Inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the use of anatomical terminology in surgical disciplines

Czech version

Authors: D. Kachlík ^1-3; V. Musil ^1,2,4; J. Stingl ⁵
Authors‘ workplace: Ústav anatomie, 2. LF UK, Praha ¹; Centrum endoskopické, chirurgické a klinické anatomie, 2. LF UK, Praha ²; Katedra zdravotnických oborů, Vysoká škola polytechnická, Jihlava ³; Středisko vědeckých informací, 3. LF UK, Praha ⁴; Ústav anatomie, 3. LF UK, Praha ⁵
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2025, roč. 104, č. 8, s. 345-354.
Category: Review
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2025345

Overview

Anatomical terminology has developed over a long period of time and has undergone several revisions with the aim of unifying the nomenclature. The first systematization was created under the name Basiliensia Nomina Anatomica in 1895, the first international anatomical nomenclature Parisiensia Nomina Anatomica was adopted in 1955 and was subsequently modified until the Terminologia Anatomica version (1998). The latest revision of Terminologia Anatomica 2 (2019) caused controversy due to changes in established terms, leading to a split in opinion among experts. The Czech Anatomical Society continues to acknowledge the Terminologia Anatomica first published in 1998. Czech anatomical terminology developed less dramatically, the first systematic attempts at Czech medical terms date from the 14th–16th centuries. Significant contributions were made during the national revival and thanks to the efforts of personalities such as Wáclaw Staněk, whose work on Czech anatomical nomenclature was unfortunately not completed. The last attempt at unification was the publication of the Czech Anatomical Nomenclature in 2010. Clinical medicine did not have time enough to follow the frequent changes in anatomical nomenclature, which led to the mixing of different versions of the terms and the emergence of “clinical dialect”. This resulted in inconsistencies, for example, in the naming of lymph nodes. Our contribution provides an overview of the use of older (obsolete/invalid) anatomical terms, both Czech and Latin; examples of introduced Latin terms, inaccurate use of terms, clinical simplification, spelling errors, and missing anatomical terms. Confusion in terminology can lead to misunderstandings in communication between physicians themselves, physicians and patients as well as teachers and students. Therefore, the anatomical nomenclature should be simple, clear, unanimous, uniform and widely accepted in order to serve for clear communication and prevent possible misunderstandings, errors or complications.

Keywords:

surgery – Anatomy – nomenclature – terminology

Sources

1. Eycleshymer AC. Anatomical Names: Especially the Basle Nomina Anatomica („BNA“). New York: William Wood & Company 1917.

2. Kachlík D, Bozděchová I, Čech P et al. Deset let nového anatomického názvosloví. Čas Lék čes 2008; 147(5): 287–294.

3. His W. Die anatomische Nomenclatur. Nomina Anatomica. Leipzig: Veit 1895.

4. Final Report of the Committee appointed by the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland on June 22nd, 1928. Glasgow: University Press 1933.

5. Stieve H. Nomina Anatomica. Jena: G. Fischer 1936.

6. Woerdeman MW. Nomina anatomica parisienssia (1955) et BNA (1895). Utrecht: Ossthoek 1957.

7. FCAT. Terminologia Anatomica. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag 1998.

8. FIPAT. Terminologia Anatomica: second edition. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology. 2019 [online]. Available from: libraries.dal.ca/Fipat/ta2.html.

9. Kachlík D, Čech P, Musil V et al. České tělovědné názvosloví. Brno: vl. Nákl. 2010.

10. FIPAT. Terminologia Anatomica Humana. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology. 2024 [online]. Available from: ifaa.unifr.ch/.

11. Ten Donkelaar HJ, Baud R, Kachlík D. Towards a Terminologia Anatomica Humana. Anat Sci Int 2024; 99(4): 387–399. doi: 10.1007/s12565-024-00759-5.

12. Musil V. Lingvistické aspekty informační vědy v aplikaci recentního odborného jazyka s důrazem na oblast anatomické terminologie. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta 2015.

13. Staněk V. Základowé pitwy, (anatomie) čili Saustawnj rozbor a popis těla lidského a gednotliwých geho částek. Praha: Spinka 1840.

14. Musil V. History of Czech anatomical terminology. Anat Sci Int 2024; 99(4): 400–407. doi: 10.1007/s12565-024-00774-6.

15. Páč L. Anatomická eponyma. Praha: Galén 2000.

16. Caggiati A, Bergan JJ, Gloviczki P et al. Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international interdisciplinary consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36(2): 416–422. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.125847.

17. Kachlík D, Musil V, Blanková A et al. A plea for extension of the anatomical nomenclature: Vessels. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2021; 21(2): 208–220. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2020.5256.

18. Holomáňová A, Brucknerová I. Srdcovocievna sústava: anatomické názvy. Latinsko-anglicko-slovenský slovník. Bratislava: Elán 2000.

19. Feigl G, Hammer GP, Litz R et al. The intercarotid or alar fascia, other cervical fascias, and their adjacent spaces –⁠ a plea for clarification of cervical fascia and spaces terminology. J Anat 2020; 237(1): 197–207. doi: 10.1111/joa.13175.

20. Layton KF, Kallmes DF, Cloft H et al. Bovine aortic arch variant in humans: clarification of a common misnomer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27(7): 1541–1542.

21. Marečková E. A linguistic view of the Latin anatomical nomenclature. Part I. Scr Med 1996; 69(6): 325–336.

22. Kachlík D, Musil V, Báča V. Contribution to the anatomical nomenclature concerning upper limb anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 2017; 39(4): 405–417. doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1749-z.

23. Kachlík D, Musil V, Báča V. Contribution to the anatomical nomenclature concerning lower limb anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 2018; 40(5): 537–562. doi: 10.1007/s00276-017-1920-1.

24. Kachlík D, Pecháček V, Báča V et al. The superficial venous system of the lower extremity: new nomenclature. Phlebology 2010; 25(3): 113–123. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2009.009046.

25. Kachlík D, Pecháček V, Hnátková G et al. The venous perforators of the lower limb –⁠ a new terminology. Phlebology 2019; 34(10): 650–668. doi: 10.1177/0268355519837869.

26. Kachlík D, Pecháček V, Musil V et al. The venous system of the pelvis: new nomenclature. Phlebology 2010; 25(4): 162–173. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2010.010006.

27. Kachlík D, Pecháček V, Musil V et al. The deep venous system of the lower extremity: new nomenclature. Phlebology 2012; 27(2): 48–58. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2011.010081.

28. Musil V, Blanková A, Báča V. A plea for an extension of the anatomical nomenclature: The locomotor system. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2018; 18(2): 117–125. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2017.2276.

29. Musil V, Blanková A, Dvořáková V et al. A plea for an extension of the anatomical nomenclature: Organ systems. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2019; 19(1): 1–13. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2018.3195.

30. Rougereau G, Valteau B, Creze M et al. The interosseous tuberosity of radius: a descriptive radiological and cadaveric anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43(5): 727–734. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02594-5.

31. Rougereau G, Langlais T, Valteau B et al. The ulnar interosseous tuberosity exists: a radiological and descriptive cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat 2021; 43(10): 1609–1617. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02792-9.

32. Salavová Š, Olson CV, Al-Redouan A et al. Quantitative study of the interosseous tuberosity of hte radius. Ann Anat 2025. In Press.

33. Vierstraete M, Pereira Rodríguez JA, Renard Y et al. EIT Ambivium, Linea Semilunaris, and Fulcrum Abdominalis. J Abdom Wall Surg 2023; 2 : 12217. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.12217.

34. Kachlík D, Bozděchová I, Čech P et al. Mistakes in the usage of anatomical terminology in clinical practice. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2009; 153(2): 157–161. doi: 10.5507/bp.2009.027.

35. IFSSH Terminology for Hand Surgery. International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand. 2025 [online]. Available from: https://www.ifssh.info/terminology_hand_surgery.php.

36. Caggiati A, Bergan JJ, Gloviczki P et al. Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limb: extensions, refinements, and clinical application. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41(4): 719–724. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.018.

prof. MUDr. David Kachlík, Ph.D.

Ústav anatomie

2. LF UK

Plzeňská 311

150 06 Praha 5

david.kachlik@lfmotol.cuni.cz

ORCID autorů

D. Kachlík 0000-0002-8150-9663

V. Musil 0000-0002-0107-690X

J. Stingl 0000-0002-9175-0610