#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The Atractiv project: improvement of cardiovascular preventiv in primary care in the Czech Republic


Authors: M. Vráblík 1;  T. Freiberger 2;  V. Lánská 3;  R. Češka 1*
Authors‘ workplace: III. interní klinika 1. lékařské fakulty UK a VFN Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. Štěpán Svačina, DrSc., MBA 1;  Genetická laboratoř Centra kardiovaskulární a transplantační chirurgie Brno, ředitel doc. MUDr. Petr Němec, CSc. 2;  Úsek odborných činností, jištění jakosti a controllingu Institutu klinické a experimentální medicíny Praha, vedoucí MUDr. Pavel Toušek 3
Published in: Vnitř Lék 2008; 54(12): 1131-1139
Category: Original Contributions

* za skupinu řešitelů projektu (seznam řešitelů projektu na str. 1137)

Overview

Introduction:
The Atractiv project assessing the efficacy of a complex approach to cardiovascular risk reduction in primary care was conducted by 464 physicians in the entire Czech Republic between 2006 and 2007.

Aim:
The primary goals of the Atractiv project were description of prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in high‑risk patients and attempt to maximize the risk reduction by optimalization of treatment. Within five visits the patients were carefully followed and their risk factors were intervened using lifestyle and pharmacological measures.

Methods:
The main focus of the project was management of dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension. Basic anthropometric and laboratory data were collected including serum lipids, glycemia, kidney liver function tests, CVD risk was assessed using SCORE charts. 4,427 patients were included in the project (2,372 men), average age 62.9 ± 10 years.

Results:
Optimalization of treatment of dyslipidemia resulted in a significant decrease of both total and LDL‑cholesterol levels by 23 and 28%, respectively, HDL‑cholesterol concentrations increased by 4.5% and levels of triglycerides declined by 22%. Improved management of arterial hypertension was accompanied by a decrease of average blood pressure from 152.5/90.5 mm Hg to 132.5/80.2 mm Hg. Average fasting glycemia was lowered by 0,4 mmol/l while body mass index and waist circumference decreased by 0.6 kg/m2 and 2,5 cm, respectively. All differences between baseline and the last visit were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Pharmacotherapy indicated during the project was well tolerated and occurrence of side effects was minimal.

Conclusion:
The Atractiv project documents the complex approach to patients at high‑risk of CVD including lifestyle intervention with effective combination of lipid-lowering drugs and antihypertensive drugs brings additional significant lowering of CVD risk. Application of modern, evidence-based approaches to treatment of dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension in everyday practice is possible, effective and feasible.

Key words:
cardiovascular risk – dyslipidemia – arterial hypertension – statins – antihypertensive drugs


Sources

1. Euroaspire III. Euro Heart Survey, Wien, September 2007, www.escardio.org.

2. Libby P. The forgotten majority: unfinished business in cardiovascular risk reduction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1225–1228.

3. Zdravotnická ročenka ČR 2006. Ústav zdravotnických informací. www.uzis.cz.

4. Gaede P, Vendel P, Larsen N et al. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 383–393.

5. Vaverková H, Soška V, Rosolová H et al. Doporučení pro diagnostiku a léčbu dyslipidemií v dospělosti, vypracované výborem České společnosti pro aterosklerózu. Vnitř Lék 2007; 53: 181–197.

6. Widimský J jr., Cífková R, Špinar J et al. Doporučení diagnostických a léčebných postupů u arteriální hypertenze – verze 2007. Vnitř Lék 2008; 54: 101–118.

7. Graham I, Atar D, Borch‑Johsen K et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prvevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Eur Hear J 2007; 28: 2375–2434.

8. Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR et al. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower‑than‑average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo‑Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial‑Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT‑LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 1149–1158.

9. Conroy R, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald A et al. Prediction of ten‑year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 987–1003.

10. Friedewald WT, Levy RJ, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18: 499–509.

11. Alexander CM, Landsman PB, Teutsch SM (NHANES III) et al. NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 and older. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1210–1214.

12. Widimský J jr. Výsledky sledování rizikových faktorů a klinických účinků rilmenidinu u nemocných s arteriální hypertenzí. Farmakoterapie 2008; 3: 325–328.

13. Souček M, Widimský J sr., Lánská V. Control of hypertension in patients with hypertension, diabetes, and impaired fasting glucose by Czech primary care physicians. Kidney Blood Press Res 2006; 29: 366–372.

14. Škrha J. Diabetes mellitus 2002 v České republice – Epidemiologická studie. DMEV 2005; 8: 5–12.

15. LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1425–1435.

16. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. Comparison of intensit and moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1495–1504.

17. Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJP et al. High‑dose atorvastatin vs usual‑dose simvastatin for secondary preventiv after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomised controlled study. JAMA 2005; 294: 2437–2445.

18. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high‑risk hypertensive patients randomised to angiotenzin‑converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium-channel rocker vs. diuretic. JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–2997.

19. Patel A, Mac Mahon S, Chalmers J. ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomoes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 829–840.

20. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A et al. Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1105–1187.

21. Kjeldsen SE, Jamerson KA, Bakris GL et al. Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension investigators. Predictors of blood pressure response to intensified and fixed combination treatment of hypertension: the ACCOMPLISH study. Blood Press 2008; 17: 7–17.

22. Cockroft JR. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in hypertension: focus on perindopril. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2007; 7: 303–317.

23. Mogensen CE. New concepts in blood pressure‑lowering management in diabetic patients: the case for early ACE inhibitor combination therapy with diuretics. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 9 (Suppl 1): S15–S20.

24. de Koning L, Merchant AT, Pogue J et al. Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta‑regression analysis of prospective studies. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 850–856.

25. Rydén L, Standl E, Bartnik M et al. Guidelines on diabetes, pre‑diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 88–136.

26. Perkins JM, Davis SN. The renin‑angiotensin‑aldosterone system: a pivotal role in insulin sensitivity and glycemic control. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2008; 15: 147–152.

Labels
Diabetology Endocrinology Internal medicine
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#