Two False Myths of the 20th Century Vascular Surgery


Authors: Č. Reček
Authors‘ workplace: v důchodu
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2011, roč. 90, č. 1, s. 0.
Category: Monothematic special - Original

Overview

Two myths or dogmas have influenced the therapeutic proceeding of phlebological surgeons in the second half of the 20th century, and both did not stopped to wield their influence up to the present time. The first one is the Cockettęs theory of the incompetent calf perforators (blow-out syndrome), the second one is the assertion that femoral vein incompetence invariably causes the most serious stage of chronic venous insufficiency.

The incorrectness of the theory of incompetent calf perforators was documented by venous pressure measurements, including direct pressure and electromagnetic flow measurements in the incompetent calf perforators themselves, as well as by plethysmographic results after surgical procedures eliminating the saphenous reflux. The pressure measurements showed that incompetent calf perforators did not cause ambulatory venous hypertension in the superficial veins of the gaiter area; directly the opposite happened: the high hydrostatic pressure measured in the quiet standing position in the incompetent calf perforator decreased profoundly during calf pump activity, as soon as the saphenous reflux was interrupted by digital compression.

As to the femoral vein incompetence, no direct evidence has so far been presented which would confirm its hemodynamic significance. On the contrary, plethysmographic findings in patients displaying both saphenous and femoral vein incompetence showed that saphenous reflux was the factor which was responsible for the hemodynamic derangement, whereas femoral vein incompetence was hemodynamically irrelevant.

Key words:
incompetent calf perforators – femoral vein incompetence


Sources

1. Scott, H. J. History of venous disease and early management. Phlebology Suppl., 1992; 1: 2–5.

2. Linton, R. R. The communicating veins of the lower leg and the operative technic for their ligation. Ann. Surg., 1938; 107: 582–593.

3. Cockett, F. B., Jones, E. E. The ankle blow-out syndrome. A new approach to the varicose ulcer problem. Lancet, 1953; 1: 17–23.

4. Perthes, G. Über die Operation der Unterschenkelvarizen nach Trendelenburg. Deutsche Med. Wschr., 1895; 21: 253–257.

5. Arnoldi, C. C. Venous pressure in the legs of healthy human subjects at rest and during muscular exercise in nearly erect position. Acta Chir. Scand., 1965; 130: 530–533.

6. Sarin, S., Scurr, J. H., Coleridge Smith, P. D. Medial calf perforators in the venous disease: the significance of outward flow. J. Vasc. Surg., 1992; 16: 40–46.

7. Bjordal, R. J. Circulation patterns in incompetent perforating veins in the calf and the saphenous system in primary varicose veins. Acta Chir. Scand. 1972; 138: 251–261.

8. Reček, C., Koudelka, V. Effet circulatoire du reflux saphénien dans la varicose essentielle. Phlébologie, 1979; 32: 407–414.

9. Reček, C. Auswirkung der Krossektomie auf die venöse Hämodynamik bei primärer Varikose. Phlebologie, 1996; 25: 11–18.

10. Reček C. Saphenous vein reflux is the cause of venous disturbance in primary varicose veins with chronic venous insufficiency (German). Acta Chir. Austriaca, 1998; 2: 76–77.

11. Fitrige, R. A., Dunlop, C., Raptus, S., et al. A prospective randomized trial evaluating the hemodynamic role of incompetent calf perforating veins. Austr. NZ J. Surg., 1999; 69: 214–216.

12. Trendelenburg, F. Über die Unterbindung der V. saphena magna bei Unterschenkelvarizen. Beitr. Klin. Chir., 1891; 7: 195–210.

13. Ludbrook, L., Beale, G. Femoral venous valves in relation to varicose veins. Lancet, 1962, 1/13: 79–81.

14. Gooley, N. A., Summer, D. S. Relationship of the venous reflux to the site of venous valvular incompetence: Implications for venous recostructive surgery. J. Vasc. Surg., 1988; 7: 50–59.

15. Pearce, W. H., Ricco, J. B., Queral, L. A., et al. Hemodynamic assessment of venous problems. Surgery, 1983; 93: 715–721.

16. Reček, C., Hammerschlag, A. Welche hämodynamische Bedeutung hat die Insuffizienz der V. femoralis und V. poplitea? Phlebologie. 1998; 27: 15–18.

17. Shull, K. C., Nicolaides, A. N., Fernandes, J. F., et al. Significance of popliteal reflux in relation to ambulatory venous pressure and ulceration. Arch. Surg., 1979; 114: 1304–1306.

18. Kistner, R. L. Surgical repair of the incompetent femoral vein valve. Arch. Surg., 1975; 110: 1336–1342.

19. O‘Donnell Jr, T. F., Mackey, W. C., Shepard, A. D., Callow, A. D. Clinical, hemodynamic and anatomic follow up of direct venous reconstruction. Arch. Surg., 1987; 122: 474–481.

20. Raju, S., Fredericks, R. Valve reconstruction procedures for non-obstructive venous insufficiency: Rationale, techniques and results in 107 procedures with two-to eight-year follow-up. J. Vasc. Surg., 1988; 7: 301–309.

21. Welch, H. J., McLaughlin, R. L., O’Donnell Jr, T. F. Femoral vein valvuloplasty: Intraoperative angioscopic evaluation and hemodynamic improvement. J. Vasc. Surg., 1992; 16: 694–700.

22. Opie, J. C., Izdebski, T., Payne, D. N., Opie, S. Monocusp – novel common femoral vein monocusp surgery uncorrectable chronic venous insufficiency with aplastic/dysplastic valves. Phlebology, 2008; 23: 158–171.

23. Reček, Č. Zhodnocení hemodynamického významu insuficience v. femoralis. Rozhl. Chir., 2003; 82: 267–272.

24. Walsh, J. C., Bergan, J. J., Beeman, S., Comer, T. P. Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping. Ann. Vasc. Surg., 1994; 8: 566–570.

25. Padberg Jr., F. T., Pappas, P. J., Araki, C. T., et al. Hemodynamic and clinical improvement after superficial vein ablation in primary combined venous insufficiency with ulceration. J. Vasc. Surg., 1997; 26: 169–171.

26. Ting, A. C., Cheng, S. W., Wu, L. L., Cheung, G. C. Changes in venous hemodynamics after superficial vein surgery for mixed superficial and deep venous insufficiency. World J. Surg., 2001; 25: 122–125.

27. Reček, C., Hammerschlag, A. Insuffizienz der femoropoplitealen Venenachse und Parva-Varikosis: Ein kausaler Zusammenhang? Phlebologie, 1997; 26: 115–119.

28. Hauser, H., Brunner, U. Neue pathophysiologische und funktionelle Gesichtspunkte zur Insuffizienz der Vena saphena parva. VASA, 1993; 22: 338–341.

29. Höjensgard, I. C., Stürup, H. Static and dynamic pressures in superficial and deep veins of the lower extremity in man. Acta Physiol. Scand., 1952; 27: 49–67.

30. Reček, C., Pojer, H. Ambulatory pressure gradient in the veins of the lower extremity. VASA 2000; 29: 187–190.

Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgery

Article was published in

Perspectives in Surgery

Issue 1

2011 Issue 1

Most read in this issue

This topic is also in:


Login
Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account