#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Artificial intelligence in healthcare: the duty to inform patients


Authors: Tomáš Doležal;  Adam Doležal
Authors‘ workplace: Oddělení soukromého práva a Kabinet zdravotnického práva a bioetiky ÚSP AV ČR, v. v. i.
Published in: Čas. Lék. čes. 2025; 164: 324-327
Category: Review Article

Overview

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in healthcare, ranging from diagnostic and therapeutic applications to administrative support. Its implementation raises not only medical and ethical, but also legal challenges.

This review article focuses on the healthcare provider’s duty to inform patients about the use of AI systems in clinical practice. It examines the ethical dimension of this duty, particularly the principles of autonomy and the patient’s right to information and explanation and analyzes the legal framework arising from the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, GDPR, the Council of Europe Framework Convention, and the Czech Health Services Act.

The authors conclude that the patient’s right to be informed about the use of AI and to understand its role in clinical decision-making can be derived from the concept of informed consent, even though it is not yet explicitly enshrined in law. The article also offers recommendations for clinical practice regarding the scope and depth of information disclosure.

Keywords:

informed consent – artificial intelligence – healthcare – ethics – patient autonomy – right to explanation


Sources
  1. The Council of Europe’s Steering Committee for Human Rights in the fields of Biomedicine and Health (CDBIO). Application of AI in healthcare and its impact on the ′patient-doctor′ relationship. Dostupné na: https://rm.coe.int/prems-172924-gbr-2007-artificial-intelligence-16x24-web/1680b30e0b
  2. Kelly BS, Judge C, Bollard SM et al. Radiology artificial intelligence: a systematic review and evaluation of methods (RAISE). Eur Radiol 2022; 32 : 7998–8007.
  3. Försch S, Klauschen F, Hufnagl P, Roth W. Künstliche Intelligenz in der Pathologie. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2021; 118 : 194–204.
  4. Voigtlaender S, Pawelczyk J, Geiger M et al. Artificial intelligence in neurology: opportunities, challenges, and policy implications. J Neurol 2024; 271 : 2258–2273.
  5. Farina E, Alaimo S, Pulvirenti A. An overview of artificial intelligence in oncology. Future Science OA 2022; 8: FSO790.
  6. Zohny H, Allen JW, Wilkinson D, Savulescu J. Which AI doctor would you like to see? Emulating healthcare provider–patient communication models with GPT-4: proof-of-concept and ethical exploration. J Med Ethics 2025: jme-2024-110256.
  7. Bundes Ärztekammer. Stellungnahme „Künstliche Intelligenz in der Medizin“, Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2025; 122: A238.
  8. Budzyń K, Romańczyk M, Kitala D et al. Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a multicentre, observational study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 10 : 896–903.
  9. Lorenzini G, Arbelaez Ossa L, Shaw DM, Elger BS. Artificial intelligence and the doctor–patient relationship: expanding the paradigm of shared decision making. Bioethics 2023; 37 : 424–429.
  10. Pflanzer M. Balancing transparency and trust: reevaluating AI disclosure in healthcare. Am J Bioeth 2025; 25 : 153–156.
  11. Floridi L, Cowls J. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 2019. Dostupné na: https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/l0jsh9d1/release/8
  12. Adams J. Defending explicability as a principle for the ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine. Med Health Care Philos 2023; 26 : 615–623.
  13. Eberbach W. Wird die ärztliche Aufklärung zur Fiktion? (Teil 2). Medizinrecht 2019; 37 : 111–117.
  14. Hurley ME, Lang BH, Kostick Quenet KM et al. Patient consent and the right to notice and explanation of AI systems used in health care. Am J Bioeth 2025; 25 : 102–114.
  15. Metodický pokyn pro poskytovatele zdravotních služeb k využívání umělé inteligence. Věstník MZ ČR 2025; 9.
  16. van Kolfschooten H, van Oirschot J. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024): implications for healthcare. Health Policy 2024; 149 : 105152.
  17. Yang YT. Beyond disclosure: Rethinking patient consent and AI accountability in healthcare. Am J Bioeth 2025; 25 : 151–153.
       
Labels
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management Dental Hygienist

Article was published in

Journal of Czech Physicians

Issue 7–8

2025 Issue 7–8

Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#