Carotid web – a rare cause of ischemic stroke

Czech version

Authors: I. Guňka ¹; M. Leško ¹; A. Hudák ¹; Z. Bělobrádek ²; L. Šimůnek ³
Authors‘ workplace: Chirurgická klinika, LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ¹; Radiologická klinika, LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ²; Neurologická klinika, LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ³
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2025, roč. 104, č. 6, s. 262-266.
Category: Case Report
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2025262

Overview

Introduction: A carotid web is a rare but clinically important cause of cryptogenic ischemic stroke. It is an atypical form of fibromuscular dysplasia localized at the carotid bulb. The aim of this paper is to present this less-known cause of ischemic stroke based on a case study.

Case report: In a 55-year-old female patient with acute ischemic strok in the left carotid territory, a carotid web was diagnosed on CT angiography. Other extracranial or intracranial cerebral arteries showed no stenoses or occlusions. The patient was initially treated effectively with intravenous thrombolysis. A follow-up brain MRI revealed a small cortical ischemia and a detailed cardiological evaluation excluded the cardioembolic etiology of the stroke. As part of the secondary stroke prevention, the patient was managed with antiplatelet therapy and underwent an uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy. During a 10-month follow-up period, there was no recurrence of cerebral ischemia.

Conclusion: Carotid endarterectomy represents a safe and effective method for treating symptomatic carotid web.

Keywords:

stroke – internal carotid artery – carotid web

Sources

1. Mac Grory B, Nossek E, Reznik ME et al. Ipsilateral internal carotid artery web and acute ischemic stroke: a cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16(9): e0257697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257697.

2. Pereira BJ, Batista UC, Tosello RT et al. Web vessels: literature review and neurointerventional management. World Neurosurg 2018; 110: e907–e916. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.115.

3. Rainer WG, Cramer GG, Newby JP et al. Fibromuscular hyperplasia of the carotid artery causing positional cerebral ischemia. Ann Surg 1968; 167(3): 444–446. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196803000-00021.

4. Coutinho JM, Derkatch S, Potvin AR et al. Carotid artery web and ischemic stroke: a case-control study. Neurology 2017; 88(1): 65–69. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003464.

5. Joux J, Boulanger M, Jeannin S et al. Association between carotid bulb diaphragm and ischemic stroke in young Afro-Caribbean patients: a population-based case-control study. Stroke 2016; 47(10): 2641–2644. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013918.

6. Kim SJ, Allen JW, Bouslama M et al. Carotid webs in cryptogenic ischemic strokes: a matched case-control study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019; 28(12): 104402. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104402.

7. Rainer WG, Cramer GG, Newby JP et al. Fibromuscular hyperplasia of the carotid artery causing positional cerebral ischemia. Ann Surg 1968; 167(3): 444–446. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196803000-00021.

8. Zhang AJ, Dhruv P, Choi P et al. A systematic literature review of patients with carotid web and acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018; 49(12): 2872–2876. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021907.

9. Compagne KC, van Es AC, Berkhemer OA et al. Prevalence of carotid web in patients with acute intracranial stroke due to intracranial large vessel occlusion. Radiology 2018; 286(3): 1000–1007. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170094.

10. Haussen DC, Grossberg JA, Bouslama M et al. Carotid web (intimal fibromuscular dysplasia) has high stroke recurrence risk and is amenable to stenting. Stroke 2017; 48(11): 3134–3137. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019020.

11. Zítek H, Nossek E, Sameš M. Karotický web. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2022; 85(5): 363–367. doi: 10.48095/cccsnn2022363.

12. Mac Grory B, Emmer BJ, Roosendaal SD et al. Carotid web: an occult mechanism of embolic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91(12): 1283–1289. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323938.

13. Madaelil TP, Grossberg JA, Nogueira RG et al. Multimodality imaging in carotid web. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 220. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00220.

14. Guglielmi V, Compagne KC, Sarrami AH et al. Assessment of recurrent stroke risk in patients with a carotid web. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78(7): 826–833. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1101.

15. Patel SD, Otite FO, Topiwala K et al. Interventional compared with medical management of symptomatic carotid web: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022; 31(10): 106682. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106682.