Patient satisfaction and ease of use of a novel method for electronic administration of validated quality of life questionnaires

Czech version

Authors: Zdeněk Rušavý ^1-3; Martin Smažinka ^1,2; Martin Havíř ¹; Vladimír Kališ ^1,2,3
Authors‘ workplace: Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika FN Plzeň ¹; Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika LF v Plzni, UK Praha ²; Biomedicínské centrum, LF v Plzni, UK Praha ³
Published in: Ceska Gynekol 2025; 90(2): 149-153
Category: Original Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2025149

Overview

Background: Evaluation of the quality of life using validated measures is an essential part of urogynecology examination and follow-up. Questionnaires administered in paper form generate paper waste or high demands for storage. Score calculation for some questionnaires may be demanding and time-consuming. The electronic format of completing questionnaires simplifies data collection and processing, but may be challenging for older patients. We developed a Medical Electronic Survey System (MESS), which facilitates completion of questionnaires on a tablet PC with an emphasis on data protection and user-friendliness for the elderly. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and ease of use between Google Forms and MESS. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study comparing the answers to a satisfaction questionnaire completed using Google Forms (193 questionnaires between 2013–2015) and MESS (329 questionnaires between 2019–2020), along with other clinically used validated questionnaires. The answers to the questionnaire were compared using a Fisher’s Exact Test or a Wilcoxon Two Sample test, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The electronic form of questionnaire completion suited more women in case of MESS (84.5 vs. 65.6%; P < 0.05). Completing questionnaires electronically was rated as easy or very easy by 89.1% of patients using MESS compared to 68.7% using Google Forms; P < 0.05. The electronic form of filling-in the questionnaires was very difficult or impossible especially for women using Google Forms (31 vs. 11%; P < 0.05). The major difference in questionnaire completion without any help was observed in the age group 60–69 years. No differences were observed in women under 60 years of age. All clinicians observed significant facilitation of their work. Conclusion: MESS has made the method of electronic questionnaire completion available even to elderly patients with pelvic floor disorders. It was positively accepted even by patients who are not familiar with any electronic devices.

Keywords:

elderly – Quality of life – Health surveys – patient satisfaction – electronic health records – urogynecology

Sources

1. Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L et al. What do women want? Interpretation of the concept of cure. J Pelvic Med Surg 2003; 9 (6): 273–277. doi: 10.1097/01.spv.0000095060.05452.3f.

2. Naughton MJ, Donovan J, Badia X et al. Symptom severity and QOL scales for urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004; 126 (1 Suppl 1): S114–S123. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.059.

3. Barber MD. Questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; 18 (4): 461–465. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0252-1.

4. Rayhan RU, Zheng Y, Uddin E et al. Administer and collect medical questionnaires with Google documents: a simple, safe, and free system. Appl Ned Inform 2013; 33 (3): 12–21.

5. FDA. Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009 [online]. Available from: https: //www.federalregister.gov/d/E9-29273.

6. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health 2008; 11 (2): 322–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733. 2007.00231.x.

7. Muehlhausen W, Doll H, Quadri N et al. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 167. doi: 10.1186/s12 955-015-0362-x.

8. Sebrow D, Lavery HJ, Brajtbord JS et al. Monitoring validated quality of life outcomes after prostatectomy: initial description of novel online questionnaire. Urology 2012; 79 (2): 314–319. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.075.

9. Huang D, Schar M, Wu PI et al. Development and validation of an electronic version of Sydney Swallow Questionnaire. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36 (5): e14766. doi: 10.1111/nmo. 14766.

10. Juniper EF, Riis B, Juniper BA. Development and validation of an electronic version of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire. Allergy 2007; 62 (9): 1091–1093. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01370.x.

11. Nishimura K, Kusunose M, Sanda R et al. Comparison between electronic and paper versions of patient-reported outcome measures in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an observational study with a cross-over administration. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (12): e032767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032767.

ORCID autorů

Z. Rušavý 0000-0001-7125-9819

M. Smažinka 0000-0002-8953-3377

V. Kališ 0000-0001-7003-6795

Doručeno/Submitted: 31. 1. 2025

Přijato/Accepted: 3. 2. 2025

prof. MUDr. Zdeněk Rušavý, Ph.D.

Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika

LF UK a FN Plzeň

alej Svobody 80

323 00 Plzeň

rusavyz@fnplzen.cz