They are listed in (Tab. 2), ranked according to the year of publication. Adjusted OR and CI are specified in the table, along with their percentage influence on the overall study.
The overall pooled effect size for LBW is OR = 1.57; 95% CI 1.24–1.98; and p < 0.001; confirming its statistical significance. The study’s homogeneity is slightly affected (p =0.04). The measure of heterogeneity is I² = 55.9%, indicating moderate heterogeneity in the analysis. Egger’s test, with p = 0.22, suggests no publication bias.
The Forest plot provides a graphic interpretation of the LBW analysis, with the diamond-shaped marker representing the overall OR and CI (Fig. 4).
The funnel plot demonstrates high cohesiveness and minimal bias. Nearly all studies fall within the funnel, with no evidence of distortion (Fig. 5).
The LBW meta-analysis confirms a significant influence of HIV positivity on the presence of LBW at the time of delivery.
SGA meta-analysis
For the SGA meta-analysis, five studies were selected. They are listed in (Tab. 3), ranked according to the year of publication. Adjusted OR and CI are specified in the table, along with their percentage influence on the overall study.
The overall pooled effect size for SGA is OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.10–1.40; and p < 0.001; confirming its statistical significance. The study’s homogeneity remained intact (p = 0.47). The measure of heterogeneity is I² = 7.6%, indicating very low heterogeneity in the analysis. Egger’s test, with p = 0.46, suggests no publication bias.
The forest plot provides a graphical interpretation of the SGA analysis, with the diamond-shaped marker representing the overall OR and CI (Fig. 6).
The funnel plot demonstrates high cohesiveness and minimal bias. All studies fall within the funnel, with no evidence of distortion (Fig. 7).
The SGA meta-analysis confirms a significant influence of HIV positivity on the presence of SGA at the time of delivery.
Discussion
We conducted meta-analyses to compare the adverse events of PTB, LBW and SGA between HIV-positive pregnant women and HIV-negative controls. In both cases, a statistically significant influence of HIV positivity on PTB, LBW and SGA at birth was proven. For our meta-analysis, adjusted data were used to ensure accurate results.
The global ART intervention has been highly successful in saving many lives, reducing HIV transmission within the population, improving quality of life (QoL), and having a significant positive effect on vertical HIV transmission [18–20].
The influence of different ART combinations on adverse delivery outcomes is not yet fully understood. Some studies report conflicting results [21–24].
There are several explanations for the occurrence of PTB, LBW and SGA in newborns [25–27]. One widely accepted theory suggests that HIV-related damage to the human immune system, particularly a reduced CD4 T-cell count and immunosuppression, plays a role. It has been shown that women with CD4 cell counts below 350 cells/mm³ have an increased risk of giving birth to LBW infants [27–30]. One explanation is that pregnant women are naturally immunocompromised, and when combined with HIV infection, this condition could negatively affect the placenta and impair fetal development [31–33]. Additionally, lower levels of progesterone may influence fetal development, potentially leading to an earlier onset of labor. This hypothesis is supported by some studies [25].
Limitations
Naturally, not all studies are fully comparable. Studies conducted in developing countries carry certain risks, particularly when evaluating newborn weight. Therefore, we believe that adjusted SGA measurements provide the most reliable criterion for assessing newborn size. We aimed to select studies with well-presented and adjusted results to minimize bias.
Another limitation is the potential bias introduced by authors and publishers. It is well known that studies with groundbreaking results are more likely to be published than those that yield inconclusive findings.
Conclusion
The findings of our meta-analysis indicate that maternal HIV infection is statistically associated with an increased probability of preterm birth, low birth weight, and having a small for gestational age newborn.
Sources
1. WHO Strategy. Implementing the global health sector strategies on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2022–2030: report on progress and gaps 2024. 2025 [online]. Available from: https: //www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789240094925.
2. van Schalkwyk C, Mahy M, Johnson LF et al. Updated data and methods for the 2023 UNAIDS HIV estimates. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2024; 95 (1S): e1–e4. doi: 10.1097/QAI. 000000 0000003344.
3. Boer K, England K, Godfried MH et al Mode of delivery in HIV-infected pregnant women and prevention of mother-to-child transmission: changing practices in Western Europe. HIV Med 2010; 11 (6): 368–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00800.x.
4. Venkatesh KK, Morrison L, Livingston EG et al. Changing patterns and factors associated with mode of delivery among pregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus infection in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (5): 879–890. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002566.
5. Kreitchmann R, Li SX, Melo VH et al. Predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women infected with HIV in Latin America and the Caribbean: a cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121 (12): 1501–1508. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12680.
6. Ray JG, Sgro M, Mamdani MM et al. Birth weight curves tailored to maternal world region. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012; 34 (2): 159–171. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163 (16) 35159-3.
7. Grignolo S, Agnello R, Gerbaldo D et al. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among a cohort of HIV-infected women in a large Italian teaching hospital: a 30-year retrospective study. Epidemiol Infect 2017; 145 (8): 1658–1669. doi: 10.1017/S095026881700053X.
8. Mejri A, Dorval VG, Nuyt AM et al. Hypoglycemia in term newborns with a birth weight below the 10th percentile. Paediatr Child Health 2010; 15 (5): 271–275. doi: 10.1093/pch/15. 5.271.
9. Saenger P, Czernichow P, Hughes I et al. Small for gestational age: short stature and beyond. Endocr Rev 2007; 28 (2): 219–251. doi: 10.1210/ er.2006-0039.
10. Macdonald EM, Ng R, Bayoumi AM et al. Adverse neonatal outcomes among women living with HIV: a population-based study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37 (4): 302–309. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163 (15) 30279-6.
11. Gagnon LH, MacGillivray J, Urquia ML et al. Antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 201 : 51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.028.
12. Moodley T, Moodley D, Sebitloane M et al. Improved pregnancy outcomes with increasing antiretroviral coverage in South Africa. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2016; 16 : 35. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0821-3.
13. Malaba TR, Phillips T, Le Roux S et al. Antiretroviral therapy use during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in South African women. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46 (5): 1678–1689. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx136.
14. Arab K, Spence AR, Czuzoj-Shulman N et al. Pregnancy outcomes in HIV-positive women: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295 (3): 599–606. doi: 10.1007/s004 04-016-4271-y.
15. Sebitloane HM, Moodley J. Maternal and obstetric complications among HIV-infected women treated with highly active antiretroviral treatment at a Regional Hospital in Durban, South Africa. Niger J Clin Pract 2017; 20 (11): 1360–1367. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_328_16.
16. Tukei VJ, Hoffman HJ, Greenberg L et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes among HIV-positive women in the era of universal antiretroviral therapy remain elevated compared with HIV-negative women. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021; 40 (9): 821–826. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003174.
17. Duffy CR, Herlihy JM, Zulu E et al. Preterm birth among women with HIV: impact of preconception cART initiation. AIDS 2024; 38 (12): 1749–1757. doi: 10.1097/QAD.00000 00000003979.
18. Chetty T, Thorne C, Coutsoudis A. Preterm delivery and small-for-gestation outcomes in HIV-infected pregnant women on antiretroviral therapy in rural South Africa: results from a cohort study, 2010–2015. PLoS One 2018; 13 (2): e0192805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192805.
19. Chen JY, Ribaudo HJ, Souda S et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and adverse birth outcomes among HIV-infected women in Botswana. J Infect Dis 2012; 206 (11): 1695–1705. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis553.
20. Jao J, Sigel KM, Chen KT et al. Small for gestational age birth outcomes in pregnant women with perinatally acquired HIV. AIDS 2012; 26 (7): 855–859. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328351f6ef.
21. Kumar SB, Handelman SK, Voronkin I et al. Different regions of HIV-1 subtype C env are associated with placental localization and in utero mother-to-child transmission. J Virol 2011; 85 (14): 7142–7152. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01955-10.
22. Mukosha M, Jacobs C, Kaonga P et al. Determinants and outcomes of low birth weight among newborns at a tertiary hospital in Zambia: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Afr Med 2023; 22 (3): 271–278. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_22_22.
23. Elenga N, Djossou FE, Nacher M. Association between maternal human immunodeficiency virus infection and preterm birth: a matched case-control study from a pregnancy outcome registry. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100 (4): e22670. doi: 10.1097/MD.00000000000022670.
24. Mesfin YM, Kibret KT, Taye A. Is protease inhibitors based antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy associated with an increased risk of preterm birth? Systematic review and a meta-analysis. Reprod Health 2016; 13 : 30. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0149-5.
25. Papp E, Mohammadi H, Loutfy MR et al. HIV protease inhibitor use during pregnancy is associated with decreased progesterone levels, suggesting a potential mechanism contributing to fetal growth restriction. J Infect Dis 2015; 211 (1): 10–18. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu393.
26. Phiri K, Williams PL, Dugan KB et al. Antiretroviral therapy use during pregnancy and the risk of small for gestational age birth in a medicaid population. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2015; 34 (7): E169–E175. doi: 10.1097/INF.00000000 00000712.
27. Ramokolo V, Goga AE, Lombard C et al. In Utero ART exposure and birth and early growth outcomes among HIV-exposed uninfected infants attending immunization services: results from national PMTCT surveillance, South Africa. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4 (4): ofx187. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx187.
28. Zash R, Souda S, Chen JY et al. Reassuring birth outcomes with Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz used for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Botswana. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 71 (4): 428–436. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000847.
29. Watts DH, Williams PL, Kacanek D et al. Combination antiretroviral use and preterm birth. J Infect Dis 2013; 207 (4): 612–621. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis728.
30. Slyker JA, Patterson J, Ambler G et al. Correlates and outcomes of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age in HIV-exposed uninfected infants. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14 : 7. doi: 10.1186/14171-2393-14-7.
31. Moussa M, Roques P, Fievet N et al. Placental cytokine and chemokine production in HIV-1-infected women: trophoblast cells show a different pattern compared to cells from HIV-negative women. Clin Exp Immunol 2001; 125 (3): 455–464. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2248.2001.01629.x.
32. Siqithi S, Durojaiye OC, Adeniyi OV. Effects of the timing of maternal antiretroviral therapy initiation, CD4 count, and HIV viral load on birth outcomes in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa: a secondary data analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19 (9): e0308374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308374.
33. Salihu HM, Mogos MF, August EM et al. HIV infection and its impact on fetal outcomes among women of advanced maternal age: a propensity score weighted matching approach. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2013; 29 (3): 581–587. doi: 10.1089/AID.2012.0242.
Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicineArticle was published in
Czech Gynaecology

2025 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- HIV infection and adverse perinatal outcomes – a meta-analysis of premature births, low birth weights, and small for gestational age newborns
- Role of tru-cut bio psy in the management of myometrial lesions
- Eff ect of hCG fol low-up on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in women with gestational trophoblastic dissease
- Can anti-Müllerian hormone predict positive sperm retrieval in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia?