#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Subarachnoid Anaesthesia with 0,5% Levobupivacaine (Chirocaine) for Lower Limb in ElectiveOrthopaedic and Trauma Surgery


Authors: I. Herold;  J. Nováček;  M. Trnovský 1;  M. Rosický;  J. Pečenková;  V. Kňourek;  L. Piskač;  L. Piskačová;  J. Sedláček
Authors‘ workplace: Anesteziologicko-resuscitační oddělení Klaudiánovy nemocnice, Mladá Boleslav, přednosta MUDr. Ivan Herold, CSc. 1Ortopedicko-traumatologické oddělení Klaudiánovy nemocnice, Mladá Boleslav, přednosta MUDr. Michal Trnovský
Published in: Anest. intenziv. Med., , 2003, č. 2, s. 77-81
Category:

Overview

Objective:
New chiral local anaesthetic levobupivacaine has been used until now mostly for epidural anaesthesia/analgesia,plexus and major nerve blocks. There are only a few reports of its use for subarachnoid anaesthesia (SA). The study aimedto evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal administration of 0.5% levobupivacaine, where previously racemicbupivacaine was used almost exclusively.Setting: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology ofRegional Klaudian’s Hospital, Mladá Boleslav.Material and methods: The authors enrolled 30 patients (ASA I–III, age 15–80, height ≥ ' 2.52 ± 0.56 of the modified Bromage scale. On average, 11.66 ± 1.95 segments were blocked, with upper level of blockadeat Th 9.68 ± 1.83 and lower of S 3.56 ± 0.6. The most frequently anaesthetized segments were L1–S2 (30x), Th12 (29x) andS3 (28x). The most frequent distribution of blocks was: Th10–S4 (5x), Th11–S4 (4x) and Th12–S4 (4x). 2-segmental sensoryblock regression was observed after 138.1 ± 65.49 min,time to motor block regression 235 ± 49.1min.Systolic blood pressurefell compared to basal values after 18., 20., 40. and 60.min (P < 0.05), but the decrease was less than 25%. Similarly, theheart rate fell after 40. and 60. min. (P < 0.05), but the lower level of 50/min was not reached. Quality of anaesthesia,musclerelaxation and comfort of patient evaluated by a 3 point scale were high (2.76 ± 0.4, resp. 2.92 ± 0.3, resp. 2.92 ± 0.24). Duringsurgery, 21 patients (70%) were sedated, mostly with midazolam. Administration of analgesics (mostly pethidin) after thesurgery was required in 21 patients (70%), with first dose required only after 470 ± 162 min from start of anaesthesia. It wasnecessary to insert a bladder catheter for urinary retention in two young men. Other adverse events were not observed.Conclusion: 15 mg of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine was used successfully in a wide range of orthopaedic procedures inlower extremities. Time limitation of estimated length of surgery up to 2,5 hrs corresponded with the observed effectivelength of block and motor regression of block. A high level of satisfaction of anaesthesiologist, surgeon and patient wasachieved. The haemodynamics are not adversely affected.

Key words:
levobupivacaine – subarachnoidal anaesthesia – onset and regression of block – haemodynamic changes –quality of anaesthesia – postoperative analgesia – urinary retention – lower extremity surgery

Full text is not available online.
If interested in a scan of this journal, contact NTO ČLS JEP.

Labels
Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Inten Intensive Care Medicine
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#