Aggressive prostate cancer in patients with low PSA


Authors: Michal Grepl;  Milan Král;  Eva Burešová;  Vladimír Študent
Authors‘ workplace: Urologická klinika LF UP a FN, Olomouc
Published in: Ces Urol 2010; 14(1): 48-54
Category: Original article

Overview

Aim:
To investigate prevalence and characteristics of the prostate cancer in men with total PSA < 4 ng/ml.

Material and methods:
We evaluated 731 men with consecutive multiplicated prostate biopsies. Indication criteria for biopsy were elevation of age-specific PSA, increasing PSA velocity or suspicious digital rectal examination.

Results:
Together 202 patients underwent prostate biopsy with PSA < 4 ng/ml. In the group with low PSA the prevalence of prostate cancer was 18,8% and in the group with PSA > 4 ng/ml the prevalence was 30.7% (p < 0.001). Acinar adenocarcinoma was described in all positive samples. After biopsy 57.8% of carcinomas were T1c stage, 36.8% were T2a–b and 5.4% were suspicious for T3a–b. Gleason score (GS) 2+3 or 3+3 were described in 65.8%, GS 7 in 26.3% and GS 8 and more in 7.9% of positive samples. In men after radical prostatectomy there were 75.8% of localized diseases and 24.2% of advanced diseases. In 9.7% we have found metastatic affection of lymph nodes or axial skelet. Upstage was nearly non-significant (p = 0.06). In these definitive specimens GS 6 was described in 32.2%, GS 7 in 50% and GS > 8 in 27.8%. Impairment of Gleason score was significant (p = 0.005).

Conclusion:
In the group of patients with prostate cancer and PSA < 4 ng/ml only 23.6% met the criteria for insignificant disease. In 76.4% cases we found potentially aggressive carcinomas and nearly quarter (24.2%) of cancers was advanced or metastatic.

Key words:
prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen, PSA.


Sources

1. Myrtle J, Ivor L. Measurement of PSA in serum by two immunometric methods (Hybritech Tandem-R/Tandem-E PSA). In Catalona WJ (ed): Clinical Aspects of Prostate Cancer. New York: Elsevier 1989; 161–171.

2. Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or = 4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2239–2246.

3. Schröder FH, Bangma CH. The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Br J Urol 1997; 79(Suppl 1): 68–71.

4. Schröder FH, Kranse R, Rietbergen J, et al. The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC): An update. Members of the ERSPC, Section Rotterdam. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 539–543.

5. Catalona WJ, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, et al. Selection of optimal prostate specific antigen cutoffs for early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 1994; 152: 2037–2042.

6. Durkan GC, Sheikh N, Johnson P, Hildreth AJ, Greene DR. Improving prostate cancer detection with an extended-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy protocol. BJU International 2002; 89(1): 33–39.

7. Van den Bergh R, Roemeling S, Roobol M, Roobol W, Schröder F, Bangma C. Prospective Validation of Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: The PRIAS Study. European Urology Urology 2009; 52(6): 1560–1563.

8. Patel MI, DeConcini DT, Lopez-Corona E, et al. An analysis of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who deferred definitive therapy. The Journal of Urology 2004; 171(4): 1520–1524.

9. Soloway MS, Soloway CT, Williams S, Ayyathurai R, Kava B, Manoharan M. Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience. BJU International 2008; 101(2): 165–169.

10. Bastian P, Carter B, Bjartell A, et al. Insignificant Prostate Cancer and Active Surveillance: From Definition to Clinical Implications. European Urology 2009; 55(6): 1321–1332.

11. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1320–1328.

12. Schröder FH. Review of diagnostic markers for prostate cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 2009; 181: 173–182.

13. Bonet M, Merglen A, Fioretta G, Rapiti E, Neyroud-Caspar I, Zanetti R, Miralbell R, Bouchardy C. Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer with PSA < 4 ng/ml at diagnosis: a population-based study. Clin Transl Oncol 2009; 11(5): 312–317.

14. Kolombo I, Poršová M, Zemanová I, et al. Prostatický specifický antigen (PSA) a digitální rektální vyšetření (DRE) v diagnostice karcinomu prostaty. Urologie pro Praxi 2008; 9(2): 83–88.

15. Študent V, Grepl M, Král M, Hartmann I. Má vyšetření PSA stále význam při vyhledávání karcinomu prostaty? Urologie pro Praxi 2006; 5: 214–218.

16. Král M, Študent V, Hrabec M. Predikční nomogramy u karcinomu prostaty. Urologie pro Praxi, 2008; 1.

17. Král M, Študent V, Hrabec M. Nomogram predikce up-gradingu Gleasonova skóre v biopsii prostaty. Česká urologie 2007; 11.

Labels
Paediatric urologist Nephrology Urology
Login
Forgotten password

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account