#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Reproduction ageing in Czechia in the European context


Authors: Anna Šťastná;  Jiřina Kocourková;  Luděk Šídlo
Authors‘ workplace: Katedra demografie a geodemografie, Přírodovědecká fakulta UK v Praze
Published in: Čas. Lék. čes. 2019; 158: 126-132
Category: Review Article

Overview

The shift in fertility to higher ages over the last few decades represents one of the most distinctive features of reproductive behaviour in Czechia. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the process of fertility postponement in the European context and assessment of the Czech situation. While the fertility postponement is a universal trend in developed countries, significant differences are evident between European countries in terms of both the commencement and speed of postponement concerning the mean age of mothers at first birth.

The article also discusses the main factors that influence the fertility postponement. While at the beginning of the 1990s Czech first-time mothers were among the youngest in the world’s developed countries, during the 1990s Czech women experienced one of the most rapid increases in the mean age of first birth. Nevertheless, in the European context Czechia continues to have slightly younger first-time mothers (28.2 years in 2016, 0.8 years younger than the EU average).

It also appears that currently no direct correlation is evident with concern to the mean age of mothers at first birth and the total fertility rate.

Keywords:

Czechia – fertility postponement – mother’s age at first birth – Europe


Sources
  1. Kocourková J. Reprodukční stárnutí české populace. Gynekologie a porodnictví 2018; 2: 4–7.

  2. Sobotka T. Shifting parenthood to advanced reproductive ages: Trends, causes and consequences. Intergenerational Justice Review 2009; 9: 56–61.

  3. Ní Bhrolcháin M, Beaujouan E. Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies 2012; 66: 311–27.

  4. Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 848–860.

  5. Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Andersen AN. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 29–43.

  6. Kohler HP, Billari FC, Ortega JA. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review 2002; 28: 641–680.

  7. Lesthaeghe RJ. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 2010; 36; 2: 211–251.

  8. Billari CF, Kohler HP. Patterns of low and very low fertility in Europe. Population Studies 2004; 58: 161–176.

  9. Sobotka T. Is lowest-low fertility explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review 2004; 30; 2: 195–220.

  10. Frejka T. The Role of contemporary childbearing postponement and recuperation in shaping period fertility trends. Comparative Population Studies 2011; 36: 927–958.

  11. Bratti M, Tatsiramos K. The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe. Journal of Population Economics 2012; 25; 1: 291–321.

  12. Dunson DB, Baird DD, Colombo B. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103; 1: 51–56.

  13. Collins J, Crosignani PG. Fertility and ageing. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11; 3: 261–276.

  14. Grundy E, Foverskov E. Age at first birth and later life health in Western and Eastern Europe. Population and Development Review 2016; 42; 2: 245–269.

  15. Kocourková J, Burcin B, Kučera T. Demographic relevancy of increased use of assisted reproduction in European countries. Reprod Health 2014; 11: 1.

  16. Maheshwari A, Scotland G, Bell J et al. Direct health services costs of providing assisted reproduction services in older women. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 527–536.

  17. Philipov D. Rising dispersion in age at first birth in Europe: Is it related to fertility postponement? Vienna Institute of Demography Working Paper 2017/11.

  18. Eurostat. Fertility indicators. Dostupné na: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

  19. Lassibille G, Gómez LN, Ramos IA, Sánchez CD. Youth transition from school to work in Spain. Economics of Education Review 2001; 20: 139–149.

  20. Human Fertility Database. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria). Dostupné na: www.humanfertility.org

  21. Sobotka T, Zeman K, Lesthaeghe R, Frejka T. Postponement and recuperation in cohort fertility: new analytical and projection methods and their application. European Demographic Research Papers 2011/2. Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 2011.

  22. Goldstein JR, Sobotka T, Jasilioniene A. The end of lowest-low fertility? Population and Development Review 2009; 35: 663–699.

  23. Luci-Greulich A, Thevenon O. The impact of family policies on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population 2013; 29: 387–416.

  24. Šprocha B. Odkladanie a rekuperácie plodnosti v kohortnej perspektíve v Českej republike a na Slovensku. Demografie 2013; 56: 219–233.

  25. Rychtaříková J. Pokles porodnosti – hlavní faktor demografické změny. In: Burcin B et al. Demografická situace České republiky. Proměny a kontexty 1993–2008. SLON, Praha, 2010: 47–64.

  26. Šprocha B, Šťastná A, Šídlo L. Bezdetnosť žien na Slovensku a v Česku vo výsledkoch sčítaní 1991–2011 (a jej možný vývoj do budúcnosti). In: Transformácia slovenskej spoločnosti vo svetle výsledkov posledných troch populačných cenzov – Zborník príspevkov z 15. Slovenskej demografickej konferencie. SSDS, 2015: 152–160.

  27. Hašková H. Fenomén bezdětnosti. SLON, Praha, 2009.

  28. Schmidt L. Should men and women be encouraged to start childbearing at a younger age? Expert review. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 5: 145–147.

  29. UNESCO. eAtlas of Gender Inequality in Education. Dostupné na: https://tellmaps.com/uis/gender/#!/tellmap/79054752/2

  30. ČSÚ. Historie a vývoj vysokého školství – 1919–2008. Dostupné na: www.czso.cz/csu/czso/historie-a-vyvoj-vysokeho-skolstvi-n-i46po3jjgu

  31. MŠMT. Data o studentech, poprvé zapsaných a absolventech vysokých škol. Dostupné na: www.msmt.cz/vzdelavani/skolstvi-v-cr/statistika-skolstvi/data-o-studentech-poprve-zapsanych-a-absolventech-vysokych

  32. Beets G, Dourleijn E, Liefbroer AC, Henkens K. De timing van het eerste kind in Nederland en Europa. Raport No. 59. NIDI, Haag, 2001.

  33. Blossfeld HP, Huinink J. Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. Am J Sociol 1991; 97: 143–168.

  34. Adsera A. Vanishing children: from high unemployment to low fertility in developed countries. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 2005; 95: 189–193.

  35. Rindfuss RR, Brauner-Otto SR. Institutions and the transition to adulthood: implications for fertility tempo in low-fertility settings. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008: 57–87.

  36. McDonald P. Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition. Population and Development Review 2000; 26: 427–439.

  37. Goldin C. The Quiet revolution that transformed women's employment, education, and family. American Economic Review 2006, 96: 1–21.

  38. Šťastná A, Slabá J, Kocourková J. Plánování, načasování a důvody odkladu narození prvního dítěte v České republice. Demografie 2017; 59: 207–223.

Labels
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management

Article was published in

Journal of Czech Physicians

Issue 3-4

2019 Issue 3-4

Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#