Spontaneous birth after Caesarean section – importance of sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment


Authors: Adéla Faridová;  Tomáš Fait
Authors‘ workplace: Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN Praha
Published in: Prakt Gyn 2015; 19(2): 136-139
Category: Students Articles: Review Article

Overview

Cesarean section is after episiotomy the most frequent surgical procedure in obstetrics. In many countries, cesarean section procedure has reached up to 21 % of deliveries. Recently the number of women undergoing ERCS (elective repeat cesarean section) has increased due to indication of a prior cesarean section in anamnesis with persisting decrease of a trial of vaginal birth. Uterine rupture discourages most of obstetricians in their decisions considering benefits and risks of VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean section). Our aim is to summarize accessible data about considerable ultrasound markers of imminent uterine rupture in current pregnancy to encourage obstetricians and gravid women.

Key words:
VBAC – ERCS – caesarean section – uterine rupture


Sources

1. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe HJ et al. Thickness of the lower uterine segment: its influence in the management of patients with previous cesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 87(1): 39–45.

2. Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N et al. Systematic Review of Cesarean Scar Assessment in the Nonpregnant State: Imaging Techniques and Uterine Scar Defect. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(6): 465–472.

3. Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42(2): 132–139.

4. Tharaux CD, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH et al. Postpartum Maternal Mortality and Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108(3 Pt 1): 541–548.

5. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe HJ et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 1996; 347(8997): 281–284.

6. Basic E, Basic-Cetkovic V, Kozaric H et al. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section. Acta Inform Med 2912; 20(3): 149–153.

7. Asakura H, Nakai A, Ishikawa G et al. Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labour: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography. J Nippon Med Sch 2000; 67(5): 352–356.

8. Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90(6); 907–910.

9. Bujold E, Mehta SH, Bujold C et al. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187(5): 1199–1202.

10. Bij de Vaate AJ, Brölmann HA, vad der Voet LF et al. Ultrasound evluation of the cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37(1): 93–99.

11. Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A et al. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41(5): 556–562

12. Sentilhes L, Vayssiere C, Beucher G et al. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170(1): 25–32.

13. Naji O, Daemen A, SMith A et al. Visibility and measurement of Cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40(5): 549–556.

14. Jastrow N, Antonelli E, Robyr R et al. Inter- and itraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27(4): 420–424.

15. Martins WP, Barra DA, Gallarreta FM et al. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33(3): 301–306.

16. Roztočil A, Velebil P. Vedení porodu u těhotné s císařským řezem v anamnéze – doporučený postup. Čes Gynek 2013; 78(Suppl): S48-S49.

17. Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A et al. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41(6):672–678.

Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicine

Article was published in

Practical Gynecology

Issue 2

2015 Issue 2

Most read in this issue

This topic is also in:


Login
Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account