Authors: Z. Líbalová 1; J. Feyereisl 2; A. Martan 3; P. Čepický 3,4; M. Halaška 3; L. Krofta 2; D. Váchová 3; J. Balcarová 5; M. Pečená 5 Authors‘ workplace: Gynekologicko-porodnické oddělení MN, Neratovice, primář MUDr. T. Bilina 2Ústav pro péči o matku a dítě, Praha-Podolí, ředitel doc. MUDr. J. Feyereisl, CSc. 3Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. J. Živný, DrSc. 4Gy 1 Published in: Ceska Gynekol 2001; (3): 171-174 Category:
Objective of study: Comparison of psychological characteristics of untreated female patients with urgent and stress urinary incontinence.Design: First stage of a perspective comparative study.Setting: Gynaecological and Obstetric Department of the Municipal Hospital Neratovice, Urogynaecological out-patient dept. of the Institute for Mother and Child in Prague-Podolí, the Urogynaecological out-patient dept. of the Gynaecological and Obstetric Clinic of the First Medical Faculty Charles University and General Faculty Hospital Prague.Methods: The study compares a group of 54 patients with stress incontinence and a group of 16 patients with urgent incontinence. Before the onset of therapy the patients were examined by a series of psychodiagnostic tests: MMPI/100 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, abridged version), STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), SCL-90 (Symptom Check List), Lüscher’s colour test, guided interview. For statistical evaluation the sign test and t-test were used.Results: In the MMPI/100 and SCL-90 questionnaires a significant difference was found, i.e. a greater psychopathology in women with urgent incontinence (in both instances p
Key words: stress incontinence, urgent incontinence, psychosomatic incontinence, psychological tests
Don‘t have an account? Create new account
Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.
