Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after anti-incontinence surgery
Authors:
A. Martan; J. Mašata; K. Švabík
Authors‘ workplace:
Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK, Praha
přednosta prof. MUDr. A. Martan, DrSc.
Published in:
Ceska Gynekol 2017; 82(1): 59-64
Overview
Objective:
The review article describes the possibilities of procedures for failed anti-incontinence surgery – sling procedure or „bulking agent“?
Design:
Review article.
Setting:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital and 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague.
Materials and methods:
The correct choice of procedure type to treat persistent SUI (Stress Urinary Incontinence) which persists or soon reoccurs after anti-incontinence surgery is often problematic. The procedures that treat SUI decrease excessive mobility of the urethra by partially compressing it. If the excessive mobility of the urethra and BN (bladder neck) persist and MUCP (Maximal Urethral Closure Pressure) is within normal range, then we choose a new sling operation to treat the persistent SUI. What type of sling procedure is preferable in this situatitons: transobturator, retropubic or possibly SISs (Single Incision Slings)? SISs are not adequately fixed to the surrounding structures after implantation and are often not of the correct size – especially regarding length – with poor compliance (elasticity). For mentioned reasons we do not use them in reoperations. In this cases we choose such a sling which is properly fixed to the surrounding structures, is of sufficient length, and of appropriate elasticity. When choosing the right type of procedure we also have to consider previous operations: for example, whether reconstructive surgery of pelvic floor defects using mesh has been carried out, where the mesh has been placed, and whether it might be an obstacle to the newly implanted sling. If there is a low urethral mobility after the unsuccessful incontinence operation and a low MUCP is observed on urodynamic examination, then we prefer either a retropubic sling or the application of a bulking agent. The decision of which method to choose also depends on other circumstances, such as whether the patient has undergone radiation treatment or more than on previous surgery to treat SUI. The results of urodynamic, ultrasound and other examinations are very important.
Conclusions:
The choice of the right type of surgery to treat SUI after a previous failed procedure depends on information and findings from complex examination of the patient. Case history, examination results, imaging and the experience of the surgeon in individual procedures are therefore most important.
Keywords:
stress urinary incontinence, anti-incontinence surgery, Bulkamid
Sources
1. Agur, W., Riad, M., Secco, S., et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review and meta-anylysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur Urol, 2013, 64, p. 323–336.
2. Bogusiewicz, M., Bogusiewicz, KR, Drop, A., et al. Anatomical variation of bony pelvis from the viewpoint of transobturator sling placement for stress urinary incontinence Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22, p. 1005–1009.
3. Botlero, R., Urquhart, DM., Davis, SR., Bell, R.J. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues. Int Urol J, 2008, 15, p. 230–234.
4. Debodiance, P, Delporte, P. MiniArc: preliminary prospective study on 72 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 2009, 38(2), p. 144–148.
5. DeLeval, J. Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol, 2003, 44, p. 724–730.
6. Delorme, E. Transobturator urethral suspension: miniinvasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol, 2001, 11, p. 1306–1313.
7. Flock, F., Reich, A., Muche, R., et al. Hemorrhagic complications associated with tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 104, p .989–99.
8. Giarenis, I., Thiagamoorthy, G., Zacche, M., et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). Int Urogynecol J, 2015, 26, p. 1285–1291.
9. Gorton, E., Stanton, S., Monga, A., et al. Periurethral collagen injection: a long-term follow-up study. BJU Int, 1999, p. 966–971.
10. Haylen, BT., de Ridder, D., Feeman, RM., et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn, 2010, 29, p. 4–20.
11. Hubka, P., Masata, J., Nanka, O., et al. Anatomical relationship and fixation of tension-free vaginal tape Secur. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2009, 20(6), p. 681–688.
12. Hubka, P., Nanka, O., Martan, A., et al. Anatomical study of position of the TVT-O to the obturator nerve influenced by the position of the legs during the procedure: based upon findings at formalin-embalmed and fresh-frozen bodies. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011, 284, 4, p. 901–905.
13. Kasi, AD., Pergialiotis, V., Perrea, DN., et al. Polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid®) for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27, p. 367–375.
14. Klarskov, N., Lose, G. Urethral injection therapy: what is the mechanism of action? Neurourol Urodyn, 2008, 27, p. 789–792.
15. Krhut, J., Martan, A., Jurakova, M., et al. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence using polyacrylamide hydrogel in women after radiotherapy : 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27, p. 301–305.
16. Krofta. L., Feyereisl, J., Velebil, P., et al. TVT-S for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: prospective trial, 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 21, p. 779–785.
17. Kuuva, N., Nilsson, CG. A national analysis of complications associated with the tension – free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2002, 81, p. 72–77.
18. Lee, KS., Doo, CK., Han, DH., et al. Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. J Urol, 2007, 178, p. 1370–1374.
19. Lee, HN., Lee, YS., Han, JY., et al. Transurethral injection of bulking agent for treatment of failed mid-urethral sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J, 2010, 21, p. 1479–1483.
20. Lo, TS., Wang, AC., Liang, CC., et al. Treatment for unsuccessful tension-free vaginal tape operation by shortening pre-implanted tape. J Urol, 2006,175, p. 2196–2199.
21. Maggiore, ULR., Bogani, G., Meschia, M., et al. Urethral bulking agents versus other surgical procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 189, p. 48–54.
22. Martan, A., Mašata, J., Švabík, K., et al. Initial experience with a short, tension-free vaginal tape (The Tension-free Vaginal Tape Secur System). Eur J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 143( 2), p. 121–125.
23. Martan, A., Švabík, K., Halaška, M., et al. Vyhodnocení prvých zkušeností s bezpečností a krátkodobým efektem mini-páskových antiinkontinentních operací MiniArc a AJUST. Čes Gynek, 2011, 76, s. 349–355.
24. Martan, A., Mašata, J., Švabík, K., et al. Transuretrální aplikace polyacrylamid hydrogelu (Bulkamid) při léčbě ženské stresové inkontinence moči a změny léčebného efektu v závislosti na čase od operace. Čes Gynek, 2013, 78, s. 554–558.
25. Martan, A., Mašata, J, Švabík, K., Krhut, J. Transurethral injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid) for the treatment of female stress or mixed urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 178, p. 199–202.
26. Mašata, J., Martan, A., Švabík, K., et al. Severe bleeding from internal obturator muscle following tension-free vaginal tape Secur hammock approach procedure. Int Urogynecol J, 2008, 19, p. 1581–1583.
27. Mašata, J., Švabík, K., Zvara, K., et al. Randomized trial of a comparison of the efficacy of TVT-O and single-incision tape TVT SECUR system in the treatment of stress urinary incontinent women – 2-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J, 2012, 23(10), p. 1403–1402.
28. Masata, J., Svabik, K., Martan, A. Bleeding complication with the TVT-Exact procedure: a report of two cases. Int Urogynecol J, 2015, 26(2), p. 303–305.
29. Masata, J., Svabik, K., Zvara, K., et al. Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(10), p. 1497–1505.
30. Meshia, M., Barbacini, P., Barbacini, R., et al. Short-term outcomes with the AJUST™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22, p. 177–182.
31. Mostafa, A., Lim, CP., Hopper, L., et al. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(2), p. 402–427.
32. Nilsson, CG., Falconer, C., Rezapour, M. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J, 2008, 19, p. 1043–1047.
33 Ridgeway, BM., Arias, B., Barber, MD., et al. Variation of the obturator foramen and pubic arch of the female bony Elvis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 198, p. 546.e1–546.e4.
34. Richter, HE., Albo, ME, Zyczynski, HM., et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362, p. 2066–2076.
35. Robinson, D., Anders, K., Cardoso, L., et al. What do women want? Interpretation of the concept of cure. J Pelvic Med Surg, 2003, 9, p. 273–277.
36. Ulmsten, U., Petros, P. Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1995, 29, p. 75–82.
37. Waltregny, D., Gaspar, Y., Reul, O., et al. TVT-O for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: Results of a prospective study after a 3-year minimum follow-up. Euro Urol, 2008, 53, p. 401–410.
38. Zimmern, PE., Gormley, EA., Stoddard, AM., et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after burch and sling procedures. Neurourol Urodyn, 2016, 35(3), p. 344–348.
39. Zivanovic, I., Rautenberg, O., Lobodasch, K., et al. Urethral bulking for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling failure. Neurol Urodyn, 2016, DOI:10.1002/nau
Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicineArticle was published in
Czech Gynaecology
2017 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
-
Comparison of vaginal use of micronized progesterone for the luteal support.
Randomized study comparison of Utrogestan and Crinone 8% - Sheep as an experimental model in the reaserch of effects of pregnancy, delivery and surgical procedures on the pelvic floor
- Are risk factors in prenatal and perinatal period important for develompent of schizophrenia?
- Current state of transvaginal meshes by resolution of pelvic organ prolapse