#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Conspiracy theories as a natural part of pandemics


Authors: Vojtěch Pišl 1;  Jan Vevera- 1 3
Authors‘ workplace: Psychiatrická klinika LF UK a FN Plzeň 1;  Katedra psychiatrie IPVZ, Praha 2;  Psychiatrická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze 3
Published in: Čas. Lék. čes. 2021; 160: 37-39
Category: News

Overview

Effectiveness of the policy measures against the COVID-19 pandemic is reduced by spread of conspiracy theories. Moreover, conspiracy theories induce opposition to vaccines. The text shows that increased occurrence of conspiracy theories is a typical public reaction to a disaster and describes some of the mechanisms contributing to susceptibility to conspiracy explanations on the individual as well as societal level.

Keywords:

catastrophe – conspiracy theories – coronavirus – medical psychology – pandemics


Sources
  1. World Health Organization. Situation Report 13. WHO, 2020. Dostupné na: www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf?sfvrsn=195f4010_6
  2. Douglas KM, Uscinski JE, Sutton RM et al. Understanding conspiracy theories. Polit Psychol 2019; 40: 3–35.
  3. Kowalski J, Marchlewska, M, Molenda Z et al. Adherence to safety and self-isolation guidelines, conspiracy and paranoia-like beliefs during COVID-19 pandemic in Poland - associations and moderators. Psychiatry Res 2020; 294: 113540.
  4. Duplaga M. The determinants of conspiracy beliefs related to the COVID-19 pandemic in a nationally representative sample of internet users. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 7818.
  5. Romer D, Jamieson KH. Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Soc Sci Med 2020; 263: 113356.
  6. Jolley D, Douglas KM. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e89177.
  7. Hornsey MJ, Finlayson M, Chatwood G, Begeny CT. Donald Trump and vaccination: the effect of political identity, conspiracist ideation and presidential tweets on vaccine hesitancy J Exp Soc Psychol 2020; 88: 103947.
  8. Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A et al. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med 2021; 7: 225–228.
  9. National Pandemic Alarm. Representative survey monitoring public opinion, emotions and experience with novelty corona virus spread in five Central European countries. NPA, 2021. Dostupné na: www.nationalpandemicalarm.eu/en/2021-01-29?index=vaccination#global-timeline-index-wrapper
  10. Robinson E, Jones A, Lesser I, Daly M. International estimates of intended uptake and refusal of COVID-19 vaccines: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of large nationally representative samples [preprint]. medRxiv 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241729.
  11. Pennycook G, McPhetres J, Bago B, Rand D. Predictors of attitudes and misperceptions about COVID-19 in Canada, the U.K., and the U.S.A. [preprint] Psyarxiv 2020, doi:10.31234/osf.io/zhjkp.
  12. Cheng C. To be paranoid is the standard? Panic responses to SARS outbreak in the Hong Kong special administrative region. Asian Perspect 2004; 28: 67-98.
  13. Smallman S. Whom do you trust? Doubt and conspiracy theories in the 2009 influenza pandemic. Inter Global Studies 2015; 6: 1-24.
  14. Townshend I, Awosoga O, Kulig J, HaiYan F. Social cohesion and resilience across communities that have experienced a disaster. Nat Hazards 2015; 76: 913–938.
  15. Sullivan G. Disasters, Overview. In: Teo T (ed.): Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2014: 445-448.
  16. Vevera J, Hrubý J. Práce s oběťmi katastrof. In: Papežová H (ed.). Naléhavé stavy v psychiatrii. Maxdorf, Praha, 2014: 123-132.
  17. Vevera J, Černý M. Truchlení. In: Papežová H (ed.). Naléhavé stavy v psychiatrii. Maxdorf, Praha, 2014: 109-122.
  18. Speis PD, Andreadakis E, Diakakis M et al. Psychosocial vulnerability and demographic characteristics in extreme flash floods: the case of Mandra 2017 flood in Greece. Int J Diast Risk Re 2019; 41: 101285.
  19. Park CL. Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol Bull 2010; 136: 257–301.
  20. Miller BL. Science denial and COVID conspiracy theories potential neurological mechanisms and possible responses. JAMA 2020; 324: 2255-2256.
  21. Stroud NJ. Selective exposure theories. In: Kenski K, Jamieson KH (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford University Press, 2014: 531-548.
  22. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psych Bul 1990; 108: 480–498.
  23. Klapper JT. The effects of mass communication. Free Press, Glencoe, 1960.
  24. Hart W, Albarracin D, Eagly AH et al. Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychol Bull 2009; 135: 555–588.
  25. Taber CS, Lodge M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am J Polit Sci 2006; 50: 755–Z69.
  26. Zaumseil M, Schwarz S. Understandings of coping: a critical review of coping theories for disaster contexts. In: Zaumseil M, Schwarz S, von Vacano M, Sullivan GB, Prawitasari-Hadiyono JE (eds.). Cultural Psychology of Coping With Disasters: The case of an earthquake in Java, Indonesia. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2014: 45–83.
  27. Swami V, Furnham A. Preliminary examination of the psychometric properties of the Psychiatric Scepticism Scale. Scand J Psychol 2011; 52: 399–403.
  28. Jasinskaja-Lahti I, Jetten J. Unpacking the relationship between religiosity and conspiracy beliefs in Australia. B J Soc Psychol 2019; 58: 938–954.
  29. Imhoff R, Bruder M. Speaking (un-)truth to power: conspiracy mentality as a generalized political attitude. Eur J Personality 2014; 28: 25-43.
  30. Wood M, Douglas KM, Sutton RM. Dead and alive: beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2012; 3: 767-773.
  31. Douglas KM, Sutton RM, Callan MJ et al. Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Think Reason 2016; 22: 57-77.
  32. Imhoff R, Lamberty PK. Too special to be duped: need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs. Eur J Soc Psychol 2017; 47: 724–734.
  33. Lincoln T, Peter N, Schäfer M, Moritz S. Impact of stress on paranoia. Psychol Med 2009; 39: 1129–1139.
  34. Kesting, ML, Bredenpohl M, Klenke J et al. The impact of social stress on self-esteem and paranoid ideation. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2013; 44: 122-128.
  35. Grzesiak-Feldman M. The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Curr Psychol 2013; 32: 100–118.
  36. Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science 2013; 341: 976–980.
  37. Oliver-Smith A. What is a disaster? Anthropological perspectives on a persistent question. In: Oliver-Smith A, Hoffman S (eds.). The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective. Routledge, London, 1999: 18–34.
  38. World Health Organization. Health literacy: the solid facts. WHO, 2015. Dostupné na: www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/190655/e96854.pdf
Labels
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management

Article was published in

Journal of Czech Physicians

Issue 1

2021 Issue 1

Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#