#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

BRCA1 and BRCA2 – pathologist’s starting kit


Authors: Petr Škapa
Authors‘ workplace: Ústav patologie a molekulární medicíny 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha
Published in: Čes.-slov. Patol., 52, 2016, No. 4, p. 193-196
Category: Preface

Overview

Dysfunction of tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is involved in the pathogenesis of malignant tumors, especially breast and ovarian carcinoma. BRCA1/2 genes may be inactivated by germinal and somatic mutations or epigenetic changes. Germinal mutations are responsible for the hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma syndrome. Defects of BRCA1/2 genes lead to the failure of homologous recombination, the basic mechanism for DNA double strand break repair. The resultant genomic instability is associated with a high risk of malignant transformation of the cell, but it also results in a higher sensitivity of tumors to platinum-based chemotherapeutic compounds which damage DNA structure directly. Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are the next generation of antitumor agents aimed on the suppression of DNA single strand break repair. In homologous recombination deficient tumors, PARP inhibitors lead to accumulation of DNA damage and death of neoplastic cells through the mechanism of synthetic lethality. Platinum-based agents and PARP inhibitors are effective not only against tumors with germinal and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations but also against sporadic carcinomas with epigenetic BRCA1/2 inactivation or with defects of other independent genes involved in the control of homologous recombination. This phenomenon is represented by the term „BRCAness“. Mutational analysis is used for the assessment of BRCA1/2 status, but it is complicated by the prominent length of BRCA1/2 genes and a wide spectrum of possible genetic alterations. Therefore, next generation sequencing seems to represent an optimal approach for BRCA1/2 evaluation nowadays. Development of reliable diagnostic tests for BRCAness in sporadic tumors and efforts to reverse platinum and PARP inhibitors resistance represent the key objectives of the forthcoming research.

Keywords:
BRCA1 – BRCA2 – hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma – chemotherapy – PARP inhibitors – BRCAness


Sources

1. Wooster R, Weber BL. Breast and ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2339-2347.

2. Venkitaraman AR. Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 2002; 108: 171-182.

3. Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A. Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4: 814-819.

4. Haber JE. Partners and pathways repairing a double-strand break. Trends Genet 2000; 16: 259-264.

5. Sung P, Klein H. Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7: 739-750.

6. Thompson LH, Schild D. Homologous recombinational repair of DNA ensures mammalian chromosome stability. Mutat Res 2001; 477: 131-153.

7. Lieber MR. The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 1-5.

8. Prat J, Ribe A, Gallardo A. Hereditary ovarian cancer. Hum Pathol 2005; 36: 861-870.

9. Birgisdottir V, Stefansson OA, Bodvarsdottir SK, et al. Epigenetic silencing and deletion of the BRCA1 gene in sporadic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2006; 8: R38.

10. Osorio A, de la Hoya M, Rodriguez-Lopez R, et al. Loss of heterozygosity analysis at the BRCA loci in tumor samples from patients with familial breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2002; 99: 305-309.

11. Nagy R, Sweet K, Eng C. Highly penetrant hereditary cancer syndromes. Oncogene 2004; 23: 6445-6470.

12. Hennessy BT, Timms KM, Carey MS, et al. Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients that benefit from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3570-3576.

13. Rahman N, Stratton MR. The genetics of breast cancer susceptibility. Annu Rev Genet 1998; 32: 95-121.

14. Esteller M, Silva JM, Dominguez G, et al. Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 564-569.

15. Bosviel R, Durif J, Guo J, et al. BRCA2 promoter hypermethylation in sporadic breast cancer. Omics 16: 707-710.

16. Ouchi T, Monteiro AN, August A, et al. BRCA1 regulates p53-dependent gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 2302-2306.

17. Greenblatt MS, Chappuis PO, Bond JP, et al. TP53 mutations in breast cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germ-line mutations: distinctive spectrum and structural distribution. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 4092-4097.

18. Phillips KA, Nichol K, Ozcelik H, et al. Frequency of p53 mutations in breast carcinomas from Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 469-473.

19. Aghmesheh M, Nesland JM, Kaern J, et al. No differences in p53 mutation frequencies between BRCA1-associated and sporadic ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 430-436.

20. Buller RE, Lallas TA, Shahin MS, et al. The p53 mutational spectrum associated with BRCA1 mutant ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 831-838.

21. Da Silva L, Lakhani SR. Pathology of hereditary breast cancer. Mod Pathol 2010; 23 Suppl 2: S46-51.

22. Shaw PA, McLaughlin JR, Zweemer RP, et al. Histopathologic features of genetically determined ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2002; 21: 407-411.

23. Ben David Y, Chetrit A, Hirsh-Yechezkel G, et al. Effect of BRCA mutations on the length of survival in epithelial ovarian tumors. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 463-466.

24. Sun C, Li N, Ding D, et al. The role of BRCA status on the prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e95285.

25. Bolton KL, Chenevix-Trench G, Goh C, et al. Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. JAMA 2012; 307: 382-390.

26. Husain A, He G, Venkatraman ES, et al. BRCA1 up-regulation is associated with repair-mediated resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II). Cancer Res 1998; 58: 1120-1123.

27. Yuan SS, Lee SY, Chen G, et al. BRCA2 is required for ionizing radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 complex in vivo. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 3547-3551.

28. Lesnock JL, Darcy KM, Tian C, et al. BRCA1 expression and improved survival in ovarian cancer patients treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Br J Cancer 2013; 108: 1231-1237.

29. Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, et al. Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1. Lancet 1998; 351: 316-321.

30. Robson ME, Chappuis PO, Satagopan J, et al. A combined analysis of outcome following breast cancer: differences in survival based on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and administration of adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res 2004; 6: R8-R17.

31. van den Broek AJ, Schmidt MK, van ‘t Veer LJ, et al. Worse breast cancer prognosis of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: what’s the evidence? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0120189.

32. Huzarski T, Byrski T, Gronwald J, et al. Ten-year survival in patients with BRCA1-negative and BRCA1-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3191-3196.

33. Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 2005; 434: 917-921.

34. Kaelin WG, Jr. The concept of synthetic lethality in the context of anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 689-698.

35. Kaye SB, Lubinski J, Matulonis U, et al. Phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 372-379.

36. Fong PC, Yap TA, Boss DS, et al. Poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibition: frequent durable responses in BRCA carrier ovarian cancer correlating with platinum-free interval. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2512-2519.

37. Livraghi L, Garber JE. PARP inhibitors in the management of breast cancer: current data and future prospects. BMC Med 2015; 13: 188.

38. Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 244-250.

39. Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 235-244.

40. Gelmon KA, Tischkowitz M, Mackay H, et al. Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 852-861.

41. Banerjee S, Kaye SB, Ashworth A. Making the best of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010; 7: 508-519.

42. O’Sullivan Coyne G, Chen A, Kummar S. Delivering on the promise: poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibition as targeted anticancer therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2015; 27: 475-481.

43. Piccart MJ, Lamb H, Vermorken JB. Current and future potential roles of the platinum drugs in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 1195-1203.

44. Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Vitale I, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene 2012; 31: 1869-1883.

45. Norquist B, Wurz KA, Pennil CC, et al. Secondary somatic mutations restoring BRCA1/2 predict chemotherapy resistance in hereditary ovarian carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 3008-3015.

46. Ratner ES, Sartorelli AC, Lin ZP. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: on the horizon of tailored and personalized therapies for epithelial ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2012; 24: 564-571.

47. Wiedemeyer WR, Beach JA, Karlan BY. Reversing platinum resistance in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: targeting BRCA and the homologous recombination system. Front Oncol 2014; 4: 34.

48. McCabe N, Turner NC, Lord CJ, et al. Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 8109-8115.

49. Shen WH, Balajee AS, Wang J, et al. Essential role for nuclear PTEN in maintaining chromosomal integrity. Cell 2007; 128: 157-170.

50. Hughes-Davies L, Huntsman D, Ruas M, et al. EMSY links the BRCA2 pathway to sporadic breast and ovarian cancer. Cell 2003; 115: 523-535.

51. Taniguchi T, Tischkowitz M, Ameziane N, et al. Disruption of the Fanconi anemia-BRCA pathway in cisplatin-sensitive ovarian tumors. Nat Med 2003; 9: 568-574.

52. Soto J, Rodriguez-Antolin C, Vallespin E, et al. The impact of next-generation sequencing on the DNA methylation-based translational cancer research. Transl Res 2016; 169: 1-18 e11.

53. Strom CM, Rivera S, Elzinga C, et al. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants for the clinical laboratory. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0136419.

54. Trujillano D, Weiss ME, Schneider J, et al. Next-generation sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the genetic diagnostics of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. J Mol Diagn 2015; 17: 162-170.

55. Ellison G, Huang S, Carr H, et al. A reliable method for the detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in fixed tumour tissue utilising multiplex PCR-based targeted next generation sequencing. BMC Clin Pathol 2015; 15: 5.

56. Mafficini A, Simbolo M, Parisi A, et al. BRCA somatic and germline mutation detection in paraffin embedded ovarian cancers by next-generation sequencing. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 1076-1083.

57. Chalasani P, Livingston R. Differential chemotherapeutic sensitivity for breast tumors with “BRCAness”: a review. Oncologist 2013; 18: 909-916.

58. Rigakos G, Razis E. BRCAness: finding the Achilles heel in ovarian cancer. Oncologist 2012; 17: 956-962.

59. Walsh T, Casadei S, Lee MK, et al. Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 18032-18037.

60. Konstantinopoulos PA, Spentzos D, Karlan BY, et al. Gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with responsiveness to chemotherapy and with outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3555-3561.

61. Kang J, D’Andrea AD, Kozono D. A DNA repair pathway-focused score for prediction of outcomes in ovarian cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 670-681.

62. Watkins JA, Irshad S, Grigoriadis A, et al. Genomic scars as biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency and drug response in breast and ovarian cancers. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 16: 211.

Labels
Anatomical pathology Forensic medical examiner Toxicology
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#