Authors: Jana Kratěnová 1; Naděžda Čapková 1; Kristýna Žejglicová 1; Kateřina Smíšková 2 Authors‘ workplace: Oddělení monitorování zdravotního stavu, Centrum zdraví a životního prostředí, Státní zdravotní ústav, Praha 1; Spirální Stabilizace SPS Brno s. r. o. 2 Published in: Čes-slov Pediat 2026; 81 (2): 94-97. Category: Original Papers doi: https://doi.org/10.55095/CSPediatrie2025/059
Kratěnová J, Čapková N, Žejglicová K, Smíšková K. Scoliosis screening in school-aged children (6–15 years) in the Czech Republic
Introduction. Scoliosis in children represents a significant clinical and public health concern, requiring attention not only from pediatricians but also from other healthcare professionals, educators, and parents. The primary aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of pathological spinal curvature among school-aged children.
Methods. Scoliosis screening was carried out by rehabilitation physicians, physiotherapists, and staff from the National Institute of Public Health. The methodology followed the recommendations of a specialized rehabilitation center for scoliosis diagnosis and treatment, in accordance with the 2018 US Guidelines. Screening included the Adams forward bend test complemented by scoliometer measurement. A total of 1,369 children in age 6–11 (grades 1–5 of primary school) and 767 children in age 12–15 (grades 6–9) from several elementary schools in the Czech Republic were examined.
Results. A positive Adams test result with scoliometer measurement (≥ 5°) was identified in 18.6 % of children. Physiological findings were observed in 58.1 %, while 23.3 % of children showed minor deviations (3°–4°). Children with results of 5°–6° are considered at risk of scoliosis, and follow-up within 6–12 months is recommended. For those with results ≥ 7°, the risk is higher and referral to a physician is advised.
Conclusion. In several countries, scoliosis screening is regarded as an effective tool for early detection and prevention of severe complications, including the need for surgical intervention. Despite the potential for both false-positive and false-negative results, it offers an important opportunity for timely identification, initiation of treatment, and improved prognosis. In the Czech Republic, scoliosis screening is currently substituted by routine preventive medical examinations by a general practitioner for children and adolescents.
children – scoliosis – school screening.
1. Van West H, et al. The smartphone as a tool to screen for scoliosis, applicable by everyone. Eur Spine J 2022; 31 (4): 990–995.
2. Richards BS, Sater K. Spinal screening program. School Spinal Screening Guidelines. Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) 2018.
3. Li M, Nie Q, Liu J, Jiang Z. Prevalence of scoliosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Front Pediatr 2024; 12 : 1399049.
4. Altaf F, Drinkwater J, Phan K, Cree AK. Systematic review of school scoliosis screening. Spine Deform 2017; 5(5): 303–309.
5. Sabirin J, Bakri R, Buang SN, et al. School scoliosis screening programme-a systematic review. Med J Malaysia 2010; 65(4): 261–7.
6. Oetgen ME, Heyer JH, Kelly SM. Scoliosis screening. JAAOS-J Am Acad Orthopaed Surg 2021; 29 (9): 370–379.
7. Fong D, et al. A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening. Spine 2010; 35 (10): 1061–1071.
8. Coelho DM, Bonagamba GH, Oliveira AS. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Braz J Phys Ther 2013; 17(2): 179–184.
9. Labelle H, et al. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. Scoliosis 2013; 8 : 1–6.
10. Bunge EM, et al. Screening for scoliosis: do we have indications for effectiveness?. J Med Screen 2006; 13 (1): 29–33.
11. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008; 371(9623): 1527–1537.
Don‘t have an account? Create new account
Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.
