Omitted-missing nursing care in hospital – a pilot study
Authors:
A. Polanská 1; D. Jarošová 2; E. Janíková 1,2; E. Mynaříková 1; I. Plevová 2; R. Zeleníková 2
Authors‘ workplace:
Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava, Útvar ošetřovatelské péče, Náměstkyně: PhDr. Andrea Polanská
1; Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě, Lékařská fakulta, Ústav ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence, Vedoucí: prof. PhDr. Darja Jarošová, Ph. D.
2
Published in:
Prakt. Lék. 2020; 100(4): 192-195
Category:
Of different specialties
Overview
Introduction: The term omit-ted-missing nursing care is a new term in this profession, Czech and Slovak nurses do not know the term or its meaning. One of the reasons is that the omitted nursing care is not a commonly used term in any country, and it is very difficult to start using it without a deeper understanding of the term. The omitted-missing nursing care is not the only term used to describe the phenomenon of a failure to provide certain aspects of the required standard nursing care. Several other terms are used in literature, such as "unfinished nursing care", "assigned nursing care" or "nursing care allocation".
Omitted-missing nursing care causes failure to provide the patient with necessary nursing activities. This increases the risk of adverse negative events in patients leading to increased healthcare costs.
Objective: To find out the perception of omitted-missing nursing care and the working environment by nurses, to find out the satisfaction of patients with the nursing care provided and the occurrence of undesirable events in connection with nursing care.
Methods: Data were collected in two standard wards of a large hospital. PIRNCA-CZ was used to determine the omitted nursing care perceived by nurses. The group consisted of 49 sisters. Patient satisfaction with care was assessed using the standardized patient satisfaction scale (PSS). The group consisted of 192 patients.
Results: The most omitted and inadequate nursing activities concerned the area of safe procedure for administration of enteral or parenteral nutrition, helping patients in eating, providing hygienic and skin care, wound treatment and adherence to aseptic procedures.
The most serious reasons for the delay or failure to provide nursing care were reported by nurses to have unplanned patients’ admissions and discharges the day, insufficient nursing staff, lack of support staff, and worsening of the patient’s condition. The nurses rated the work environment as favourable. The nurses evaluated the area of staffing and adequacy of resources as unfavourable working environment. Patient satisfaction with care was influenced only by the patient's health. Patients best rated the professionalism and behaviour of nurses. The most adverse events occurred in connection with non-compliance with aseptic procedures and medication errors. Health-related infections were most often related to peripheral vascular infections, surgical site infections and urinary tract infections.
Conclusion: The results of the survey serve to obtain the first information from the research in the Czech clinical environment and contribute to the initiation of a discussion on the issue and consequences of omitted-missing nursing care.
Keywords:
omitted-missing nursing care – nurses working environment – patient satisfaction – Adverse events – pilot study
Sources
1. Ausserhofer D, Schubert M, Desmedt M, et al. The association of patient safety climate and nurse-related organizational factors with selected patient outcomes: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50(2): 240–252.
2. Carthon JMB, Lasater KB, Sloane DM, et al. The quality of hospital work environments and missed nursing care is linked to heart failure readmissions: A cross-sectional study of US hospitals. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24(4): 255–263.
3. Dozier AM, Kitzman HJ, Ingersoll GL, et al. Development of an instrument to measure patient perception of the quality of nursing care. Res Nurs Health 2001; 24(6): 506–517.
4. Drahošová L, Jarošová D. Spokojenost pacientů s ošetřovatelskou péčí na chirurgických odděleních nemocnic Kraje Vysočina. Ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence 2013; 4(3): 245–251.
5. Griffiths P, Recio‐Saucedo A, Dall’Ora C, et al. The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74: 1474–1487.
6. Hessels AJ, Flynn L, Cimiotti JP, et al. The impact of the nursing practice environment on missed nursing care. Clin Nurs Stud 2015; 3(4): 60–65.
7. Jarošová D, Janíková E, Vrublová Y, a kol. Spokojenost pacientů s ošetřovatelskou péčí na chirurgických odděleních. Prakt. Lék. 2011; 91(5): 269–273.
8. Jones TL. Validation of the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) instrument. Nurs Forum 2014; 49(2): 77–87.
9. Kalisch BJ, Xie B. Errors of omission: missed nursing care. West J Nurs Res 2014; 36(7): 875–890.
10. Lee SE, Scott L. Hospital nurses’ work environment characteristics and patient safety outcomes: a literature review. West J Nurs Res 2018; 40(1): 121–145.
11. Lucero RJ, Lake ET, Aiken LH. Nursing care quality and adverse events in U. S. hospitals. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19(15–16): 2185–2195.
12. Papastavrou E, Andreou P, Efstathiou G. Rationing of nursing care and nurse–patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Int J Health Plann Manage 2014; 29(1): 3–25.
13. Winklerová J, Jarošová D. Hodnocení spokojenosti pacientů s ošetřovatelskou péčí. Profese on-line 2013; 6(2): 36–40.
Labels
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsArticle was published in
General Practitioner
2020 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- Manifestations of infectious diseases in the oral cavity
- ERAS concept and its contribution to intensive care
- Laryngocele – current view of the issue
- Two current pandemics: obesity and COVID-19