Alternative healing methods around us

Authors: Vojtěch Mornstein ;  Jiří Beneš ;  Zdeněk Mrozek ;  Štěpán Svačina
Authors‘ workplace: Biofyzikální ústav LF MU v Brně, 4. interní klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 1;  4. interní klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 2;  Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny LF UP a FN Olomouc 3;  3. interní klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 4
Published in: Čas. Lék. čes. 2016; 155: 267-273
Category: Review Articles


This article gives information on selected alternative medicine methods (AMM) under conditions of the Czech health care system. They can be defined as contemporaneous diagnostic and therapeutic methods which differ in their theoretical fundaments as well as practices from the evidence based medicine. This definition is controversial because these methods are an intrinsically incompatible aggregate of modalities acting as a placebo above all. We can encounter many "therapeutic" and "examination" methods which are practiced namely by healers without formal medical education, and connected closely with esotericism. A general feature of the alternative methods is a void usage of scientific concepts and theories, e.g. the concept of energy.

Motivations of patients and doctors are briefly introduced here. However, AMM is also an ethical problem because the doctor should help the patient with maximum efficiency hence excluding the methods with a questionable, small or negligible efficiency. The opinions how to find the way out from this situation are divergent. It could be a refusal or a very reserved attitude to AMM plus maximisation of the placebo effect enhancing the efficiency of a rational therapy. Furthermore, the methods most spread in the Czech Republic are subjected to elementary critics – the homoeopathy, acupuncture, the so-called "bioresonance" instrumental methods, psychic healing, and also some refused methods in cancer treatment. In our opinion medicine disposes of sufficient knowledge and experience to assess the efficiency of AMM and refuse them in causal therapy, eventually. Their use as a placebo should be carefully considered.

Key words:
alternative medicine, placebo, homeopathy, acupuncture


1. Mornstein V. Základní vyjádření k alternativní medicíně. In: Souček M a kol. Vnitřní lékařství, 1. díl. Grada Publishing, Praha, 2011, s. 26−32.

2. Mornstein V. Postavení doplňkové a alternativní medicíny v onkologii. In: Jurga L a kol. Klinická a radiačná onkológia. Osveta, Martin, 2010, s. 617−625.

3. Mornstein V. Alternativní medicína a onkologie. In: Adam Z, Vorlíček J, Koptíková J. Obecná onkologie a podpůrná léčba. Grada Publishing, Praha, 2003, s. 765−770.

4. Klener P a kol. Klinická onkologie. Galén, Praha, 2002, s. 250−254.

5. Ernst E. A primer of complementary and alternative medicine commonly used by cancer patients. Med J Aust 2001; 174: 88−92.

6. Ernst E. Complementary medicine: common misconceptions. J Royal Soc Med 1995; 88: 244−247.

7. Ernst E. Komplementärmedizin in der Jahresübersicht 1995. Perfusion 1996; 9: 123−134.

8. Heřt J. Alternativní medicína a léčitelství. Věra Nosková, Praha, 2011.

9. Heřt J a kol. Homeopatie, clusterová medicína, anthroposofická medicína. Lidové noviny, Praha, 1997.

10. Heřt J, Hnízdil J, Klener P. Akupunktura − mýty a realita. Galén, Praha, 2002.

11. Kolektiv. Alternativní medicína: možnosti a rizika. Grada Publishing, Praha, 1995.

12. Škrabánek P, McCormick J. Pošetilosti a omyly v medicíně. Lidové noviny, Praha, 1995.

13. Gordon JS. Alternative medicine and the family physician. Am Fam Physician 1996; 54: 2205−2212.

14. Ernst E. Complementary and alternative medicine: what the NHS should be funding. Br J Gen Pract 2008: 208−209.

15. Heřt J. Homeopatie. In: Věda kontra iracionalita. Academia, Praha, 1998, s. 107−119.

16. Mornstein V, Kaplan P. Ultrazvuk, jeho chemické účinky a biochemické aplikace. Chemické listy 1994; 88: 650−659.

17. Davenas E et al. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature 1988; 333: 816−818.








25. Werneke U et al. Potential health risks of complementary alternative medicines in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 408−413.

26. Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Drug interactions in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2004; 5: 489−496.

27. Borrelli F et al. Systematic review: green tea and gastrointestinal cancer risk. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19: 497−510.

28. Crespy V, Williamson G. A rewiev of the health effects of green tea catechins in in vivo animal models. J Nutr 2004; 134: 3431S−3440S.

29. Adissu HA, Schuller HM. Antagonistic growth regulation of cell lines derived from human lung adenocarcinomas of Clara cell and alveolar type II cell lineage: Implications for chemoprevention. Int J Oncol 2004; 24: 1467−1472.

30. Yip I, Cudiamat M, Chim D. PC-SPES for treatment of prostate cancer: herbal medicine.Curr Urol Rep 2003; 4: 253−257.

Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management fenix.admin.empty
Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.


Don‘t have an account?  Create new account